The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Saturday, May 18, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Crafting National Standards

Ken Silverstein, Editor-in-Chief, EnergyBiz Insider
February 05, 2010  |  8 Comments

Renewable energy is making a gradual presence in this country. But the key question facing U.S. lawmakers is whether to mandate broad portfolio standards or whether to continue giving the states the authority to determine such measures.

The greening of America has a permanent place in the mindset of most citizens. And policymakers are keenly aware of this sentiment despite some concerns over rising costs and the creation of unrealistic goals. Through cooperative efforts that have involved all participants, state officials were first to require a certain percentage of utility portfolios to come from green fuels. Now, though, federal lawmakers are considering the same.

"The goal of a national renewable portfolio standard is to up the ante," says Mary Anne Sullivan, former general counsel to the U.S. Department of Energy in the Clinton administration. "You don't do that by leaving it up to the states."

At least 28 states now have those mandates on the books, all of which have set ambitious long-term goals. The goal of any such standard is to create demand, which in turn attracts providers to the field and ultimately leads to the development of newer and better products and services. The end result would produce a cleaner environment and more jobs without causing electric rates to fluctuate.

Congress has grappled with this issue in the past. But it has chosen not to act largely because of regional differences and the ability of the various states to meet strict targets. In other words, the southwest is endowed with lots of sunshine while Texas has ample wind resources. But the southeast says that it lacks such blessings and it would therefore have difficulty complying with any national mandates.

When the Obama administration took over Washington, a movement took root to enact national renewable portfolio standards. The most notable bill would establish a 15 percent threshold by 2021 — a number that has been reduced from 20 percent because of utility concerns. Three percent of this amount could come in the form of implementing energy efficiency measures.

Some conservatives in Congress want to defeat the legislation, arguing that it will cause energy prices to escalate and make the country less competitive. Others acknowledge the momentum and as such want to influence its outcome. Therein lay the potential for a more flexible renewable portfolio standard. States with limited sustainable resources, under pending proposals, could adopt renewable portfolio standards of 12 percent as long as they require eight-percent efficiency gains.

"When Congress looks at renewables, it should recognize regional differences and not enact a one-size-fits-all solution," says Glenn McCullough, former chair of the Tennessee Valley Authority. "These decisions are made better at the state level by public service commissioners or voters than at the federal level."

State Leadership

The southeast, for example, has lush forests that the nearby manufacturing facilities process and use. The result is lots of sawdust — a form of biofuel — that could be used a substitute fuel or as a supplement to fossil-fired generation. Public service commissioners recognize such assets and would more than likely be amenable to credit them in the effort to meet any standards.

If the goal is to move steadily toward a low-carbon society, then any form of renewable mandates should be accompanied by the proper financial incentives and well-considered federal regulations, says Greg Unruh, professor at the Thunderbird School of Management in Arizona. One way to create more renewable franchises and fewer emissions is to continue to allow the states to set their own standards while also giving the federal government the right to oversee a cap-and-trade system, he says.

"If you set up a market place and mandate reductions, then one must ask if it is cheaper to build solar plants or install advanced coal with sequestration," says Unruh. "Once markets start telling the truth, then we can find the most cost effective solutions."

While resistant at first, the utility industry has come to the table. Its interests vary. But generally it recognizes that the nation is trending green and that it is expected to offer solutions. Regulators and electric companies, in many corners, are rising to the market challenges by building the foundations for robust energy enterprises, according to the Center for American Progress.

Take New Mexico: In 2004 it adopted a 10-percent standard by 2011. But three years later it doubled that to 20 percent by 2020 for large utilities and 10 percent by 2010 for electric co-ops or private, independent electric utilities, the center says. That, in turn, has attracted major solar manufacturers that have invested millions and employed thousands in the process.

A number of other states have also increased their stakes. Beyond the built-in regulatory flexibility, they all expect advancing technologies to propel their long-term goals forward. That is, as an increasing number of enterprises get involved in the renewable sector, more products and services will come to market in a more cost effective way.

Wind turbine and solar panel prices, for instance, have fallen dramatically. With subsidies, the resulting energy sources are becoming more and more competitive. As a result, their market penetration rates have gone up.

"What seems uneconomic now will become increasingly cost competitive," says Sullivan, who is now a partner in Hogan & Hartson's energy practice. "It will make it easier to comply with national standards. Companies would not have to meet the percentage changes tomorrow. They would get phased in over time."

The fate of national energy legislation is unknown. Regardless, the country is embracing green technologies and the states will continue to act in the absence of federal rules. To some, that is preferable. Others, though, say the results will be inadequate.

Ken Silverstein is an award-winning journalist who is the editor-in-chief of Energy Central's publication, EnergyBiz Insider. With a background in economics and public policy, he has spent several years writing about the issues that touch the energy and financial sectors, and his work has been published in more than 100 periodicals.

Republished with permission from CyberTech, Inc. EnergyBiz Insider is published three days a week by Energy Central. For more information about Energy Central, or to subscribe to EnergyBiz Insider, other e-newsletters and EnergyBiz magazine, please go to http://www.energycentral.com/.

8 Comments

Register To Comment
Therese Shellabarger
Therese Shellabarger
February 20, 2010
Mike-Holly, I believe that as long as harvesting crops includes use of CO2 producing machines, you can't escape calling them net generators of CO2. So it doesn't really matter what you use, it's all part of the problem. However, I'm not unrealistic on that score, I just think we need to re-think our entire energy chain and eliminate as much as we can "burning" and go more towards other things. So geothermal energy is 24 hour, wind might work 24 hour in some places, less often in others, tidal energy is 24 hour, and then there are a variety of solar options for daytime, as well as methods of building that capture heat to warm homes and buildings overnight, etc. Those who claim we must use nuclear or coal sequestration clearly do not know the entire spectrum of what is out there and need to learn more science.
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
February 19, 2010
@ therese-shellabarger, if you mean old growth forests then I agree. If you are including woody biomass crops, then you are wrong because that usually doesn't produce a net generation of CO2.
Jay Turner
Jay Turner
February 11, 2010
Any federal standards must not prevent states from enacting more stringent requirements. Advocates of the status quo tend to try to use federal standards as a back-door way to undermine local environmental laws.

The practical reality is that the coal-dependent states for the most part haven't come around to accepting renewable portfolio standards and so any federal standard will be blocked. Until the marjority of the coal-dependent states have their own renewable portfolio standards, there won't be sufficient support to get meaningful federal standards through (except as a way to gut the standards in states that are moving more aggressively).
Therese Shellabarger
Therese Shellabarger
February 11, 2010
I would suggest if a federal mandate is set, that smaller states be allowed to form co-operative mandates so their smaller size doesn't work against them in developing projects. Also, I don't like the idea of using wood for burning. We got into this climate mess *because* we based our energy use on burnables. That's something we need to get away from, at least until after we have brought down the CO2 levels to manageable numbers where it's finally safe to use renewable sources of carbon in this manner, but in limited quantity to prevent causing the same problem from re-occurring. It won't happen in our lifetimes or the lifetimes of our currently living relatives.
Mike Holly
Mike Holly
February 10, 2010
Our renewable energy company COULD support a national renewable portfolio standard ONLY IF it is combined with national feed-in tariffs OR the current method of setting prices for renewable energy, competitive bidding, is restructured so all renewable projects are offered for bid, all renewable technologies qualify, and the lowest-cost bid wins (otherwise utilities will keep favoring their own company, affiliates and friends).
Jonathan Chance
Jonathan Chance
February 10, 2010
How about a free and fair market-based economy rather than perpetual subsidies for corporate crime?

JPChance.wordpress.com

When Congress and the Treasury serve the public, abolish the Federal Reserve Corporation, and issue legitimate currency, most institutionally created problems will diminish rather than expand.

BoobsNotBombs.Net
Susan Kraemer
Susan Kraemer
February 7, 2010
A national RES absolutely IS the way to go. Every state has SOME kind of renewable energy potential, and the RES proposed in CEJAPA does not pick what kind of RE, only that the renewable goal be met.

There are 24 states with mandated (accountable if fail to meet) standards. 5 more have "aspirational goals" (unmet) The states with mandates have lowered their ghgs already. The states that don't have a RES are the ones dragging the US down: (Wyoming, Virginia, Indiana, North Dakota and Tennessee (or Kentucky) with 90% coal.
Jenna Lee Thomas
Jenna Lee Thomas
February 5, 2010
With such diverse resources in the different regions, a blanket of a national renewable energy standard is not the way to go...yet. Perhaps as new technologies emerge, and prices of these technologies decrease every state will find their niche in RE. Once every state is involved in some way, the government may want to step in create some minimum requirements for various types of RE.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Sol Systems LLC
  • CleanEdison
  • EcoFasten Solar
  • Northern Lights Solar Solutions
  • Johnson Controls, Inc.
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • Standard Solar Inc.
  • W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information