Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Electric Vehicles, Infrastructure Power 2009 "Beyond Oil" Conference

By Keith Arterburn, INL Communications & Governmental Affairs
November 24, 2009   |   5 Comments

Do you like this research & reports?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Over the past few years, INL has built partnerships in the Pacific Northwest to support its DOE customer and continues today to serve as a key regional asset in providing clean energy solutions."

-- Mike Hagood, INL's program development manager.
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
November 25, 2009
We have a hi efficiency, low cost multifuel engine, which in an aerodynamic car, slices the fuel comsumption considerably, e.g., 150 MPG, maybe 100MPG in retrofits, in heavy trucks, 6.5MPG to 9.0. Do not need to change infrastructure, Biofuels, e.g.,biomethane then become practical. This approach will severe our dependence on oil. However, it will render autos a commodity which is why I am pushback. Fuel is still 100X the energy of batteries per pound. Once you improve the Carnot efficiency of heat engines, then use of batteries, and fuel cells becomes an much less important decision. However, making sur that user get benefit, at greatly reduced car prices etc., is the key. Not expensive newer tech will have its own set of problmes JR Sannerwind@gmail.com
Comment
2 of 5
November 27, 2009
plugin vehicles are great. We don't need a power infrastructure since many can just plug into a regular 120 V outlet. If we charge off peak at night no new power plants or energy fuels are needed since there is excess at night.

The new advanced battery vehicles can go 100-300 miles on a charge. If you need go a little farther you could use a plugin hybrid. If it's a long trip normall people would take a bus, train or airplane to save time.
Comment
3 of 5
November 27, 2009
Fiat Siena Tetrafuel can run on four fuel types:

http://green.autoblog.com/2007/08/28/fiat-siena-tetrafuel-can-run-on-four-fuel-types/

The Fiat Siena can run on petroleum, or it can run completely petroleum free. It needs no complicated and expensive batteries or electronics, costs about the same as conventional vehicles, is being manufactured, on sale and in use now. It needs no recharging, can be refueled with natural gas from home, and can use either petroleum or ethanol mix if natural gas is not available. Running on hydrous ethanol(straight from the still, no blending required) and natural gas means no starting problems in cold weather(start up and run the engine until it is warm with natural gas, then switch to liquid fuel if necessary)----with no need for petroleum gasoline at all, ever. Natural gas (with a comparative octane rating of ~120) is also ideally suited to use in diesel bi-fuel engines.

Methane(natural gas, CH4) can easily be produced from sewage, landfills, or any other source of organic biomass. Fossil methane and biomethane can be mixed in any proportion with no loss of performance. Chemically, it is the same stuff.

Honda began production of the Honda Civic GX natural gas powered vehicle in its Indiana plant in May.

It costs about 1/2 or less to power a vehicle with natural gas than it does with petroleum.
Comment
4 of 5
November 29, 2009
we've been helping many people evaluate weather its a good idea to install coulomb technologies electric vehicle charging stations on their property to offer their customers or employees the chance to charge up their electric vehicles.

Next year, Detroit is going to release more electric vehicles than ever. The electric vehicle charging infrastructure needs to be built to make these vehicles practical. To reduce the problem of on-peak EV charging, the coulomb technologies ev charging station can be combined with a grid tie "solar structure" that can help offset the charge required by the EV.

To help our economy transition to EVs we must not only deploy the charging stations but also micro-generate solar power in every place possible to provide the electricity supply that is going to be needed as electric transportation becomes more popular.

To address the problem EV chargers will have an effect on the electric grid we have created the GoGreen 1.2kW Solar Electric Vehicle Charging Station, which combines an coulomb technologies CT1000 with a 1.2kW solar array.

I think 2010 is going to be an explosive year for the electric vehicle industry, wouldn't you agree?
Comment
5 of 5
December 9, 2009
The Tesla is advertised as having a 200 mile range, and the batteries hold a 56 kWh charge. A 1.2 kW solar array at full capacity would take 47 hours to produce 56 kWh of charge, assuming 12 hours of sunlight per day, it would take 4 days to be able to drive 200 miles.

Not impressive performance for a car that costs over $100,000.

A wood burning steam locomotive going at 20 miles an hour would get you there over 3 1/2 days sooner.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Endurance Wind Power Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group 350 Media Interstate Renewable Energy Council BBI International EnPower Systems Inc. Unirac, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters