Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

3 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
September 14, 2009

Video: Powering Up with Landfill Gas

by Stephen Lacey, Staff Writer and Graham Jesmer, News Editor

New Hampshire [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Excessive trash can be a problem at college campuses, fouling up dorm hallways and campus walkways. But an energy team at the University of New Hampshire (UNH) has found a way to turn that problem into a solution by using trash for heat and electricity.

"Rather than spend money to upgrade those old technologies, the school decided to spend the money on a co-gen plant. We figured, why spend the money on this old technology? Let's move into the 21st century."

-- Paul Chamberlin, Assistant VP of Energy and Campus Development at UNH

Starting this fall, UNH will be getting 85% of its heat and electricity from landfill gas provided by a nearby waste disposal facility. The project, called ECOline, is yet another example of a college developing an innovative renewable energy project in order to reduce operating costs and prove its “green” credentials to students.

In the middle of the UNH campus sits an old brick building that once housed coal and oil-fired central boilers. In the 1990's, the boilers were converted to run on natural gas. Finally in 2004, when the college realized it needed to upgrade the boilers again, the idea of a co-generation plant came up.

“Rather than spend money to upgrade those old technologies, the school decided to spend the money on a co-gen plant,” says Paul Chamberlin, assistant vice president of energy and campus development at UNH. “We figured, why spend the money on this old technology? Let's move into the 21st century.”

Then the school decided to take the upgrade one step further. Instead of using natural gas to run the turbine and heat-recovery boiler, they thought about using landfill gas as the primary fuel. UNH approached Waste Management, the owner and operator of a local landfill, to see if such a project would be possible. It turned out that Waste Management had a lot of extra landfill gas that was just being flared off.

“They needed to get rid of it and we had the need to use it,” says Chamberlin. “It was the perfect opportunity. We couldn't pass it up.”

A deal was soon struck between Waste Management, UNH and contractor SCS Energy, to construct a 12-mile pipeline from a gas-processing facility at the Turnkey Landfill to the school's new co-generation plant. UNH will use landfill gas as the primary fuel and natural gas as a backup, if needed.

Now, instead of wasting the landfill gas, Waste Management is using it to diversify revenue streams from its facility. And more importantly for UNH, it has a stable supply of renewable landfill gas that will heat and power the campus. When school is out of session, UNH will sell excess electricity generated from the landfill gas to the local utility. Because the electricity is considered renewable in New Hampshire, the school will also be able to sell the renewable energy certificates.

At first, convincing the board of trustees to spend $49 million on the project was a difficult task, says Chamberlin. But once members learned about the multiple payback options and the benefits of diversifying fuel options, there was consensus that the project should move forward.

“When everything was laid out and we explained how it was going to work and how we were going to get the return on our investment, we got the support,” says Chamberlin. “Now we're the first school to develop a project like this on such a scale.”

While this project is a unique “first” for a college, landfill-gas-to-energy is not new for Waste Management. The company, which is the largest operator of landfills in the U.S., has over 100 such facilities in operation. It also plans to develop up to 60 similar plants with a total electricity generating capacity of 700 megawatts by 2013.

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency estimates that there are 2,700 MW of total electricity capacity and 900 million standard cubic feet of gas per day buried beneath the country's landfills. That represents only a small piece of the energy picture. But with innovative partnerships like the one between Waste Management and UNH, that small piece could play a very important role.

For and in-depth look at the inner workings of the plant, as well as the technical apsects to working with landfill gas, play the video below.

Video
Add Your Comment 7 Reader Comments
No image available
September 14, 2009
I'm curious if they use the landfill gas "as is" or is there upgrading done at the landfill.
September 15, 2009
Hi Dursun. Good question. They can't use the gas "as is." They have to clean it up to natural gas standards and take out a lot of CO2 and Volatile Organic Compounds. It's one of the most energy intensive and costly parts of the process.
No image available
September 16, 2009
Using the methane as a substitute for fossil gas is a step forward. However, what is the life of the methane source, and what will the college's the fuel source be, and conversion cost, once the landfill is depleted (or falls below economic levels)? What is the efficiency of the operator in catching the methane produced at the landfill site? What is the embedded carbon cost of installing the landfill site equipment, the pipeline and any methane specific aspects of the heating/generating unit?
From an overall greenhouse gas perspective the world would be better off if less trash was produced in the first place and put into landfill, second best would be if more of it was actively reused or recycled rather than being inefficiently converted and collected into methane, third best is using the methane (with the concomitant costs of cleaning the landfill gas to usable standards). Clearly worst case is flaring or simply letting the methane seep into the atmosphere.
So, while the programme has many benefits, it is not the 100% upside, cost free, scenario that the article projects.
No image available
September 16, 2009
There is a short half life to the methane produced; meaning that within a few years unless this is a landfill that is replenished with organics; the gas produced will be depleted, rendering the infrastructur useless. In other words, this is not a renewable!

Gas cleaning is somewhat expensive and Maine's Cassella gas project in Hampden has patented a cleaning process they are now marketing.

If you are in an area with a thriving bio-mass, you should consider the pioneering work in installing a gassifier that uses 'green' and other organic waste for a CHP. Web site below is well documented.

Contact is:

Rob Rizzo
Director of Facilities Administration
Mount Wachusett Community College
978-630-9137 (voice)
978-630-9559 (fax)
RRizzo@mwcc.mass.edu
http://www.mwcc.mass.edu/renewable
No image available
September 16, 2009
How are you removing the CO2?...is it in a gaseous form for resale or 'fixed'?

With the Anaerobic digesters I design, the raw methane is bubbled through water containing marble chips, the CO2 dissolved in water forms a weak carbolic acid which then reacts with the limestone to form soluble calcium bicarbonate.This is also very inexpensive!

Several companies have CO2 filters so that the 'gas' can be used to flood adjacent greenhouses at night.

Landfill gas may be contaminated with a wide variety of other toxics and needs special cleaning, so careful analysis beforehand is critical to overall design.
No image available
Anonymous
September 16, 2009
Sounds like Mr. Keller is trying to get some free advertising for his digesters. If you watch the video all of his points are addressed, also the State would issue permits having requirements on emissions. WM is required to have gas collection systems to prevent gas from escaping since methane is a much more dangerous green house gas, so the inferstructure is already in place most of the time. In the video you will also notice WM has power generation from the LFG, along with the UNH deal. Don't be so quick to judge the use of LFG as a renewable, the sun doesn't shine everyday, and the wind doesn't blow all the time, but the trash produces gas 24 hrs a day and power, heat, etc can be generated from it. Yes, the will be a peak and a fall to gas production off the landfill, but there are a lot of factors, it might take 10, 20, 50 years for that to happen. Wouldn't it be better to use the LFG for some type of benefit, than just to flare it. I agree we should be producing less trash and just putting it into landfills, but this trash is already there, why not use the LFG pruduced to do some good and off set fossil fuel usage. Every little bit helps.
September 16, 2009
Nigel -- you make a good point. Just as we see with any other energy project, there are downsides. Coal is dirty. Oil is in hostile countries. The sun doesn't shine every minute of the day. Drilling geothermal wells can be costly and difficult. I do agree that there are downsides to the project -- of course the landfill gas won't be there forever. They will eventually have to use natural gas. But as anonymous says, it's better to be using what we have to offset 20 years worth of fossil fuels.

Also, I think we have to consider the energy needs of recycling. While it is a very good an necessary thing, it takes energy just like anything else.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
SolarCraft Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division EC Harris LLP AltaTerra Research Geothermal Energy Association ULVAC Technologies, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters