Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Britain To Launch Innovative Feed-in Tariff Program in 2010

By Paul Gipe, Contributor
July 30, 2009   |   8 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

8 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 8
Anonymous
July 31, 2009
What about Ireland??? It's English speaking and is also a former "colony" of the UK...it has had a FIT for some years now..perhaps you havent noticed. If not you should have. if you havent then shame on you - wake up and drop your quaint Anglocentric myopia...
No image available
Comment
2 of 8
Anonymous
July 31, 2009
That's it, I am moving to England. Vision is certainly not a great trait of the US. Here it's all about big business. The fact that small PV and Wind systems will be available is something I have been fighting for for years here. God bless England and I am packing soon after I speak with Jeremy to get a job. Also, CHP (microturbines) and biomass to be included completes my prayers being answered. The US will never get away from fossil fuels, coal and oil as they are too powerful and influential in DC. The Germans have set a great FIT vision for copycats to follow.
No image available
Comment
3 of 8
Anonymous
July 31, 2009
Questions no one that advocates FITs seem to answer:

How is this FIT funded? Is it a tax on regional electric distribution company load? How is this subsidy ultimately funded by ratepayers?
Comment
4 of 8
July 31, 2009
Britain has mildly positive news, but far from even good news. Like every other policy that pretends to de-monopolize utility monopolies in the English-speaking world, these feed-in tariffs have been rigged to keep renewable energy and independent energy production from becoming anything more than a tiny niche.

To the anonymous clown above who can't figure out how feed-in tariffs can be funded: They can be funded with embedded subsidies in the same way as utility monopoly regulatory compacts for coal and nuclear plants or so-called competitive bidding (rigged by utilities to go at higher costs to their affiliates and friends). You don't really think this industry is competitive free markets do you???
Comment
5 of 8
July 31, 2009
Nothing mentioned about the KW's offset with SolarThermal. It is the same saving of BTU's or KWH's.

Politicians are quite dense unless the incentive green is the folding type.
Comment
6 of 8
July 31, 2009
What's up with the incorrect statement that California's Feed-In Tariff system has been largely ineffective? "California Public Utility Commission's largely ineffective program"

It has been VERY effective as over 200 MW of Solar power installations have been added in less than 2 years. For an update of the program you can download the full report:

Go Solar California Full Report - June 2009 Solar Program Assessment

http://docs.cpuc.ca.gov/PUBLISHED/Graphics/103173.PDF

Since the program was enacted in 2007, CA has "226 MW installed under the CSI Program"

"The CSI Program has over 22,000 solar applications, including both pending and installed systems that will account for an estimated 373 MW of new solar capacity. (See Section 3.1.3):"
Comment
7 of 8
July 31, 2009
No mention in the article if they are using single or double metering and what the tax implications are. In Germany they are double metered and pay income tax at their marginal income tax level for every kwh they generate and then pay Value Added Tax on every kwh they use. Depending on his tax level a German has to have a system which is between 1.7 to 4 times as large as he needs to produce the amount of power he uses in order to be fiscally neutral with respect to his power use. Britian professes to be basing her system on making it worthwhile for the small generator so perhaps she has taken care of this problem.
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2008/04/double-metering-its-insidious.html
Comment
8 of 8
One disappointing fact of the FITsytem already being applied in Germany since a couple of years, when compared with developments of FIT for UK, may be that it grew without any historical commenwealth background and only back-date anglo-saxon language relations.Nevertheless it appears to be successful and to some extent copyworth. Overall however, this finding supports global prospects for real "historical" FIT- progress. This would be important to encourage more renewable energy development, including now UK. etc... .
Peter
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

paul gipe

View paul gipe's Profile
About: Paul Gipe has written extensively about renewable energy for both the popular and trade press. He has also lectured widely on wind energy and how to minimize it... more »

Advertise With Us

Prudent Living, Inc. K2 Solar,Inc. ClearEnergy Inc. Delta Rigging & Tools The Stella Group, Ltd. Conergy Inc. MaRS
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters