The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

U.S. Military Leads Green Charge

Bill Opalka, Editor-in-Chief, Energy Central Topic Newsletters
July 29, 2009  |  14 Comments

The U.S. military is not just setting standards in the areas of advanced weaponry. It's also leading the renewable energy charge. It's involved in solar, geothermal and wind projects and its stake in the field will continue to grow.

Consider the solar arena: If you thought the biggest solar array in the Americas was in the Southwestern United States, you'd be right. At 140 acres, the site's 70,000 panels produce peak energy of 14 megawatts, or enough energy to supply 14,000 homes.

But what may not be widely known is that the solar site is at the Nellis Air Force Base in Nevada, providing about one-fourth of the base's power, with the capability of selling renewable credits back to NV Energy. The site, completed in late 2007, can produce about 30.1 million kilowatt hours per year.

The photovoltaic plant provides electricity that can be used on base, although excess power can be fed into the electric grid. The Nellis solar plant provides clean energy, and the base saves $1 million annually in utility bills. The project, financed by private investors, cost $100 million and took six months to complete.

Another renewable energy resource, geothermal power, has been a mainstay at the China Lake Naval Air Weapons Station in California for more than two decades. Since the 1980s, the 270-MW plant has provided enough power to supply the entire base. The Navy receives revenues from geothermal power facilities. And it recently awarded a contract to build a 30-plus MW geothermal plant at Fallon Naval Air Station in Nevada. The Department of Defense (DOD) is looking at other opportunities for similar public/private ventures to tap renewable energy resources.

These aren't just individual projects to take advantage of local resources, but an overall strategy to reduce energy use and revamp procurement. "The DOD is tailoring its installation energy strategy to address efficiency improvements to existing buildings, constructing highly efficient and sustainable new facilities, managing our energy costs through long-term power purchase agreements and contracts, and incorporating renewable energy and smart grid technologies to reduce installations' risk of power outages, improve on-site resilience to grid power interruptions and create a measurable increase in energy security," said Brian Lally, director, facilities energy, DOD.

"In some cases, large commercial-scale renewable power projects can be built that not only provide renewable power to a DOD installation, but also to the city or community that supports the installation through services and an organic workforce," he continues. "This means that there could be potential that should be explored for other uses."

Early Efforts

Increased renewable energy use and production by the military has been a priority since earlier this decade. One of the first efforts in the early 2000s was at Dyess Air Force Base in Texas, which became the first facility to be 100 percent renewable. Fairchild Air Force Base in Washington is also 100 percent renewable. The Air Force also operates a 2.4-MW wind farm on Ascension Island and a 1.3-MW wind farm at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming. Other wind farms are under consideration elsewhere.

Since the DOD is the single largest energy user in the United States, any marginal increases in efficiency or the use of renewable sources could have significant impacts on civilian supply. According to DOD reports, the military consumes 1.2 percent of the energy required in the United States. While the vast majority of its more than 832 trillion BTUs are consumed by aircraft, vehicles and ships, at least 12 percent of its needs are met by electricity at its more than 5,300 sites.

The Energy Policy Act of 2005 mandated an increased share of renewable energy over the next decade, therefore causing more urgency in the removal of fossil fuels from some of the military's uses. By 2013, the military must acquire 7.5 percent of its electricity from renewables.

In this era of environmental awareness, all sectors of American society will make greater attempts to go green. The Defense Department is no different and in fact, it will be taking a leadership role.

Bill Opalka is the Editor-in-Chief of the Topic Center newsletters, which are sent via email to subscribers across the globe. Before joining Energy Central, he was the founding editor of a leading wind energy trade publication. He has an extensive career in trade publications and newspapers, mostly focused on the utility sector, covering such issues as restructuring, renewable energy and consumer affairs.

Republished with permission from CyberTech, Inc. EnergyBiz Insider is published three days a week by Energy Central. For more information about Energy Central, or to subscribe to EnergyBiz Insider, other e-newsletters and EnergyBiz magazine, please go to http://www.energycentral.com/.

14 Comments

Register To Comment
JD Polk
JD Polk
August 3, 2009
SolarmanJD
This is easy to overcome, stop thinking of just one AE source. Wind alone
as you have seen is not cost effective....So for over 20years I have touted
Solar, Wind and Tidal-Flow or Wave Generation on one platform offshore...now a Hybrid of all 3 NOW YOU HAVE A POWERHOUSE OF GENERATION @ LESS COST OVERALL... BETTER ROI ALL ROUND...

SolarmanJD, ceo
Advanced Technology Industries Inc
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
August 2, 2009
Jack Morrison-------"July 29, 2009
I am all for renewable energy but if this cost $100 million to build and saves $1 million a year then it looks like at this rate it won't break even for 100 years providing there is zero maintenance costs during that 100 years. I realize there is the environment to consider too. But I hope that these projects can become more economically feasible."-----------

I think the more accurate way of figuring pay off is the cost difference between two options. What the system that was replaced was costing and would have cost to replace.
I don't think there is any real way to compare----we aren't given the numbers.
Frank Heller
Frank Heller
July 31, 2009
I was instrumental in transferring DOD developed technology to local government in the early Seventies under an NSF grant I directed for the National League of Cities/U.S. Conference of Mayors.

I was amazed at all the great 'stuff' the military had developed that cities could use...nearly all of it was locked up in security red tape....so we created a program that enabled cities to hire a scientist with a high security clearance.

I've occasionally run across Alt. energy 'appliances' developed for DOD that would have a high degree of marketability....U. of Indiana's anaerobic digester for the Marine corps bases in IRAQ...portable and capable eating nearly all the organic waste produced. The navy pioneered fuel cells and nuclear power plants. The Air Force has done solar and composites.

BTW...offshore wind sounds great on paper; but the costs of bringing power onshore are horrendous. ....Never forget the evaluation of five major offshore European wind farms that revealed that they would produce between 25% to 33% of the nameplate capacity!
ANONYMOUS
July 31, 2009
Is Solar Thermal or Solar PV Installer a new MOS yet?
(Military Occupational Specialty)

When that happens, the civilian world will end up with trained personnel to interface with plumbers and electricians for retrofits.

People might even sign up just to get this skill, like they used to for Mechanic....
larry jeppesen
larry jeppesen
July 31, 2009
I WAS IN SCOTLAND A FEW YEARS AGO AND WAS WATCHING THE RAF MAKE TOUCH AND GOs ON A RUNWAY RIGHT NEXT TO A WINDMILL FARM!!

NELLIS PUSSEY USAF PILOTS HAVE WINED THAT THEY CAN'T FLY OVER NEVADA WHEN A WINDMILL FARM IN CONSTRUCTED!!

A REAL SHOCKER FOR USAF PILOTS FLYING OVER PICKEN'S WINDMILL FARMS IN TEXAS!!
Kevin Swartz
Kevin Swartz
July 31, 2009
Peter-I don't want to argumentative, but regarding geothermal, I understand that there is always some chance that you might have to drill different holes over time, or lose the resource entirely.
Kevin Swartz
Kevin Swartz
July 31, 2009
You are right-the simple payback is 100 years. However, I think that the reason there are investors is because they can use the tax benefits. I am sure the after tax returns are pretty good, or why would anyone invest?
James Marett
James Marett
July 31, 2009
@ Jack Morrison - I can't believe Renewable Energy World, of all sources, has done such a poor job of covering this.

Nellis AFB has what's called a Power Purchase Agreement for their solar panels. This means the following:
1) Nellis didn't pay any of the $100M upfront cost
2) Nellis now pays their energy bills to investors instead of the utility
3) The investors cover their investment out of the bills they charge to Nellis

So the 100 yr payback is completely wrong. I don't have access to the financials but i would guess it's more like 3-5, with a hugely positive NPV (especially since it's built on a capped landfill, so there's 0 oppty cost to this land use; you coudln't have done anything else with it).
Peter Denholm
Peter Denholm
July 31, 2009
I like geothermal the best. Solar panels must deteriorate being exposed to the elements continuously. Also wind generators are exposed and depend on the wind for full output.

In geothermal you drive the pipes into the ground, and the pipes last at least 100 years, maybe longer with modern materials. Maybe we can put a pipe in the ground that will work for a thousand years. The temperature difference is constant, sun light is not, and wind is not. China lake knew this a few years ago.
Dimitar Mirchev
Dimitar Mirchev
July 31, 2009
Besides cost saving is not the only benefit in this very early stage of renewable energy development. Some such benefits are the training of staff, stimulating home-based production of renewables which will pay off later, jobs per megawatt installed and the experience of building energy neutral bases is priceless for the military.

It is too early to think only for cost.
ANONYMOUS
July 31, 2009
The $1 million savings vs. the $100 million cost does not mean that it will take 100 years to recoup the cost.

If the base was paying $4 million/yr for electricity, and is now paying $3 million/yr, then it is indeed saving $1 million/yr. However, that $3 million/yr would be going toward the initial cost of the solar installation. This is just an example, as the exact figures for the base were not provided.

Another way to look at it: is it better to pay $4 million/yr to rent, or $3 million/yr to own?
Tyillere Hansen
Tyillere Hansen
July 29, 2009
I couldn't agree with you more Jack Morrison - 74117. Going green or being environmentally conscious does not mean you need to all sense of ROI. We should be looking at technology that gives a faster and more substantial return on investment.
ElectraTherm http://tinyurl.com/ktxlq5 using their technology to harness geothermal waste heat for energy. Their technology has an ROI of only about three years.
There is plenty of other clean technology that has a reasonable ROI like ElectraTherm. Why aren't we using them?
Jack Morrison
Jack Morrison
July 29, 2009
I am all for renewable energy but if this cost $100 million to build and saves $1 million a year then it looks like at this rate it won't break even for 100 years providing there is zero maintenance costs during that 100 years. I realize there is the environment to consider too. But I hope that these projects can become more economically feasible.
Derek Boyle
Derek Boyle
July 29, 2009
For the East Coast, a connected Grid of Offshore Wind Farms could produce up to 330 GW of power.

http://www.udel.edu/PR/UDaily/2007/feb/wind020107.html

Eleven East Coast governors are calling for an East Coast Offshore Wind connection Grid to tap into local resources as opposed to importing Wind energy from Midwest sources that are hundreds of miles away . An East Coast interconnected Offshore Wind grid would bring energy resources directly to the end users, while creating Jobs and Investment in local economies.

East Coast Governors Letter to Congress and Senate May 2009 requesting support for Regional Development of Offshore Wind Resources:

http://files.eesi.org/governors_051109.pdf

For Virginia, the Offshore Wind feasibility studies have already been completed by the Virginia Coastal Energy Research Consortium ( VCERC: http://www.vcerc.org/ ) which estimate that Virginia get 25% of it's total energy needs from Offshore wind alone by 2025, and do it at a lower price than coal and nuclear production. This will also help military installations meet their 25% by 2025 mandates.

Offshore Wind Potential in VA July 17th, 2009

http://files.eesi.org/hagerman_071709.pdf

Environmental and Energy Study Institute Conference July 17th, 2009

http://www.eesi.org/071709_offshore

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • US, Australian Companies Taking Giant Steps for Global EGS Geothermal
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Wind Power — Even without the Wind
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 15
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?
  • 12
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 7
    San Antonio Solar Fans Delay Introduction of SunCredit Program
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • PLANSEE SE
  • Standard Solar Inc.
  • Ambient Technologies, Inc.
  • Quickscrews International Corp.
  • Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software
  • HelioSage
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • AR Power Company, Ltd.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information