Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Solar Trackers: Facing the Sun

Tracking systems that adjust the position of PV modules to follow the sun can boost yields from solar installations by 40% or more. What is available and who is building them?

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
24 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 24
June 1, 2009
The article is good. I am interested in the manufacturing aspect of the trackers since they presently are costly. I believe that with active single axis trackers, the support design, the electro-mechanical portion and extra reflection from mirrors will be key to power increases and that manufactured in large quantities, the cost of this type of tracker could be lowered to equal the percent increase of the system. In other words, if the tracker increases power production by 30%, the tracker cost should be no greater than 30% of the module cost. Presently this does not seem to be the case.

Instead of an active dual axis system, I think that a simple mechanical means should be used to adjust for seasons. It makes sense that for a large installation, the modules should be checked weekly or bi-weekly and this would be sufficient to realign the North-South direction to compensate for the latitudinal changes of about 1 or 2 degrees per week. It does not seem worthwhile to invest in a second motor axial system for this purpose.

I am convinced that a modified bicycle factory could produce good support systems for the modules and that Traxle type mirrors should be employed to assist in the collection of energy. It is true that the land area needed for collection would be increased but so would the power. I also believe that a CPU robotic motor controlled electric pulse system would minimize the power needed for the motor and lengthen its life.

The decending cost per watt of PV should cause a corresponding increase in the demand for good tracking systems. These systems should be cost effective according to the value of the modules which would be rotated by them. If the cost per watt of PV comes down, then the same must happen with tracking costs.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
2 of 24
June 2, 2009
I would not like to be the person employed to adjust the North South alignment - thousands of panels, 26 times per year.

Strikes me as a perfect job for a small battery electric robot equipped with a push rod and some kind of brake release mechanism.

People talk about jobs in Renewable Energy as though this is some kind of plus. Jobs per watt is a measure of INEFFICIENCY. To beat coal head on, the industry needs to be obsessive about efficiency.

Sure, let there be jobs (aka careers) in greening the power grid, but let NOT there be jobs (aka chores, costs) in the actual power production.
Comment
3 of 24
June 2, 2009
Carl, thank you for your comments. I agree with you on North-South hand adjustment for thousands of panels but for home use it may be a practical system. A simple screw thread push rod like a car jack should do the trick. There are already motor driven push rods for trackers but they tend to be expensive and I do not know if their use would be worth the percentage gain.

John. I think the mini-strip idea is good but would need strong backing for wind conditions to prevent vibration and damage to the cells. There would be increased expense in the manufacturing since the modules would be less unified. More wiring would be needed between strips. I think it more economical to keep the modules to size but more power could be gained with the use of mirrors, especially during the morning and evening hours.

My idea is to design the modules with holes spaced throughout so that the wind could pass through. This design would have to be implemented at the factory level. Less wind forces mean that the skeletal structure of the trackers could be lighter in weight. Presently, the support systems are very heavy and strong anchoring is necessary. My thoughts on the design of the PV supports are like of a 3D type as under a bridge which could be robotically assembled in a factory. This somewhat honeycomb design would permit the use of light materials. The 3D method would enable the use of thin support trusses. Also, the support would be central, that is, stronger and thicker materials at the center and then declining towards the outside in thickness.The size of the module holes going out from the center should increase in area. It is the wind forces that are of great concern. The problem is that the construction of tracker modules should be different than from fixed ones in that they need holes to reduce wind forces.. This goes to the very core of the industry because no company has yet designed modules to be used specifically with trackers.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
4 of 24
June 3, 2009
A few sensors connected to the control board and a clever software running in a small microcontroller could easily eliminate the need for any manual adjustments, as the tracker would always point to the direction of maximum power. If this sounds attractive I can offer my services to design and build such subsystem.

Stepan.Tatulian@sollatek.com
Comment
5 of 24
June 3, 2009
In the 1970's we developed Tracker Systems that were inexpensive and simple too. No controller or software was needed, PC hadn't even been invented yet. A simple system of Solar Optic Switches and AC Drive Motors.
Anyone interested in resurrecting this technology contact me. ross.epm@gmail.com
Comment
6 of 24
June 3, 2009
The North-South alignment wouldn't have to be done 26 times a year.

Having dual axis control allows the solar panels to be parked to minimize damage and snow cover during inclement weather.

Are mirrors economical especially when they need to be controlled?
Comment
7 of 24
June 3, 2009
Interesting. We have dual axis tracking +/- 0.004 degrees on a 13 m^2 CPV dish. Drive cost is about $100 per axis.
Comment
8 of 24
June 3, 2009
The Chicago project interested me greatly. There exists potential to plant a low-growing succulent such as purslane, in a layer below the modules, with mycelia below the purslane. Depending on what is in the brownfields, mycelia can sometimes remediate long-chain hydro-carbons. If the area is contaminated with heavy metals, there are other plants, e.g. potatoes, that will take up heavy metals. Chamomile can grow in inhospitable places, and it gives off a pleasant scent when stepped on. This is a heartening use for urban brownfields. I could not resist the permaculturist's reflex to stack functions. I see educational opportunities in a project like this as well.
Comment
9 of 24
June 3, 2009
For the tracking systems that are based on time and using calculations to keep the panels pointed toward the sun, how are they initialized during installation? Is there a need to periodically realign the system?
Comment
10 of 24
June 3, 2009
The arguement should only about the numbers. It is either economically feasible to use a dual tracker or it is not. If maintenance and/or human interface is required, again, just run the numbers. Of course, as alwasy in this industry, just running the numbers is not necessarily the final say since in many cases solar installations are even economically feasible in the frist place,,,,,,, unless subsidized dollars are substracted from the actual installation cost. Don't get me wrong, I truely believe that we must move toward RE before it is too late ! ! !
Comment
11 of 24
June 3, 2009
For the tracking systems that are based on time...

An open loop sun sensor updates clock and position of closed loop tracking.
Comment
12 of 24
June 4, 2009
As a smart assed year 12 physics student, I asked my dad, an engineer, why people use such inefficient bent tin vanes (60% efficient) on wind powered water pumps when much more efficient propellor types (90% efficient) were available. He pointed out to me that besides costing a third as much, the maintenance was cheaper and could be done by a home mechanic. A salutary lesson on engineering reality. Could these tracking solar panels be a similar case in point. Add to that that you have to space them much further apart so that they don't shade each other except at noon and that they can be destroyed by catching the wind during a storm. I suspect that simple cladding of the roof, possibly with a hinge at the bottom and a simple ratchet at the top to adjust for the seasonal angle might be a much more robust, economic solution.
Comment
13 of 24
June 4, 2009
Economic feasibility of using labor in place of North South tracking:

Carl says " would not like to be the person employed to adjust the North South alignment - thousands of panels, 26 times per year."

Would this be a valid use of manpower? Let us assume that it takes about 15 seconds to adjust a 200 watt module in the North South direction each two weeks.
1. A worker could adjust about 4 per minute or about 240 per hour or about 1,900 per day.
2. If the adjustment was done in sections, then over a 2 week period, about 19,000 modules could be adjusted.
3. The power of a field of this size is 19,000 x 0.2 Kw = 3800 Kw or about 3.8 Mw.
4. The adjustment should earn about a 2% increase in power or 3800 Kw x 0.02 = 76 Kw.
5. If PV solar assumed to be about $0.14/kwh and assuming with a mirror system that you have a yearly average desert conditions of about 6 hours of good sunlight per day, then the daily increased value of labor returns 0.14 x 6 x 76 = $64/day. Since the sun shines on Saturday and Sunday, the total value would be 64 x 365 = $23,360.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
14 of 24
June 4, 2009
William Hughes, I like your idea of hinge-and-ratchet.

If you put a clear panel (Suntech) on a box, you then have a cold frame in a cold climate. If the box is made of masonry, you have some heat storage capacity, and you have wind stability since it is unlikely limestone or your rocks of choice would blow away in the wind.

If you sink a closed-loop PET slinky under your passive solar floor, then you can cool if things heat up too much. Fill the PET with ethyl and you can circulate it up under the panel for heating at night (melting snow if that's an issue) and cooling during the day, to get better solar efficiency.

I'm not an engineer, but I am a smart-ass. I hope someone else is tracking back and will correct me if I'm missing something.

The most beautiful built space I know of has a two-story glass roof-wall that stores heat in bluestone on the north wall that faces the sun and in the rock floor.

I could happily live in such a room, with my tangerinerie and other tropical plants yet to be determined. Too bad I probably could not stand the humidity required for cacao-growing.

The model house at the Earthships outside of Taos had features similar to this some years ago. I had a backache as I walked in. The tropical plants in a trough under the south roof were striking. There were bananas, and I was hungry.

I was so blown-away, I forgot my back-ache and didn't remember I couldn't sit on the floor. I sat to watch the construction and sales video. I remembered the back-ache when I went to get up, but it was gone. I realize this isn't the kind of miracle that can be scientifically replicated, but it worked for my DNA.

As poor as U.S. people are now advertised to be, it is this kind of design that has the potential to lure money out of insecure storage vessels and into multi-tasking silicon-based devices needing minimal inputs after installation.
Comment
15 of 24
June 4, 2009
It is difficult to imagine many solar trackers being a decent economic proposition. Photovoltaics are solid-state and can last up to 40 years. They require virtually no maintenance other than periodic surface cleaning with a soft broom and a rinse. In order to make a tracking device that could last 40 years would be a very expensive proposition and the more complex the device, the more broken controllers and drives would occur. Mechanical devices are notoriously bad at enduring the insults of weather, corrosion, and temperature variations. Our atmosphere is increasingly corrosive and the weather increasingly volatile. Tracking systems generally require a larger footprint of land than fixed systems. The added costs of maintenance, downtime, and additional land requirement are better spent on adding additional fixed angle modules that are robust enough to endure hurricane winds.
Comment
16 of 24
June 5, 2009
There was a brief mention of passive trackers. Here is a quote from the website of one manufacturer.
"Since 1980, more than 15,000 Zomeworks tracking systems have been installed in different climates on nearly every continent in the world. Track Racks are highly cost-effective components for domestic and industrial photovoltaic power systems, water pumping systems, cathodic protection systems, and utility applications."
There may be other passive tracking systems available. These may be more relavant to residential or smaller scale operations.
Comment
17 of 24
June 5, 2009
The usefulness or otherwise of trackers has to be considered on a case-by-case basis The article ignored the problems associated with the use of trackers. Where land is at a premium, the cost of additional space required (to prevent shading by adjacent modules) may not be offset by the increased energy yield. In the open desert where land may be cheap, the tracker linkages will regularly get clogged by dust from sandstorm, necessitating use of water – another scarce commodity. As correctly said by Jerry (Comment 11), you just have to run the numbers.
Comment
18 of 24
June 5, 2009
I would like feedback on the hinge idea from William, (Comment 13), for a human-scaled installation. A person could eyeball the angle, then check how output is doing. It would be a great science experiment for a family with science-inclined kids. For the bottom, one could design telescoping legs or panels or some sort of hydraulic set-up. Ratchets would not need to be the only choice.

I'm not dismissing the importance of designing against wind shear. That's an important consideration even in normally un-windy places, given climate weirdness.

Another issue I have not seen addressed yet here is the issue of possible environmental change from desert installations. When it does rain in the desert, evaporation will be curtailed by shading. This could lead to microclimates in the way that creating reefs works in the ocean. Kudzu would not appear overnight, but large installations could need to be monitored. I assume desert dust is designed for. Desert plants, insects, and rodents probably should be scanned for if more of them become supported by changes to the land. I do not conjecture about whether there would be a difference in this between fixed, one-axis, or two-axis, but it would be interesting to track the differences.

Just think if we had pursued all this without pause from the 70's to now.
Comment
19 of 24
June 5, 2009
Re. Jonathan-cole's comment (#16): I agree completely with PV being solid state, lasting up to 40 years and requiring little maintenance other than surface cleaning. Who wants to bother with mechanical and electronic controls that could break down. However, my answer is that if the mechanical and electronic devices can be manufactured and maintained at reasonable cost, then they can certainly pay for themselves if the increase in production of electricity is 20-40% of the normal stationary field. The key is bringing the initial cost and maintenance of the trackers down to below the 20-40% value of the increase. I believe this can be done.

Certainly, in areas with hurricane winds, trackers might not be acceptable but there are some desert areas not bothered by strong winds where the trackers would prove feasible. Trackers are also not feasible on the roofs of houses with steep angles, for example. Yes, more space is required for trackers because of the shade produced in morning and afternoon hours but then there is always the possibility of a PV hybrid system with fixed PV set between tracker PV to take advantage of the time when the tracker PV is at the +- 30 degree incline between 10 am and 2 pm. Yes, spacing is required between the trackers but this space can be productive of additional power.

Also, it would be possible to use track racks linking modules in equitorial line for the North-South change while providing individual modules the freedom to swing East-West during daylight hours. This could be done with parallel top/bottom bars with the top (North) bar being able to swivel on its axis and the bottom (South side) bar raised or lowered to change the NS angle.

The possibilities are of great interest and we should see more development along this line as the cost/watt of modules decline.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
20 of 24
June 8, 2009
Recent studies show that due to the reduction of PV price, more kWh can be produced over the working life of the system by covering the ground with PV and NOT tracking. Where land cost is an issue or space is constrained this can be an important consideration. In this case the issue of tracker repair and maintenance is avoided.

While this may not be the best use of our technologies this lower initial cost approach may lead to the lowest levelized cost of ownership (LCOE).
Comment
21 of 24
June 8, 2009
Glenn (comment 21). Recent studies do not take into consideration the fact that tracking systems can be designed differently and mass produced so that cost per wattt can be brought down to reasonable levels. Granted that the cost of trackers is now presently high, this does not mean that costs will remain that way. If you recall, when simple electronic calculators were first produced, they were about $250 each (back in the slide rule days) but now the same item may be purchased at 1/100 of that price due to mass production efficiencies.

It is my belief that the development of trackers has definitely not matured and will not mature until the watt price of PV modules comes down considerably. Then demand for modules and trackers will increase so that the production of trackers in large quantities can be justfied and methods be expanded to the point that costs of trackers will plummet. Trackers will not be difficult or expensive to manufacture if they are to be produced by the millions.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
22 of 24
June 8, 2009
adrianakau2aol.com

I agree the technology has not fully matured however as PV price continues to decline and cell efficiencies improve, trackers will have to get significantly less expensive. Knowing that you'll always need some amount of material to get the strength and durability you need and that you'll have greater repair and maintenance than fixed mount, the equation for tracking payback becomes questionable.

Utilities may still choose to track to improve the capacity factor – it may be worth the premium to them to get more on peak power.
Comment
23 of 24
June 9, 2009
Glenn. I agree with your comments. The main idea for investing in PV is to get the most power for the amount invested. As you have said, materials for trackers are part of the investment and so are maintenance costs. The point is whether these additional expenses can be justified along with the need for increased land area.

I think that the question might be looked at from a different point of view: should trackers not be used to help produce additional power if the overall cost per watt can be decreased?

1. We know that the angle of the sun at 8am and 4pm are 60 degrees with respect to the vertical. This means that the cells can only be 50% effective (ratio of 30-60-90 triangles are 1, 2, 1.732). By 10 am or 2pm, the angle with respect to the normal is 30 degrees so that 86.6% of the sunlight is effective. This means that for early and late hours, a fair percent of the sun light cannot be used because of the angle effect. Tracking effectively improves the situation but, at a cost.

2. Simple flat 45 degree placed mirror systems cannot be used effectively unless there is tracking. Again, the key is to decide if the cost of mirror placement and maintenance is justifiable in terms of overall cost per watt.

The key issue is the cost increase of using tracking and mirrors but this must be weighed against the power increase of the system. If the purpose of a power company is to make money, then all factors should be considered. We cannot limit ourselves to the % efficiency of the solar cells when we know that they cannot reach proper efficiency unless receiving maximum light from the sun per unit area. A power company should not sacrifice an increase in power revenue unless the expense for producing the additional revenue would exceed the increased income over the lifetime of the system.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
24 of 24
January 26, 2010
A solar tracker does not have to be expensive and weak. You can build a tracker that can withstand strong winds and carry heavy arrays. It can also be used with water heaters. By adding very inexpensive circuitry, you can track declination also. I built my own, starting with a relatively light array, but it can carry as heavy an array as needed, depending on the inexpensive automotive parts used. I invested as little as 150.00 U.S. dollars and the power consumption of the motor is as low as 6 watts. Please check it out at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCmCFHnCP6c.

Thanks
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With 30,000 subscribers and a global readership in over 170 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine is targeted at those who make growth happen in renewable industries. Covering policy, technology, finance,... more »

 

David Appleyard

View David Appleyard's Profile
About: David Appleyard is Chief Editor of Renewable Energy World. He also currently holds the position of Chief Editor for sister publication Hydro Review Worldwide.... more »

Advertise With Us

Concepts NREC SolarTech Solar Leadership Summit 2012 OTTI - Ostbayerisches Techn. Transfer Institute Solar Energy International (SEI) SolarEdge Technologies Renewable Energy World Asia Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters