Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

MIT Researchers Tip Their Cards

By Graham Jesmer, Staff Writer
March 9, 2010   |   15 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
While each of these technologies seem disparate, MIT Energy Initiative director Moniz emphasized that they all have one goal, to make renewable energy cheaper and easier to implement around the world, reducing reliance on carbon intensive sources of energy and helping to bring about a fundamental shift in the way the world produces and consumes electricity.
15 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 15
March 9, 2010
I applaud the great research being conducted by MIT Faculty and students. Renewable energy is the future of this planet if it's going to have one. In the last 2 years I have seen no less than 5 Disruptive technologies that when adapted and placed in the main stream energy marketplace, will render the use of fossil fuel power obsolete. Solar, Wind, Biomass technologies are on the horizon that will change our lives for the better. We are in the process of entering into the age of Clean, Cheap, Inexhaustible Green Energy. I am proud to have the opportunity to see the industry bloom. Good Job MIT.
Comment
2 of 15
March 10, 2010
Whenever I hear MIT I cringe for they were major critics of hydrogen with intitial Pons and Fleischmann cold fusion announcement for reasons which are more clear now than ever, GREED. MIT was worried about the gov. grant tap being diverted away from traditional energy alternatives, so they ripped hydrogen fusion at the time.

Now they are finally falling in line, again, for GREED as the gov. money flows again into hydrogen fusion development. I also think back to Chu who announced a huge cut in funding for hydrogen fusion, and then three months later it is restored which clearly is an indication gov doen't know what is going on in the garages and basements around the world and just how close hydrogen fusion energy is to being introduced. Sounds like they didn't want to be labeled idiots for pulling funding on the most promising of all renewable energy alternatives just before they come to market. Just another GREEDY example of what is going on behind the scenes which is nothing new, just research how Tesla was treated.
Comment
3 of 15
March 10, 2010
Boy and I was so looking forward to the anarchy everyone was talking about! And I spent all that money on guns and bullets ...
<;-P

'If it ain't science it ain't nothin!'
Comment
4 of 15
March 10, 2010
Nanomike - I agree that greed is an inherent factor in the development of any industry. Hell, do you think people started building PV systems out of the goodness of their heart? Hell, no! It was a business opportunity, a way to make money. If it helped the environment, fine. But if there was no market for it, I guarantee you they would have all given up and moved on to other things. Come off your high, white cloud, you dingbat. Greed is an inherent motivator in ALL of humanity, whether it's greed for money, for land, or for the perfect slice of pizza. I'm just glad the "greed" you misrepresent here are some of the finest minds on the planet and I thank god they're on our side.
Comment
5 of 15
March 10, 2010
Once you find the technical solutions to the problem, your troubles are just starting. Then you have to fight the vested interests such as the coal, automobile and oil industries, just to mention three. MIT needs a course on ethics and how not to prostitute yourself by selling patents to vested intrests so that they can sit on them; a course on law and how to fight the legal challenges of vested interests and a course on the economy and how to start up a firm and make it successful without ending up capital poor in the first stages which allows the big boys to buy you out.
Comment
6 of 15
March 10, 2010
Energy storing sounds very boring,
Yet is very important if the lines go down,
Chemical methods, a partial answer,
We should keep looking 'till new ways are found.
Comment
7 of 15
March 10, 2010
Complements to MIT. My company is close to commercializing its RET, a high efficiency, low cost, multifuel heat engine. RET engines can turn generators to produce off grid electricity at $.04 /kWh using NG, less if biomethane etc. A Low tech core works, does not disrupt the infrastructure, e.g., no need for new logistics if Hydrogen, and gives an ROI in 2 years from fuel savings! RET- Powered trucks, still using diesel would save over 1 Billion bbls imported oil. Run on NG, savings are more. RETs are an enabling technology. To conquer energy means, confering disruptive economic benefit to the users/ buyers, not just changing the Pay To address on the checks. JR Sannerprojects, Inc Sannerwind@gmail.com
No image available
Comment
8 of 15
Anonymous
March 10, 2010
Douglas, anyone who thinks everyone is motivated by greed is the real dingbat? In a few months you will see a technology introduced which will impact the world regarding clean renewable energy, and we haven't taken a dime from anyone, so where is this greed you think exists in all companies?
Comment
9 of 15
March 16, 2010
Hi its good for Energy research point of view, how can be a research member in MIT as being a Energy Engineer, its my interest in Energy saving.
Comment
10 of 15
March 16, 2010
The simplest form of electricity storage is through pumped storage. If the US laid out a HVDC grid (minimal transmission losses compared to HVAC), they could use solar PV & Concentrated Solar Power and windpower, all of which are intermittent, to pump water up hill to lakes in the Rockies and other mountain ranges. The water could then be released to generate instantanous hydro-electricity when required to balance the grid and meet unexpected surges in power demand.

Gage Williams, Renewable Energy Office for Cornwall, UK
Comment
11 of 15
March 16, 2010
What percentage of this MIT graduating class will be able to stay in the Unitied States and keep working on developing these innovations? Or will they need to reenroll in some other degree to stay on?
Comment
12 of 15
March 16, 2010
Avoiding the need for the greatest share of electrical energy storage is also an option. Sleeping when the sun does is one way. Pumping water is highly inefficient. Natural rainfall does it so well.
Making hydrogen with excess power may be a more useful battery and for transportation as in fuel cells as well. Solar heat can be easily stored for off sun uses and is far more efficient to gather from current sunshine. Over half of our national energy is used for heating. That could be easily laid off onto distributed current sunshine. Once installed, the energy is free.
This doesn't get the press and politic because it is...........................(fill in this blank).
Comment
13 of 15
CEA
March 18, 2010
In order to keep the hopes of America remaining competitive in the "clean energy revolution", the government needs to take all steps to supply the necessary funding as well as incentives to develop and research into these emerging technologies. Domestic energy production is key to strengthening the economic, social, and environmental conditions in the United States. Want to learn more about balanced energy for America? Visit www.consumerenergyalliance.org to get involved, discover CEA's mission and sign up for our informative newsletter.
Comment
14 of 15
March 19, 2010
Phil - water pumps generally have +90% hydraulic efficiency and well designed hydro pumped storage will generally return about 80% of the energy used to store the water in the higher reservoir. In general, in engineering such efficiencies are very very good. In comparsion a coal fire power station is may be 35 - 40% effiecnt overall and internal combustion enginer about 30 - 35%. Making hydrogen has much higher losses than pumped hydro storage.

Storing electricity is useful as it is a high grade/form of energy (i.e. it can be converted in heat or motion with high efficiency). Whereas turning heat energy into electricity has high losses (as given above).

You are correct that about 50% of gross primary energy is low grade heat and solar thermal is a very important technology but electricity is really very useful too. Both technologies are needed.
Comment
15 of 15
July 19, 2010
The principle of storing energy in a battery functioning on ionic movements in stratified liquid metal layers is good. The problem of handling high temperature liquid metal alloys and the large scale supply of these metals has to taken care of. Moreover, this technique may work well in specified industrial locations.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Graham Jesmer

View Graham Jesmer's Profile
About: I am currently a second year Law Student at Vermont Law School where I work as a Research Associate at the Institute for Energy and the Environment writing and ... more »

Advertise With Us

Leybold Optics Nextronex, Inc. K2 Solar,Inc. Solectria Renewables LLC Schiller Motech Industries, Inc. Kipp & Zonen
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters