Photo Credit: Poet
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (14) View image gallery Image Gallery (3) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
6 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
September 23, 2009

Are Biofuels Ready for a Comeback?

New Hampshire, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The Cambridge, Massachusetts headquarters for Joule Biotechnologies are very discreet. The only thing marking the office from every other pale brick building on Rogers Street is a large "83" printed on a tinted glass door – hardly the type of labeling one might expect from a company claiming to have the answer to cheap, abundant, renewable fuels that don't require fresh water or farmland to grow.

But Joule CEO Bill Sims is not exactly the loud type, either. Walking around the company's lab, he nonchalantly points out a room where biologists are testing a secret fuel-producing organism that he believes will soon rival conventional oil in abundance and cost.

“This is where a lot of the magic happens,” he says in a matter-of-fact tone, sounding more like an ambivalent tour guide than the CEO of a company with a potentially game-changing technology.

Make no mistake, Simms and his team of biologists and engineers are very excited about what Joule has to offer the world of biofuels: An organism that bathes in sunlight and brackish water, eats CO2 and directly perspires “SolarFuels” like ethanol, biodiesel and petroleum-derived chemicals.

Joule has also developed a “SolarConverter” that will be the breeding ground for these still-unnamed organisms. The converter looks kind of like a solar-photovoltaic panel, but instead of generating electricity, it generates liquid fuel. Joule's engineered organisms live inside the panel, which is filled with recycled non-potable water. CO2 and sunlight are pumped in, the organisms start photosynthesizing and then secrete usable fuel products.

According to the company, the ethanol and biodiesel created in these converters need very little processing to meet fuel standards for tanks, pipelines and engines. To top it all off, Sims says that Joule will be able to produce 20,000 gallons of ethanol and 13,000 gallons of biodiesel on one acre of land per year. With those yields, a barrel of Joule's ethanol could cost around $75 to produce and a barrel of biodiesel could cost around $50.

“This puts Joule in the position to a provide path to energy independence — plenty of availability, cost-competitive, no requirement for precious resources like fresh water and agricultural land — it's a terrific solution,” says Sims, pictured left at his lab in Cambridge.

This process has been under development for two years. Sims was hired this summer to take Joule out of stealth mode, secure financing and help the company build out a pilot-scale plant by the end of 2010 and a commercial facility by 2012. That's no easy task, considering the state of the credit markets and how new and untested the Joule concept is.

“There's frankly some disbelief because this is a little bit like science fiction to many – and that's fine, we're not offended by that,” says Sims. “We realize that's the type of response you should get if you have such a transformational, game changing idea that's so new to the world. But as we've explained the progress we've made...and the steps we've taken to make sure our ideas are valid...investors realize that this is something that is very special.”

Joule offers an interesting test case for the biofuels industry. Entering the scene after a dismal year and a half for ethanol and biodiesel producers, the company offers a sliver of hope for an industry trying to pull itself out of a rut. Without having a pilot plant built and without independent verification of the fuel, the company is essentially asking potential investors to “trust us.” However, if Joule can pull off what it claims it can do, the biofuels industry may be in for quite a jolt — as long as economic conditions will allow.

Challenges and Solutions

Biofuels typically get a lot of attention as gas prices go up in the summer driving season. This year was different. After the love affair with biofuels throughout 2006 and the bitter attack on biofuels in late 2007 and 2008, there was a general slowdown in interest from the press moving into 2009. As oil prices dropped, it became much more difficult to produce ethanol and biodiesel at a profit. Production facilities were scaled back or closed, many companies went bankrupt and investors looking for big payouts went searching for other markets. There has been a general malaise in the industry since.

“I don't think we're in a crisis...but we've really hit a plateau,” says Rick Kment, a fuel analyst with DTN Research. “We have seen significant movement in the ethanol industry that has shifted the players involved...and impacted industry growth.”

According to the National Biodiesel Board, two-thirds of biodiesel facilities in the U.S. have closed their doors, unable to profitably produce fuel. At the beginning of the year, Archer Daniels Midland reported that 20 percent of ethanol production capacity had been shut down as well. Many of those ethanol facilities are now back at partial or full production, but there are very few new facilities being built today.

The much-anticipated next-generation fuels industry is also challenged. Many analysts doubt that ethanol producers will be able to hit the targets for cellulosic fuels set by the Renewable Fuels Standard because of slowed investment and delays in ramping up commercial facilities.

But recently there are signs that the ethanol industry is coming out of this period of stagnation. U.S. ethanol production will total over 11 billion gallons this year, a 20% increase from last year. Oil companies have moved into the market, buying up cheap assets and keeping production facilities running. And now that oil prices are slowly climbing back up, plants are able to break even or generate a small profit.

“Things are certainly better today than they have been in the last year and a half,” says Jeff Broin, CEO of the largest U.S. ethanol producer, Poet. “We are operating successfully. I would say that most of the financial problems are decreasing significantly and we are getting back on track.”

Poet operates 26 ethanol plants around the country with a capacity of more than 1.5 billion gallons per year. Being a large, vertically-integrated company, Poet made it through the last year in much better shape than other producers. The company is working on expanding its corn-ethanol refining capacity and plans to finish construction of a 25 million gallon-per-year commercial cellulosic ethanol plant in Iowa by 2011.

While still not a commercial reality, cellulosic ethanol will help Poet maintain its position as an industry leader. With potentially-competitive start-up companies like Joule Biotechnologies making big (and still unverified) claims about low-cost, environmentally benign biofuels, Poet has every reason to throw a lot of effort behind cellulosic fuels.

But right now, Poet's Broin isn't worrying much about companies like Joule. He's more concerned with the U.S. government hindering the development of cellulosic and other next-generation fuels. While that might seem counterintuitive, given how much support Washington has thrown behind biofuels, Broin says that the government's contradictory stance on renewable fuels could hold back the industry from a new phase of growth coming out of the downturn.

The Renewable Fuels Standard requires 36 billion gallons of ethanol to be produced each year in the U.S. by 2022, with 16 billion gallons of cellulosic fuels coming from feedstocks like corn cobs, switchgrass or sugarcane bagasse. However, an EPA rule limits biofuels blends in gasoline at 10 percent, essentially capping the market at around 14 billion gallons of ethanol since the U.S. consumes approximately 140 billion gallons of gasoline per year. With the industry already approaching that limit, Broin worries that there won't be any room for cellulosic ethanol unless the blendwall is lifted to 15 percent.

“There is no market for cellulosic fuels if the blendwall is not increased. The blendwall is a rule that is in contradiction to a law,” he says, adding that it discourages investors from entering the next-generation biofuels space.

The EPA will likely revisit the blendwall this December, but for now, investment in advanced biofuels remains low. According to the analysis firm New Energy Finance, only 3% of investment in renewable fuels has gone into non-food based fuels.

The poor economy hasn't helped matters. Many investors are working on refinancing loans for existing plants and not really thinking about how to put money into new, riskier projects. There have also been a number of technical delays at plants across the country. The government is requiring producers to pump out 100 million gallons of cellulosic fuels by next year; however these problems will prevent the industry from producing much more than a third of that target.

DTN Analyst Rick Kment doesn't think that investors have pulled out for good. With available loan guarantees, tax credits and a possible increase of the ethanol blend wall, the industry has a variety of tools to lure private investment. Also, because there are so many cheap assets up for grabs, oil companies have moved aggressively into the space. This could mean that a large amount of capital moving into next-generation fuels will come from traditional oil companies rather than venture capital or private equity firms.

“There is a lot of interest in this industry. Petroleum companies have used the downturn in the economy to get an ownership in the production side portion of their ethanol needs. And I think as the economy moves out of a recessionary period, we'll see a lot more movement” says Kment.

Oil Companies Get Onboard

Just down the road from Joule Biotechnologies in Cambridge, Carlos Riva sits in his office overlooking the Charles River. Riva, a gregarious man who talks about ethanol with wide-eyed excitement, is president of the cellulosic ethanol company Verenium Corporation.

Verenium makes concoctions of enzymes extracted from different organisms and uses them to break down sugarcane bagasse for ethanol production. There are no scientists in lab coats walking around this office – only executives in suits. The company's research labs are in California and its first cellulosic facility is in Louisiana.

Looking out at the cars and trucks zipping around the city beyond the river, Riva contemplates a big move for the company: BP, one of the largest energy companies in the world, has agreed to work with Verenium to build out ethanol production facilities in Florida. The agreement is one of many announced by oil companies like BP, Shell, Exxon-Mobil and Valero over the last 9 months. [For more on this topic, see Big Oil Bets on Biofuels by RenewableEnergyWorld.com contributor Jennifer Kho.]

“This is a trend,” he says. “We need companies like this getting into ethanol production to create a commercially viable industry. This is a natural fit for petroleum companies.”

Under the partnership, BP will invest $90 million in Verenium and assist in the construction of a 36 million-gallon-per-year production facility. BP will also have access to Verenium's proprietary enzymes. Without a partnership with a company like BP, raising capital for the construction of a commercial facility would be incredibly difficult, says Riva.

(See image of Verenium's San Diego lab, left)

“Even if [the credit markets] were in good shape, for a first-of-a-kind technology, it will always be difficult to finance projects. But we feel pretty good about where we stand...We're benefiting tremendously from their process engineering and large project delivery skills.”

With investors nervous about the technical viability of the industry, adding oil company expertise to the mix helps companies attract capital. Companies like BP can provide the technical know-how that many start-ups lack. Once a few commercial facilities are built out, investors will be more willing to finance additional plants. 

Government loan guarantees are also key to assuring investors; Verenium is waiting on a loan guarantee from the Department of Energy for its 1.4 million-gallon-per-year demonstration facility in Jennings, Louisiana. DOE has promised to streamline the application process in order to more quickly move the industry toward commercial scale.

Riva believes that these developments are signs that the industry has great potential, despite some of the current gloom. If he's right, companies like Verenium, Joule Biotechnologies and Poet will soon be battling it out for a market worth hundreds of billions of dollars.

Image Gallery (3)
 
Reader Comments (14)
 
No image available
September 23, 2009
Sims says that "Joule will be able to produce 20,000 gallons of ethanol and 13,000 gallons of biodiesel on one acre of land per year."

It sounds like another closed bioreactor system with a twist: remarkable new beasties who secrete "solar fuels." I'm a bit confused about the sunlight being "pumped in." Is natural sunlight not used?

Being a closed system, I have to assume it is subject to the same scaling (i.e., laboratory to commercial) constraints as previous efforts. GreenFuel Technologies comes to mind. But at least they do not claim outrageous yields. 13,000 gallons of biodiesel/acre seems reasonable, IF the system can be successfully scaled to a commercial size. I look forward to hearing more about this company.

-JWB
www.bebout-and-associates.com
Comment 1 of 14
No image available
September 24, 2009
Where did Mr. RIva say the CO2 inputs would be coming from?
Comment 2 of 14
September 24, 2009
Good question. They will be coming from power plants. Many people question the "renewable-ness" of the fuel if it's coming from fossil-fueled plants. But I asked one of our writers, Chris Tachibana, that exact question. She pointed me to some reports on the feasibility of using wastewater to grow biomass, which could then be burned for heat and electricity. The CO2 emitted would be used for algae growth (or similar organisms like Joule's).

Sheehan et al. (1998) A Look Back at the U.S. Department of Energy's
Aquatic Species Program: Biodiesel from Algae, NREL/TP-580-24190
http://www.nrel.gov/biomass/pdfs/24190.pdfhttp://www.nrel.gov/biomass/pdfs/24190.pdf

Benemann, J.R.; Koopman, B.L.; Baker, D.; Goebel, R.; Oswald, W.J. (1977) "Preliminary design of the algae pond subsystem of the photosynthesis energy factory." Final Report to Inter-Technology Solar Corp., Sanitary Eng. Res. Lab., Univ. of Calif.-Berkeley.
Comment 3 of 14
No image available
September 25, 2009
and what is the chance that this little beasty could survive / multiply in the wild from the almost 100% chance they will be released either by chance, accident or terrorist attack on a plant?
Comment 4 of 14
September 25, 2009
Hi Bama,
I wouldn't really call these things beasts. They're probably organisms like e.coli, which we find all over. But I really can't answer that question, seeing how little we know about Joule's process!
Comment 5 of 14
No image available
Anonymous
September 25, 2009
Are they genetically engineered?

I once toyed with making fuels from green waste--Locally we have over 500,000 tons of it burned or landfilled every year.

Then I visited COLD RIVER VODKA and realized how dumb it was to convert bio waste to a fuel which would have to compete with oil; when I could make Vodka which could sell for over $30/bottle.

Bio-refineries that use fermentation are centuries old; but why bother when you can 'burn' old beer, cheaper than you can make it fresh?
Comment 6 of 14
No image available
September 25, 2009
Regarding Joule
Come on Stephen. Some skepticism is called for.
"This is where a lot of the magic happens,"
Magic indeed is likely will be required to make 13,000-20,000 gallons per year per acre of whatever we want - ethanol or biodiesel in a PBR.
The creature can produce either of these two products?
These volume claims are unsubstantiated, best-theoretical back of the envelope assumptions and irresponsible for the CEO to state and should not be repeated without a bit of perspective.
Somebody might crack a genetic pathway to produce a biofuel in volume - probably not Joule.
Comment 7 of 14
September 25, 2009
Eric -- you're right that skepticism is called for. I fully agree. But with no independent verification of their fuel or PBR, we don't have much to evaluate on their end.

I felt that 13,000-20,000 gallon number was appropriate. That's the number they're incessantly quoting, so we should use it to have a benchmark to evaluate their success in the coming years.

I don't know that we can say at this point whether Joule has or hasn't cracked the genetic code....
Comment 8 of 14
September 26, 2009
Sounds familiar. I have nothing against investors gambling with their money:

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2009/08/disruptive-technologies-are-so.html

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2009/07/cello-lesson-in-due-diligence.html

As for Verenium:

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2009/03/aventine-verenium-on-ropes.html

They are just one of dozens of companies trying to economically unlock sugars from cellulose so they can be fermented into alcohol. BP has jumped in to save them, which lends evidence to my contention that all biofuel production will eventually be controlled by the oil companies, the same ones that biofuel enthusiasts rail against. From Verenium's website:

"..Working to produce cellulosic ethanol from items such as sugarcane bagasse, agricultural waste, and wood products.."

And the third company (Poet), the one producing 99% of the ethanol between the three, makes ethanol out of food.
Comment 9 of 14
No image available
September 27, 2009
Steve L--------"Hi Bama,
I wouldn't really call these things beasts. They're probably organisms like e.coli, which we find all over. But I really can't answer that question, seeing how little we know about Joule's process!"---------------


I remember seeing news releases before(maybe 6 months to a year ago) about scientists having success in creating a genetically modified E. coli that secretes "diesel fuel".

E. coli is a normal intestinal flora of humans. It is present in everyone's gut(and many other mammals also). Its presence is considered the definative test for untreated sewage. In large enough numbers, it can cause severe morbidity or mortality in the wrong places. There have been a number of deaths in the news due to E. coli contamination of food----hamburgers, lettuce and spinach are three instances that come to mind.

Knowing this----I had to wonder what their definition of "diesel fuel" is. Diesel fuel can be pure plant lipids. The first diesel engine ran on pure peanut oil. We eat foods made with and cooked with plant lipid "diesel fuel" everyday. If this is the case, I don't think that if they got released into the environment that there would be any problem. At least not any more that getting E. coli where we don't want them, which is no different than what we have right now. Any secretions would be quickly decomposed by other bacteria.

If however, their definition of "diesel fuel" is something that is chemically the same or similar to petroleum diesel fuel----THEN we'd have a huge problem. I wouldn't want a genetically modified E. coli that secretes petroleum to take up residence in my intestinal tract.
Comment 10 of 14
No image available
September 27, 2009
from the article-----------"The converter looks kind of like a solar-photovoltaic panel, but instead of generating electricity, it generates liquid fuel. Joule's engineered organisms live inside the panel, which is filled with recycled non-potable water. CO2 and sunlight are pumped in, the organisms start photosynthesizing and then secrete usable fuel products."-----------------

This would not be E. coli. Only green plants with chlorophyll can carry out photosynthesis---take carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, combine it with water in the presence of light and create sugars. It would have to be algaes.

----------"StephenLacey September 25, 2009
Eric -- you're right that skepticism is called for. I fully agree. But with no independent verification of their fuel or PBR, we don't have much to evaluate on their end."-------------

I think so too.
Comment 11 of 14
September 28, 2009
Fred -- your first comment made me laugh out loud. No, I don't think I'd want some mutant strain of e.coli making diesel fuel in my intestines either.

The company is adamant in saying that the bacteria are not algae. With the right genetic modifications, I think it is possible to engineer e.coli to turn CO2 and sunlight into usable energy. If I remember correctly, there was some research done in 2006 on putting the RuBisCO gene inside e.coli, which essentially allowed it to produce energy from CO2.
Comment 12 of 14
No image available
Anonymous
September 28, 2009
You cannot "produce energy from CO2". And puttig RuBisCO into E. coli is not the same as engineering e. coli 'to turn CO2 and sunlight into useable energy". Rubisco is the least of your problems if you want to engineer a non-photosynthetic organisms to be photosynthetic. And why would anyone bother, anyway, except for the coolness factor? There are already tons of photosynthetic bacteria and eukaryotes (algae and plants) to work with, and some cyanobacteria are about as tractable experimentally as E. coli.,
Comment 13 of 14
No image available
October 1, 2009
Joule says people should be skeptical, then they still pour on the unproven hype with words like magic. Two years and they are ready for a breakthrough. We've heard all this before with cold fusion, clean coal, electric cars, hydrogen, cellulose, algae etc. Policy should not be formulated from hype. It can discourage investment in other techs. This country should just open markets for all technologies so we don't need to hear this hype until they are ready to really commercialize something.
Comment 14 of 14
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Solarfun American Wind Energy Association Trina Solar Ltd. Green Power Labs Inc. focus solar Global Marine Renewable Energy Conference
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo