Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: Enercon
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (11) View image gallery Image Gallery (2) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
1 rating - Sign-in to rate this article
May 12, 2009

Wind Turbine Technology Gets Bigger and Better

The Hannover Fair 2009 offers a positive shift in the outlook on wind power.
Hannover, Germany [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The world's largest annual Hannover Messe industry technology fair took place this year at the end of April in Hannover, Germany. The fair boasted 6,150 exhibitors from 61 different nations and around 210,000 visitors – of these one in four from abroad. South Korea was Hannover Messe Partner Country 2009.

Enercon is rumored to be testing an 8-MW version of the E-126 (onshore) giant. The German market leader now manufactures one 6-MW E-126 onshore turbine a month and this number will expand gradually to meet growing international demand, said a company representative in Hannover.

The wind industry presented itself well at the Hannover Messe industry event, where equipment suppliers and service providers alike were mainly concentrated in Hall 27. A simultaneous conference entitled “A World Energy Dialogue” was an integrated two-day parallel event reflecting the growing importance of sustainable energy supply as a global issue affecting everyone.

Optimistic Wind Industry

The mood regarding wind market prospects for the remainder of 2009 can be described as generally optimistic. A pleasant and encouraging surprise was the far more positive market outlook compared to opinions expressed at EWEC 2009, which took place one month earlier. EWEC respondents typically expected a 20 – 25% overall wind market volume decline for 2009. Hannover exhibitors only weeks later quoted growth percentages that ranged between the industry losing 5 – 10% in volume to some surprising estimates of 5 – 10% growth.

Unfortunately wind industry news is not overall positive. Vestas Wind Systems A/S in its 1st quarter 2009 report released on 28 April 2009 announced to lay-off 1,900 of its workers in Denmark and the UK. This is due too “substantial structural excess capacity in Northern Europe” according to the report. It continues: “… The projects that will help Vestas meet its forecast for 2009 are currently only awaiting funding; everything else is in place. Consequently Vestas expects that significant contracts will be signed during the coming months.” In the same report Vestas announced a new version of the 850-kW turbine model with its larger 60-meter rotor diameter in China, which is specifically developed for local low- and medium-wind speed sites.

Other wind turbine suppliers present in Hannover included major players like Enercon, Ecotécnia, Fuhrländer, GE, Nordex, REpower, and Siemens.

At a press conference German companies EnwB and Siemens signed a contract for the delivery of twenty-one 2.3-MW Siemens turbines for Germany’s 2010 Baltic I offshore wind farm. Siemens this year commenced with the building of five offshore wind farms in both the UK and Denmark.

Global Wind Power

Fuhrländer displayed a full-scale model of the its 2.5-MW FL 2500 nacelle, a product development by engineering consultancy W2E based in Rostock, Germany. Apart from Fuhrländer the well-received W100 turbine model is now being produced by eviag AG and Chinese company A-Power while further global production expansion in Montana (US) is planned. In Hannover, aviag announced a major further cooperation with W2E, this time involving a worldwide license for a new 2-MW W93 sister product. A W93 prototype is planned for this autumn, followed by a 0-series in 2010 and serial production start in 2011.

Cairo (Egypt) based SWEG, a wind power subsidiary company of ELSEWEDY Cables, last August acquired a 30% share in Spain’s mTorres. The latter has already developed a novel direct drive 1.5-MW turbine that is now available in a 1.65-MW version with three different rotor diameters.

A larger 2.5-MW sister turbine model is under development, with a prototype planned for 2010. Part of SWEG’s ambitious wind power plan is to commence wind turbine manufacturing in Egypt. One 1.65-MW turbine as part of a special project will be erected at a demanding Red Sea desert location, explained SWEG managing director Faisal Elssa: “Egypt’s New & Renewable Energy Authority (NREA) will conduct a comprehensive turbine duration testing program. These tests especially focuses at the (air-cooled) generator extreme temperature behavior and turbine built-in capabilities to cope with continuous exposure to fine sand dust particles,” he said.

Another new wind industry player that presented itself in Hannover is Delaware (US) based Avantis Group. Its Chinese joint venture partner Guangxi Yinhe Avantis Wind Power Co. Ltd. (GYAW) built the first prototypes of a new IEC WC IIA water-cooled 2.5-MW direct drive turbine model with 93.2-meter rotor diameter, named AV 928. The turbine is fitted with a permanent magnet generator, developed by Avantis spin-off company German Drive Systems, and manufactured by Hyundai Heavy Industries of Korea. The company also developed sister models of 2.3-MW and 3.5-MW (offshore) and during the next few years plans additional production facilities in Europe and the US.

Super Class

In the wind turbine super class REpower presented its offshore 6M turbine with “a guaranteed rated electrical power of 6,150 kilowatts (kW).” This power rating record is achieved with a double fed induction generator, making the 6M into the world’s most powerful wind turbine. (See image, left, courtesy REpower; photo: Jan Oelker.)

However, in the continuing megawatt race, BARD Engineering has already announced that is plans to scale up its 5-MW offshore turbine to 6.5-MW. Enercon is rumored to be testing an 8-MW version of the E-126 (onshore) giant. The German market leader now manufactures one 6-MW E-126 onshore turbine a month and this number will expand gradually to meet growing international demand, said a company representative in Hannover. (See lead image of the E-126 onshore turbine, above, courtesy Enercon.)

This year Enercon presented itself in a spacious new design booth. A partly open 2-MW E-82 nacelle with characteristic egg-shaped aluminum cover attracted many viewers, while one of the screens displayed details of the Enercon’s revolutionary E-ship fitted with four spinning Enercon-designed cylindrical steel Flettner rotors. The operating principle known as the Magnus effect is named after German physicist, Heinrich Gustav Magnus. Another German physicist Anton Flettner first demonstrated the concept in 1924.

The 130-metre long E-ship is planned to make its maiden voyage by the end of 2009 and will be employed for transporting turbines and components. The E-ship is claimed to achieve a 30 - 40% fuel saving compared to a vessel of the same size with conventional diesel powered propulsion.

Image Gallery (2)
 
Reader Comments (11)
 
No image available
May 12, 2009
Comparing to a previous conversation mentioning I really like the idea of placing the generators at the bottom of these large scaled Wind Turbines. Using Hydraulics to propel the Generators at a more reachable height of Ground level then 40 stories up in the air. But, this thinking has not caught on by the large wind turbine manufacturers yet has it?
Comment 1 of 11
May 12, 2009
The losses associated with conversion of rotational motion to hydraulic pressure and flow down and back up 40 stories would be significant and constant. The value added by easier access or possible reduced construction cost would be trivial in comparison.
Comment 2 of 11
No image available
May 13, 2009
I agree that hydraulic transfer of power is probably not practical, but the generator should be installed at ground level. It would be driven by a vertical shaft, just like the post windmill which has been used for centuries. The gearbox at the top of the tower would increase the rotor speed and turn the rotation 90 degrees to drive the vertical shaft. The faster the vertical drive shaft turns, the smaller the diameter required. It is not difficult to design the gearbox and right-angle drive. I proposed this idea to Vestas several years ago but received no reply.
Comment 3 of 11
No image available
May 13, 2009
Gentlemen, we have already conquered the positioning of the generator. It was done over the last 15 years and is in commercial use today with ocean energy device. We have now applied it to wind power generation.
Any questions please direct them to jjg@cmgai.com
Comment 4 of 11
No image available
May 13, 2009
Good thoughts, I hope the book is not closed on development. It seems to practical to push aside. Regardless these new and future machines are engineering elegance in vivo.
Comment 5 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
May 20, 2009
There is a hearing today May 20th for setbacks to commercial wind turbines in Massachusetts . Massachusetts has failed the public in the areas of public safety ,ice throw,shadow flicker ,noise tests. Installations have been met with lawsuits by small citizens groups holding up the states plan for renewable energy goals.
Since 2004 many citizens groups have started as of a result of the siting of commercial wind turbines to close to residential property. The setbacks proposed in Mattapoisett less than 750 feet,Fairhaven 600 feet, Cohasett 1000 feet and some towns no setbacks at all because of "special permits."
Legal action and studies done by the citizens groups has been paid for by the residential homeowners that border these sites to defend their bundle of rights in residentially zoned locations in these towns. The theory that a few have to suffer for the good of all is heard over and over from towns that want to install these commercial turbines. The entire class of people in Massachusetts that lose their property rights because of the siting of these turbines need compensation.
The state of Massachusetts needs to come up with a method of compensation for the introduction of commercial products for the class of residents in residential areas.
The shoreline of southeastern Massachusetts is already densely populated.
The continued placement of commercial wind turbines in Massachusetts is going to result in a class action lawsuit against those placing commercial wind without compensation of the residential property rights and the loss of the sticks of rights from that bundle of rights
Comment 6 of 11
No image available
June 16, 2009
I guess that's the way those muckity mucks survive.
Comment 7 of 11
No image available
Anonymous
June 16, 2009
Placing the heavy turbine generator on ground elevation will provide numerous advantages in the dynamic response as well as the column structures, which will logically require a vertical axis wind blades.
For mills going larger generation capacity per unit, we will have to go to Darrieus type blade. I visualize numerous advantages and efficiency.
Also we can install a round elevated water storage tank inside the space provided by the blade configuration.
NASA and DOE must look into the issues.

Samuel W. Chung, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
June 16, 2009
Comment 8 of 11
No image available
June 16, 2009
I find nothing encouraging about the news in the article for the U.S. wind energy market. One of the primary selling points for more wind energy by wind energy advocates, especially AWEA, is job creation. However, all of the news is about foreign companies and their progress in the development of the technology. The job creation will be in foreign countries as usual and the U.S. will be the loser.
Comment 9 of 11
June 18, 2009
Hello, all of you are right ;-) I think, the people around the world should believe in renewable energy in spite of imprefection wind turbines... I'm optimist how one of chapter this article "Optimistic Wind Industry" ;-)) /-/ Best regards Tom Rubanowicz
Comment 10 of 11
No image available
June 28, 2009
Good discussion, but I think the engineering involved with having a vertical shaft turning a 6MW generator from a perpendicular source of power that's 40-50 Meters away might just be a bridge too far. The prospect of bearing failure or a broken shaft ripping the tower to pieces or destroying the generator would be significant. I also agree that hydraulic makes less economic sense comparred to current configuration. I think what we have now works relatively well, however, if someone has a better idea, let's give it a try! Maybe we'll see 20 MW off shore installations before this is all over. I also agree, the Europeans really deserve high-accolades for their work in this industry. Though I love my country, I no longer count on the US government or industry making intelligent decisions, regardless of venue.
Comment 11 of 11
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Renewable Energy World Europe KYOCERA Solar, Inc. Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition The Stella Group, Ltd. Apollo Solar EnerWorks Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo