Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Video: Powering Up with Landfill Gas

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Rather than spend money to upgrade those old technologies, the school decided to spend the money on a co-gen plant. We figured, why spend the money on this old technology? Let's move into the 21st century."

-- Paul Chamberlin, Assistant VP of Energy and Campus Development at UNH
7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
September 14, 2009
I'm curious if they use the landfill gas "as is" or is there upgrading done at the landfill.
Comment
2 of 7
September 15, 2009
Hi Dursun. Good question. They can't use the gas "as is." They have to clean it up to natural gas standards and take out a lot of CO2 and Volatile Organic Compounds. It's one of the most energy intensive and costly parts of the process.
Comment
3 of 7
September 16, 2009
Using the methane as a substitute for fossil gas is a step forward. However, what is the life of the methane source, and what will the college's the fuel source be, and conversion cost, once the landfill is depleted (or falls below economic levels)? What is the efficiency of the operator in catching the methane produced at the landfill site? What is the embedded carbon cost of installing the landfill site equipment, the pipeline and any methane specific aspects of the heating/generating unit?
From an overall greenhouse gas perspective the world would be better off if less trash was produced in the first place and put into landfill, second best would be if more of it was actively reused or recycled rather than being inefficiently converted and collected into methane, third best is using the methane (with the concomitant costs of cleaning the landfill gas to usable standards). Clearly worst case is flaring or simply letting the methane seep into the atmosphere.
So, while the programme has many benefits, it is not the 100% upside, cost free, scenario that the article projects.
Comment
4 of 7
September 16, 2009
There is a short half life to the methane produced; meaning that within a few years unless this is a landfill that is replenished with organics; the gas produced will be depleted, rendering the infrastructur useless. In other words, this is not a renewable!

Gas cleaning is somewhat expensive and Maine's Cassella gas project in Hampden has patented a cleaning process they are now marketing.

If you are in an area with a thriving bio-mass, you should consider the pioneering work in installing a gassifier that uses 'green' and other organic waste for a CHP. Web site below is well documented.

Contact is:

Rob Rizzo
Director of Facilities Administration
Mount Wachusett Community College
978-630-9137 (voice)
978-630-9559 (fax)
RRizzo@mwcc.mass.edu
http://www.mwcc.mass.edu/renewable
Comment
5 of 7
September 16, 2009
How are you removing the CO2?...is it in a gaseous form for resale or 'fixed'?

With the Anaerobic digesters I design, the raw methane is bubbled through water containing marble chips, the CO2 dissolved in water forms a weak carbolic acid which then reacts with the limestone to form soluble calcium bicarbonate.This is also very inexpensive!

Several companies have CO2 filters so that the 'gas' can be used to flood adjacent greenhouses at night.

Landfill gas may be contaminated with a wide variety of other toxics and needs special cleaning, so careful analysis beforehand is critical to overall design.
No image available
Comment
6 of 7
Anonymous
September 16, 2009
Sounds like Mr. Keller is trying to get some free advertising for his digesters. If you watch the video all of his points are addressed, also the State would issue permits having requirements on emissions. WM is required to have gas collection systems to prevent gas from escaping since methane is a much more dangerous green house gas, so the inferstructure is already in place most of the time. In the video you will also notice WM has power generation from the LFG, along with the UNH deal. Don't be so quick to judge the use of LFG as a renewable, the sun doesn't shine everyday, and the wind doesn't blow all the time, but the trash produces gas 24 hrs a day and power, heat, etc can be generated from it. Yes, the will be a peak and a fall to gas production off the landfill, but there are a lot of factors, it might take 10, 20, 50 years for that to happen. Wouldn't it be better to use the LFG for some type of benefit, than just to flare it. I agree we should be producing less trash and just putting it into landfills, but this trash is already there, why not use the LFG pruduced to do some good and off set fossil fuel usage. Every little bit helps.
Comment
7 of 7
September 16, 2009
Nigel -- you make a good point. Just as we see with any other energy project, there are downsides. Coal is dirty. Oil is in hostile countries. The sun doesn't shine every minute of the day. Drilling geothermal wells can be costly and difficult. I do agree that there are downsides to the project -- of course the landfill gas won't be there forever. They will eventually have to use natural gas. But as anonymous says, it's better to be using what we have to offset 20 years worth of fossil fuels.

Also, I think we have to consider the energy needs of recycling. While it is a very good an necessary thing, it takes energy just like anything else.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc Brightergy LORD Corporation FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division Total Energy USA SunMaxx Solar Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters