Photo Credit: US Army Corps of Engineers
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (4) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
1 rating - Sign-in to rate this article
July 9, 2009

World Bank Outlines Priorities for Sustainable Hydro Development

by John Braden, Senior Associate Editor, Hydro Group
Washington, D.C. United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Acknowledging a sharp change in direction from the 1990s, the World Bank is emphasizing a growing role for sustainable hydropower to bring both energy and water resources benefits to the developing world.

The World Bank report said total economically feasible potential hydro capacity in developing countries exceeds 1,900,000 MW, 70 percent of which, 1,330,000 MW, is not exploited.

In “Directions in Hydropower,” a newly issued exposition of the World Bank Group’s views on the value of hydropower, the bank said hydropower now is viewed as an integral factor in addressing energy security, climate change, water security and regional cooperation.

World Bank lending for hydropower bottomed out in 1999 due to growing opposition from environmental and other non-governmental organizations.

“There are risks inherent in development and operation of hydropower, many of which were the focus of passionate debate in the 1990s,” the bank said. “These risks cross the range of financial, geological, engineering and market concerns, with particular attention to environmental protection, resettlement, social inclusion and sharing of the benefits of development across all stakeholders.”

Triple Bottom-line Policy: Social, Environmental, Economic

As a consequence, the bank said, the definition of acceptable hydropower has shifted to one that recognizes core principles of sustainable development with attention to social and environmental, as well as economic “bottom lines.” It said the shift has been supported by a decade of better understanding and of developing best practices, safeguards and self-assessment measures from players including the World Bank, Equator Banks, International Hydropower Association, International Energy Agency, the World Commission on Dams and the United Nations Environment Program.

“The priority is shifting towards development ‘done right’ and comprehensive environmental management and benefits sharing,” the bank said.

In a stark change from a decade ago, World Bank lending now reflects a Water Resources Sector Strategy approved in 2003 that says significant levels of investment in water infrastructure are required throughout the developing world.

New lending for hydropower increased significantly, from less than US $250 million per year from 2002-2004, to US $500 million per year from 2005-2007. In fiscal year 2008, new lending for hydro exceeded US $1 billion.

The bank said 67 hydropower projects have been approved since fiscal year 2003, amounting to US $3.7 billion in World Bank Group contributions to support a total of US $8.5 billion and nearly 9,700 MW in project investments. Within those numbers, the bank noted, is money for rehabilitation of existing capacity at the 350-MW Inga 1 and 1,424-MW Inga 2 hydro projects in the Democratic Republic of Congo (HydroWorld 4/20/09) and of hydro plants totaling 1,338 MW in Niger. (HydroWorld 2/11/09)

Bank Sees Pipeline of US $2 Billion in Projects

Major hydro projects have been approved in Africa and Asia, as well as several rehabilitation projects in Eastern Europe. The bank said a range of new projects is under discussion in India, Vietnam, the Nile Equatorial Lakes Region, Ethiopia, Guinea, Brazil, Romania, Turkey, Georgia and Tajikistan. Bank-backed carbon finance projects are under discussion in Russia, Sri Lanka and Madagascar.

The bank’s two-track strategy of investment lending, and energy and water sector strengthening, has only just begun. The bank said it has identified a “promising pipeline” of US $2 billion in projects under preparation for the next several years, not including projects that are only under preliminary discussion with clients.

The World Bank report said total economically feasible potential hydro capacity in developing countries exceeds 1,900,000 MW, 70 percent of which, 1,330,000 MW, is not exploited. That is four times the current installed hydro capacity of Europe and North America and nearly double the 740,000 MW installed worldwide. It said significant additional amounts of energy and capacity are available from rehabilitation of existing hydropower and water resources assets.

“Directions in Hydropower” may be obtained from the World Bank’s Internet site or by clicking here http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWAT/Resources/Directions_in_Hydropower_FINAL.pdf.

John Braden is senior associate editor, Hydro Group, with PennWell Corporation. He has been covering hydro news for more than 20 years.

This article was reprinted with permission from the Hydro Group as part of the PennWell Corporation Renewable Energy World Network and may not be reproduced without express written permission from the publisher.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (4)
 
No image available
July 10, 2009
What are the revisions in world bank policys as they apply to the "genocide" refered to in the documentry "Flow for the love of life" ? I might urge anyone who thinks that the title suggests it is a "green touchy feely" flick with out real facts see it and investigate it allegations. Also the highest cost of power in terms of water is hydro power due to evapration, and some have said power = water & water = power so the "expense" of evaporation needs to be subtracted from the generated power to get to the NET. Unless this is water dam just before the water is "wasted" to the ocean. and not to a rural farming area with peoples who will become food,jobless as result of dam. or as never before forced to pay for the water which has been free since time began.
Comment 1 of 4
No image available
July 10, 2009
I am interested in the effects of the current world financial situation on these plans. Where is the money to fund these projects going to come from? Or is it already flowing from somewhere?

I am also interested in details concerning how these projects will make sure that ordinary people have access to drinking water, even if they are unable to be part of work crews.

Will traditional village ways of storing water in Africa be included, rebuilding lost technologies and their contributions to plant and animal diversity and productivity? Will some of these technologies be transferred to other dry places to sequester water on the land and to make sure it passes through enough earth that it is cleaned before it enters rivers?

The article discusses the controversies. More detail on addressing the issues would be appreciated.

I hope we will see follow-up on this.

Some important thinkers in the world should be invited to examine these projects closely. I hope the weight of wisdom from scientists like Wangari Maathai, Vandana Shiva, Geoff Lawton, Larry Santoyo, Willie Smits, Paul Hawken, and Toby Hemenway will be considered.

I would love to be a fly on the wall if that should happen. Including only the usual suspects would be a boring endeavor even for the usual suspects, I would think. The personalities listed above are enormously successful, brave, and interesting characters with proven ability to draw audience and readers the world over.
Comment 2 of 4
No image available
July 10, 2009
As a potential reaearcher my views are in favour of Hydro Power and I need possible support from World bank for my research. May I get the contact details of world bank, so that I can contribute to the development, through proper channel?
Comment 3 of 4
No image available
July 12, 2009
I believe the documentary referred to earlier is Flow: For Love of Water by Irina Salina. http://www.flowthefilm.com/ Anyone who has read Naomi Klein's well documented book The Shock Doctrine would be wary to accept World Bank proposals at face value. I hope that there are changes underway from past abuses.
Comment 4 of 4
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Renewable Energy World Asia SolarTech Consortium Rolls Battery Engineering PennEnergy Trina Solar Ltd. Marketforce
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo