Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Hydropower in Europe: Current Status, Future Opportunities

By Marla Barnes, Chief Editor, Hydro Group
July 20, 2009   |   3 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
The emphasis in Western Europe is retrofitting hydro plants with modern equipment, usually upgrading the capacity of the plant. In Eastern Europe, the focus is rehabilitating aging plants that often were allowed to deteriorate during the era of the Soviet Union.
3 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 3
July 20, 2009
Good for Europe. They are giving renewable energy a chance to succeed by using low-cost, base-load and local hydro, geothermal and biomass resources, in addition to wind and solar. In comparison, the US is building 97% unreliable utility-scale wind and a little solar through preferential mandates and subsidies. Idiot environmentalists!
Comment
2 of 3
July 22, 2009
"Another area of significant growth for the hydropower sector in Europe, especially in the central region of the continent, is in pumped storage. In addition to supplying additional electricity during times when demand for power is highest, pumped storage's ability to balance power production and regulate the transmission network, in light of increased use of intermittent renewables, particularly wind, is attractive."

This is good to see.
Storage is a vital ingredient to RE supply strategy if it is to form a significant part of our 'low carbon' energy supply. Apart from conventional hydropower, biomass & possibly geothermal, other RE sources are intermittent; and even if they are predictable, such as tidal and desert solar, they often do not coincide with demand. With 80% efficiency and working life of 100+ years possible, pumped hydro is probably the best bulk electrical energy storage option currently available. For the distributed storage option, EVs (electric vehicles) show great promise, combined with intelligent charging not only could they often charge at times of peak RE electricity generation but would also reduce the actual transport energy demand by a factor of about 4 or 5 compared to current liquid fuelled vehicles.
No image available
Comment
3 of 3
Anonymous
July 22, 2009
It isn't just the "idiot environmentalists" but also the expensive, complicated, burdensome FERC licensing requirement, which other renewables don't have to meet. Those requirements, by the way, are primarily because of the "idiot environmentalists" This isn't about destroying the environment - it's about being reasonable with a proper balance of care for the environment and producing cost-effective renewable energy.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Trojan Battery Company Cantsink Manufacturing 350 Media Standard Solar Inc. Via Expo ClearEnergy Inc. GoGreenSolar.com
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters