Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

The Power of Solar Now

By Neal Lurie, ASES
September 30, 2009   |   11 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

11 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 11
September 30, 2009
100% with you, Neal. It's what I blog about here on REWorld, as well as on my solar referral site, SolarPowerRocks.com that dumbs down solar for consumers. Social networking and blogging is key. If everyone does their part, not exaggerating, but stating the very positive facts about solar affordability and technology, we'll eventually push the tipping point into the main stream.

For those who haven't read this post on REWorld, here are some other talking points to educate consumers:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2009/08/hey-you-solar-company-shove-it-the-solar-tipping-point

Thanks for all your hard work.
Comment
2 of 11
October 2, 2009
Excellent points. I continue to be amazed that so many assume solar needs much more development to become viable. My excitement is with Concentrating Solar Thermal Power (CSP), which has huge potential, and can be built in utility size scale, but most think it can only provide a drop in the ocean of supply, and only for the southwest.

I'm also disappointed that Secretary Chu at DOE seems mainly interested in high tech solutions that are indeed far off in the future, and only commits a relatively small amount of effort to advancing solar.We need to push him too.

Bruce Michael
Comment
3 of 11
October 2, 2009
Great article. So many times have I pondered over catchy phrases that help sell electrical books to electricians and contractors. I agree that words have power in forming concepts in an observer's mind. "Future is Now" embeds an indelible vision to act on immediately.

Ben Jacks,
author....ELECTRICAL TERMINATOR, House Wiring Construction.
Comment
4 of 11
October 2, 2009
There is an unfortunate fact about emerging markets that causes great frustration for anyone offering something "new." Your article (above) about the solar industry is a great example.

People do not view something new as "in the mainstream" until they see someone EXACTLY like themselves using it. So a homeowner in Iowa with a 2000 sq. ft house located on a hill, must see another homeowner in Iowa with a 2000 sq. ft house located on a hill using solar before he describes solar as available here and now. You can have millions of people using solar in other parts of the world, on all kinds of different buildings, and it means NOTHING to the guy on a hill in Iowa.

We've studied this peculiar market-behavior pattern for many many years now and it applies to anything new or innovative that is introduced into a marketplace. In every case, the secret to achieving mainstream market acceptance (which includes positive support from NPR correspondents) is extreme vertical marketing. In other words, focus on one vertical market segment at a time because mainstream buyers/users will only accept information from people who are identical to themselves.

Any technology that is considered mainstream today, had to go through a phase of extreme vertical marketing to get there. And I'm not seeing anyone do this yet in the solar industry.

Warren Schirtzinger
http://www.hightechstrategies.com/
Comment
5 of 11
October 2, 2009
Well said, Neal.
I would say that there are two kinds of barriers in front of solar energy's wide scale implementation: a) Negative Interests and b) Public's Inertia.

Actually, the people who act in the interests of fossil fuels, as Mr Tom Gjelten you quoted, are cleverly using public's inertia to their advantage and the result rises another barrier in front of us. Unfortunately, people with negative interests are found everywhere (even where they should not be). For example, more than one year ago we offered our Australian solar air heating technology (www.q-solar.com) to United States. The technology transfer was blocked by the very people who should have facilitate it: the US Department of Energy, NREL, etc. Maybe this was because the decision positions were occupied by clerks from the previous American administration .??.. However, we are still waiting for positive changes on this line (Bruce also was right). So Negative or Other Interests are a powerful barrier...

The situation is complicated also because there are tens of solar technologies, each applicable to a certain use (as Warren said). This confuses the non-professional people and generates a lot of Public Inertia.

Another cause for Public's Inertia is the fact that solar technologies are new, there are weekly or monthly improvements, and many who have for example aquired a solar system last year will find out now that a similar system now costs much less.

Lastly, we should mention another cause of Public Inertia: unfortunately many have jumped in this pool of opportunity and performed poor quality solar job, and this also decreased the confidence of the public.

However, solar is the star of the moment, and given its huge potential, it will shine even brighter in the future with the help of positive people.
Comment
6 of 11
October 9, 2009
Thank you Neal. I would add that the "future" comments were also made 30 years ago when the thermal solar industry was struggling to get a foothold. Yet many of the products that were installed then still operate today producing hot water from the sun. Labeling solar technology as a "future" solution then as it is being done today is a tactic to downplay the viability of the technology. As we learned years ago, a dangerous one.

In addition to Neal's suggestions for combating this I would like to add one more. Those of us who are industry professionals and proponents must show by example. But i wonder how many have actually taken the step to install solar products on their own homes?
Comment
7 of 11
October 9, 2009
Gary, I don't have solar, but there's a reason: I rent. When I buy one day, I'll certainly be looking for minimal shading and southern facing roof. Either that, I hop that my city, Los Angeles, implements a virtual net metering policy where I can "buy" into a solar co-op where the panels are not on my roof, but get the same benefits.

Another reason an industry person might not have solar may be do having a home that fits all other needs like good schools, etc...but not solar due to trees, etc. There are so many good reasons a solar industry person may not have solar that reflect the fact that solar isn't right for everyone, even industry folks. That being said, if you don't have one of those good reasons...what are you waiting for.?
Comment
8 of 11
October 9, 2009
Hey, I know a guy who has a poorly insolated, tree surrounded home and another vacant property where his solar window is great. He's planning a grid tie array on that spot so he can keep his home place as it is. Lots of ways to get up.

The initial purpose of this comment: There is an "opportunity cost". That is the money not saved by delaying implementation of a practical economic method as well as environmental benefit, which is near impossible for the individual to asses. But think of the money you'd save if you had solar thermal or perhaps PV in place right now. Projecting that forward can put you in a "wish I'da" mindframe. So, here are more catch phrases, "It's Never too late for Solar Energy". And, "The Future Was Solar, And Here It IS!".
Comment
9 of 11
October 9, 2009
An option for renters; Consider pad or sleeper mounted CVT thermal or PV arrays. I had one at my previous "skunk works" and took it with me whan I moved to a place where more permanent installation was feasable.

Landlords may also be amenable to increasing property equity with a well done solar energy system, and compensate the installer in rent money to boot. It can't hurt to ask.
Comment
10 of 11
October 10, 2009
As a Realtor, I have had trouble getting value for my listings with PV systems. I spoke with one appraiser who said that she can rarely get away with assigning more than nominal value to a PV installation, and will even deduct $5,000 if it detracts visually from the property. She explains that the only way to obtain a justifiable value for such a system is to prove, by pointing to sales of comparable homes with and without PV systems, how much those previous PV systems added to their homes' values. Even if she can find a comp with a PV system, you can bet that that previous home got a low value assigned to its PV system because that home had no comps. It's a vicious circle or Catch-22 situation -- you choose your favorite metaphor. The lesson, however, appears to be this: you should NEVER add a PV or other solar system to your house in expectation of getting back upon resale anything approaching what you'd get back from spending the same amount of money on a new kitchen or bathroom. On the other hand, you can buy a home with an existing PV (or other) system, if you can find one, and pay pennies on the dollar for what you'd pay buying a comparable home without a PV system and adding one to it. Sad but true... This dynamic will definitely continue to hold back the investment by homeowners in solar systems -- if they're aware of it.
Comment
11 of 11
October 12, 2009
Jim,

I don't understand the difficulty of persuading homebuyers of the value of a PV system. It the system is properly designed and located (i.e. no shading) and the local utility charges a time-of-use tariff (not everywhere but in many parts of the USA with hot summers) then the demonstrated savings on utility bills should be more than compelling enough to justify a significant premium for the PV system on the roof (or in the yard, the hill behind the property, etc.). This argument is already well-tested with homes that use solar heating for a swimming pool. It's the same principle for solar electricity and air conditioning. But it does require one to keep records, do the math, and present the results in clear, understandable way.

I believe this web site has some good posts demonstrating the ability of solar-powered homes to maintain their prices and even command a price premiumg during a *falling* market. One example was in the city of Davis, California; I believe the development was called "White Horse" or "Wild Horse".
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Concepts NREC 350 Media SkyFuel AltE Endurance Wind Power Solar Electric Power Association Florida Alliance for Renewable Energy
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters