Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Feds Playing Catch-up As States Take Renewable Energy Lead

By Bob Haavind, Editor-at-large, Photovoltaics World
June 17, 2009   |   7 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
RPS is a failure, and discourages GOOD practices, like building energy generation facilities within the BUILT ENVIRONMENT, and encourages the ongoing externalization of costs onto the environment and ratepayers and taxpayers so Big Energy can keep ripping us off.

The reason Germany, Spain and friends have so much uptake is because they AREN'T stuck with a "Governator" who is so maniacally pro-Big Business, that he keeps hollering about how great it will be to destroy all of CA's deserts for Big Energy profits, and he can't even get us the most basic energy policy of a FEED IN TARIFF, like 42 other countries have.

Do we want clean, affordable, democratic power production that does not destroy our environment like Big Wind, Big Solar and Big Transmission will? If so, we need to push HARD for feed in tariffs and generous loan programs so that every appropriate structure and in-city brownfield gets the PV, microwind and efficiency upgrades it needs, and WE get the benefits.
Comment
2 of 7
June 17, 2009
Hey Stop Killing:

You are beating your head against the wall... Main stream news will only cover articles that are about disaster, death, sex or making some entity money, which is the bulk of everything else.. Imbedded advertising is in everything... I have a story that is very relevant but they won't cover it because it doesn't make money for anyone. In short, it is negative without any positives. Positives only occur if the situation is rectified, which doesn't cut it. That is second tier. Capitalism is a world problem without an viable alternative.... No one that has power and is sitting comfortable will rock the boat. Everyone knows this underneath but does not openly profess it due to possible business repercussions, unless they have nothing to loose. Try to self publish your text and video on you own. Attempt to achieve high quality in the presentation, content and take your chances......

.....Bill
Comment
3 of 7
June 18, 2009
The CEB sounds good but i doubt it will ever be actualized because there is no one willing to be that nice with so much cash.

Killin and Bill,
What? "Capitalism is a world problem without an viable alternative"? sorry but it works, and not everyone can be happy, welcome to life. As for California being destroyed by Wind, Solar, and Grid building projects, i assure you damage is being limited to only the necessary, but yes, some dessert does need to be affected in order to build transmission towers and CPV farms. You may be interested to look into Solar Convection Power Towers, or Solar Towers, that do radically change the land under them, but they actually improve the dessert into usable land with high moisture contents. Granted they are HUGE and take plenty of space, we are talking about a carbon negative power source if built correctly.
Sorry, you also sorta hit a pet peeve; simply calling the solar industry 'Big Solar', does not convey they are evil, corrupt, and insidious. It says you don't understand their motives, and don't care to learn. maybe it's just me, but slapping 'Big' in front of an industry you don't like is childish and completely uncalled for. It also makes you seem like the agitator. I mean c'mon, these are some of the few companies on the planet who care enough about the environment to be making less money than they could in exchange for saving people from their own dumb habits.
Don't misunderstand, non-invasive energy production is something i sympathize with; I'm currently developing a non-ecologically-impacting hydro-power design that will generate 24/7 power in any river in the US, commercially used for shipping or not. But until such time as advanced nuclear, passive hydro, geo-thermal, solar, wind, and marine can all co-exist peacefully, you are going to need to deal with the patches. Band-aids rip off arm hair, but they sure are better than Impetigo. Trust me on that one.
Comment
4 of 7
June 18, 2009
The author is wrong - the US doesn't need renewable energy portfolios and mandates. State programs are bad enough. They are controlled by the utility monopolies, who have shown a 97% preference for utility-scale wind, even though other renewable technologies are cheaper and more reliable. Moreover, utilities most often favor bids from their own company, affiliates and friends.

The author uses a poor example to make the boast that other countries like Germany, Spain and Japan have spurred far more alternative energy installations. European nations offer feed-in tariffs (which are far more effective and fair) and Japan is more of an exporter, with monopolized power markets and few domestic renewables.
Comment
5 of 7
June 18, 2009
Sometimes complex and difficult perspectives or views, can be seen clearly by just a phrase or two. So, to quote one of such from Savage Garden, Affirmation:

"I believe the struggle for financial freedom is unfair
I believe the only ones who disagree are millionaires"

Capitalism has twisted and distorted this country so much from its original creation point that concepts like "conflict of interest" and "lying for profit" are considered the norm rather than mendacious failings to be avoided. Ethics, morality and truth have been stripped from reality and relegated to the world of fantasy. So, if where we have functionally digressed to in 233 years is your definition of, "it works", than I guess you sleep very well at night.

.....Bill
Comment
6 of 7
June 20, 2009
It seems we have given the fantasies of Disneyland a belief as reality, so much so that it can maintain in Government bodies, where falsities are intended (by our nations founders) to be checked.
Strong FIT's would allow thw markets in renewables to sort itself out and do away with the special favoritism of award programs, which like other gifting programs, tends to align with the larger vendors for the kickbacks and perks. Only energy production FIT's will level the field with a fair chance for all viable technologies. Metered systems are a must. Electric and thermal.
Comment
7 of 7
June 24, 2009
"We want the US to be the dominant solar manufacturer in the world, and to become a leading exporter," he added."

The US become an exporter? Fat chance - we're already outsourcing our technology and manufacturing...

The federal tax credits don't need to be made permanent, as the article suggests. This keeps the cost artificially high and prevents competition from bringing the prices down. Temporary credits are fine, within reason, but what is really needed is federally directed feed-in tariffs to encourage more installations adn growth. Too many utilities and their lobbyists are fighting FITs, because it costs them money...
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

LORD Corporation Asia Solar Expo RBI Solar Inc. Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software Rittal Corporation Trojan Battery Company SunMaxx Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters