Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Wind Technology Trends: Why Small Steps Matter

Although the current slide in overall wind market demand means 2009 figures are unlikely to match recent booms, the dip has not come at the expense of wind technology innovation.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Also from the UK comes a futuristic 5–10 MW NOVA (Novel Offshore Vertical Axis) Aerogenerator offshore wind turbine vertical-axis concept, an ambitious 'high-risk' project currently in a feasibility study phase.
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
September 16, 2009
Why no mention of FloDesign's shrouded turbine design:

http://news.cnet.com/8301-11128_3-9945005-54.html

I think this single innovation will yield turbine power output levels between 10 MW - 15 MW, in addition to installing them more densely in high wind areas for an additional multiple increase in wind farm output.
No image available
Comment
2 of 5
Anonymous
September 17, 2009
Massachusetts is taking small steps taking property rights away from residential property owners through the proposed Massachusetts Wind Energy Siting Reform Act . This act will start the largest NIMBY class action lawsuit in the nation .
You only need to see what the Attorney General Martha Coakley has done with turbine rip off scams ! They let them blow in the wind !

Key word : AG Martha Coakley Mark Howland Fire Wind Energy Siting Reform Act
Comment
3 of 5
September 18, 2009
What is the world thinking? Has it done any cost-benefit analysis of this intermittent energy resource? Governments continue to encourage companies to add windpower only because they fail to internalize the lower value of windpower's intermittency into the power market, even after the Danish Debacle. The July 2009 issue of Power Engineering indicates windpower increases generation costs by more than twice, while reducing greenhouse gases by a mere 11 percent, mostly because it must be inefficiently backed up by natural gas. (In comparison, other lower-cost and more reliable renewable energies like small-hydropower, geothermal and biomass cogeneration could reduce greenhouse gases by nearly 100% at very low costs.)
Comment
4 of 5
September 21, 2009
What does Mike Holly mean by reducing green house gases by 11 percent?

Its highly unlikley that a reduction of 11% can be made in total emmisions by wind power which provides perhaps 1.2 to 1.4% of world electricity demand each year. However it is also very unlikley that for each kWh of electrical energy generated by wind power, that back up plant will burn the equivalent of 89% of the fuel it would have burnt if it had generated the 1kWh of electricity. The reason for this is that if it were so then a minimum of 89% of the energy put into the generator at full load is required to overcome the generators own losses. If this was the case then the maximum efficency of the generator would be 11% as the other 89% of the input energy would be lost as waste heat in turning the generator over.

This would assume that for every kW being produced by wind that back up was available, in fact much less back up is required as wind is forcastable over longer periods than the start up of fossil fuel generating plant. I belive that the best figures for energy cost to provide back up is between 0% and 4% of the fuel which would have been required should the wind plant not have been built. The figure would be nearer 0% in systems with large amounts of hydro capacity with storage capacity and perhaps nearer 4% in systems relying on fossil fuel back up sources. There may be a 1 to 2% diference between systems with poor forcasting and those with good forcasting.

Could we get some real facts please.
Comment
5 of 5
September 22, 2009
I am saddened but not surprised to see GE and Mistubishi squabbling over technology rights - typical old school thinking. Imagine what they could achieve if they worked on the variable speed project collaboratively instead of competitively.

I appreciate that they need to recoup their respective investments in technology, but as long as shareholders are more important than the environment, it seems likely that progress will be hampered by this sort of coprorate myopia.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With 30,000 subscribers and a global readership in over 170 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine is targeted at those who make growth happen in renewable industries. Covering policy, technology, finance,... more »

 

Eize de Vries

View Eize de Vries's Profile
About: Eize de Vries was from 2001 to March 2010 Wind Technology Correspondent for Renewable Energy World magazine. He currently works as a Technology Writer and Techn... more »

Advertise With Us

Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems American Wind Energy Association Richardson RFPD, Inc. Interstate Renewable Energy Council OTTI - Ostbayerisches Techn. Transfer Institute Florida Alliance for Renewable Energy    groSolar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters