Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Nevada Extends Tax Credits for Renewables & Increases RPS

June 2, 2009   |   4 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Unfortunately, the bill in its final form falls short of creating a robust rooftop and small scale solar market. The 5 percent distributed solar carve-out we supported would have created upwards of 6,700 jobs in the state by 2020."

-- Julia Curtis, Sharp Solar, Solar Alliance's Nevada Lead
4 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 4
Anonymous
June 2, 2009
I worked on SB 358 as a non-paid lobbyist, and unfortunately the final result is not good for consumers in Nevada. NV Energy's lobbyists clearly won the day.

Rather than increasing funding, NV Energy succeeded in getting a net reduction in rebate funding while allowing for a 9% increase in rebate availability annually. When rebates go in just 38 minutes for the whole year, I doubt 9% is going to have much of an impact.

In addition, NV Energy was able to get provisions enacted (or prevented such as DG) which essentially allow it to follow a path of owning all or almost all of the portfolio renewable energy. This means their is less chance for a viable market for regular consumers, and they will continue to pay a higher price.

By taking their action, with the assistance of our Legislators and Governor, Our state utility essentially won the market.

Good Job NV Energy and big hearty "Thank You" to our weak state government - you showed excellent skills at doing nothing, and feeling good about it.
No image available
Comment
2 of 4
Anonymous
June 3, 2009
SSDD (Same S*%t, Different Day)
No image available
Comment
3 of 4
Anonymous
June 3, 2009
Waht would you expect from a captive transmission service provider? There wil be no benefit provided from the state or federal government that the independent power generator will obtain if the utility can "suck it out" during their power contract negotiations. This is a proven fact.

Answer: A strong GEA where the utilities are NOT allowed to particpate since they are preditory and obvioulsy in sync with the state. It is not illegal or even illogical for the process the way it is and it makes perfect sense for both the state and the utiliy, but the collusion is perhaps unethical. Then again, who cares about ethics as Wall Street has proven.
Comment
4 of 4
June 3, 2009
Unfortunately, I only figured out what feed-in tariffs (FITs) were in late December of 2008 and there wasn't time to build a coalition to support passage of legislation in Nevada's short, 120 day, legislative session. So we wait for the 2011 session, which will give us time to build wide support for a FIT law in Nevada. Join us - http://ElectricNevada.org > click "Renewable Energy Payments Initiative" in the menu bar.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Motech Industries, Inc. Unirac, Inc. Poet Schletter Inc. RussTech Inc. North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners Texas Solar Energy Society
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters