Article Rating
2 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 8 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

Obama's State of the Union Address Highlights Renewables' Role

Published: January 28, 2010

Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyWorld.com] In his first State of the Union address, US President Barack Obama has highlighted the key role of renewables in the economic development of the country.

"Providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future, because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation."

-- Barack Obama, President of the United States of America

He said: “We can put Americans to work today building the infrastructure of tomorrow. From the first railroads to the Interstate Highway System, our nation has always been built to compete. There's no reason Europe or China should have the fastest trains, or the new factories that manufacture clean energy products.”

To applause he added, “We should put more Americans to work building clean energy facilities and give rebates to Americans who make their homes more energy-efficient, which supports clean energy jobs. And to encourage these and other businesses to stay within our borders, it is time to finally slash the tax breaks for companies that ship our jobs overseas, and give those tax breaks to companies that create jobs right here in the United States of America.”

In a State of the Union speech clearly weighted in its call for a move to more bipartisan politics, and in the wake of a recent Republican Senate victory in Massachusetts, Obama warned of the consequences of delaying legislation saying: “Washington has been telling us to wait for decades, even as the problems have grown worse. Meanwhile, China is not waiting to revamp its economy. Germany is not waiting. India is not waiting. These nations, they're not standing still. These nations aren't playing for second place. They're putting more emphasis on math and science. They're rebuilding their infrastructure. They're making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs.”

But, to create more clean energy jobs, more production, more efficiency and more incentives are needed, he said, highlighting investment in advanced biofuels. “And, yes,” said Obama, “it means passing a comprehensive energy and climate bill with incentives that will finally make clean energy the profitable kind of energy in America.”

Continuing on his bipartisan theme, Obama added: “I am grateful to the House for passing such a bill last year. And this year I'm eager to help advance the bipartisan effort in the Senate. I know there have been questions about whether we can afford such changes in a tough economy. I know that there are those who disagree with the overwhelming scientific evidence on climate change. But here's the thing, even if you doubt the evidence, providing incentives for energy-efficiency and clean energy are the right thing to do for our future, because the nation that leads the clean energy economy will be the nation that leads the global economy. And America must be that nation.”

Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
January 29, 2010
Glass half full? One could argue that the President's concurrent support of more nukes, more drilling and "clean coal" belies anything but "highlighting" renewables. Let's be clear, he missed a golden opportunity to highlight the role windpower plays in current new power generation in the US, with another record year, and the fact that the industry's jobs remained stable in a downturn at 85,000. That this was partly a result of of the quick implementation of his Stimulus bill should have made it obvious. But he was silent, instead nodding to the coal and conventional lobbies. Highlight? Shameful fits just as well.
No image available
Comment
2 of 8
January 29, 2010
It's good to see leaders like President Obama focus on the need for renewable energy sources. This boosts the overall economy and leads to employment to a large number of people. According to a report, the United States is capable of netting 4.5 millions jobs in the renewable energy space by 2030. More at http://www.pacificcresttrans.com/home.html
Comment
3 of 8
January 29, 2010
Were you listening? Here's what he said, "But to create more of these clean energy jobs, we need more production, more efficiency, more incentives. That means building a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in this country. It means making tough decisions about opening new offshore areas for oil and gas development. It means continued investment in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies."

Nuclear? O&G? Coal? Where are the renewables in this list? I was stunned that he has so quickly adopted Cheney's agenda. Who is giving this president advice? His new bipartisan theme pretty much leaves renewable to fend for themselves.
Comment
4 of 8
January 29, 2010
Finally, an American politician who talks a good story. And he talks so gracefully, so elequently, and so full of sh*t. That guy has no intention of doing anything that he says he'll do.
He simply badmouths what ever the public is up in arms about, just to chill them out, (and keep his ratings up), and then proceeds with business as usual.
And in the USA, business as usual means corporate run government, with profit margin as the bottom line. His plan? Profit for all corporate sponsors.
Profit for corporate wind energy producers. Profit for oil. Profit for nukes. Profit for military contractors. Profit for the legal drug cartel. Profit in heroin and opiates from the war zones.

The common man? Gotta keep them alive, enough, to fill out the military rosters. Because America "must be that nation". The one On Top.

Stupid American voters think they actually have a say in things.
Comment
5 of 8
January 29, 2010
Dear Obama's Teleprompter & The Apollo Alliance,

As you probably know, President Kennedy intended to replace the petro-banking warfare racket with a peaceful and productive economy by having our Treasury issue usury-free United States Notes rather than borrowing alleged "debt" from the fraudulent Federal Reserve Corporation.

The last thing we need is more alleged debt, artificial inflation, bloated bureaucracy, political graft, world war, counter-productive "jobs", financial bubbles, and wage taxation (theft, terrorism, slavery).

Making the transition today to an efficient, prosperous, free and fair, market-based economy probably requires that our Treasury replace the Fed's counterfeit debt "dollars" with lawful silver dollars, United States Notes backed by domestic US hydrocarbon reserves, and United States Renewable Energy Credits (US RECs) issued directly to individual (legally transparent) citizens:

JPChance.wordpress.com

We also need to abolish NATO, bring home all our troops, and stop wasting most of our resources on the military-industrial complex:

BoobsNotBombs.Net
No image available
Comment
6 of 8
January 29, 2010
Wow, comments kind of all over the place here. Well, all I can say is - ferrets. FERRETS IN MY PANTS!
Comment
7 of 8
February 5, 2010
If President Barack Obama would green the existing US affordable housing stock–some six million units—this would provide important fiscal, economic and environmental benefits.

GREEN AFFORDABLE HOUSING – THE NEXT FRONTIER?
http://www.socalgreenrealestateblog.com/?p=423
No image available
Comment
8 of 8
February 19, 2010
Something destructive. Obama could still change his mind to focus on more serious things like the rampant economic crisis in America. The Obama nuclear agenda apparently consists of more than just dealing with Iran – Obama wants a nuclear power plant or two built. He and the Department of Energy have just agreed to underwrite and guarantee loans in excess of $8 billion (it takes more than a few payday loans to build a power plant) for the construction of two new power plants in Georgia, both capable of generating over 1100 MWe each (so that's about 2,200 MWe total), on a couple thousand acres. By contrast, a wind power plant takes up almost 100,000 acres to produce less than 800 MWe. 1 MWe is about the equivalent amount of energy (irrespective of watt hours) used powering 1000 homes.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Trina Solar Ltd. Geothermal Energy Association DuPont Photovoltaic Solutions German American Chamber of Commerce of the Southern US, Inc. Via Expo GT Solar Incorporated
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters