Article Rating
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 4 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Obama Unveils Plans To Boost Biofuel Market

Industry Reaction Mixed
Published: February 4, 2010

Washington, D.C., United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com] On Wednesday, President Barack Obama announced that his Administration is taking a series of steps designed to help grow the U.S. biofuels industry to reduce dependency on foreign oil, fight climate chance and create jobs. At a meeting with a bipartisan group of governors from around the country, the President laid out three measures that will work in concert to boost biofuels production.

EPA has finalized a rule implementing the long-term renewable fuels mandate of 36 billion gallons by 2022 established by Congress.

First and foremost, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has finalized a rule to implement the long-term renewable fuels standard of 36 billion gallons by 2022 established by Congress. Second, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has proposed a rule on the Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP) that would provide financing to increase the conversion of biomass to bioenergy.

Finally, the President’s Biofuels Interagency Working Group released its first report – Growing America’s Fuel. The report, authored by group co-chairs, Secretaries Vilsack and Chu, and Administrator Jackson, lays out a strategy to advance the development and commercialization of a sustainable biofuels industry to meet or exceed the nation’s biofuels targets. Read the Growing America’s Fuel report.

“Now, I happen to believe that we should pass a comprehensive energy and climate bill. It will make clean energy the profitable kind of energy, and the decision by other nations to do this is already giving their businesses a leg up on developing clean energy jobs and technologies. But even if you disagree on the threat posed by climate change, investing in clean energy jobs and businesses is still the right thing to do for our economy. Reducing our dependence on foreign oil is still the right thing to do for our security. We can’t afford to spin our wheels while the rest of the world speeds ahead," President Obama said.

EPA has finalized a rule implementing the long-term renewable fuels mandate of 36 billion gallons by 2022 established by Congress. The Renewable Fuels Standard requires biofuels production to grow from last year’s 11.1 billion gallons to 36 billion gallons in 2022, with 21 billion gallons to come from advanced biofuels.

Increasing renewable fuels will reduce dependence on oil by more than 328 million barrels a year and reduce greenhouse gas emissions more than 138 million metric tons a year when fully phased in by 2022. Read the full Renewable Fuel Standard Program rule.

"This plan combines an appropriate appreciation for the importance of the existing biofuels industry with an understandable excitement for new technologies near fruition. A more coordinated effort from federal agencies together with the continuation of sound biofuels policies, such as extending existing incentives, will go a long way toward meeting and exceeding America’s renewable fuel potential," said Bob Dinneen, president of the Renewable Fuels Assocation (RFA). "We are pleased to see this plan address some of the concerns raised by cellulosic and next generation ethanol technology companies concerning federal loan guarantee programs. These loan guarantees must be made to work for cellulosic ethanol producers if this plan and the President’s stated goals are to be realized."

Reaction to Obama's plans, as well as EPAs decision from inside the biofuel industry for bioenergy has been mostly positive, though not without reservation.

“This is a much needed step toward building America’s clean energy economy, especially with the emphasis on advanced biofuels and direct substitute fuels like biobutanol that can leverage the existing liquid fuels infrastructure. Biobutanol is versatile and can be used as a drop-in fuel that is compatible with today’s automobile engines," said Rick Wilson, CEO of Cobalt Techologies.

Both Dineen and Poet CEO Jeff Broin however expressed concern over EPA's inclusion of rules regarding ethanol's international indirect land use change (ILUC) in the RFS. According to EPA’s modeling, corn-based ethanol achieves a 21% greenhouse gas reduction compared to gasoline when ILUC rules are included. Without ILUC, RFA said corn-based ethanol achieves a 52% GHG reduction. Cellulosic ethanol achieves GHG reduction of 72-130% depending upon feedstock and conversion process. All GHG reductions for ethanol exceed those mandated by the RFS2.

“EPA has correctly credited cellulosic and other next generation ethanol technologies with dramatic GHG improvements over gasoline,” said Dinneen. In addition, EPA rightly and justifiably adjusted some of its assumptions and modeling from its proposed rule to more accurately reflect the carbon profile of grain-based ethanol in the U.S. “These necessary corrections ensure that all grain-based ethanol will be eligible to meet the requirements and achieve the stated goals of the RFS, though continue to shortchange grain-based ethanol’s climate contributions,” noted Dinneen.

The RFA called IULC theories unproven and an unfair penalty leveled at U.S. biofuel producers to the advantage of imported ethanol and petroleum.

“We welcome the commitment of the President to continue growing the domestic ethanol industry. He correctly noted that producing home-grown ethanol creates jobs in America at a time America most needs them,” POET CEO Jeff Broin said. “However we are concerned that some pieces of the rules put out by EPA today run contrary to that stated effort. Although the international indirect land use change penalty has been lessened somewhat, EPA still relied on the disproven theory when all of the data shows that ethanol production continues to improve and isn’t requiring new land," Broin said.

Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 4
February 7, 2010
That's a lot of fancy talk.

Why not just mandate that all cars sold in the US must be Flex Fuel capable. That way, consumers have a choice to use ethanol or not.

If it is too difficult to figure out how to mandate that all cars sold be flex fuel capable----ask the Brazilians, they can tell you how.
No image available
Comment
2 of 4
February 8, 2010
Sounds like a quarter of all gasoline (if 2022 uses the same as today)! I was going to say "Why bother?", but it may actually be worth both the research and the basic mandates (less oil dependency). Being that photosynthesis is only about 1% efficeint at converting sunlight into fuels, though, I doubt land based biofuels will ever achieve much more. They require more water and care than other options like Stirling solar dishes and wind power, however, this IS a large chunk of a solution (and is obviously storable) and should continue to be supported!
No image available
Comment
3 of 4
February 10, 2010
Fred,

Shouldn't car producers have a choice of cars they manufacture?
Is it too late now to resurrect the Electric Car?
No image available
Comment
4 of 4
February 15, 2010
Robert----we mandate safety laws and regulations for the health and safety of the public. We already mandate fuel prohibitions(lead) for health reasons. I see no reason that we can not make fuel requirements in the interest of health and safety. The last three wars the US has been involved in have oil as a pivotal underlaying cause, and dependence on foreign oil is the major cause of much of the political and national security problems for the US now---and will only increase increase in the future.

Vehicles with diesel or flex fuel bi-fuel engines can use either petroleum, biofuels, or methane----in any combination. The choice is up to the consumer what fuel they want to use. I think this is where the power of choice makes the most sense. Let consumers decide. Petroleum industry proponents make the argument "let the free market decide"---but with no choice available on the part of consumers, there is no free market. Oil is a monopoly cartel. I say, put the choice in the hands of the consumer and then let the free market decide.

-----------" Is it too late now to resurrect the Electric Car?"----------

There is no need to resurrect the electric car. The electric car has been around for 170 years and still has the same limitations it has always had, size, power and range. To gain range, you have to give up size and power, and vice versa. That doesn't make them bad, just limited. It is still possible to build good cars within those limitations. One of the best cars ever built on any classic car list is the Baker----an electric car. Too limited to gain really widespread appeal, but still, VERY good for what it was designed to do, circa 1915. I have no problem at all with people who would like an electric car----but I don't see them ever filling the role of what we expect from our internal combustion vehicles.

http://www.goodcleantech.com/2007/08/new_fiat_siena_ttrafuel_runs_o.php
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
Canadian Clean Energy Conferences HUBER+SUHNER AG Nikkei Business Publications America, Inc. National Solar Trainers ATAS International, Inc. Intersolar SolarTech Consortium
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters