Can We Meet Our Energy Needs with Solar?

Stephen Lacey, Podcast Editor
June 19, 2009 | 2 Comments

New Hampshire, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com] Theoretically, we could get all of our energy from the sun. But is it realistically feasible? And if so, what are the technical, economic and political barriers to reaching that lofty goal? In this podcast, we'll look at the challenges and implications of such a heavy reliance on solar.

First, we'll take a brief tour of the new air-cooled solar thermal tower in the Northern German town of Jülich.

Then, Michael Webber of the University of Texas at Austin describes the complicated relationship between energy (including solar energy) and water.

Finally, Ken Zweibel of the George Washington University Solar Institute talks about the possibility of powering the entire U.S. with solar.

Inside Renewable Energy is a weekly audio news program featuring stories and interviews on all the latest developments in the renewable energy industries.

2 Comments

Stephen Lacey
2009-06-25 13:02:02.0

Martin --
I'm actually surprised it took this long for someone to make a comment like yours. I do agree, we didn't talk extensively about the long-term storage picture, which is one of the most important components of this conversation.

Unfortunately, it's a lot more difficult to do the topic justice with a single-interview format. This type of topic really needs to be addressed in a more dynamic way.

However, I think there are storage/back-up methods out there for solar today. Those include: Wind (where feasible) Compressed air, and something like molten salt or oil (which you mentioned). Then further in the future, we're talking about huge flow batteries. While we still have a way to go before some of the next-generation storage techniques are viable, there are technologies out there today that can provide the bridge.

Therefore, I think we can start having realistic discussions about such a high penetration of solar today.

Anyway, I appreciate your comment.

PS -- I should have made it clear that Zweibel was talking about 70 percent of our electricity and 35 percent of total energy by 2050.

Martin Nicholson (Author - ENERGY IN A CHANGING CLIMATE)
2009-06-25 01:29:40.0

I'm not sure what Stephen Lacey meant by "powering the entire U.S. with solar". One obvious interpretation is that it means that all of the US power comes from solar. From the interviews I can only assume that it was meant to mean something quite different.

But if that was what was meant then there was a giant elephant in the room with Ken Zweibel that got completely ignored. Solar only produces power for 8 hours a day (if you are lucky). What do you do for the other 16 hours? Ken talked about the "easy" problem - the short term loss of power from cloud cover but ignored the night or a string of cloudy days. The nights are a certainty and the string of cloudy days happen not infrequently - even in the South West.

Zweibel talked a lot about solar PV technology (obviously his area of expertise) but never talked seriously about electrical energy storage technology that can store the kind of TWhs you would need to rely on all solar. Solar thermal may have a part answer with heat storage but the technology still has a long way to go for solar PV.

I was amazed that Stephen didn't even raise this critical question. In my opinion it will be the cost effective energy storage problem that will hold back solar power not the solar technology.

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

Stephen Lacey

I am a reporter with ClimateProgress.org, a blog published by the Center for American Progress. I am former editor and producer for RenewableEnergyWorld.com, where I contributed stories and hosted the Inside Renewable Energy Podcast. Keep...