article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (10) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
2 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 26, 2009

Innovation and Sea Change in the Residential Solar Market

The year 2008 will go down in history as the year that bred innovation in the downstream residential solar market. The extension of the 30 percent federal tax credit and removal of its cap solidified the U.S.'s position in the global solar market.

The collapse of the capital markets doesn’t seem to sway solar entrepreneurs from innovating and remaining hopeful of the future. Many European companies share the same sentiments as their American counterparts in the role that U.S. will play in the future solar market.

Like a tide turning, there’s a big shift happening in the solar market that many people aren’t really seeing because they’re busy chasing after financing and market-share like never before. The power behind the sea of change comes from the fact that that there is now more manufacturing capacity for producing PV modules than there is demand. For the first time, big module manufacturers are fumbling to put a new focus on the end customer and how to get solar solutions to them.

Entrepreneurs from the high tech industry are partnering up with solar veterans to introduce new ways to reach the end consumers. One great example is 1BOG — a for-profit social marketing solar aggregator. 1BOG negotiates a favorable price with system integrators to drive down residential solar pricing. Another great example is SunRun who pioneered the residential power purchase agreement business model. For the first time, companies are addressing the true hurdle for the average consumer to go solar. As solar becomes mainstream, solar companies will need to put more focus on the consumer as opposed to the technology.

This is a classic industry cycle — for a market in its infancy, the technology gets the glory. As the market grows and matures, the technology becomes secondary and slowly becomes a commodity. This is when branding and solid consumer insights will help a company sustain its position in the market.

SunPower is leading the branding game with their strong focus on making solar a lifestyle choice. The recession is causing some industry analysts to question the dollar value of brand equity. First Solar, on the other hand opted for a different strategy to capture market share in the consumer market. It acquires a stake in SolarCity — a downstream system integrator who invests heavily in branding.

The solar industry can certainly learn from other industries on how to scale the business profitably and reducing the cost of sales. However, if 2008 is any indication, many downstream companies lacked the patience and strategic foresight to customize and implement best practices from other industries. For example, several system integration companies tried to apply best practices brought over by executives from the software industries without taking into consideration that these best practices needed to be modified to fit into the solar industry’s business model. Therefore many companies failed to implement those best practices and decided to abandon these initiatives altogether due to pressure from investors and the stock market.

Nevertheless, the downstream companies will be forced to innovate as the market matures. The current cost per solar sale (total marketing dollars spent divided by the total number of sales) is between US $1100 and $2500 for a national solar player. With a slim margin of 10 ~ 21%, the national players will not be able to scale and sustain for the long term. The cost of engineering is between $400 and $600 for a residential home. Again this is not sustainable for the long term.  More traditional industries such as the construction or engineering industry are spending half those amounts on sales.

In addition to that, the cost of sales is anywhere between 5 and 9% of revenue and the construction cost is anywhere between 6 and 11% of revenue. With cost structures such as these, it is very hard for downstream players to scale and sustain their business.

Some industry analysts argue that the only way for downstream players to scale is to be acquired by a large manufacturer to absorb the costs associated with selling to end consumers. However this is not true.

Innovative companies such as Sungevity are trying to reduce the cost of sales by selling solar through the internet. This is similar to the travel industry where internet aggregators such as Expedia and Travelocity drove down the cost of sales significantly. Solarcity on the other hand, is trying to drive down cost by driving sales through their call centers. Ultimately, companies will be forced to innovate and to drive down cost of sales and that is a good thing for the end consumer.

Reader Comments (10)
 
No image available
May 26, 2009
I agree with your analysis, Isabelle. Combining innovative financing with business process improvements that strip out costs can drop the cost of solar into the $.22-$.25 per kWh range. While this may seem high to many, it's a bargain compared to the maximum rate of $.44/kwh charged to the high-consuming residential accounts in Northern California.

One way to drop the cost of solar even further would be to allow the panels to be installed somewhere other than the homeowner's roof -- in a solar farm, to be precise. These panels would be owned or leased by the customer, not owned by the utility. This approach lowers costs and gives renters and condo owners a chance to go solar. For more info, including a 6-page overview, see http://mvsolar.blogspot.com/2009/05/solar-for-all-including-renters.html

Cheers,
Bruce Karney
Solar PV Marketing and Finance Consultant
Comment 1 of 10
No image available
May 27, 2009
Good article. However; installation, maintenance and dependability are items to be investigated. It may be of interest to investigate wave water pumps, wave air pumps and wind turbine pumps that give dependable power supply and are all scalable to megawatts.
Comment 2 of 10
No image available
May 27, 2009
Good article. However; installation, maintenance and dependability are items to be investigated. It may be of interest to investigate wave water pumps, wave air pumps and wind turbine pumps that give dependable power supply and are all scalable to megawatts.
Comment 3 of 10
No image available
May 27, 2009
SunPower has had a marketing plan where neighbors are encouraged to go in together to decrease the costs for installers, the company, and the purchasers. I am also interested in alliances of PV manufacturers with a Massachusetts company called SunDrum Solar. SunDrum makes a module to capture waste heat for water heating but also to cool the collector for better efficiency. Its product is an add-on for PV. Its website lists the manufacturers it supports.
Comment 4 of 10
No image available
May 28, 2009
I think this author needs to down play her vocabulary to use of terms that would allow a reader to want to read this story. What the heck is a down streamed company? I would think that she wants to say a solar energy dealer. If an author cannot write in a clear approach, then don't write!
Comment 5 of 10
No image available
Another tool to overcoming the high up-front cost is the creation of local Clean Energy Assessment Districts, which allow cities and communities to bond for money that local residents can then borrow from for energy efficiency and renewable energy projects, and pay the loan back over a long period (usually 20 years) as an assessment on their property tax -- well explained here: http://www.solaramericacities.energy.gov/PDFs/Municipal_Property_Tax_Finance.pdf. This is the tool behind Berkley's residential program.
Comment 6 of 10
No image available
May 28, 2009
Thanks for this comment, Brendan Gallivan. Programs like this could be wins all the way around. These liens can be transferable as well, which means that persons who don't know how long they can stay in a particular place can opt for a capital improvement hoping to live to 100 but knowing that's somewhat unlikely. The improvement makes the rent/mortgage more predictable for a subsequent tenant and makes energy use a part of the affordability equation before someone new takes over the property. As mortgages are structured now, borrowers often have no idea what their energy costs will be until after they move in. In the past, lenders have generally not expressed interest in knowing whether occupants can pay the energy bills. If the situation of occupants degenerate, they may wild-cat a wood stove or sit in the kitchen with the oven door open. These hard-time remedies have risks for occupants and their neighbors. Knowing where energy-generation is installed has benefit for the community at large and for the occupants iso long as the community is a barn-raising, pitch-in kind of community. Adding on to an already installed base may be more cost-effective than adding all-new installations, especially if a net-metering set-ups were overbuilt in the hope of renewable energy payment plans (REP's) or Renewable Energy Checks (REC's).
Comment 7 of 10
May 30, 2009
"construction cost is anywhere between 6 and 11% of revenue."
This is similar to a NREL report of 7-9% for installation labor and material other than modules, inverter and mounting structures. About $0.75/Watt.


It is becoming apparent that even a vigorous but rational expansion (>1 GW/year) of the residential solar PV industry in the USA will result in few new jobs in construction. Most new jobs will be created in manufacturing, and most of those will be in other countries. Solar PV needs cheap electricity and labor for manufacturing but needs an environment of expensive power and well paid consumers to create a market. The finished modules are already commodity products and are easy to ship anywhere in the world by container.
Comment 8 of 10
No image available
Anonymous
May 31, 2009
Almost every article I've ever read on this site would have benefited from a quick proofread. But I disagree that the vocabulary should be dumbed down.
Comment 9 of 10
No image available
September 18, 2009
Nice piece Isabelle - can you provide a source for your cost of sales/margin/engineering/construction numbers?
Comment 10 of 10
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
ULVAC Technologies, Inc. Solar Electric Power Association Rolls Battery Engineering Financial Research Associates, LLC Teledyne RD Instruments MKS Instruments, Inc
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo