Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (4) View image gallery Image Gallery (2) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
November 2, 2009

The Deal: Loan Guarantees for Beacon Power and Nordic Windpower

Two companies recently received conditional loan guarantees through funds from the Energy Policy Act of 2005.
by Sharryn Harvey, Power Engineering magazine

Beacon Power will use the $43 million it received to develop a 20 MW regulation plant at a site in New York. Nordic Windpower, USA will use its $16 million loan guarantee to build two-bladed, utility-scale wind turbines.

"They asked what would happen if we had to decommission, things that seem 20 years into the future."

-- Gene Hunt, Spokesperson, Beacon Power

But while these companies are waiting to get their money from the government, others are wondering if it’s even worth trying to apply for the loans or any kind of funding for that matter. So what does it take to come out on top of the money race through the Department of Energy? Each company had a different start but came out the same at the finish line.

Beacon is using the money to develop a 20 MW regulation plant at a site in Stephenton, NY. The site will use several 1 MW flywheels to store energy as well as electrical and technological equipment.

Company spokesman Gene Hunt said Beacon didn’t have financial advisors per se, just its outside law firm of Edwards, Angell, Palmer & Dodge. “We also used our in-house expertise and we have good relationships with our congressional members.”

The loan would be funded by the U.S. Treasury’s Federal Financing Bank and is expected to provide debt financing for 62.5 percent of the estimated $69 million total project cost. Around $50 million of this is direct equipment and facility costs. Beacon’s equity contribution of roughly $26 million will be provided by a combination of cash, in-kind assets and other eligible project costs. The company is currently exploring funding options to cover its equity contribution.

In mid-September, Beacon received word from NASDAQ that it was out of compliance with the exchange’s minimum trading-price of $1 per share. Beacon Power closed at 72 cents a share the day NASDAQ sent its notice. Beacon said it believes it meets applicable standards, other than the minimum bid price requirement.

Hunt advises other companies pursuing similar funding to be prepared to answer the government’s questions about anything and everything.

“They asked what would happen if we had to decommission, things that seem 20 years into the future,” Hunt said. “They are very thorough and have high expectations.”

Beacon is looking to work on other projects where government backing is available. “Vice President Biden said there would be $4 billion for smart grid projects grants, $615 million of that for energy storage,” Hunt said. “We intend to apply for that as well.”

Nordic Windpower CEO Thomas Carbone, said his company was part of a round of applications accepted in late February and started getting feedback from the government within the week.

“They asked us questions about the environmental part of the application and we took the process very seriously,” Carbone said. “We just wanted to answer each question properly and keep the process moving.”

Nordic is a privately held company. In late March, the company closed additional funding in the form of convertible notes. Goldman Sachs and Impax Asset Management participated in the funding along with new investors I2BF Venture Capital & Pulsar Energy Capital.

The investment enables Nordic to fulfill the first orders for its N1000 1 MW wind turbines. The federal loan guarantee also will go toward commercializing and building the wind turbines, which were expected to be shipped sometime in September, Carbone said. The turbines feature a damped teeter hub to distribute fatigue loads and lessen the need for maintenance. The loan will pay for the buying and selling of the turbine parts, equipment and tooling and technology development.

Carbone advises other firms that may be thinking about applying to seek the help of an outside firm who knows the process. Nordic went through World Business Capital — a financial institution based in Hartford, CT that specializes in loans for renewable energy projects — to help with their application.

The outside advisers knew what was required, how to present the information and what the government will look for, Carbone said. “That support was invaluable. It pays to reach out.”

But if it’s not in the cards to hire an outside firm, Carbone said do your research and learn as much as you can.

So what’s on the horizon for Nordic? “We’re participating with several universities in grant writing for innovative projects around improving service and maintenance costs of wind turbines,” Carbone said. “We’re also looking into near-offshore wind power on the Great Lakes.”

Both companies said the government requires them to have equity on hand as well as to follow a list of guidelines after they get their money. Both said they were still waiting to sit down and discuss terms with the government.

No matter if it’s a loan guarantee or stimulus funding, both companies agree that patience is key in terms of getting financial help from the government.

“You’re getting a loan whether it’s through a bank or the Department of Energy,” Carbone said. “There’s due diligence.”

Sharryn Harvey is online editor at Power Engineering magazine.

Image Gallery (2)
 
Reader Comments (4)
 
No image available
November 3, 2009
Hello from NE Wisconsin:

I wonder why the State of New York is interested is interested in energy storage? Perhaps, the transmission capacity is not present; if this is the case, then the excess energy could be stored for later use.

I am not keeping track of all the states that have a renewable portfolio standard. If New York is one of them, then, transmission capacity will have to be added (eventually to cope with all the wind generated power from wind farms from throughout the state.)

Seriously, why have fly-wheel based energy storage? I can see it if New York was a large island like Hawaii.

Douglas Johnson
Comment 1 of 4
No image available
November 3, 2009
Douglas, these flywheels are not used for long term storage such as hours or days, but very transient storage like 1-15 minutes. They prop up the voltage (technically the frequency) of the grid when big demand spikes hit. If the spike is short, then the flywheels are all that is needed. If it is a longer spike, then additional generation will come on line, like gas turbines. Currently, this is done using "spinning reserves" which are gas or coal generators that are running at below peak output and can ramp up and down to handle these spikes. The trouble with these are that it is very inefficient (ie expensive) to keep a whole plant generator running just to supply a few possible spikes. These flywheels help smooth out the demand spikes on the grid, and give operators more time to bring another generator up from a cold start. The term for this is "frequency regulation", and is gradually becoming a separate billable service provided on the grid.
Comment 2 of 4
No image available
November 4, 2009
The simplest way to think of Beacon is that it's flywheel plants are shock absorbers for the grid -- absorbing or injecting energy instantaneously as needed moment to moment to keep the power stable.No more flicker or the worse damage that adds up to billions each year. Generators or "spinning reserves" today don't come close doing the job well. The transient has usually done its harm before they can ramp up, and they can't absorb energy anyway.
Comment 3 of 4
No image available
November 6, 2009
Hello from NE Wisconsin:

After I submitted my thoughts on this article about why there was a need for a flywheel for energy storage, I learned from others what flywheel storage was all about. The answer bothered me because no where else in the country has there been talk about energy storage for their wind farms. I learned the other day that when a cloud passes by a solar farm, that there are energy spikes too; but, you don't read about energy storage to level off the spikes in that scenerio either. The only place that is using flywheel storage (unless I am wrong) is in New York.

Well, there is more to the story: I read in "Clean Energy Magazine" the May/June edition, from the article, Earth, Wind and Fire, that there was a plan to establish a 190 mile transmission line from up-state New York to the New York City suburbs that was curtailed because of opposition. So, somebody lost $20 million dollars and large wind development was put on a back burner.

In this article, a wind farm of 20 MW is far from being large. I would still think that the electrons from this generating plant will more likely be used locally.

Doug Johnson
Comment 4 of 4
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
National Hydropower Association Financial Research Associates, LLC Third Sun Solar and Wind Power, Ltd. GreenBeat Comdel SANYO Energy (USA) Corp.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo