Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: John Kerastas
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (6) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
5 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
October 28, 2009

Mending the Rift Between the Solar Community and Ontario

by John Kerastas, Independent Solar Consultant

If you haven’t heard, the international solar community is frothing at the mouth over the most recent regulations and edicts issued by the province of Ontario.

This is a remarkable turnabout from the reams of accolades that the industry had been issuing in response to Ontario’s innovative “Feed-in-Tariff” (FIT) Program. Previously the solar community had been heaping praises on the program saying it was “forward-looking,” “smartly addresses global warming” and “efficiently designed.”

However, all that changed a little more than a week ago when the Ministry issued a few new rules for the program.  Now solar industry pundits claim that the program is “backward,” “protectionist” and a “Catch 22.”

A “Catch 22”?

Well, after months of negotiating with the solar industry, the Ontario government decided to make a couple of last minute, somewhat surprising changes to the rules for utility-scale solar projects in the province.

Perhaps the most contentious change is a requirement that in order to qualify to the FIT, at least 50% (and for all practical purposes 60%) of the equipment for the projects must be manufactured in Ontario. The way that the requirements are parsed, this means that some aspect of the solar module must be manufactured in Ontario.

So what’s the big deal? Don’t all countries make rules like this?

As best I can tell, THERE ARE NO SOLAR MODULES CURRENTLY BEING MANUFACTURED IN ONTARIO.

A Simple but Bold Solution

So what’s a solar power developer to do?  Wait for a manufacturing plant to be built?

Actually the solution is quite simple: SELL MICHIGAN, AND ITS SOLAR MANUFACTURING PLANTS, TO ONTARIO.

Now I know what you’re going to say, “Why not sell Ohio or New Mexico?”

Actually, there are some very good reasons why selling Michigan to Ontario makes the most sense:

  1. Ohio is too big and too expensive.
  2. New Mexico is too far from the Canadian border (and given the economy we may need to sell it to Mexico in the near future).
  3. We could make Ontario a really, really, really good deal on Michigan.

Do we have to sell ALL of Michigan?

Actually,  no. All we would have to do is sell Detroit, the bit north of the city with the UNI-Solar plants and maybe a piece of Ann Arbor to sweeten the deal.

Why would Ontario buy some or all of Michigan?

There are a surprising number of very good reasons that Ontario would want to buy, or just plain annex, the Detroit area from Michigan:

  1. They’d get the Detroit Tigers, and Canada would have a winning baseball team for the first time in thirty years.
  2. They’d also get a pretty good Detroit Red Wings team, and since most of the players are Swedes Fins or Russians, they wouldn’t care.
  3. We’d agree not to sell them any of the U.S. car companies.

But wouldn’t many Americans, especially Republicans, scream bloody murder and stop the sale?

Maybe, but once you remind them that Michigan is a “swing” state, and that without all the Democrats from Detroit the state would definitely vote Republican, I don’t think you’d get much push back.

Plus, the remaining legislators in Michigan could take credit for immediately reducing the state’s crime statistics, and get re-elected.

Net, selling just a bit of Michigan to Ontario has a little something for solar power developers, legislators and sports nuts…in short, everybody who matters.

Like most solutions to thorny and knotty problems, I’m surprised that nobody had thought of this sooner.

John Kerastas is a solar industry marketing communications consultant.  Earlier this year he was the chairman of the solar track at the 2009 Electric Power conference. He has worked for a solar power development company, appeared in two CarbonConnect web-streaming videos about solar power and is writing an article on rooftop solar for the inaugural issue of Green Manufacturer magazine. Prior to working in the solar business, he worked for SmartSignal Corporation, which provides Predictive Analytics to the Power Generation, Oil & Gas, and aviation industries, among others.

Image Gallery (1)
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

Reader Comments (6)
 
October 28, 2009
Why would Ontario want the record cash-drainer called Uni-solar? Uni-solar is a voracious destroyer of value - they will eat up the Ontario tax revenues within a year, if allowed to. Please have mercy on the Ontario residents! As a former UPC guy, you are quite familiar with Uni-solar (now Uni-solar with SIT to boot), so there is no excuse for you.

http://ecdfan.blogspot.com/2009/07/cash-preservation.html
Comment 1 of 6
No image available
October 28, 2009
Aside from some inaccuracies regarding Canada's success in baseball (the Blue Jays one the World Series twice, 92 and 93), Mr. Kerastas is simply mimicking the entire fab industry. "There's no solar industry in Ontario", "they don't make solar panels in Ontario". That's entirely the point. Ontario is losing huge numbers of manufacturing jobs in the automotive industry. The US has a "Buy American" policy which the government and every local legislator feels is appropriate. If Ontario is willing to pay premium prices for renewable energy, they can surely rule that they want a "SIGNIFICANT" portion of the money to stay in the Province.

The industry needs to be a little more realistic. Does every panel have to be made in China, or Germany, or any other state where the manufacturer has already received massive government subsidies? No! As one panel manufacturer told our firm "we'll just package up a couple of our lines and send them to Ontario. It will take about three months."

So, stop whining, and stop with the outstretched hand looking for taxpayers' money. The Ontario government has decided to pay premium prices for energy output, not stimulate a manufacturing industry with tax write-offs for construction. Get with the (FIT) program.
Comment 2 of 6
No image available
October 28, 2009
As usual, your humor and insight mix well. I think this is a good plan and don't forget they would get the Canadian healthcare system they are trying so hard to get in play in the US.
Hopefully the motivated developers will come up with a way to work within the made in Canada constraint that would likely require more time or cost to the systems already struggling to keep prices low and protect ratepayers. Why would anyone want to pay premiums when the ultimate objective is to get the prices down?
Comment 3 of 6
No image available
Anonymous
October 30, 2009
Long live George Carlin.
Comment 4 of 6
No image available
October 30, 2009
Fun take on a somewhat serious issue. I think the regs will require all the balance-of-system to be sourced in Ontario, and of course the labour (no sending your house to China to be fit with panels, then shipped back!) Someone involved in the field told me there would likely be a rush of suppliers setting up assembly of inverters in Ontario to meet demand from these new regs.
As for modules, there is of course Arise Technologies, headquartered in Waterloo, Ont., but with their thin-film cell factory in (former East) Germany, to capture the generous industrial policy incentives there. Arise had plans for a silicon processing plant in Waterloo, but these have been on hold thru the recent downturn (and sharp drop in prices for Si ingots, wafers, cells - everything down the line.) Arise also has a systems installation division.

There was also ATS Spheral / Photowatt, but I think they ran into financial trouble and never got their research product to market, AFAIK. Photowatt still exists as a company in France, but I'm not current on what they're doing.

I've seen TV ads for Michigan as a new hub of high-tech, including PV, evidently aimed at countering the "Parts of Detroit have begun returning to wilderness, complete with wolves" story line.
Comment 5 of 6
No image available
October 30, 2009
Speaking as a life long resident of Michigan, I would be thrilled if Gov. Granholm would just give the counties of Wayne, Macomb, Oakland, Livingston and, and Washtenaw Ontario at no cost whatsoever!! That way, there would be a surplus in our treasury and we could restore quality to our schools and other state supported institutions. Great idea, but under no circumstances would any real Michigander consider throwing in the UP (Upper Peninsula) to sweeeten the deal.
Comment 6 of 6
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Systems FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division ReflecTech, Inc. Conergy Inc. Premier Power Renewable Energy, Inc. Second Wind Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo