Photo Credit: BERC
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (5) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 14, 2009

Middlebury College's Biomass Heating and Cooling Plant

by The Biomass Energy Resource Center (BERC)
Vermont, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

In 2004, when Middlebury College committed itself to cutting by 8 percent its carbon emissions - a pledge it would later strengthen, to full carbon neutrality by 2016 - "among the different actions that were identified, biomass was clearly one that could make a big difference," recalls Jack Byrne, sustainability coordinator at the renowned Vermont liberal-arts college.

"The other question it's important to ask, that we asked for our willow project, is: Okay, right now there's sufficient [fuel] capacity. But what happens five years from now, if many more people switch to wood as a fuel source, which is quite likely to happen?"

-- Jack Byrne, Sustainability Coordinator, Middlebury College

As the biggest of its emissions-reduction efforts, the college invested in a biomass-fueled, district heating and cooling system. After a feasibility study by the Biomass Energy Resource Center (BERC) showed the idea to be practical, Middlebury broke ground in 2007 on an $11 million biomass gasification plant. The new system is expected to be the primary heating and cooling source for the school’s district energy system — and steam from it will also help fuel the college’s cogeneration system, which meets about one-fifth of the campus’s electricity needs.

When the college began looking at biomass in 2004, the price of number-six fuel oil — of which it was using about 2 million gallons per year — was $0.89 per gallon, notes Tom Corbin, director of business services. By summer 2008, it was more than $3.00 per gallon. Middlebury expects the biomass facility to cut its fuel-oil usage by half, replacing that million gallons of oil with 20,000-21,000 tons of chips per year. At fuel-oil price levels in summer 2008, that predicts an annual cost savings of about $2 million.

At the same time, the college has planted ten acres of fast-growing willow shrubs, on fallow farmland that it owns, as a test project to determine if it can raise enough biomass to meet up to half its system’s needs.

With or without the willow project, Middlebury also expects its biomass plant to:

  • cut by almost 12,500 tons per year, or about 40 percent, the volume of greenhouse gases that it emits;
  • replace a distant fuel source with a local one, as the college requires that all of its biomass must come from less than 75 miles away;
  • generate 2 million to 2.5 million kilowatt-hours of electricity, with a renewable fuel;
  • benefit the economy of its home region, especially its forest-products industry — along with area farmers, if the willow project catches on; and
  • serve as a learning and demonstration lab for biomass gasification technology in action.

“Our hope is that the college’s entry into biomass will greatly stimulate the growth of the local, sustainable wood chip market and bioenergy economy in Addison County and Vermont,” says Nan Jenks-Jay, Middlebury’s dean of environmental affairs.

Added college President Ronald Liebowitz: “The biomass plant exemplifies the college’s longstanding commitment to the environment—not only as an academic subject, but also as an integral part of the institution’s operations.”

“Maximum Participation and ‘Onboardness’”

Middlebury students have played key roles in evolving the college’s commitment to going carbon-neutral. Formed in 2002, a Carbon Reduction Initiative Working Group included student, staff, faculty, and administration representatives—and students successfully urged the trustees to adopt its two successive carbon-reduction goals.

“Middlebury’s approach to reducing its carbon footprint was, and continues to be, maximum participation and ‘onboardness,’” write Jenks-Jay and Byrne in a chapter they co-authored for a recently published book, The Green Planet: Meeting the Challenge of Environmental Sustainability (APPA, 2008).

The carbon-reduction working group noted that three-quarters of the college’s emissions came from burning number-six fuel oil for heating and cooling — and a woodchip system could displace half of that. A BERC study affirmed the potential for a biomass system that would use locally harvested fuel and could generate economic and learning benefits.

In 2004, trustees committed Middlebury to reducing greenhouse gas emissions 8 percent below 1990 levels by 2012. In late 2006, trustees approved the biomass-system plan — and in 2007, they voted that the college would go entirely carbon-neutral by 2016. To meet that goal, the college is also moving on a brace of additional strategies, from mixing 20 percent vegetable oil into the fuel used in furnaces for 100 buildings not on the biomass district system, to replacing college vehicles with hybrid cars and electric carts.

Test-Growing a Fuel Supply

“Really looking at the supply question, for us, was the critical piece,” said Jack Byrne, the college’s sustainability coordinator, in summing up lessons learned in the process of moving to biomass district energy. Initially hoping to find a single, nearby supplier for all its woodchips, the college found that wasn’t possible and contracted instead with a New Hampshire wood-products broker. Middlebury has required that its chip supply be obtained from within 75 miles of the campus, and that a stockpile of it be stored no more than 25 miles away.

“That guarantees us a six-week supply,” said Byrne, who expects the biomass system to meet all of the college’s heating and cooling needs “for probably eight months of the year.”

“The other question it’s important to ask, that we asked for our willow project, is: Okay, right now there’s sufficient [fuel] capacity. But what happens five years from now, if many more people switch to wood as a fuel source, which is quite likely to happen?”

In hopes of ensuring its own, reliable, sustainably produced supply, the college looked into farming trees for fuel. It found that the SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry in Syracuse had been growing, testing, and studying willow crops for several decades.

“They said, ‘You should do a test planting, and see how it goes,’” says Corbin, the college’s business-services director. So the college planted about 10 acres in 2007.

The willows — in this case, more fast-growing shrubs than trees — are first harvested after four years, then on a three-year rotation. The college hopes to harvest 25-30 tons per acre, the yield achieved by SUNY ESF. If it does, then planting and/or contract for the planting of 1,200 acres would meet half of the college’s biomass needs.

“That’s a lot of willows — and that’s a lot of work!” says Corbin. “The logistics are not going to be easy, but we look at it as investing in the willow crop.” Several people in the area area have already inquired about raising willows, he said. The college has advised them to wait and see how the test plot fares.

“Ten years from now, I may look real smart,” Corbin quips. “Who knows? We’re going to have to try some of this stuff. We’ve got a lot of options.” One key aim, he summed up, is to “control your supply of fuel — to know where it’s coming from, and how ‘green’ it is.

“On balance, our fuel source now is greener. That’s where we’re going.”

To watch a video of the biomass gassification plant in action at Middlebury college, click here.

The Biomass Energy Resource Center (BERC) is an independent, national nonprofit organization located in Montpelier, Vermont with a Midwest office in Madison, Wisconsin.  BERC assists communities, colleges and universities, state and local governments, businesses, utilities, schools, and others in making the most of their local energy resources.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (5)
 
No image available
May 15, 2009
ON THE BIOMASS FUEL SUSTAINABILITY
If we combust biomass with CO2 release into atmosphere we increase planet warming and violate the human right to breathe. To be really sustainable we need immediately to implant some greens to capture the same amount of CO2 or to combust biomass in zero-emissions oxy-fuel devices. Significance of CO2 capture by photosynthesis strongly depends on the time span between photosynthesis and combustion. If it is too long the biofuel does not differ from peath, which nobody consider as sustainable fuel.
The cost of land for implantation should be involved in calculation. The best is seaweed like Ulva, which growth in natural conditions up to 20% in a day.
The biomass use without immediate green implanting or carbon capture and sequestration is definitely not sustainable. It should be explained to modern students, active in biomass fuel use.
see details in Ch.8 of our book ZERO EMISSIONS POWER CYCLES.
E.Yantovsky.
Comment 1 of 5
No image available
May 15, 2009
I attended the opening of this plant and took the tour due to my interest as a automation/controls specialist. I can tell you as a local that Middlebury is an outstanding institution with world class professors dedicated to environmental issues and has had an environmental major since 1965. Every effort small and large is being made on campus to reduce energy and water use. Much of the dining hall(s) food supply is purchased within 50 mile of campus. Waste stream reduction is addressed in a variety of ways. My hat is off to these folks.
Comment 2 of 5
No image available
E Yantovsky: If we combust biomass with CO2 release into atmosphere we increase planet warming and violate the human right to breathe.
Not really. It depends, as intelligent people like to say.

Much of forest slash gets burnt each year, for no other reason than to reduce (uncontrolled) fire risk. If you got some of that biomass you are reducing the total CO2 released (since you have eliminated fossil fuel use).

Even if the biomass you burn was just left to decompose, you are still reducing GHG emissions, as some of the decomposition would be anaerobic (producing CH4, which is 20 times worse [by weight] a GHG as CO2). You are also merely increasing the rate of decomposition, while capturing the heat energy that would normally be released to the environment (contributing to global warming, admittedly in a small way). You are still getting rid of fossil-based CO2 emissions.

These guys are doing good, with or without planting trees.
Comment 3 of 5
No image available
May 16, 2009
At an equivalent of over 10kWh thermal per person per day, I'd be interested to know what energy efficiency improvement or consumption reduction measures this institute is taking. They could probably make that biomass go alot further.
Comment 4 of 5
No image available
June 24, 2009
I believe to look for the new (not from oil) fuel for transportation is not needed.
The boom in electrical vehicles will urge electricity in stead of a fuel.
The electrical power for accu recharge should be produced on OXY-FUEL fired zero emissions power plants (ZEPP), using coal or gas or a coal-derived gas.
The good example is the 30 MW pilot power plant made by Vattenfall and Alstom in Germany.


The algae technology is the most important modern technology without using any land, by macroalgae (like Ulva) farms off -shore in a shallow ponds. The cultivated biomass should be combusted on nearest ZEPP, using CO2 to feed algae.
The details see in our book Zero Emissions Power Cycles, CRC press.
It is non-nuclear, non-fossil fuel or oxygen consuming the abundant energy supply concept.
E.Yantovsky.
Comment 5 of 5
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Magnum Energy Inc. Solar Living Institute Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Energy Ocean Conference National Hydropower Association Midwest Renewable Energy Association
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo