Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (22) View image gallery Image Gallery (6) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 27, 2009

Could Ontario Be the Next Germany?

The introduction of Ontario's Green Energy Act, modeled after Germany's successful feed-in tariff approach, is expected to fuel rapid growth of the clean energy market in the province.
by Greg Boutin and Jon Worren
London, UK [Renewable Energy World Magazine]

If the Green Energy and Green Economy Act (Bill 150) is passed as expected in May 2009, Ontario will become the first North American jurisdiction with an incentive system modeled after German feed-in tariffs (FITs), according to incentive expert Paul Gipe. With proposed tariffs of up to 80.2 CAN cents/kWh (US$0.64/kWh, €0.47/kWh) for solar power generation, fixed and guaranteed for 20 years, the province would have the most favorable incentives currently available worldwide for roof-mounted systems below 100 kW. More lucrative, even, than current German incentives under the Renewable Energy Sources Act (EEG).

Ontario’s proposed Green Energy Act passed a second reading in March and was ordered to the Standing Committee on General Government for public comment, ending as REW goes to press. Changes to both the Act and the feed-in tariffs may still occur, but as it is almost certain to pass (the Act is supported by the Ontario Liberal Party, which controls 71 of the 107 seats in the Legislative Assembly), the Ontario government started a parallel process in February to work out the deployment details.

In a separate initiative, the Ontario government will also launch a C$250 million (€150 million) Emerging Technologies Fund, which should be operational on 1 July 2009. This fund will match investments from private sources, such as venture capital firms, in Ontario-based technology companies, including cleantech firms. It might, for example, be leveraged by innovative solar companies seeking to establish a broader presence in Ontario by developing technologies locally.

We believe that the combination of the Green Energy Act and the Emerging Technologies Fund will dramatically improve the business conditions for cleantech endeavours in Ontario. Combined with the province’s integration into the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) space, traditionally low manufacturing costs and abundant skilled workforce, this Act may actually turn Ontario into the most attractive beachhead for European and Asian renewable energy technology companies seeking to expand into North America.

This fund seems to be making a difference already. For instance, Nicolas Morgan, co-founder and vice president of Business Development at Morgan Solar, a Toronto-based venture developing a concentrating photovoltaic panel, observed: ‘For a while, it looked like Morgan Solar would have to move to the US to attract investments. As a young company with two products to commercialize in the next 12 months, we have been talking to a number of investors and have received offers of financing on condition that we move to the US. Ontario’s Green Energy Act and the Emerging Technology Fund may change all that. We are now hopeful that we can launch our venture in Ontario.’

How does Ontario compare to Germany?

Looking solely at installed capacity, Ontario and Canada are dwarfed by Germany. While Germany has over 5000 MW installed, the whole of Canada has less than 50 MW. California, the largest PV market in North America, has 530 MW by comparison. Capacity-wise, Ontario therefore has lots of catching-up to do, currently standing roughly where Germany was 20 years ago.

Comparing the inputs to the economics of energy is more flattering for Ontario. It might surprise even Canadians themselves to learn that Ontario receives more sunlight than Germany, which is located a little further north than the Canadian province. In fact, large parts of Ontario get 10%–15% more sunlight per year than southern Germany. (Left: Houses in the community with solar panels, credit Ontario Green Energy Act.)

Since the incentives take the form of a feed-in tariff in both Ontario and in Germany, as opposed to California where they are added to the electricity savings (through net metering), local electricity rates are less important to the return on investment for solar systems.

On the other hand, Ontario electricity rates are much lower than in both Germany and California, meaning that public support to expand the energy supply side has not been as strong as in those two jurisdictions. Instead, the political incentive used to motivate the Ontario public and justify the Green Energy Act has been the promise of a province free of coal-fired plants.

‘Ontario has the potential to become a mini-Germany,’ confirms Ian MacLellan, Systems Division president and founder of Ontario-based solar cell manufacturer ARISE Technologies. ‘Obviously, with 82 million inhabitants in Germany – more than six times as many as the 13 million in Ontario – we will never get the same volumes as in Germany. But, if our politicians and bureaucrats manage to make the process of developing solar systems as simple as it is in Germany, I would expect Ontario to see a development similar to that of Germany, only at a relatively smaller scale. We have to recognize that Germany, through their ‘1000 roofs’ programme (1990–1995) and later their ‘100,000 roofs’ programme (1999–2003), gained years of experience which we don’t have in Ontario, so even if the politicians have sought to learn from the German experience, I expect it will take time in Ontario as well. One cause for concern is the 100 MW cap which leads to an automatic 9% lowering of the tariffs, an uncertainty which I believe will keep some from investing in Ontario,’ he notes. (Left: The Sun Simba HCPV is a high concentrating photovoltaic system. It is not yet available, and is still in the prototype and testing stage of development. Credit: Morgan Solar)

Ontario FITs favour systems below 100 kW

MacLellan explains further the effect he anticipates from the suggested tariff structure on the type of photovoltaic projects that will be proposed: ‘At ARISE, we feel the feed-in tariffs play to our sweet-spot. On the other hand, developers of solar parks will probably be disappointed. If you take our previous estimate of 100 MW for 2010 we assume that 20% of the volume will be solar parks, 40% will be commercial rooftop systems between 10–500 kW and 40% will be residential and smaller systems up to 10 kW. In other words, we are looking at only four or five solar parks of a size of 4–5 MW next year.’

For systems up to 100 kW in size, the Ontario FITs at the recommended rates would be superior to the German FIT. That is especially true for residential and smaller rooftop installations with rates at 80.2 CAN cents/kWh (68 US cents/kWh) for rooftop solar photovoltaic systems below 10 kW. It’s worth noting that, in 2007, systems below 10 kW made up 40% of the German market – it appears that the Ontario FITs will stimulate a similar initial focus on smaller systems. And as with Germany, Ontario systems would benefit from a guaranteed 20-year fixed rate.

Interestingly, a handful of companies had already announced the development of large solar parks under the previous incentives, the Renewable Energy Standard Offer Program (RESOP), which paid a lower rate of 42 CAN cents/kWh (€0.25/kWh) to all solar project categories. In April 2008, for example, Toronto-based SkyPower and SunEdison of Baltimore launched the construction of their First Light solar park, a 19 MW project (broken down into two phases each falling under the current 10 MW threshold) consisting of more than 200,000 panels near Kingston, Ontario, and announced they would be pursuing six more projects.

Even though RESOP was suspended the following month, in May 2008 (according to our contacts at SunEdison, the First Light project was delayed as a result, but construction has resumed and is scheduled to be completed by August 2009), those companies may now find even a minimal 5.5% increase – from 42 CAN cents to 44.3 CAN cents (36 US cents to 38 US cents) – welcome, especially if it applies retroactively to projects they already saw as financially viable. To discuss this last possibility, the Ontario Power Authority recently called for comments on the application of the new incentives to ‘legacy’ projects.

Is it time to set up shop in Ontario?

The main criticism of the Act is that it does not establish long-term targets for renewable capacity. Some observers argue that regulatory policy stability is not guaranteed, and the minister concerned can still change policies if political priorities shift. While regulatory uncertainty remains indeed a source of risk, some cleantech companies have decided not to wait for more assurance from the government, and jumped in with announcements of new installations in Ontario.

Everbrite Solar, a division of Toronto-based Everbrite Industries, has licensed a turnkey manufacturing technology from an unnamed supplier overseas, to invest CAN$500 million (US$400 million, €300 million) in a photovoltaic manufacturing facility in Kingston, Ontario. Arizona-based First Solar and solar project developer Recurrent Energy of San Francisco acquired and are planning to develop multi-megawatt solar projects in Ontario, and thin-film module manufacturer Nanosolar Inc. is considering setting up a regional assembly plant in the province, according to a local newspaper.

It has been made clear that the Act will favour businesses with operations in Ontario and include requirements for a certain amount of domestic content (at a level yet to be decided). With the Ontario value chain in cleantech needing considerable strengthening, early movers are likely to see significant advantages. Apart from a handful of local manufacturers, additional suppliers are needed to get new projects off the ground. Ontario-based companies like ARISE Technologies, 6N Silicon, Timminco and Menova Energy are leading domestic players, but they all depend on outside partners to complement their offerings. This need is likely to create opportunities for best-in-class providers from Europe and Asia.

This sentiment was shared by Nicolas Morgan of Morgan Solar: ‘The proposed feed-in tariffs are well designed from a solar perspective. Currently, the province lacks capacity in the solar supply chain, so we believe there will be more wind projects in Ontario in the first couple of years. The fact that the province is committing to invest substantial amounts in a smart grid, however, means that the timing is perfect for companies like Morgan Solar.’

But MacLellan is less concerned with the supply chain: ‘Bottlenecks are not a problem for ARISE Technologies, but may be for newer companies in Ontario. ARISE probably has installed more rooftop systems in Ontario than anyone else and has established all the necessary partnerships in the supply chain. On the financing side we will rely on our international partners, at least until the Canadian banks enter the market with products.’

And other incentives to setting up operations in Ontario may help further build local R&D and manufacturing capabilities – chief among them, the Next Generation Job Fund, which covers 15% of the cost of establishing operations in Ontario for direct foreign investment, and generous R&D tax credits covering a wide range of activities. Universal healthcare and a federal pension plan, Ontario’s proximity to a market with over 400 million people through NAFTA, and a very cost-competitive workforce compared to the US (with the third largest manufacturing base in North America after Texas and California) complete the picture.

So, while this is not a foregone conclusion, the stars seem to increasingly align to make the Ontario market more attractive.

The path to success in Ontario

As we alluded in our previous article in Renewable Energy World magazine, Roadmap for A Changed Landscape: Consolidation and Integration in the Solar PV Business (Nov/Dec 2008), businesses with a winning formula must take advantage of international expansion opportunities such as those emerging in Ontario, or risk being rapidly outflanked by their competitors. With average factory gate prices of crystalline modules already 24% down on 2008 levels due to overcapacity, and module prices decreasing, favourable business environments like the ones being created in Ontario should be explored pro-actively.

However, uncertainty remains about the level of interest among businesses and home owners in Ontario in investing in rooftop systems in these constrained economic times, even with a good return on investment.

Indeed, the federal election results from October 2008 saw voters in Ontario reject party leader Stephane Dion’s proposed ‘Green Shift’. The Liberal party, who had put that initiative at the centre of its campaign, lost 7% of votes in Ontario, and the Green party failed to pick up a single seat in the province, suggesting that ‘green’ may not be as important for Ontarians as for Germans. After all, the Alliance90/Green Party holds 51 seats in the Bundestag, while its Canadian counterpart has seats in neither the federal parliament nor the provincial assembly. In this context, a market entry strategy in the residential and commercial segments should include a solid local awareness campaign built around the financial and societal benefits of a rooftop system.

Canada has not been impacted by the economic recession as much as the US has, but property prices have nonetheless fallen and businesses have considerably reduced their spending. With Canadian banks still some way from being able to offer financing products for retail and commercial solar systems, new entrants to the Ontario market should consider partnering with other financial institutions and PPA providers (such as SunEdison for commercial rooftops) to ensure they can offer a turnkey solution to prospective customers. (Left: Solar PV panels by Bright Solar Inc, a Toronto-based green energy company.)

Be it made of residential, commercial, or solar farm installations, or a mix thereof, any solar project portfolio should include a financial risk alleviation component, driven by a project mix diversification strategy, and tight management of the committed projects. For the latter, a well-articulated market strategy, bolstered by a targeted partnership and networking programme, will go a long way in facilitating the right financial and project development support.

Generating local goodwill would also help address the politically-motivated resistance to the subsidized programme that, left unaddressed, will inevitably gain further traction and likely derail solar projects and the progress of the province towards a cleaner energy mix. History has shown that the price to pay to address this problem after the fact was, too often, underestimated by the solar industry and its political supporters. It is especially regrettable since it can be tackled cost-effectively through a discerning awareness-building programme, making good use of innovative actions such as a social media campaign to build thought leadership and positive word-of-mouth around positive messages.

A point worth considering is to note that one in four Canadians are already on Facebook, and Toronto had the largest Facebook community until it was overtaken in 2007 by London, a characteristic that could be leveraged effectively to build local support for solar energy. A timely industry- and/or government-led grass roots awareness campaign would greatly help fuel exponential interest in the programme, and make sure that solar power really ignites in Ontario.

Greg Boutin and Jon Worren are independent partners co-operating together on projects, see www.growthroute.com. E-mail: gregboutin@gmail.com or jon.worren@gmail.com

Image Gallery (6)
 
 
Reader Comments (22)
 
No image available
May 28, 2009
With the Green Energy Act passed in Ontario, the upcoming feed-in-tariff incentives should see many new wind farm & solar projects on the go. The government has been seen a bullying the municipalities into this legislation. Time will tell but don't think this is a rosy opportunity or picture (like Germany). It's a massive cash grab for those that can endure a long-standing dance before the new administration wins the next election. May be better to wait until then before spending a dime.

To quote a statement from the announcement: 'The legislation itself is expected to lead to many important changes, including a process of regulatory and policy changes"

We've long had to wade through the various reincarnations of the heavy-handed Crown Corporation that still exists. The back scratching from foreign investors may not be as satisfactory as one would assume. 2 new nuclear reactors are to be built to support the smart grid and lack of renewable energy. Atomic Energy Canada Limited (CANDU reactor) is said to be the frontrunner in the bidding war up against Westinghouse and Areba. No doubt to keep it Canadian (eh) but many of us worry about the past overruns that end up on the taxpayer bill.
The provincial government would be better off campaigning the massive budget to better education on the costs of green power along with their long standing ignorance of hiding the true cost of power with the failed deregulation of the market.

Buyer beware.
Comment 1 of 22
No image available
Anonymous
May 28, 2009
We continually read at this site that grid parity for PV is expected by about 2015; if this is true, why would anyone want to guarantee long term payments for solar power of up to 65 US cents/kWh? It is hard to see how this amounts to anything other than Ontario poring money into the pockets of an elite interest group at the detriment of their electricity consumers.
Steven
Comment 2 of 22
No image available
May 28, 2009
Anonymous,

Grid parity is expected to be achieved in the most favorable jurisdiction, those with high grid-power prices and the most sun. It will take more time for the others.

In the meantime, clean energy still has a superior price tag and the economics need to be supported through incentives. Just like nuclear R&D or oil exploration which have been utterly subsidized, without mentioning a long list of other 'hidden' costs our society is covering for fossil-fuel and atomic sources of energy, be it the environmental cost, defense and security cost, health cost, transportation cost, trade and employment balance cost etc...

Sam Dixon, I see a contradiction between your statement that "2 new nuclear reactors are to be built to support the smart grid and lack of renewable energy" and then "The provincial government would be better off campaigning the massive budget to better education on the costs of green power".

To fill the energy gap and not have to build more nuclear energy reactors which, to my point above, carry a lot more hidden costs than clean energy (i.e. waste with no satisfactory storage solution in sight, nuclear dissemination, vastly underestimated accident risks, uranium depletion, huge R&D and defense cost, frequently down - at least in Canada etc...), it sounds perfectly logical to invest in clean energy, and the government deserves kudos for it.

Like you, I will be carefully monitoring the implementation as there are risks as with every program involving contract allocation and money transfers, but let's give it a chance and support those first step towards a cleaner future even if they are still tentative.
Comment 3 of 22
No image available
May 29, 2009
Despite its great success in increasing the uptake of solar-electric, the German system is seriously flawed from the point of view of the small generator-consumer. It's flaws are releated to its unsustainability and the associated tax regime around generated and bought power. See:
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2008/04/double-metering-its-insidious.html
In addition, any government could with a few strokes of the pen go a long way to encourage the uptake of soar, for the most part without dipping into the exchequer. See
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2007/07/solar-electric-government-role.html
It just takes political will.
Comment 4 of 22
No image available
May 29, 2009
Update: Since we wrote this article in mid-April for the May/June edition of Renewable Energy Magazine, the Ontario Legislature passed the Green Energy Act in a vote on May 14. The votes were 59 for and 13 against in favour of the act.

Two days prior to that, on May 12th, the Ontario Power Authority presented updated feed-in tariffs following a number of stakeholder consultations. Compared to the table in this article, there are three noticeable changes to the proposed tariffs for solar systems:
- For systems above 10MW the automatic 9% degression of the tariff once 100MW had been intalled has been removed. Instead, OPA will review the rate in two years from now. This is great news for all developers that have optioned land and are planning utility scale systems.
- At the other end of the scale, smaller systems up to 10kW now also include small ground mounted systems in addition to roof top systems.
- The next system size up, have now been expanded, so that the $ 0.713/kWh included systems from 10kW and up to 250kW.

More details are available at the OPA website: www.powerauthority.on.ca
Comment 5 of 22
No image available
May 29, 2009
It's not just solar power. Plasco has a plasma waste-to-power plant that is really starting to work after a tough battle. Ontario may be exporting these plants all over the world. Only 0.2% left to be discarded after 10,000 C plasma gets done. 1.2 MWh/ton generated, 2.1 tons CO2 credits per ton!
Very clean stack output, no dioxins, etc.
http://www.plascoenergygroup.com/?Environmental_Performance
Comment 6 of 22
No image available
May 29, 2009
You ask "Could Ontario Be the Next Germany?" I answer NO! Germany has FITs for virtually all renewable energy technologies and are extended to economies of scale. There is nothing here but FITs for solar systems below 100 kW. What about large-scale geothermal, biomass, solar and wind in Ontario? I suppose that gets blocked by your friendly neighborhood utility monopoly like here in the US?
Comment 7 of 22
No image available
May 29, 2009
These articles, and others like it, act as if installation of capacity is all that matters. Production is never mentioned. It is hard to image many places worse to install solar on a large scale than Germany and Ontario. The amount of energy to produce and ship the modules to regions of the world with limited solar resources is simply not sustainable. If this was being offered in CA, AZ, or NV I would applaud the legislation. Doing so in Germany and Ontario makes me cringe. It is a waste of energy (the energy going into producing the panels, of which it takes a lot) and of financial resources of those governments that could direct the money to more sustainable energy options particular to their location. It is my hope that the understanding will grow to review policies through the concept of sustainability and not just installation of large capacity renewable energy systems without consideration of optimizing their output.
Comment 8 of 22
No image available
May 30, 2009
Jason, the energy going into the production of solar panels is a fraction of what the panel will produce over its lifetime. This has long been documented, and I wish people could check their facts before spreading those arguments.

Mike, the Green Energy Act actually does include FITs for a number of other technologies including wind and biomass, not just solar. We just decided to focus the article on solar.

William, the solar incentives in Germany are by now means perfect, but so far no other system has done better at encouraging the growth in that industry.

I must point out that there have been a number of surveys showing the support of the local population for this Act, see this page, so the comments above are clearly not representative of the general population.

Also see my new blog post about the recent editorial in Canadian Business.
Comment 9 of 22
No image available
May 30, 2009
The link in my post were removed, here they are:
- Survey: http://www.newswire.ca/en/releases/archive/April2009/26/c5160.html
- Blog post: http://www.torevenue.com/2009/05/canadian-business-magazine-confused-over-vc-emerging-tech-fund-and-green-energy-act/
Comment 10 of 22
No image available
May 31, 2009
Greg, I don't know why you just decided to focus the article on solar. But it made me think there were loopholes for the other technologies, something that has appeared in virtually all US policies that have passed by utility special interests. After a quick examination of the Ontario tariffs, I found a 10 megawatt limit. Not fair, especially since the utility monopolies can build any size they want to take advantage of economies of scale.
Comment 11 of 22
No image available
May 31, 2009
Mike, you can split your project in different tranches to fit the 10MW limit, this is what one of the companies we mention in the article has done with the past program and I believe this is still possible with the new one.
Comment 12 of 22
No image available
May 31, 2009
Yes on Solar but no to high priced fits!

The sunny areas need solar fits! Now, if they pay 50 cents for each kWh, that might be wonderful up to a certain point, say 5% of all juice generated. If normal price for conventional's is 15 cents, then (up to) 5% of total is 35 cents "too much". This means that only about two or three cents would be added to the overall price once fully implemented. But that would only achieve small results.

What we really need to do is enact fits that promote FULLY AUTOMATED PV FACTORIES, that is such that unlimited juice can be generated until "fully implemented". Obviously, such a fit could only be offered AFTER the fully automated PV factories came online (for business guarantee needed for upstart of such factories), otherwise the fits would have to be much higher and indeed be too much of a burden for the rest of us!

Such factories would lower the cost of PV to the point where feed in tariffs of only a few cents would be needed (basically to guarantee the business for the PV factories). Home owners within the "fitted" areas would finally be able to install solar for less than half the costs without subsidies and receive just slightly more per kWh than "normal".

As for the cost per solar kWh, a few cents extra would definitely be worth it if implemented on a large scale, not the puny scales that high priced fits only offer `~'
Comment 13 of 22
No image available
June 1, 2009
Greg, the Green Energy and Green Economy Act (Bill 150) sounds like a miracle. But did it pass as expected in May 2009 and in the right form?
(I can't find any news.)
Comment 14 of 22
No image available
June 2, 2009
Mike, yes the act passed, see Jon Worren's comment (9 comments before you). A search on Google News will also give you several results such as http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7015158016.

"Fire of energy", let me assure you that solar manufacturers are already working hard to reduce the cost of solar manufacturing through automation and other means. The cost is declining yet incentives such as the FITs are still needed to make the economics work until we reach lower costs.
Comment 15 of 22
No image available
June 2, 2009
Greg, the reference article you just gave made the Ontario program appear either even more confusing than your article or as worthless as I suspected. Your article appears to say large-scale solar systems of about 5 MW will be limited to a total of 16-25 MW? Meanwhile, your article said nothing about the other technologies like wind and biomass. The reference article appears to say that new proposed nuclear plants could crowd out all (but 8%?) of capacity for new renewable energy? This hardly sounds like Germany! You or someone should explain exactly how much capacity and at what price will be available to each renewable energy technology, before there is any reason for any excitement here.
Comment 16 of 22
No image available
June 2, 2009
Having had a large utilitity company in UK, offer what I thought was a good price for generated photovoltaic electricity. Though I was told expected rate should rise either in June or July this year.
After reading the rates on offer in Ontario Canada, the UK rate now seems to be very poor. Plus offer was dependant on no more than 5kW, £0.28 per kWhe, for home use only. The 100kW rate £014 per kWhe, is more appropiate for small factory owners. The 0.82 Canadian $, is very nice rate.

John Gregson 07772 427 761 or 07796 533 460
Comment 17 of 22
No image available
June 4, 2009
Before Ontario builds any nuclear plants, they should calculate the total costs, including the cost of storing the waste for 10,000 years, and require full insurance against disaster. Then, all renewable energies should first be offered feed-in tariffs and tested to see if they can meet needs at that cost. How could anyone except a utility monopolist and their pocket politicians oppose that plan?
Comment 18 of 22
No image available
June 4, 2009
Mike, it seems our article was not to your liking and that you are not optimistic about the green energy act. We'll try to do better next time.

You draw a lot of hypothetical conclusions from the comments by Greenpeace and Pembina in the article I referred to, and although they certainly refer to existing risks, those have not been confirmed and I see a number of reasons why the Green Energy Act would still be a positive move under a number of the scenarios evoked. This is by no means a perfect act and nowhere are we suggesting that, but it certainly is one of the best actions we have seen in the recent period, and that is worth celebrating.

I also want to point out that nowhere our article meant "to say large-scale solar systems of about 5 MW will be limited to a total of 16-25 MW", this is your own conjecture. You also should rely on other sources to learn more about the green energy act. In fact the act can be downloaded online. Our article is not intended to describe all the consequences of the act, just take a look at the solar portion of it, so you are welcome to discuss the act more broadly but you may want to take up that discussion with other people involved in the field as they may offer additional views of interest to you.
Comment 19 of 22
No image available
June 5, 2009
What I don't like are green wash bills.
Comment 20 of 22
No image available
June 6, 2009
Authors at Renewableenergyworld.com should explain all of the potential pitfalls of renewable energy bills. Otherwise, they risk misleading industry and the public into thinking governments are giving renewable energy a fair chance, when perhaps they are not, thereby promoting failure. They can also waste the people's time trying to figure it out themselves. People generally don't have time to analyze the complicated bills of every country, province, state and locality.
Comment 21 of 22
No image available
June 10, 2009
Mike, I disagree with your assessment which I do not find grounded in actual facts, but I do appreciate the time you took to raise your concerns. Certainly the government and energy industry have not always been examples of transparency and some amount of skepticism is fair. I think we have tried to point out some risk in the article but the bill is quite promising in our opinion and speculating on the future is not something we think would be constructive.

To move on, an interesting announcement last week for a large project in Ontario:

"EDF EN Canada, a company of the EDF Energies Nouvelles family, announced its intention to start construction of a 23.4MW (DC) photovoltaic power plant near Arnprior, Ontario. More than 300,000 solar panels will generate electricity when the province's power demand is highest via the Hydro One distribution grid. The Arnprior Solar Project is being developed as two installations under the Government of Ontario's Standard Offer Program, formed to help replace the coal-fired power generation."

http://www.pv-tech.org/news/_a/edf_en_canada_announces_solar_project_in_arnprior_on/?utm_source=PV+Tech+Newsletter&utm_campaign=c18f50c47d-pvtech_newsletter_10_06_2009&utm_medium=email
Comment 22 of 22
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
SolarCraft Southwest Windpower National Semiconductor San Luis Valley Energy Fair Focus Solar Navigant Consulting
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo