Photo Credit: RenewableEnergyWorld.com
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (5) View image gallery Image Gallery (2) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
November 13, 2009

Thin-film's Share of Solar Panel Market to Double by 2013

California, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Thin-film solar cells are rapidly taking market share away from the established crystalline technology, with their portion of Photovoltaic (PV) wattage more than doubling by 2013, according to iSuppli Corp. Thin-film will grow to account for 31 percent of the global solar panel market in terms of watts by 2013, up from 14 percent in 2008.

“The market viability of thin-film has been solidly established by First Solar Inc. as it rockets to become the world’s top solar panel maker this year, with more than a gigawatt of production,” said Greg Sheppard, chief research officer for iSuppli. “At the same time, the company has driven its cost of production to less than 90 cents per watt, keeping its costs at approximately half the level of crystalline module producers.”

Most solar panels are made of crystalline wafers with 180 to 230 microns of polysilicon. In contrast, thin-film panels are made by depositing multiple layers of other materials a few micrometers in thickness on a substrate.

The main tradeoff between the two technologies is efficiency versus cost per watt of electricity generation. Thin-film panels are less efficient at converting sunlight to electricity, but they also cost significantly less to make.

At the same time thin-film is at a disadvantage when installation space is limited, such as on a residential rooftop. A thin-film installation can take 15 percent to 40 percent more space to achieve the same total system wattage output as crystalline. This tends to limit its appeal in certain applications.

The average thin-film solar panel price is expected to decline to US $1.40 in 2010, down 17.6 percent from $1.70 in 2009. Average prices for crystalline panels are expected to drop to $2.00 in 2010, down 20 percent from $2.50 this year. Through 2012, crystalline prices will continue to close the thin-film pricing gap to some degree because its purveyors collectively have deeper pockets and keep pouring on capital spending, technology R&D developments and manufacturing refinements, iSuppli expects.

Another accelerator of thin-film technology is the rising availability of turn-key production lines from companies such as Applied Materials, Oerlikon, and Centrotherm.

To read more about the report, click here.

Image Gallery (2)
 
Reader Comments (5)
 
No image available
Anonymous
November 13, 2009
Wow, a thin film solar panel for $1.70? I'll take a thousand of them. What's the rated watts of each panel, 200W?
Comment 1 of 5
No image available
Anonymous
November 18, 2009
I'll take TWO thousand of them and pay 1.75 per watt!

O.K. Just kidding

I insTall these all of the time. The panels are between 70 and 75 watts each and roughly 2 ft by 4 ft in size. There is more labor involved in installing them but because of their smaller size, you can often utilize more of the roof space on an odd shaped roof such as a triangle or trapezoid. Also, Their is no metal frame and thus, no lip on the edges of the panel to collect dirt i.e. the condensation from every morning can drip off much better. Traditional framed modules with a tilt angle of 5 to 10 degrees or less, result in dirt build up and often wind up covering the edges of the cells. I've seen it first hand numerous times.
I enjoy working with these modules and the price is right too!
Comment 2 of 5
No image available
Anonymous
November 19, 2009
Sorry if I misunderstood your points...what prompts the growth of thin-film when the price gap is closing, but the efficiency gap isn't?
Comment 3 of 5
No image available
Anonymous
November 19, 2009

Comment 4 of 5
No image available
Anonymous
November 20, 2009
I don't necessarily agree with the author. It is my opinion that the price of thin film will continue to drop and thus continuously keep a price gap. Economies of scale. Understand that most of these "thin film factories" consist of robots that are capable of running 24/7, don't require benefits, and don't complain! BTW my comment earlier was regarding First Solar Modules. Soon, enter the Applied Materials "Solar Cell Factory". A surplus of thin film modules entering the market is inevitable. Unless the thin film industry develops its own form of OPEC and conspires to manipulate the market, mankind's natural greed will eventually create an oversupply of thin film. Last night when we were sleeping, another Megawatt of thin film was produced by robotic arms. I'll bet money that the price of thin film will be less than $1.00 per watt by 2011.
Comment 5 of 5
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Johnson Controls, Inc. Interstate Renewable Energy Council Solar Power International 2009 Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition BP Solar PennEnergy
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo