The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 25, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Greening Deserts for Carbon Credits

Thomas R. Blakeslee, Clearlight Foundation
February 24, 2010  |  15 Comments

Poor farming practices have degraded the world's soils causing them to release carbon that should have stayed in the soil. In the past 150 years soils have released twice as much carbon as fuel burning. Improved farming methods could quickly rebuild degraded land and store enough carbon to offset the damage already done by fuel burning. Dr Rattan Lal of Ohio State University, a leading expert on soil carbon, estimates that the potential of economical carbon sequestration in world soils may be .65 billion to 1.1 billion tons per year for the next 50 years. This is enough to draw down atmospheric CO2 by 50 ppm by 2100. This is a one-time opportunity, however. We must ultimately stop burning fossil fuels.

Man has already degraded about five billion acres of land on the planet by misguided farming practices and overgrazing. In fact, many of the world's deserts were once rich land. Desertification from overgrazing, plowing and growing annual crops has greatly reduced the carbon retained in the earth's soils. Many of our deserts started as forests that were cut or burned down to clear the land and then ruined by overgrazing. If we could reclaim these ruined lands we could restore the carbon balance of our planet. 

We have only recently begun to understand the destructive effects of plowing and grazing. The delicate surface crust is an almost invisible biotic network of algae, cyanobacteria and lichens that hold the soil together with tiny filaments. This thin crust takes in an amazing amount of CO2 by photosynthesis and also fixes the nitrogen in the air to a form usable by plants. Tilling the soil breaks up and buries the biotic crust, stopping photosynthesis.

The dust bowl in Oklahoma in the 1930s was an example of the bad effects of plowing the land. Wind and erosion almost turned that once-rich grassland into a desert. In China and Africa the sand dunes have been advancing southward, turning more and more land into sterile deserts. Dust storms in the Gobi desert often block the sun in Beijing and many Saharan dust storms ultimately evolve into the hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico.

One very encouraging project in China has restored a desert community and given it a source of revenue growing sand willow for making wood planks. This experiment was so successful that the restored area is growing rapidly as more individuals plant sand willow as a source of income. Even more exciting, is the plan to build hybrid solar power plants in the area that will use the sand willow as biomass to feed boilers when the sun doesn't shine. Esolar will provide heliostats and a solar tower for generating solar power in the daytime. The same turbines will be driven at night by steam, generated by burning the sand willow. A total of two gigawatts of these hybrid power plants are planned. 

The sand willow matures in only three years and quickly regrows when cut. Villagers sell sand willow timber to plank companies for $30/ton. This economic boom has driven more and more plantings which are greening of the desert. Once a beachhead is established, the local micro climate is changed.  Trees provide shade and shelter from the desert winds. Ultimately moisture brings clouds and increases in rainfall. A whole new ecosystem evolves. 

Carbon credits could drive this kind of renaissance even faster. It is very important that we develop inexpensive soil carbon monitoring systems so that such important changes in land use can be rewarded. Farmers are already receiving millions of dollars for no-till farming in the U.S. but some have challenged their legitimacy as being "non-additional."  Hopefully, projects with multiple benefits will not be deprived of the carbon credits that could drive the fast progress we need.

A "green wall" project has been proposed by the UN that will plant trees along a 7000 km strip on the current southern edge of the Sahara desert. It is floundering now for lack of money but carbon credits for land restoration could restore it to health.

One of the biggest challenges is re-educating people in degraded areas to keep them from turning these areas back into a desert. Grazing goats and sheep were practical only when population density was much less than it is today. Under crowded conditions animal hooves quickly trample the soil crust. Denuded plant life soon leads to erosion and desertification. Goats and sheep are particularly destructive as they pull up vegetation by the roots. Too much of our agriculture has been dedicated to feeding animals, which is inefficient at best. It takes 15 pounds of grain to produce one pound of beefsteak. Fish, being cold blooded, are much more efficient. They eat as little as two pounds per pound of meat.

The "green revolution" doubled cereal production between 1961 and 1985. Unfortunately, much of the increase was based on use of cheap fossil fuels to make fertilizers, pesticides and herbicides and to irrigate and cultivate the land. The energy content of food has reached frightening levels. Worse yet, the whole philosophy of this movement treats nature as an enemy to be conquered. Other plants, insects and microbes are simply poisoned.

Unfortunately, the result of all of this has been degraded soils that need even more chemicals. Good healthy soil can hold three times more carbon than the plants themselves, mostly in the form of humus, bacteria, algae and other organic matter. The University of Illinois has maintained corn-growing test plots for over 100 years. Since 1955 synthetic nitrogen fertilization has been applied, which contained 90-124 tons of carbon per acre. Today, all of that residue has disappeared into the atmosphere adding to global warming and there has been a decrease in soil carbon of 4.9 tons per acre. 

Today, there is a healthy revival of permaculture principles that work with nature instead of against it. Annual crops only do photosynthesis during the growing season, leaving bare dirt the rest of the year. By growing perennials, the root mass and the biotic community can grow steadily larger year after year instead of starting from scratch. Roots go deeper and deeper with each season, increasing drought resistance. Yearlong Green Farming maximizes carbon storage in the soil by keeping soil covered with greenery all year long. The world's soils hold three times as much carbon as the atmosphere and four times as much as all of the plants in the world. A large part of the carbon storage is in the biotic soil community and humus, which  forms only when the community is kept intact. Restoration experiments in Australia found that conventional cropping practices had reduced soil carbon to half to one third of original levels.

Biomass can be grown from perennial grasses harvested regularly like a lawn that is repeatedly mowed. This allows undisturbed roots to continue to grow larger every year. Symbiotic fungi called mycorrhizae form an association with the roots, which can increase their efficiency by a factor of ten. They are powered by the grasses' metabolism but pay back by creating nitrogen and collecting nutrients. By putting rows or clumps of perennial grasses in fields of other crops, yield can be increased while collecting carbon credits. In some cases 8 tons of CO2 stored per acre per year have been recorded with virtually no biomass inputs. The more the soil has been degraded, the easier it is to earn credits with changes that store significant carbon. A recent study by Stanford University's Carnegie Institution identified 1.8 million square miles of abandoned farmland worldwide.

Heavy use of chemical fertilizers is unnecessary if the soil's crust is kept intact. Even in barren deserts specialized cyanobacteria on the very top surface remove CO2 and nitrogen from the air through photosynthesis. They protect and colaborate with other species in the next layer that fix the nitrogen but cannot stand oxygen. These species have coevolved to work together to hold the soil together and support the growth of more complex vascular plants.

Almost invisible to the naked eye, this crust ecosystem stabilizes the soil while fixing carbon and nitrogen.  When the delicate crust community is destroyed, plants starve for nitrogen unless they are given massive fertilizer applications. Chemical fertilizers are an environmental nightmare which release lots of nitrous oxide into the air. Nitrous oxide is 298 times worse than CO2 as a greenhouse gas. Fertilizers also pollute streams, consume fossil fuels and emit CO2 in their manufacture.

Bioinoculants can restore degraded soils by adding natural microorganisms that greatly reduce the need for chemical fertilizers and even water in the soil. Dramatic increases in soil carbon are possible in a single season. Damaged soil crusts could be healed by aerial spraying of tiny amounts of cyanobacteria mixtures which remain viable through long periods of dryness yet rehydrate and begin growing within minutes of receiving rain or even dew condensation. Cyanobacteria were responsible for creating the oxygen on our planet from CO2 billions of years ago. Perhaps they can help us to rescue the planet today.

Another promising approach to greening deserts is seawater farming. Coastal desert areas lacking fresh water can grow plants like Mangrove and Salicornia along with fish and shrimp that provide the fertilizer.  The first commercial-scale saltwater farm was built by the Seawater Foundation on a barren desert in Eritrea, on the west coast of the Red Sea. Before the project, ecologists found only 13 species of wild birds in the area. By the time the farm was completed in 2002, the count had increased to 200. Here is a movie about that farm. 

Another massive farm is planned for Abu Dhabi. Boing and Honeywell are partners in the project, which will grow salt-water biomass to be used for making green fuel for jet aircraft. There are 25,000 miles of coastal desert in the world that could be developed in this way. Carbon trading could be the driver for these projects if we can only develop sound verification protocols and measuring instruments.

Download my free renewable energy book, Fuel Free: Living Well Without Fossil Fuels here.

15 Comments

Register To Comment
David Cameron
David Cameron
March 24, 2011
Really really good posts, thank you all for sorting out so many issues & politely too!

It looks like nematodes, protozoa & fungi are the prime-movers in making fertile soils & we know next to nothing about the first two and only a little about fungi! Worms also are great enzyme vats, bioengineers, converting, merging, binding & recombining chemicals in the most miraculous ways.
Humbling.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
March 2, 2010
Robert Mida-------" You are talking about burning methane for energy and this releases hydrogen sulfides."-------

The chemical formula for methane is CH4----no sulphur. Methane powered vehicles are already used in enclosed environments where clean emissions are critical, warehouses to power forklifts, mines, tunnels, etc.

The point about mentioning methane is that as Tom and Mary point out, it is biological systems that need to be used to remediate encroaching deserts---and my point is that it is those exact same biological systems that can provide us what we need to maintain our needs also. We can remediate a desert, provide food, provide fuel, provide housing(wood), provide clothing and most everything else we need at the same time.

As Tom pointed out---overgrazing has been a problem in the past. Why? Because the natural system was not taken into account. The system of nomadic herding----moving the herds to better pastures, allowing grazed pasture to replenish was ignored. You can't pen up grazing animals to graze the same pastures indefinitely and expect the pastures to regenerate----they have to be grazed, left fallow, then regrazed in cycles. That is how nature has maintained for millions of years---by migration. Nomadic herding was successful because it mimiced the natural migration cycles. Nature can provide and endless stream of what we need---but it is not a factory. You have to consider how and why things have evolved the way they have, and mimic the natural order. We get into trouble when we try to nature into a mold that we want instead of working with the natural order of evolution .
Mary Saunders
Mary Saunders
March 1, 2010
I love comment streams like this. We get somewhere by parsing the details.

Geoff's Lawton's Jordan work is so heartening because he takes on so many issues at once.

The site is now a working lab, unfinished in its implications.

The challenges that salted and hardened that ground are still at work there. The operation and maintenance of the fragile cooperation of plants and animals still require careful observation and pruning to keep it viable.

It will clearly revert if not maintained.

Regarding Fred's concern about methane, I'm not sure how you would tell exactly what is going on at that site without coming up with ways to measure and log.

Fungi are present in the mulch.

Fun guys are pretty good at breaking complex hydrocarbons into simpler compounds (Stamets, TED, etc.). I just don't see how we can know what is happening there without measuring.

If that mulch is fiber from Egyptian walking onions, say, then there will be a sulfur issue, but if it is from silicon-containing plants, then we have a different dynamic. Interestingly, I believe that figs tend to have some natural sulfur, from experience having a fig in my back yard.

What's so exciting about Geoff's work is all the hanging details it presents.

Exactly how is that salt bound up in the bio-matter?

How do the beans taste that are grown here, are they already salty enough when you put them in the pot (barsotto lamon sp? tongue of fire) beans can take up salt, and then you don't have to season them.

Permaculture is all about active but lazy people working their brains over-time to earn ah, meditation and altered-states time in gloriously beautiful circumstances (no blue plastic sticking out! (Santoyo, my personal nine hours of video HiLarrity).

Consequently, the more permies the earth can generate, the less humans will find it appetizing to heat, beat, and treat stuff (Benyus: one of two TED talks), saving us energy in the aggregate.
Robert Mida
Robert Mida
March 1, 2010
Fred,

Biogas isn't even mentioned in this article or in my comment and aren't relevant to my point, which you failed to address in your reply.

Digesters are relatively alright environmentally, but need a large farm or co-op to be economical. They ARE NOT 0% net warming. You are talking about burning methane for energy and this releases hydrogen sulfides. Spare me the carbon neutral myth, please. Digesters aren't emissions-free. They are known to emit nitrogen and sulfur oxides, particulate matter, carbon monoxide and ammonia. They can help to produce Nitrogen fertilizer as you indicated, which is nice.

Also, composting does not "naturally release methane into the air" when composting is done right. Composting is aerobic (with oxygen) and generates heat, which can be used. Methane only occurs with anaerobic processes like Digesters.

Digesters are only marginally effective at reducing problems with odors, pathogens and greenhouse gas emissions from animal waste or sewage sludge, but they are incapable of making any chemical contaminants in the wastes go away. We should be aware of these issues when making decisions.

And back to my original point/post. PM 2.5 isn't even regulated and cause upper respiratory problems. Sure it's not an open fire, but it is still incineration.

I'm much more of a fan of Geoff Lawton's approach as Mary Saunders mentioned above. Work such as his would generate more jobs, be better for the environment and food supply, and suck up much less money than biomass incinerators, with biochar capabilities or not. And like digestors, the law of conversation of matter, chemical contaminants don't go away, and various pollutants are created in the "thermal conversion" process that go into the air or the ash or the charcoal or the slag, etc.
Jim White
Jim White
March 1, 2010
I'm surprised you did not mention biochar. The ancient Amazonians figured out how to store carbon in the soils and increase soil productivity thousands of years ago. The carbon they put in the soils still exists throughout the Amazonian basin today in what the Brazilians call terra preta. Mixing charcoal into the soil greatly enhances plant productivity while reducing the need for fertilizers, while simultaneously locking up carbon. The best description I have seen on biochar was done by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzmpWR6JUZQ

I believe one of the ways out of our current energy crunch and reducing atmospheric CO2 is to use gasifiers to extract combustible gases from crop residues to generate base load power and heat. The gasifiers reduce the biomass to charcoal, not ash. The charcoal is then added back to the soils to make them more productive, reduce the need for fossil fuel fertilizers and lock away carbon.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
February 27, 2010
Robert Mida-------" I'll admit that Biomass power plants are not "open fires," but they still admit particulate matter. They may not be the flaky soot we think of with open wood fires, but soot is defined as matter resulting from 'incomplete combustion of coal, wood, insert fuel type.'"-------

Methane does not produce soot. Methane is already a gas.

The end product of methane production is compost. Even if you use mulch as mentioned several times, it has to compost naturally to be of any use, which releases methane into the air. Methane has 17X the infrared capture ability of CO2. If we produce methane by composting biomass, and capture the methane that would have escaped into the atmosphere, and then we burn that methane---we are exchanging high GHG effect methane to relatively low GHG effect CO2. We have methane(fuel that can be used in any application we need) and compost(fertilizer). We can even feed grasses and herbaceous shrubs to cattle, goats, sheep and other ruminant animals and get triple use from the same biomass, animal feed--->food(meat and dairy)------->manure------->anaerobic digestion----->methane------compost(fertilizer). A 6% mixture of biomethane with fossil methane will produce GHG neutral emissions---net 0 warming effect on the atmosphere. Any mixture of over 6% biomethane will produce a negative effect on atmospheric warming.
Dominic Jermano
Dominic Jermano
February 26, 2010
Tom your idea is that animals should be in pens and raised instead? That is land areas grow the plants such as grass or hay to be cut from tractor mowers then gathered and fed to the animal flocks in pens....Then their manure is later spread back on the land for fertilization?

The issue of using the plants the same way except not feeding to the animals, but using to make bio-fuel presents another issue in balancing the give what back to the fields? Simply spreading the remaining pulp back will not give the same fertile effect as the animal manure returns...

So you think that Bio-Fuel operations should also be herd raisers as well....to provide a mixture of pulp and manure to keep the growing fields fertile?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Desert rennovation is inspiring as a concept....but I think Deserts undergoing total rennovation is wrong... Perhaps a 60-40 ratio is good...in that 40% is reclaimed....because deserts do provide a drying effect to the world atmosphere...This should not be frowned up...but as a balancer to the atmospheric makeup. I think bamboo is an excellent choice to greening the desert... Other efforts such as bringing water there as well is a desirable task. Very simple technological methods could be employed such as digging long trenches from the ocean to desert locations... and domed over with glass type solar panels... The evaporation would collect on the glass and roll off into fresh water pipe collectors that provide water to the areas being reclaimed, while also creating electricity.. This would be an on going process & would create many good jobs...The money they spend to maintain militaries could be used to pay for the desert rennovation development instead. Organizing is the only issue standing in the way.
Laurie Benson
Laurie Benson
February 26, 2010
You should all take a look at the following site http://www.savoryinstitute.com/brown-revolution-fund/

The Savory Institute has started The Brown Revolution based on reversing biodiversity loss and desertification. Their research has targeted locations all over the world where the abandoned land can be purchased for a minimal price and turned around to store vast amounts of carbon.

They have gained the attention of Wall Street as they are opening up an opportunity for people to invest in a true triple bottom line venture while opening doors to enormous amounts of carbon sequestration.

This isn't speculation - it is already being done today with incredible effects.
Robert Mida
Robert Mida
February 26, 2010
"Also, he soot from biomass is from open fires used for cooking and heat in the third world. Biomass power plants emit no soot."

I'll admit that Biomass power plants are not "open fires," but they still admit particulate matter. They may not be the flaky soot we think of with open wood fires, but soot is defined as matter resulting from 'incomplete combustion of coal, wood, insert fuel type.' So you still have PM 2.5 and PM 10 as well as unregulated soot from modern wood combustion units like nanoparticles. A look into any biomass incinerator will reveal this fact. And if you're not using the heat, which many current biomass proposals don't, then these biomass power plants are grossly inefficient and a waste of resources.
Mary Saunders
Mary Saunders
February 26, 2010
Greening the Desert as a search brings up Geoff Lawton's work in Jordan, which is astounding.

The first view is of Geoff shaking his head, not sure. This ground he is supposed to reform is discouraging, visibly salted, and hard.

The use of deep mulch to improve production in a short time is carefully documented. The people are motivated to make change, they regrade to make contours and swales, they mulch, and they plant through the mulch.
They get figs in three months when local experts said it couldn't be done. Parting deep mulch, they find mushrooms in the desert.

What happened to the salt that it did not interfere with plant growth? Interesting discussion of that is an important feature of these easily accessed films.

Masanobu Fukuoka's work is also eye-opening. He is also easily searched. His One-Straw Revolution promoted no-till but carefully enriching the earth year by year.

There is also new research going on to develop perennial grains that will not require tilling or heavy outside inputs of other kinds.

Energy savings from changing agriculture are proceeding in pilot projects that will emerge to scale when the beauty, resilience, and other benefits become more visible. I am glad to see this article posted here.
Jeff Schahczenski
Jeff Schahczenski
February 26, 2010
I am thankful for the optimism Tom, however it is not an easy trick to build SOM or to reduce the GHG emissions from our current systems of industrial commodity crop production. In other words, I support the direction but am less optimistic that we can achieve the levels of carbon sequestration that Dr. Lal projects are possible (not that we shouldn't make every effort). But here is one quandary, biofuel/biomass interests want to capture as much crop residue as possible from existing stands of our annual commodity crops and not return them to the soil where they are needed for soil health building. This in turn may cause an elevated level demand for synthetic fertilizer which in turn increases the GHG releases from these highly industrialized and fossil energy intensive systems...We need to change these system. We also need to keep our eye on the sustainability of what we can do so that we move in the correct direction without overestimation of the possible
Thomas Blakeslee
Thomas Blakeslee
February 26, 2010
The best source of degraded soils is in our working farms, whose soils have been ruined by years of chemical applications which have killed the biological soils. These soil ecosystem microorganisms are 57% carbon so it's a win-win. Biofertilizers increase productivity while they sequester carbon. Please read these studies that prove it:

http://www.microsoil.com.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=byILcti/idI%3d&tabid=59

http://www.microsoil.com.au/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=R7b9FqHSZtg%3d&tabid=59

http://www.rodaleinstitute.org/files/Rodale_Research_Paper-07_30_08.pdf

Also, he soot from biomass is from open fires used for cooking and heat in the third world. Biomass power plants emit no soot.
Russ Finley
Russ Finley
February 26, 2010
In a nutshell you are saying we should grow plants on land that has been badly degraded.

It is abandoned because it costs too much to try to grow plants on it.

So, the question comes down to how much it would cost per pound of carbon sequestered?

An obvious example of why the world needs a price on carbon if it wants to reduce CO2.

Also, the soot produced from burning biomass is one of the leading causes of global warming.

Never simple.
Laurie Benson
Laurie Benson
February 25, 2010
The Savory Institute is doing some incredible work in this realm. The understanding that desertification and loss of biodiversity is directly linked to global climate change is crucial. Allan Savory, founder of Holistic Management and the Savory Institute, has over 20 years of proof that animals on the land are crucial to restoring plants and healing the land.

An interview this month by the Society for Range Management gets into the details of why animals are so important on the land and the incredible potential for carbon sequestration and reversing desertification, mitigating drought and famine and much more.

Another incredible resource is the Africa Centre for Holistic Management. They have taken 1000's of acres in Zimbabwe that were nothing but bare ground and turned them into flourishing habitat for wildlife, increased water sequestration and carbon sequestration. They have just received a grant to take their work to scale in Kenya as well.

Great things happening on this front! Now we need to show our support and get the word out to the masses.
stop killin our wilderness
stop killin our wilderness
February 24, 2010
Maybe i missed it but you REALLY need to distinguish between "desertification" and "deserts."

The former is an ecosystem that has been destroyed by man's unsustainable practices, and which would be a good candidate for the types of "re-greening" you suggest. The latter is a perfect, functioning ecosystem which needs to be LEFT ALONE, not bulldozed, dynamited, paved, herbicided and destroyed for more industrial development like farming, Big Solar and Big Wind. It has been proven, for example, that the Mojave sequesters as much CO2 as temperate forests - that is a LOT, but most of it, as you say, is managed in the soil crusts which are fragile.

As long as you are only advocating for "greening" dead, desertified areas, i support your idea, but intact desert ecosystems are already perfect - we just need to keep our grubby, destructive mitts off of them.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Thomas Blakeslee

Thomas Blakeslee

Thomas R Blakeslee’s books have been published in nine different languages. After serving for three years in the U.S. Navy, he earned a degree from CalTech in Pasadena, California in 1962. After working for IT&T in Antwerp, Belgium, he...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 8
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    Texas Legislature Passes Commercial and Industrial PACE Bill
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • The Stella Group, Ltd.
  • OnGrid Solar
  • Prudent Living, Inc.
  • Enecsys
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Johnson Controls, Inc.
  • Kipp & Zonen
  • RevoluSun
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information