Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Ontario FIT Program Off to a Cautious Start

October 12, 2009   |   13 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
October 13, 2009
Jon, this appears to be a great program that has shot itself in the foot with the domestic content requirement. As you noted, it's a bit too early (and complicated) to require this in the early years of solar in Canada. Similarly, in American, we also need roadblocks such as net metering caps and hoops to also be lowered until 2016 when the Fed ITC expires and the industry is well on its feet. Thanks for this great analysis.
Comment
2 of 13
October 13, 2009
Thanks for your comment Tor. I agree with your comments about the need for both Canadian, American and other regulators to work hard to remove "inconveniences" that might hinder the solar market from reaching the masses. The solar industry needs scale and the bigger we can make the market, the more viable solar technology will become.

/Jon
Comment
3 of 13
October 14, 2009
Interesting,

One can understand the reasoning behind the domestic content, but they should have phased that in over time to allow the concept to take hold first. This has always been the problem and why it has taken decades to even talk about the FIT in NA. To think such a logical concept was created so long ago and we are only now seeing serious discussions in U.S., never mind CAN taking the lead. Better to have a FIT rather than none, so I call this progress even with anchor of domestic content.

Nano-Electric.com
Comment
4 of 13
October 14, 2009
I appreciate your comment Mike. Most of the local industry players I have spoken to agree with your statement that it is progress just to have a FIT, but many have argued, like you, that it would make sense to factor in a ramp up time to allow a market to develop.
Comment
5 of 13
October 14, 2009
Surprise, surprise! If the utility monopolies and their pols hadn't thought of a domestic content requirement to sabotage feed-in tariffs, I'm sure they would have used something else. They always do in North America.
No image available
Comment
6 of 13
Anonymous
October 14, 2009
The domestic content rules that were written behind closed doors, at the last minute, were written to advantage a select few companies.
If I were to list them, this post will be removed as have other posts of mine that called out the main actors. Just go through the list of big players already doing large projects in Ontario--soooo many lobbyists on the payroll.
Just as U.S. state level RPS's have been gamed, the Ontario FIT was gamed as well.
Intent is not enough Ontario--you have been had.
Comment
7 of 13
October 14, 2009
Jon-
Why didn't you address the different treatment of thinfilm vs. silicon based modules...they appear to heavily favor thinfilm manufacturers. Those with First Solar supply agreements can rest easy that their projects will move forward as long as inverters are assembled in Ontario and that the rest of BOS are "built" in Ontario. For the rest of us on the outside looking in???
No image available
Comment
8 of 13
Anonymous
October 14, 2009
The simple solution is reduce dom con to 35% for 2009. That would allow installers to drive revenue while manuufacturers scramble to ramp up production.-which did not have to happen. After meetings many months ago, certain manufacturers were told there would be a soft start, and that content rules would rise incrementally. The manufacturers offered to invest early and build stock, but were told not to worry by ministry officials.They were also told they would be consulted if plans change...............
the 35 % for 2009 content is simple- it does not change any milestones, nor slow investment. it is so simple that it will never be considered by the bureacrats.
Comment
9 of 13
October 14, 2009
Thanks for your comments Mike. I am not sure the domestic content requirements are of interest to the Ontario utility companies, rather I suspect the manufacturing industry associations and their unions have been involved here. In any case, just speculation on my part.

/Jon
Comment
10 of 13
October 14, 2009
Fred,
Your comments about the rules differentiating between thin film and other modules are well taken as long as we keep in mind that the additional recognition for thin film is for thin film modules produced in Ontario. In theory this makes it more lucrative to be a thin film manufacturer in Ontario - of which there are none at the moment. Why the OPA decided to incent thin film manufacturing in this way I don't know, but unless First Solar has plans to actually manufacture in Ontario they are not benefiting in any way.

/Jon
No image available
Comment
11 of 13
Anonymous
October 15, 2009
Jon,
another PV anomoly is the exclusion of string ribbon- if a string ribbon manufacturer set up in Ontario, they would get far less domestic content points than other manufacturers, according to the OPA content dictates.

p.s.-ARISE (a company based in Ont., but manufacturing in Germany) has been spending taxpayers money for years, playing w/ thinfilm deposition-but they have no product-yet........perhaps..... no. couldn't be.
Comment
12 of 13
October 20, 2009
This is very funny. First announce 80c per kWh then make it so difficult that almost no-one gets any benefit. Stop kidding yourself Ontario, manufacturing is done in Asia. Asia's cost base makes it economically viable to consider investment in solar. Even at that level, its marginal at best. The jobs you seek are in design, installation, management, IP and maintenance, not manufacturing.
Was your interest piqued by 80c per kWh but now you are disappointed? I know I was.
So join us in Australia at 60c per kWh. Compared to Ontario, no, none, zero local content rules and no snow - ever. For that matter, almost zero rain either. You generate flat out up to 300 days per year at an average, I repeat average, of 6kWh+ per kWp of installed capacity per day.
Forget Ontario, come on over here.
Comment
13 of 13
December 5, 2009
Great article. Ontario content will not be a problem. I know of three companies bringing manufacturing of solar panels, two companies for racking and two companies for inverters (I am one of the companies bring inverters). These are just the ones I know of, there are likely more.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Helios Solar Works Leybold Optics SolarTech Solar Leadership Summit 2012 Enphase Energy Florida Alliance for Renewable Energy    American Solar Energy Society EnPower Systems Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters