Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

BrightSource To Reduce Size of Ivanpah CSP Facility by 48-MW

February 16, 2010   |   2 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
The mitigation proposal for the Ivanpah project is a direct response to comments and suggestions made during the Ivanpah permitting process' public comment period.
2 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 2
February 17, 2010
My comment about this decision is good as well as bad.
Good because you are concerned about the impact on the environment and more concerned about the opinion of the people in general by showing regads to and respect for their feelings.
Bravo!!
My bad comment is due to the decision taken in haste without giving proper thought to address the concerns of the people in general and having to take such a hard decision. By taking this decision you have lowered the opportunity to reduce the carbon emissions further, reduced the number of construction jobs as well as permanant jobs. You can avoid all the above effects without having to reduce the the project capacity. Not only that, I wolud go one step further to say that you can increase the project capacity even after addressing the impacts mentioned by you on environment, excessive use of water and land as well as saving the rare plants and species. All this can be brought about by making slight changes in the design, use of innovative materials for thermal storage. I do not know what method you are using i.e. parabolic trough, power tower etc. for energy concentration and collection. All I can say that you can address all the problems with some innovative design ideas and use of new materials and produce clean water as well instead of using water if you have the source of raw water nearby.

Hiro Chandwani

Author is a professor at a Maritime Institute at Mumbai, India and has been working on Renewable Energy System designs on solar and energy from oceans, since last few years. He may be cantacted on email: sunrise1945@gmail.com
Comment
2 of 2
February 17, 2010
can't say for sure, but I'd venture that they reduced capacity to avoid these areas where environmental mitigation costs are at their peak, thus making project economics more favorable. If they had to reduce the plant footprint 12% to do so, well then they do it... and to the previous post: fyi, Brightsource has publically commited to dry cooling on all their CSP projects --- so only water consumption from cleaning heliostats.

But there seems to be significant changes in their design, "Reduce overall number of towers at the Ivanpah project from seven to three", and "Reduce the potential maximum number of heliostats by about 40,000". Very interesting.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Geothermal Energy Association Richardson RFPD, Inc. Endurance Wind Power IntertechPira Via Expo AltEnergyStocks Standard Solar Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters