Photo Credit: Gamesa
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (8) View image gallery Image Gallery (4) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
2 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
November 23, 2009

Gamesa's New 4.5-MW Wind Market Entry

Alava, Spain [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Late in 2008 Spainish-based Gamesa put up a prototype of a medium-speed 4.5-MW wind turbine at Cabezo Negro, an R&D wind farm in the Saragossa region of Spain. Among its many innovative concepts, the main design features are segmented composite Gamesa-designed INNOBLADE rotor blades, a record 128-meter rotor size and a 250-tonne Top Head Mass (THM).

Gamesa’s key technical and marketing experts recently spoke with RenewableEnergyWorld.com about product development of the 4.5-MW turbine, major challenges and achievements and how the company plans to win new markets and increase market share.

Gamesa G10X-4.5MW is the result of a major multiyear in-house development effort, which involved more than 150 Gamesa engineers and other experts working in close cooperation with external specialists and research organizations.

If you look at the company’s product development history, it becomes obvious that this new turbine represents a huge leap forward in both rated capacity and rotor size.  Gamesa’s current turbine is its 2-MW G8X-2.0MW, which has been commercially available since 2002. The G8X-2.0MW features a conventional fast-speed drive system including a multi-stage gearbox and a double-fed generator and various rotor diameters that range from 80 - 90 meters.

Reliability and Logistics

In developing the Gamesa G10X-4.5MW, the company wanted maximum drive system reliability and the ability to use the same type of transportation and erection equipment that the smaller Gamesa G8X-2.0MW series uses.

With regard to reliability, the company zeroed in on the medium-speed drive system after performing extensive multiyear drivetrain studies and development process studies that looked at many solutions. When conducting the study, the company analyzed everything from direct drive (no gearbox) solutions, to medium-speed and conventional high-speed geared solutions. In addition to striving for maximum reliability, developers also wanted system flexibility and stability, with the goal of setting new standards for Life Cycle Costs (LCC) performance, according to Gamesa CTO Jose Antonio Malumbres and others (see note below).

According to Malumbres, the company feels that the limitations associated with main direct-drive systems, "include complex and costly transport and erection logistics due to annular generator size and weight."  He said that, "by choosing for a medium-speed drive system we were able to overcome size and weight issues linked to direct drive. Simultaneously a medium-speed drive system eliminates the trouble-prone high-speed gear stage, which is integral part of three-stage gearboxes applied in conventional geared wind turbines."

He said that by eliminating the high-speed gear stage "as a reliability enhancing measure, it proved not necessary to compromise on overall systems flexibility.”

Compact Drive

The Gamesa G10X-4.5MW CompacTrain drivetrain is comprised of a main shaft with two main bearings and a two-stage planetary-type gearbox with 1 to 37 speed-up ratio together built as a single module. Gamesa, like some of its competitors (i.e. GE and Vestas) that have also introduced new products, made a switch away from a double-fed generator to a permanent magnet (PM) type synchronous generator.

Malumbres said, “PM generators offer multiple advantages including greater compactness, slip-rings elimination, superior partial-load efficiency, and easier compliance with stringent future grid codes. Being a full converter technology it also offers greater project developer application flexibility at combined 50Hz and 60Hz wind markets.”

The generator itself is flanged directly to the gearbox and — as a self-aligning solution — virtually eliminates misalignment risks. The complete drive system is also easy to remove if it becomes necessary to split it into separate main components, he said.

The full converter system consists of modular units located in the nacelle rear and is subdivided into two levels. A medium-voltage transformer is also fitted in the nacelle rear and behind the converter, whereas a liquid-cooling system for converter, generator and gearbox is put above the converter. (See main image, top of page.)

Cyclic Rotor Blade Pitching

“A main contributing factor to explain the favorable THM (nacelle + rotor) is the combination of an advanced MultiSmart turbine control system and the application of load reducing cyclic rotor blade pitch technology. The latter continuously monitors blade root loads and adjusts the blade angle accordingly during each rotor revolution,” said Malumbres.

He explained, “as our highest priority was to commence soonest with controller testing and optimizing, we decided to initially fit the prototype with a smaller provisional 107-metre rotor based upon conventional single piece blades.” The segmented rotor blades that are going to be fitted on the prototype consist of glass fiber reinforced epoxy composite inner and outer sections joined by a single bolted joint. Malumbres explained that, “Eliminating any risk of a potential stiffness interruption occurring in the joining surface cross section thereby represented a major challenge for our rotor blade designers and required extensive research efforts.”

As far as transportation and erection logistics are concerned, a major advantage, said the company, is that individual blade section lengths are less than 35m. Secondly, similar to the 2-MW erection process again (only) a standard 800- to 1000-tonne crane is required depending on hub height, said Malumbres. 

He also explained that “due to the modular concept with easily removable drivetrain and other main components, such a relatively inexpensive crane will be employed to hoist an ‘empty’ nacelle on top of a matching tower.”

FlexiFit Nacelle Mounted Crane

After each job is completed the crane can then move to the next turbine erection location so that a newly developed Gamesa FlexiFit nacelle mounted crane system can take over and hoist in all the main components. The latter crane is a ground assembled self-mounting system capable of either hoisting-in or exchanging-out a complete drive system.

Malumbres is convinced that the FlexiFit solution will be a key contributor towards substantially lowering installation costs and lead to more Gamesa G10X-4.5MW installations in the field.

The company said that it plans to introduce a second prototype next year in close vicinity to the first unit. The next two prototypes — 3 & 4 — are planned for Q2-2011, perhaps 60Hz versions in the U.S., and are to be followed by another twenty pre-series turbines until the end of the year.

The company plans to start series production in 2012 with the U.S., Canada, Spain, Italy, Germany, France and China pinpointed at as likely main markets.

“We have already received lots of interest in the G10x-4.5MW from potential clients in many countries,” said Malumbres confidently.

(Author's note: G10X-4.5MW Chief Engineer Rafael Hernández and Marketing Manager Juan Diego Díaz also participated in the interview. Some of the quotes below came from them.)

Image Gallery (4)
 
Reader Comments (8)
 
No image available
Anonymous
November 25, 2009
What about noise?
Comment 1 of 8
November 25, 2009
Excellent description. How many of such wind turbines would be needed to supply the entire base load electricity demand for North America and Europe?

JPChance.wordpress.com
Comment 2 of 8
No image available
November 25, 2009
Who cares, it's beautiful.
Comment 3 of 8
No image available
November 29, 2009
Awesome! Now people need to engineer a cheaper storage concept, perhaps based on LiFePO4 battery tech to be mass produced.
Comment 4 of 8
No image available
November 29, 2009
" When conducting the study, the company analyzed everything from direct drive (no gearbox) solutions, to medium-speed and conventional high-speed geared solutions."

I am wondering if internal blade technology might be improved to help control the speed of rotation. This might possibly be accomplished by a shifting of a heavy liquid in the blades themselves from where the blades are attached towards the ends of the blades during the time wind velocity increased and then the liquid could be restored towards the center as the wind velocity decreased. It would be similar to spinning on a chair and moving the hands outward (slowing down rotation) or bringing them inward (speeding up rotation) according to the law of conservation of angular momentum. The effect would basically be to keep the blades moving at a fairly steady rpm during wind fluctuations but I do not know if the production of energy from this method would be economical as the design of the internal structure of the blades would certainly increase their cost of production and perhaps maintenence. There would probably have to be a computerized flow control system to insure that the individual blades were matched and balanced with respect to each other at all times.

adrianakau2aol..com
Comment 5 of 8
No image available
December 1, 2009
H.A.W.T technology relies on the energy capture capacity of (simply put) a "Propeller". Which happens to have an efficiency ratio of; 33%. Should you wish to validate; go to any aeronautical web-site. Furthermore; the "Gyratory" loading variable, is most notable. Notwithstanding; the enormous stress variable to the orbital axiom.

The longevity factor, and maintenance, of this particular unit, does not warrant the confidence of any potential purchaser.

G.R. Palmer, P. Eng (Aero.)., BA Sc., M.E.T.

glenn-palmer@bmts.com
Comment 6 of 8
No image available
December 1, 2009
Yes what are the noise specs?

"I am here to serve."
The Window Man
Comment 7 of 8
No image available
Anonymous
December 13, 2009
Noise levels will have to decrease to meet necessary setbacks in various states. As the turbines get bigger so do setbacks. Bigger and better is not a problem if you go offshore or have transmission that allows companies to develop projects in the middle of nowhere. The limit for onshore turbines will not be size of generator but size of the setbacks.
Comment 8 of 8
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
All Energy EC Harris LLP ORMAZABAL Bella Energy High Sun Engineering EnerWorks Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo