Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

How Much PV Capacity Is Actually Installed in Germany?

By John Blau, European Contributor
January 21, 2010   |   22 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
22 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 22
January 21, 2010
It's not the alleged capacity that really matters, but the actual kWh of renewable energy produced - and to whom the revenue is distributed.

Legitimate governments can allow a free and fair market-based economy by mandating public treasuries to replace debt currencies with genuine wealth currencies such as silver dollars, domestic hydrocarbon reserves, and appropriately valued Renewable Energy Credits (RECs) issued directly to individual (legally transparent) citizens (prosumers):

JPChance.wordpress.com

yahoogroups.com/group/GlobalRelations
Comment
2 of 22
January 22, 2010
John,

This article clears up nothing. You throw around lots of numbers but manage to convey no meaning. Last year was extraordinary for the solar industry (not the only one that saw dramatic change), and now with hindsight German wound up with a lot more solar than it expected.

disdaniel

PS could you at least report what the current (1/21/09) top FIT is? rather that using last years numbers...
Comment
3 of 22
January 22, 2010
You also strangely fail to report the fact that Germany has the most mature FiT in the world. It has been running at least 15 years, and has been reducing by approx. 5%/yr every year since it began.

I would think that if there was going to be an outcry about the cost of implementing Germany's solar FiT, the energy companies would have made a big thing about it by now.

Given the fuss energy companies have made about implementation costs since renewables have become more mainstream in the last 10 years, if they were losing money on the deal, they would have pushed rates up or made a big noise about it long ago.

These consumer groups who are suddenly exercised about the cost must have been asleep for the last decade.
Comment
4 of 22
January 22, 2010
This article fails to put the solar tariff in context. The 77 billion Euro figure from RWI is a puff number created by adding up 25 years of program. Imagine how much Germany's electric bill will be over the next 25 years...clue: it will be in the trillions.

Let's assemble the context:

The worst case RWI number comes to 3 billion Euro per year

Germany Electricity Sales: 549 billion kilowatt-hours (http://www.countryreports.org/economy/electricityresources.aspx?countryId=91)

Average German Rates: About 0.15 Euro/kwh (~E0.13/kwh for industrial rate; ~E0.21/kwh residential rate)
http://www.energy.eu/#domestic

Annual German Retail Bill: ~85 billion Euro today; and this is sure to increase over the next 25 years.

Hence, even the worst critics are saying the largest solar program in the history of the world would only add 3% to the electricity bill.

But what goes for subsidies should also go for free markets:

As I recall, unsubsidized, free market natural gas has increased retail electricity rates in California by 3% (or more) on multiple occasions.

World Oil consumption is 30 billion barrels per year. A mere increase of $10/barrel would cost the world an extra $7 trillion over 25 years--100 times more than the world's largest "solar subsidy" program. Surely we have seen such higher cost of oil many times.

Far greater increases in costs of oil, natural gas and coal get a free pass, while "consumer advocates" and "business advocates" bring the boom down on renewables that reduce pollution and protect the climate.

That is the real "scandal".
Comment
5 of 22
January 22, 2010
I think there are a few crooks in Germany just like in the good old U.S.A.
If the 3 gigawatt PV installations were sudsidized, the German utility should not increase rates, since their tax payers already paid the subsidy, their rates should actually go down.

Maybe a few payment holidays are in order for Germany's tax payers.
Comment
6 of 22
January 22, 2010
Bundesnetzagentur recently published their October update for 2009. Added together with the previous numbers (in high detail, kWp per installation, postal code, day of enscription in BNA database) I have summarized the following staggering numbers. With, mind you, the busiest months November and December yet to be published...

Total accumulation 2009: 1849 MWp Jan. up till Oct., 95498 new installations. Average system size: 20.3 kWp...

http://www.polderpv.nl/PV_weltmeister_2009_prequel.htm

Many other data, split into "Bundesland" numbers, graphs (with English captions), etc. on that web page in which I also included the most recent production numbers for kWh produced by different sustainable technologies under the effective EEG Law (data from BDEW, worked out graphically by me). PV must "come from far". Bavaria already had 2.38% of its electricity mix in solar, and that was only in 2008:

http://www.polderpv.nl/PV_weltmeister_2008.htm

Net managers in Bavaria and some other regions were "stretched to the limit" in 2009, as a Photon account (December 2009) revealed. So, much more is already on the net, and impact on the electricity mix will be even larger. With extra artificial help of the dramatic cut in consumption, accounted to 5% less in 2009 in Germany. The only "troubling" effect of that is that the EEG Umlage (the "bonus" that must be paid for ALL renewable electricity feed-in, decreasing in impact for wind >> biomass >> solar >> hydro etc.) has risen from 1.1 eurocent/kWh up till an estimated app. 2.2 eurocent/kWh. The biggest price drivers however remain the production and distribution of fossil power in Germany. EEG "bonus" is still a small component. Consumers hardly will note the difference, as they already pay a "strong socket price" with all taxes and distribution costs included. It is the great electricity consumers that pay an absurd low price for the product, that have started a row to get rid of the extra 2.2 cents...
Comment
7 of 22
January 22, 2010
The 20.3 average by the way is for October only (new installations, 387 MWp) Taken all PV-systems from Jan. up till Oct. 2009 together (that is installations far below 1 kWp up till MWp parks such as 53 MWp Lieberose that was included in several parts in the BNA database), the average is 19.4 kWp/installation.
Comment
8 of 22
January 22, 2010
Finally, one also has to realize that there has been criticism concerning the reliability of the Bundesnetzagentur data. The German magazine Solarthemen complained about installations counted twice in the database. Photon found the same but also found that various large installations they knew of that were already connected to the grid could not be found in the BNA database, even months later. Not only on basis of that finding, but also due to the fact that inverter producers sold excessive capacity, and the fact that net managers reported huge growth volumes for applications (Bavaria netmanager E.ON reported up till 200-250 applications a day), Photon concluded that even this government-based database could in fact register less than was actually realized.

So the final outcome for 2009 still is misty. That the total capacity realized in 2009 in Germany will shatter the Spain 2008 boom seems, however, more than certain.
Comment
9 of 22
January 22, 2010
Excellent article and comments. I am particularly pleased to see that Germany continues to stay in the front league of RE progressive countries. The yearly days long cut-off of Russian natural gas feeds passing through Ukraine on their way to Germany and many other E.U. countries, is the best motivator to keep investing in local decentralized energy production, even if it cost a few % more than just continue importing fossil fuel resources.
Comment
10 of 22
Firstly, thanks again to Germany for pioneering a DEMOCRATIC model of energy production and payments. It's so refreshing to see a nation that doesn't sell out ratepayers and taxpayers for Chevron!

Secondly, they experimented with half a dozen levels of FIT before they had even nominal success. Although the successful rate seems high, the costs are negligible compared to the huge spikes (with no benefits) we have seen here in natural gas.

Thirdly, the cost of installing a system has not dropped 40%, only the cost of panels, temporarily. The big expense - labor - is still what it was, and what it will remain. Here in the US, installers are paid $16 - $32/hour plus benefits. THAT carries a societal cost, but we can all agree that having our nation's workforce gainfully employed is worth it.

So, the vast majority of the "expense" of Germany's PV is going towards it's residents (homeowners, local manufacturers and installers), whereas here, it will all go to Chevron, BP, Goldman Sachs and the other Big Solar mercenaries (which will, per usual, externalize all their costs and privatize all their profits), so we will have a net loss of CO2 storing wilderness, water AND money, with very few jobs. Society will be WORSE off and will pay more.

The entire US has higher insolation than Germany, so our prospects (Big Energy adoration aside) are much brighter for affordable uptake. But we need to vastly increase our "net metering"programs and only pay FIT for excess power, not for all power. This will prevent huge new transmission and power plant costs and create a nearly no-cost conversion that is also democratic. Ratepayer generators receive modest ROI on production (especially if they conserve), non-ratepaying generators pay only the incremental difference between resale price of FIT-bought power and the FIT (nominal), plus save on "infrastructure" costs.

The only loser is the utilities' fixed profits on building and future gouging for "renewables." So what?
Comment
11 of 22
January 22, 2010
@daniel-simon-33441

All tariffs are, of course, in the EEG 2009 Novelle text ("Feed-in Tariffs are Law", hence making "sudden adjustments" by bureaucrats, such as happens to be the case in my own country the Netherlands, virtually impossible). You can find the EEG Novelle 2009 here, avalaible in English translation:
http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/inhalt/42934/

I summarised all tariffs since EEG Novelle 2004 in a table, with the new adjustments dictated under the EEG Novelle 2009 (as of Jan. 1 2009), and the most recent adjustments (based on the market corridor requirements fixed in that Novelle) already made by Bundesnetzagentur for tariffs valid as of Jan. 1 2010, in this pdf: http://www.bundesnetzagentur.de/media/archive/17479.pdf ):
http://www.polderpv.nl/teruglevering_EEG.htm#tabel_EEG_2009-2010

(in red the new tariffs following from the EEG Novelle 2009 conditions)


Detailed explanation by BMU (environmental ministry in Germany) of the 20. Januar press conference proposals to seriously increase degression (hence: decrease Feed-In tariffs), you can find here in German:
http://www.bmu.de/erneuerbare/energien/doc/45543.php

Note that Bloomberg already reported that CDU (Angela Merkel's party) partner CSU is trying to dampen the haste for new proposals, probably to get some air for huge MWp parks planned by German cell and/or module makers like Q-Cells (which has taken quite a beating the previous year):
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601100&sid=aB9S5mdEbKOA

Several informative, English publications on the EEG succes: with highly interesting graphs explaining details:
http://www.erneuerbare-energien.de/inhalt/42456/
Comment
12 of 22
January 25, 2010
If only 1% of the of the power actually comes from PV, it's practically impossible they have any impact on it: the average price is just plainly uninfluenced. For example, 1% * 43 cents + 99% * 10 cents = 10.33 cents.
Comment
13 of 22
January 25, 2010
Thank you Peter-Segaar.
That price "history" table with the red numbers is quite helpful.

I had already seen the BMU (german environmental ministry) document, although that seemed to indicate that 2010 volumes would drive 2011 decreases. Now all the reports I have seen in recent days reflect a "2011 decrease" starting in Apr/July 2010.
Comment
14 of 22
January 25, 2010
The German FIT system is brilliant
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2009/09/german-fit-system-brilliant.html

Could this be why the uptake is not everything one could wish for.
wlhgmk@gmail.com
Comment
15 of 22
January 26, 2010
@daniel-simon

We'll have to see what the Bundestag (German parliament) will have to say, when the tariff cuts will become law, how high these cuts (still: proposals) will turn out to be, what the world market will do, how the U.S.A. market will develop, and numerous other markets. The modules will be produced, and they will get sold (at whatever price, better not too low for the industry). If not, there will be "a serious problem".

Things are going now as we see them in everyday press. Influencing the rate at which changes will be implemented in the German world market will be difficult and mired in several political interests. Pray that it is and will not become a dramatic market cap. We have seen to what kind of disaster that has led in Spain.

We're still looking at almost 10 years of unprecedented success in Germany. Never forget that, and Hermann Scheer, Hans-Josef Fell and several others may be forever applauded for that tour de frappe (phrase used at a somewhat different level as the French meant it to be... ;-) ).
Comment
16 of 22
January 26, 2010
to robert-freehling-46753's point ... not only do the worst critics only alledge that FiT's may add 3% to the cost for consumers, don't forget about the businesses and jobs created by the burgeoning solar industry! FiT's reverberate thru the economy by creating jobs, tax revenue, far > 3% energy $$ savings, etc.
Comment
17 of 22
January 27, 2010
@davosil

Some very dark-minded people in Germany (and the Netherlands) claim that these are only "minor, low-tech" jobs, and that at the same time "workforce in the conventional energy is being destroyed".

You and I (probably) know that it is a big lie, that installers, if well-trained and in healthy market conditiions provide for quality labour (the largest portion of all solar markets), and that the technical staff at the silicium-, cell-, module-, and BOS producers are working in a very demanding, high-tech environment. That "destruction" of workforce in the conventional industries (a) remains to be seen in times that energy prices are again sinking "in a highly competitive energy market" (electricity rates in the Netherlands have sunken this half year). If "true", (b) if that should be considered as a "problem" when one considers the "clean" jobs created in the sector that will ultimately replace the conventional energy providing business (will take some years, that is not the issue of course). There is also something like reschooling and training programs for coal-plant workers to get a probably much more interesting, and future oriented job for which public respect and support should be given...
Comment
18 of 22
January 27, 2010
@william-hughes-66196 "Could this be why the uptake is not everything one could wish for."

Actually the uptake has been so overwhelmingly strong they are having to lower the price offered. Did you not know this?

disdaniel
Comment
19 of 22
February 2, 2010
I just heard on the radio that the UK is improving incentives for individuals to install renewables. This should improve confidence because it indicates that more than one band of experts thinks it worthwhile.

However, it still isn't easy for an ordinary consumer to get answers to simple questions, like what are the risks (variable FIT...) in taking on an investment that won't pay back before (on average) the house is sold.

I'd also like some basic information such as what is the the real (non subsidised) cost advantage of an embedded electricity source (that is, one that does not increase demand for transmission and distribution facilities).

Finally, various commentators remark that we are still in the 1-5% range with respect to total electricity production. Shouldn't we be working on something else, such as a high technology push to get gas-fired cogeneration into individual dwellings?
Comment
20 of 22
February 2, 2010
@ christopher lee 166032

"However, it still isn't easy for an ordinary consumer to get answers to simple questions, like what are the risks (variable FIT...) in taking on an investment that won't pay back before (on average) the house is sold."

Chris, I am now in the process to inquire for prices to install PV panels on my home roof. I live in Belgium. I can get 350 Euro per produced 1000 kWh for 20 years in government subsidy, paid for by FF generated electricity users being taxed 1.5 cent per their consumed kWh.

I now pay 200 Euro per year to get 1300 kWh in green electricity being supplied by my 100% RE sourced utility called Ecopower (google it).

From what I am receiving in quotes, if I install a 1250 kWh energy generation per year installation, the payback will be 11 years, which is calculated by investment sum divided by 630 Euro per year in earnings and consumption savings, calculated from :
1) € 350 / 1000 kWh earnings x1250 kWh/year produced
2) € 200 x1250 / 1300 kWh in utility consumption savings

Given that I earn € 350 x1.25 in PV-production earnings for the next 20 years, I will make a more than 80% in profit over 20 years on this investment, giving me a net profit return of 4 % per year. I could also get an supplementary government tax reduction up to a max. of € 3600 on this investment, but it seems that it will be canceled soon, given that the FIT earnings are enough to cover the investment.

If I live in my house longer than 11 years, the return increases dramatically, since the PV panels will be paid off after 11 year, I continue to earn € 350 X 1.25 for 9 years, and continue to earn € 200 x1.25 / 1.3 for the rest of my life in utility bill savings (utility rates that are raising regularly, being linked to country inflation rates).

PV panels are guaranteed 25 years, but the cells themselves can continue to work 40 years with 80% of their original efficiency. So putting some cash into that is a sound investment.
Comment
21 of 22
February 5, 2010
New astonishing numbers by Bundesnetzagentur have been published for November 2009. New installation capacity for that month only:

497 MWp new, total for Jan. up till Nov. 2009: 2.345 MWp
22.166 new installations, total for Jan. up till Nov. 2009: almost 118.000 new PV owners...

Extensive report with English captions, various figures made from data in the BNA spreadsheet, and some interactive graphs on this webpage:

http://www.polderpv.nl/PV_weltmeister_2009_prequel.htm

enjoy, enjoy...

... even if one realizes that the struggle for extensive feed-in tariff cuts is leading to extensive political turmoil in Germany (even FDP and CSU partners of CDU starting to question the speed and the extent of the changes planned by the BMU department). It is time to spread the risks: many more countries should adopt the most democratic renewable electricity option based on the German success model.
Comment
22 of 22
February 24, 2010
German coalition published their plans for the EEG (solar incentives) yesterday. As expected harsh cuts in tariffs. How "harsh" will have to be seen in practice, closely related to the actual pricing of modules, BOS, and inverters. Parliament will have their say on this, of course. July 1, 2010 would have to become the starting point. Mind you: for NEW installations only, as of that day.

Details with adjusted table (on basis of the proposals) and graph with feed-in tariff development with the new findings on my site (captions and explanations in English):

http://www.polderpv.nl/nieuws_PV55.htm#24feb2010_EEG_voorstel_BRD_2010_II_bekend
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

John Blau

View John Blau's Profile
About: I'm based in Germany where I have accumulated more than 25 years of experience as a journalist focused on business, economics, technology and the environment. I... more »

Advertise With Us

Mannvit KACO new energy, Inc. Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group DNV SMA America, LLC Cantsink Manufacturing SunMaxx Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters