Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: Jim Tetro
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (7) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
June 17, 2009

Feds Playing Catch-up As States Take Renewable Energy Lead

by Bob Haavind, Editor-at-large, Photovoltaics World
Philadelphia, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

In the US, some 27 states and Washington DC have renewable energy portfolios and mandates, but not the federal government. Meanwhile, countries like Germany, Spain, and Japan have spurred far more alternate energy installations. That may soon change, based on reports from an array of speakers at PV America, held last week (June 7-12, 2009) in Philadelphia, in association with the 34th IEEE PV Specialists conference.

"The states have a Governator," quipped Rhone Resch, president/CEO of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), which organized the first PV America exhibit and conference, "And now we have a Cabinet filled with clean energy leaders."

The new approach is apparent in the huge economic stimulus bill, which has 19 provisions supporting solar, Resch explained. He also pointed out that solar has potential far beyond sun-bathed regions like California and Arizona. In fact, he pointed out, policy initiatives have pushed NJ into 2nd place in the US in solar behind California.

To emphasize his point, he said that Germany, a world leader in solar installations, has a solar profile like Alaska, but it has 5× the solar installations of the US, while Spain, with a solar profile like Idaho, has 30×.

"Political leaders put in policies," he said, "and innovators create new industries."

NJ has a mandate for 22% renewable energy by 2022, while PA is mandating 18% by 2020, with 0.5% of its electricity from photovoltaics. Resch said many states in the north-Atlantic region, as well as the Midwest, have solar set-aside programs with ambitious targets for the next decade or so, totaling 5077MW-7077MW [see table, below — note that PA is still negotiating a final goal].

State Solar Set-aside Program Goals
State
Goals (MW)
Pennsylvania 690-2700
New Jersey 1800
Maryland 1400
Ohio 820
Maine 250
New York 100
Connecticut 17
TOTAL
5077-7077

Gov. Edward G. Rendell of PA said that his state, in 2004, was the 24th to pass renewable energy legislation in the absence of any federal program. State tax credit could provide up to $0.30/kWh for solar. The recent stimulus bill now has provided a $650M energy fund to PA, and $180M of that will go to solar, he said, $100M to homeowners and small businesses, and $80M to foster solar industries.

"The race is on for who can create the most resourceful, innovative, alternative energy," he said, citing work in solar, wind, and geothermal technology as well as fuel cells and batteries for electric cars.

The US needs to catch up with countries like Germany, he believes, while renewable energy industries are in a formative stage.

"We want the US to be the dominant solar manufacturer in the world, and to become a leading exporter," he added.

To foster innovation in his state, grants from the Pennsylvania Energy Development Authority (PEDA) are offered, with $20M available in the latest round, about $10M of that from the federal American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and more than 300 applications have been received. Already, Plextronics, a western-PA company making thin-film solar devices, has received three PEDA grants, he said, growing to 70 employees and aiming for large-scale production.

He explained that PA, like a number of other states, now has a net-metering program where solar facilities can get credit from the local utility for feeding excess electricity back into the grid. But each state has its own quirks in the rules and limits, so a federal standard would help provide some uniformity. Rendell said that federal tax credits for renewable energy (RE) need to be made permanent, and a federal mandate for future RE targets, setting the bar even higher than the scattered state goals, is needed to nurture new industries.

"We need to focus with laser-like dedication," Rendell said, urging attendees to become advocates pushing Congress to quick action on renewable energy programs. For the US to achieve a strong economic turnaround, he believes two major programs are needed. One is a massive, 5-10 year infrastructure effort on roads and bridges as well as a smart electric grid, the other is green energy.

The innovators are eager to get to work, he suggested. Energy secretary Steven Chu recently told him that Washington has been flooded by renewable energy grant applications just like the PEDA program in his state.

Sam Baldwin, chief technology officer for the DOE's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, cited President Obama's May 27 announcement that $117.6M will be available for solar energy projects, including $51.5M for development and $40.5M for deployment.

Meanwhile, two renewable energy bills are making their way through the US House and Senate. But SEIA CEO Resch suggested some important points that should be included. One is renewable energy grants making up to 30% of installation cost for those who can't take advantage of tax credits. Another is an RE loan guarantee program that jointly covers manufacturers and installers. He also urged a 30% tax credit for new RE manufacturing investment, similar to what Germany and Japan have had for several years. Penalties should be removed where federal grants overlap state and municipal benefits.

Resch also called for a $3.1B for states to use for renewable energy and energy efficiency grants. This could create 110,000 new jobs over the next two years. The renewable energy portfolio should designate 2% for distributed generation installations for private dwellings and businesses, which would still leave the major share for utilities, he added.

Resch also called for a national standard on net metering, as well as uniform national standards for interconnecting to the grid. It doesn't make sense, for example, to require a 4-prong plug in PA, while MD allows a 2-prong plug, he said.

Another program urged by several speakers is a clean energy bank (CEB), providing lines of credit, low-interest loans, loan guarantees, and other benefits for renewable energy and energy efficiency projects.

Lower interest rates can greatly speed the march of solar technology to grid parity, Resch stated. If rates are pushed from 6% down to 2%, he suggested, over 80% of the US would quickly reach grid parity.

The availability and cost of capital are two factors that could hold back solar even if grid parity is reached, according to John Byrne, director of the Center for Energy and Environmental Policy at the U. Delaware. He proposed that a tax-exempt bond process be established for renewable energy. He pointed out that in the 20th century, this is how the US was able to build up its transportation system and housing.

The migration of the solar industry toward commercialization is evidenced by the change in the nature of the IEEE's PV Specialist conference. Years ago, this was the venue for detailed reports on materials and device developments in photovoltaics. While these topics are still covered, it is often by means of poster sessions for those interested in technology specifics. Meanwhile, many of the oral sessions deal with broader system-level issues, including government policies, markets, and lessons to be learned from other countries across Europe and Asia. Many of the engineers and scientists who have come to this meeting for years — or even decades — are now either starting companies or are involved in innovative new ventures. Solar is moving onto a new track.

Bob Haavind is editor-at-large for Photovoltaics World magazine and SST.

This article was republished with permission from Photovoltaics World. PV World is part of the Renewable Energy World network.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (7)
 
No image available
RPS is a failure, and discourages GOOD practices, like building energy generation facilities within the BUILT ENVIRONMENT, and encourages the ongoing externalization of costs onto the environment and ratepayers and taxpayers so Big Energy can keep ripping us off.

The reason Germany, Spain and friends have so much uptake is because they AREN'T stuck with a "Governator" who is so maniacally pro-Big Business, that he keeps hollering about how great it will be to destroy all of CA's deserts for Big Energy profits, and he can't even get us the most basic energy policy of a FEED IN TARIFF, like 42 other countries have.

Do we want clean, affordable, democratic power production that does not destroy our environment like Big Wind, Big Solar and Big Transmission will? If so, we need to push HARD for feed in tariffs and generous loan programs so that every appropriate structure and in-city brownfield gets the PV, microwind and efficiency upgrades it needs, and WE get the benefits.
Comment 1 of 7
June 17, 2009
Hey Stop Killing:

You are beating your head against the wall... Main stream news will only cover articles that are about disaster, death, sex or making some entity money, which is the bulk of everything else.. Imbedded advertising is in everything... I have a story that is very relevant but they won't cover it because it doesn't make money for anyone. In short, it is negative without any positives. Positives only occur if the situation is rectified, which doesn't cut it. That is second tier. Capitalism is a world problem without an viable alternative.... No one that has power and is sitting comfortable will rock the boat. Everyone knows this underneath but does not openly profess it due to possible business repercussions, unless they have nothing to loose. Try to self publish your text and video on you own. Attempt to achieve high quality in the presentation, content and take your chances......

.....Bill
Comment 2 of 7
No image available
June 18, 2009
The CEB sounds good but i doubt it will ever be actualized because there is no one willing to be that nice with so much cash.

Killin and Bill,
What? "Capitalism is a world problem without an viable alternative"? sorry but it works, and not everyone can be happy, welcome to life. As for California being destroyed by Wind, Solar, and Grid building projects, i assure you damage is being limited to only the necessary, but yes, some dessert does need to be affected in order to build transmission towers and CPV farms. You may be interested to look into Solar Convection Power Towers, or Solar Towers, that do radically change the land under them, but they actually improve the dessert into usable land with high moisture contents. Granted they are HUGE and take plenty of space, we are talking about a carbon negative power source if built correctly.
Sorry, you also sorta hit a pet peeve; simply calling the solar industry 'Big Solar', does not convey they are evil, corrupt, and insidious. It says you don't understand their motives, and don't care to learn. maybe it's just me, but slapping 'Big' in front of an industry you don't like is childish and completely uncalled for. It also makes you seem like the agitator. I mean c'mon, these are some of the few companies on the planet who care enough about the environment to be making less money than they could in exchange for saving people from their own dumb habits.
Don't misunderstand, non-invasive energy production is something i sympathize with; I'm currently developing a non-ecologically-impacting hydro-power design that will generate 24/7 power in any river in the US, commercially used for shipping or not. But until such time as advanced nuclear, passive hydro, geo-thermal, solar, wind, and marine can all co-exist peacefully, you are going to need to deal with the patches. Band-aids rip off arm hair, but they sure are better than Impetigo. Trust me on that one.
Comment 3 of 7
No image available
June 18, 2009
The author is wrong - the US doesn't need renewable energy portfolios and mandates. State programs are bad enough. They are controlled by the utility monopolies, who have shown a 97% preference for utility-scale wind, even though other renewable technologies are cheaper and more reliable. Moreover, utilities most often favor bids from their own company, affiliates and friends.

The author uses a poor example to make the boast that other countries like Germany, Spain and Japan have spurred far more alternative energy installations. European nations offer feed-in tariffs (which are far more effective and fair) and Japan is more of an exporter, with monopolized power markets and few domestic renewables.
Comment 4 of 7
June 18, 2009
Sometimes complex and difficult perspectives or views, can be seen clearly by just a phrase or two. So, to quote one of such from Savage Garden, Affirmation:

"I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair
I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires"

Capitalism has twisted and distorted this country so much from its original creation point that concepts like "conflict of interest" and "lying for profit" are considered the norm rather than mendacious failings to be avoided. Ethics, morality and truth have been stripped from reality and relegated to the world of fantasy. So, if where we have functionally digressed to in 233 years is your definition of, "it works", than I guess you sleep very well at night.

.....Bill
Comment 5 of 7
June 20, 2009
It seems we have given the fantasies of Disneyland a belief as reality, so much so that it can maintain in Government bodies, where falsities are intended (by our nations founders) to be checked.
Strong FIT's would allow thw markets in renewables to sort itself out and do away with the special favoritism of award programs, which like other gifting programs, tends to align with the larger vendors for the kickbacks and perks. Only energy production FIT's will level the field with a fair chance for all viable technologies. Metered systems are a must. Electric and thermal.
Comment 6 of 7
No image available
June 24, 2009
"We want the US to be the dominant solar manufacturer in the world, and to become a leading exporter," he added."

The US become an exporter? Fat chance - we're already outsourcing our technology and manufacturing...

The federal tax credits don't need to be made permanent, as the article suggests. This keeps the cost artificially high and prevents competition from bringing the prices down. Temporary credits are fine, within reason, but what is really needed is federally directed feed-in tariffs to encourage more installations adn growth. Too many utilities and their lobbyists are fighting FITs, because it costs them money...
Comment 7 of 7
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Geothermal Energy Association North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners IntertechPira FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division Comdel Green Power Labs Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo