Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Could Ontario Be the Next Germany?

By Greg Boutin and Jon Worren
May 27, 2009   |   21 Comments
The introduction of Ontario's Green Energy Act, modeled after Germany's successful feed-in tariff approach, is expected to fuel rapid growth of the clean energy market in the province.

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
21 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 21
May 28, 2009
With the Green Energy Act passed in Ontario, the upcoming feed-in-tariff incentives should see many new wind farm & solar projects on the go. The government has been seen a bullying the municipalities into this legislation. Time will tell but don't think this is a rosy opportunity or picture (like Germany). It's a massive cash grab for those that can endure a long-standing dance before the new administration wins the next election. May be better to wait until then before spending a dime.

To quote a statement from the announcement: 'The legislation itself is expected to lead to many important changes, including a process of regulatory and policy changes"

We've long had to wade through the various reincarnations of the heavy-handed Crown Corporation that still exists. The back scratching from foreign investors may not be as satisfactory as one would assume. 2 new nuclear reactors are to be built to support the smart grid and lack of renewable energy. Atomic Energy Canada Limited (CANDU reactor) is said to be the frontrunner in the bidding war up against Westinghouse and Areba. No doubt to keep it Canadian (eh) but many of us worry about the past overruns that end up on the taxpayer bill.
The provincial government would be better off campaigning the massive budget to better education on the costs of green power along with their long standing ignorance of hiding the true cost of power with the failed deregulation of the market.

Buyer beware.
No image available
Comment
2 of 21
Anonymous
May 28, 2009
We continually read at this site that grid parity for PV is expected by about 2015; if this is true, why would anyone want to guarantee long term payments for solar power of up to 65 US cents/kWh? It is hard to see how this amounts to anything other than Ontario poring money into the pockets of an elite interest group at the detriment of their electricity consumers.
Steven
Comment
3 of 21
May 28, 2009
Anonymous,

Grid parity is expected to be achieved in the most favorable jurisdiction, those with high grid-power prices and the most sun. It will take more time for the others.

In the meantime, clean energy still has a superior price tag and the economics need to be supported through incentives. Just like nuclear R&D or oil exploration which have been utterly subsidized, without mentioning a long list of other 'hidden' costs our society is covering for fossil-fuel and atomic sources of energy, be it the environmental cost, defense and security cost, health cost, transportation cost, trade and employment balance cost etc...

Sam Dixon, I see a contradiction between your statement that "2 new nuclear reactors are to be built to support the smart grid and lack of renewable energy" and then "The provincial government would be better off campaigning the massive budget to better education on the costs of green power".

To fill the energy gap and not have to build more nuclear energy reactors which, to my point above, carry a lot more hidden costs than clean energy (i.e. waste with no satisfactory storage solution in sight, nuclear dissemination, vastly underestimated accident risks, uranium depletion, huge R&D and defense cost, frequently down - at least in Canada etc...), it sounds perfectly logical to invest in clean energy, and the government deserves kudos for it.

Like you, I will be carefully monitoring the implementation as there are risks as with every program involving contract allocation and money transfers, but let's give it a chance and support those first step towards a cleaner future even if they are still tentative.
Comment
4 of 21
May 29, 2009
Despite its great success in increasing the uptake of solar-electric, the German system is seriously flawed from the point of view of the small generator-consumer. It's flaws are releated to its unsustainability and the associated tax regime around generated and bought power. See:
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2008/04/double-metering-its-insidious.html
In addition, any government could with a few strokes of the pen go a long way to encourage the uptake of soar, for the most part without dipping into the exchequer. See
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2007/07/solar-electric-government-role.html
It just takes political will.
Comment
5 of 21
May 29, 2009
Update: Since we wrote this article in mid-April for the May/June edition of Renewable Energy Magazine, the Ontario Legislature passed the Green Energy Act in a vote on May 14. The votes were 59 for and 13 against in favour of the act.

Two days prior to that, on May 12th, the Ontario Power Authority presented updated feed-in tariffs following a number of stakeholder consultations. Compared to the table in this article, there are three noticeable changes to the proposed tariffs for solar systems:
- For systems above 10MW the automatic 9% degression of the tariff once 100MW had been intalled has been removed. Instead, OPA will review the rate in two years from now. This is great news for all developers that have optioned land and are planning utility scale systems.
- At the other end of the scale, smaller systems up to 10kW now also include small ground mounted systems in addition to roof top systems.
- The next system size up, have now been expanded, so that the $ 0.713/kWh included systems from 10kW and up to 250kW.

More details are available at the OPA website: www.powerauthority.on.ca
Comment
6 of 21
May 29, 2009
It's not just solar power. Plasco has a plasma waste-to-power plant that is really starting to work after a tough battle. Ontario may be exporting these plants all over the world. Only 0.2% left to be discarded after 10,000 C plasma gets done. 1.2 MWh/ton generated, 2.1 tons CO2 credits per ton!
Very clean stack output, no dioxins, etc.
http://www.plascoenergygroup.com/?Environmental_Performance
Comment
7 of 21
May 29, 2009
You ask "Could Ontario Be the Next Germany?" I answer NO! Germany has FITs for virtually all renewable energy technologies and are extended to economies of scale. There is nothing here but FITs for solar systems below 100 kW. What about large-scale geothermal, biomass, solar and wind in Ontario? I suppose that gets blocked by your friendly neighborhood utility monopoly like here in the US?
Comment
8 of 21
May 29, 2009
These articles, and others like it, act as if installation of capacity is all that matters. Production is never mentioned. It is hard to image many places worse to install solar on a large scale than Germany and Ontario. The amount of energy to produce and ship the modules to regions of the world with limited solar resources is simply not sustainable. If this was being offered in CA, AZ, or NV I would applaud the legislation. Doing so in Germany and Ontario makes me cringe. It is a waste of energy (the energy going into producing the panels, of which it takes a lot) and of financial resources of those governments that could direct the money to more sustainable energy options particular to their location. It is my hope that the understanding will grow to review policies through the concept of sustainability and not just installation of large capacity renewable energy systems without consideration of optimizing their output.
Comment
9 of 21
May 30, 2009
Jason, the energy going into the production of solar panels is a fraction of what the panel will produce over its lifetime. This has long been documented, and I wish people could check their facts before spreading those arguments.

Mike, the Green Energy Act actually does include FITs for a number of other technologies including wind and biomass, not just solar. We just decided to focus the article on solar.

William, the solar incentives in Germany are by now means perfect, but so far no other system has done better at encouraging the growth in that industry.

I must point out that there have been a number of surveys showing the support of the local population for this Act, see this page, so the comments above are clearly not representative of the general population.

Also see my new blog post about the recent editorial in Canadian Business.
Comment
10 of 21
May 30, 2009
The link in my post were removed, here they are:
- Survey: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2009/26/c5160.html
- Blog post: http://www.torevenue.com/2009/05/canadian-business-magazine-confused-over-vc-emerging-tech-fund-and-green-energy-act/
Comment
11 of 21
May 31, 2009
Greg, I don't know why you just decided to focus the article on solar. But it made me think there were loopholes for the other technologies, something that has appeared in virtually all US policies that have passed by utility special interests. After a quick examination of the Ontario tariffs, I found a 10 megawatt limit. Not fair, especially since the utility monopolies can build any size they want to take advantage of economies of scale.
Comment
12 of 21
May 31, 2009
Mike, you can split your project in different tranches to fit the 10MW limit, this is what one of the companies we mention in the article has done with the past program and I believe this is still possible with the new one.
Comment
13 of 21
June 1, 2009
Greg, the Green Energy and Green Economy Act (Bill 150) sounds like a miracle. But did it pass as expected in May 2009 and in the right form?
(I can't find any news.)
Comment
14 of 21
June 2, 2009
Mike, yes the act passed, see Jon Worren's comment (9 comments before you). A search on Google News will also give you several results such as http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7015158016.

"Fire of energy", let me assure you that solar manufacturers are already working hard to reduce the cost of solar manufacturing through automation and other means. The cost is declining yet incentives such as the FITs are still needed to make the economics work until we reach lower costs.
Comment
15 of 21
June 2, 2009
Greg, the reference article you just gave made the Ontario program appear either even more confusing than your article or as worthless as I suspected. Your article appears to say large-scale solar systems of about 5 MW will be limited to a total of 16-25 MW? Meanwhile, your article said nothing about the other technologies like wind and biomass. The reference article appears to say that new proposed nuclear plants could crowd out all (but 8%?) of capacity for new renewable energy? This hardly sounds like Germany! You or someone should explain exactly how much capacity and at what price will be available to each renewable energy technology, before there is any reason for any excitement here.
Comment
16 of 21
June 2, 2009
Having had a large utilitity company in UK, offer what I thought was a good price for generated photovoltaic electricity. Though I was told expected rate should rise either in June or July this year.
After reading the rates on offer in Ontario Canada, the UK rate now seems to be very poor. Plus offer was dependant on no more than 5kW, £0.28 per kWhe, for home use only. The 100kW rate £014 per kWhe, is more appropiate for small factory owners. The 0.82 Canadian $, is very nice rate.

John Gregson 07772 427 761 or 07796 533 460
Comment
17 of 21
June 4, 2009
Before Ontario builds any nuclear plants, they should calculate the total costs, including the cost of storing the waste for 10,000 years, and require full insurance against disaster. Then, all renewable energies should first be offered feed-in tariffs and tested to see if they can meet needs at that cost. How could anyone except a utility monopolist and their pocket politicians oppose that plan?
Comment
18 of 21
June 4, 2009
Mike, it seems our article was not to your liking and that you are not optimistic about the green energy act. We'll try to do better next time.

You draw a lot of hypothetical conclusions from the comments by Greenpeace and Pembina in the article I referred to, and although they certainly refer to existing risks, those have not been confirmed and I see a number of reasons why the Green Energy Act would still be a positive move under a number of the scenarios evoked. This is by no means a perfect act and nowhere are we suggesting that, but it certainly is one of the best actions we have seen in the recent period, and that is worth celebrating.

I also want to point out that nowhere our article meant "to say large-scale solar systems of about 5 MW will be limited to a total of 16-25 MW", this is your own conjecture. You also should rely on other sources to learn more about the green energy act. In fact the act can be downloaded online. Our article is not intended to describe all the consequences of the act, just take a look at the solar portion of it, so you are welcome to discuss the act more broadly but you may want to take up that discussion with other people involved in the field as they may offer additional views of interest to you.
Comment
19 of 21
June 5, 2009
What I don't like are green wash bills.
Comment
20 of 21
June 6, 2009
Authors at Renewableenergyworld.com should explain all of the potential pitfalls of renewable energy bills. Otherwise, they risk misleading industry and the public into thinking governments are giving renewable energy a fair chance, when perhaps they are not, thereby promoting failure. They can also waste the people's time trying to figure it out themselves. People generally don't have time to analyze the complicated bills of every country, province, state and locality.
Comment
21 of 21
June 10, 2009
Mike, I disagree with your assessment which I do not find grounded in actual facts, but I do appreciate the time you took to raise your concerns. Certainly the government and energy industry have not always been examples of transparency and some amount of skepticism is fair. I think we have tried to point out some risk in the article but the bill is quite promising in our opinion and speculating on the future is not something we think would be constructive.

To move on, an interesting announcement last week for a large project in Ontario:

"EDF EN Canada, a company of the EDF Energies Nouvelles family, announced its intention to start construction of a 23.4MW (DC) photovoltaic power plant near Arnprior, Ontario. More than 300,000 solar panels will generate electricity when the province's power demand is highest via the Hydro One distribution grid. The Arnprior Solar Project is being developed as two installations under the Government of Ontario's Standard Offer Program, formed to help replace the coal-fired power generation."

http://www.pv-tech.org/news/_a/edf_en_canada_announces_solar_project_in_arnprior_on/?utm_source=PV+Tech+Newsletter&utm_campaign=c18f50c47d-pvtech_newsletter_10_06_2009&utm_medium=email
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With 30,000 subscribers and a global readership in over 170 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine is targeted at those who make growth happen in renewable industries. Covering policy, technology, finance,... more »

 

Advertise With Us

Midwest Renewable Energy Association Via Expo American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE) AltaTerra Research National Hydropower Association HUBER+SUHNER AG Cantsink Manufacturing
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters