article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (8) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
2 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
July 30, 2009

US Wind Industry Goes Against Expectations, Installs 1.2 GW in Q2

Washington, D.C., United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The U.S. wind energy industry installed 1,210 megawatts (MW) of new power generating capacity in the second quarter, bringing the total added this year to just over 4,000 MW – an amount larger than the 2,900 MW added in the first six months of 2008, the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) found in its second quarter (Q2) market report.

"Even in an economic meltdown, the installation of over a gigawatt of wind shows that the technology is mature and destined for long term growth no matter what economic conditions happen to be."

-- Scott Sklar, President, The Stella Group Ltd.

During the second quarter, the U.S. wind energy industry completed a total of 1,210 MW in 10 states. These new installations nudge total U.S. wind power generating capacity to 29,440 MW, according to the report.

The state posting the fastest growth in the 2nd quarter was Missouri, where wind power installations expanded by 90%. Pennsylvania and South Dakota ranked second and third in terms of growth rate in the second quarter, expanding by 28% and 21% respectively.

The states that added new wind power generating capacity are:

Texas

454 MW

Iowa

160 MW

Missouri

146 MW

Washington

129 MW

California

120 MW

Pennsylvania

102 MW

South Dakota

50 MW

Oregon

45 MW

Minnesota

2 MW

Wyoming

2 MW

Three wind turbine and turbine component manufacturing facilities were opened, four facilities were expanding, and eight facilities were announced during the past quarter. This brings the total of opened, expanding and announced facilities up to 20 since the beginning of the year.

At the same time however, many existing supply chain companies have stopped hiring or have furloughed employees due to the slowdown in contracts for wind turbines. Despite this, and reports from earlier in the year that 2009 would be a very slow year for the industry, analysts are generally positive about the wind industry.

"Even in an economic meltdown, the installation of over a gigawatt of wind shows that the technology is mature and destined for long term growth no matter what economic conditions happen to be,” said Scott Sklar, president of renewable energy consultancy The Stella Group Ltd.

While the number of completed wind farm installations was solid, AWEA said the reduced number of orders and lower level of activity in manufacturing of wind turbines and their components is troubling.

“The numbers are in, and while they show the industry has been swimming upstream, adding some 4,000 MW over the past six months, the fact is that we could be delivering so much more,” said AWEA CEO Denise Bode. “Our challenge now is to seize the historic opportunity before us to unleash this entrepreneurial force and build up an entire new industry here in the U.S. that will create jobs, avoid carbon, and strengthen our energy security. To achieve that, Congress and the Administration must pass a national Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) with strong early targets.”

Click here to download the full Q2 market report from AWEA.

Reader Comments (8)
 
No image available
Anonymous
July 31, 2009
Massachusetts has led the way on taking away residential property rights in its rush for renewable energy.

What is the Massachusetts Wind Energy Siting Reform Act ?

The state of Massachusetts through the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act is about to set standards for responsible development of land-based commercial wind turbines. The current standards for setbacks are the least protective in the world.


Massachusetts, through the new legislation, chooses to redefine property rights through the Wind Energy Siting Reform Act.

The Wind Energy Siting Reform Act will transfer power from towns, legislators, and the courts to the executive branch, giving the governor and his successors unprecedented power to determine the future landscape and economy of every community. This is similar to the 40B housing laws .

The Wind Energy Siting Reform Act is an assault on our rights.
Another issue is, should residential property owners be compensated for parts of their previously held rights? Should there be "just compensation" for lost property rights when new regulations are enforced?

The state needs to protect individuals from bearing the burdens imposed by the takings clause of the Fifth Amendment of the Constitution. A quote from this amendment is: "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." The placement of commercial wind turbines in residential locations by zoning change or special permit is a form of intervention called a "police power," or placing restrictions on land use activities that could be injurious to the health, morals and safety of the community.

The state has an objective of a certain percentage of renewable energy by the year 2010. The objective requires a certain percentage of land-based wind turbines in the formula. The installation of these land-based turbines as high as a 10-story building intrudes in residents' backyards. These residents are commonly called NIMBYs, "not in my back yard."

The regul
Comment 1 of 8
No image available
July 31, 2009
Of course, windpower is growing fast because states are mandating it, even though it is unreliable and must be backed up by natural gas (from ever more costly reserves). Meanwhile utility monopolies are blocking other renewable energies, especially lower-cost and much more reliable base-load hydropower, geothermal and biomass and also solar for peaking power. Corrupt US politicians, influenced by utility, environmental and wind energy special interests, are allowing these monopolies to violate antitrust laws and rig potential remedies including PURPA, competitive bidding, deregulation and even recently feed-in tariffs. As US power supplies become more expensive by focusing on only wind and natural gas, the utility monopolies will no doubt be allowed in economic desperation to resume building more large coal and/or nuclear plants.
Comment 2 of 8
No image available
August 1, 2009
Windpower is economical, but it needs more growth. 1.2 GW per quarter growth will keep the US dependent on fossil and bio fuels.

Natural gas is now meeting most of the domestic needs of the US. The low cost of gas turbines makes it ideal for peaking power.
Comment 3 of 8
No image available
August 2, 2009
Natural gas is needed for heating, peaking power and some intermediate load. Natural gas will become too expensive if the US continues to also use it for base-load power and backing up excessive windpower. Other renewable energies should also be allowed to meet demand including hydropower, geothermal and biomass and also solar for peaking power. Otherwise, coal and nuclear will be needed.
Comment 4 of 8
No image available
August 2, 2009
Only a corrupt or stupid nation would not allow fuel diversity

Generating Capacity Added in US in 2008 (Source: AWEA)

Natural Gas 48%
Windpower 42
Coal 6
Other 4
(hydropower, geothermal, biomass, solar, oil, nuclear, etc.)
Comment 5 of 8
No image available
August 2, 2009
Between 1990 and 2006, bioelectricity generation progressively increased at an average annual rate of 11% in the EU-27. Between 1994 and 2007, bioelectricity generation grew by less than 1% in the US. Why isn't biomass good enough for the US???
Comment 6 of 8
No image available
Anonymous
August 2, 2009
I can tell you why. Congress is using the threat of dispatchable & renewable biomass competing head-to-head in distributed generation with dispatchable but dirty and non-renewable coal and big polluting central generation utilities to extract coal and utility lobby attention. I believe most people no longer run for Congress to serve the common good but to serve their own interests. The coal and utility lobbyists have seemingly seduced enough Congressmen and Congresswomen with money, gifts and various forms of corrupt quid-pro-quo deals that they are able to keep us tied to dirty coal and central generation.
Comment 7 of 8
No image available
August 2, 2009
If you read the above....it will show how important it is to put term limits on all of our Congress men & women & Senators. This energy problem could have been resolved 50 years ago, but the folks in DC who are continueally re-elected didn't want it solved. Their votes always go to the highest bidder.
Logic shows it's time to put term limits on the Senate and the House of Representatives etc. if we want our energy problems solved intelligently.
Limit elected officials to 12 yrs in the Senate and/or 12 yrs in the House.
Anyone who is reading this note knows that any problem can be solved in 12 years....that is if you, or they want the problem solved.
Comment 8 of 8
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group National Semiconductor Alteris Renewables Stoel Rives LLP Morningstar Corporation Thompson Technology Industries, Inc. (TTI)
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo