Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Concentrating Solar Energy Technologies Explained

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

11 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 11
May 13, 2009
As always, I've enjoyed educational articles such as this. I hope you can go one step further and educate us about the different types of photovoltaic systems on an updated and archived page. For example, I'd like to see CIGS, Cadtel, thin film, amorphous, single crystal, and other tech compared to the latest efficiency%, average cost/Kwh, % of total PV, and frequent updates. And an update on what various companies are doing...Heliovolt, Solyndra, Energy Conversion Devices, First Solar, Solar Power, Evergreen Solar,...etc.
Comment
2 of 11
May 13, 2009
The problem with all forms of CSP is that any clouds interfering with direct sunlight causes there to be effectively zero energy conversion. Such cloud cover can linger for days or even months. On the other hand, flat plate PV and thermal collectors create useful energy conversion even on a cloudy day. The useful energy conversion in these simple systems is proportional to the light, and do not require direct sunlight nor mechanical tracking with its substantial costs and maintenance issues. With climate change altering cloud cover in many areas, CSP is a risky investment.
Comment
3 of 11
What this skips over is:

1. Concentrating Solar Thermal permanently destroys roughly 10 acres/mW of land; and

2. uses rougly 90,000 gallons/year/MW of scarce desert groundwater to rinse mirrors; and

3. production drops precipitously in hot climates, when power is needed most, so In order to be cost-effective, it requires BILLIONS more gallons of non-existent desert groundwater to water-cool. air cooled plants are much more expensive and much less productive;

so, actually, the desert Southwest - a highly effective carbon sink when left intact - is a LOUSY place to put these plants. It is only Big Energy propagandists and lobbyists who are rushing to destroy millions of acres of intact ecosystem to re-centralize and re-monopolize our energy supply who think of it as anything other than wasteful, GHG spewing, ecosystem slaughter.

The rest of us support point of use solutions like efficiency gains and rooftop solar, which would be plenty to power our nation over twice over, on existing rooftops and in-city brownfields. We are having our planet, our open spaces, our water table and our economy destroyed by Big Energy with these crappy projects and the greenwashing is disgusting.

Big Energy is the PROBLEM, not the solution. Look to yourself, your friends, and neighbors for the real solutions.
Comment
4 of 11
May 13, 2009
Stirling engine concentrating systems are the least disruptive to the desert environment. No land leveling needed and each dish only needs a pole planted, much like planting a telephone pole. Simple trenching between dishes, then the ground is left to go back to its natural state of native grasses and sage. Stirling dishes offer 1.5 mW per 10 acres verses 1 mW for trough and power tower. Washing is much more efficient requiring only 13,200 gal per mW per year. Stirling systems hold the world record for highest efficiency conversion of solar energy into grid electricity- >31%

Higher efficiency means less land needed per mW.

Check out: http://www.tesserasolar.com/north-america/award-winner.htm
Comment
5 of 11
May 14, 2009
There is an old solar "concentration" technology, invented in UK about 1957 and tested by Harold Wentworth which has been "forgotten" It is low concentration 3.5-4 times but very inexpensive and uses flat reflective surfaces.

Am developing a revised version for water heating, may be able to combine with PV or make a PV version only. Interested parties please look at http://www.grunweb.org.uk for contact info

Roofing over open air car parks eg at shopping malls, would seem to be good sites for PV ? Could collect rainwater too.
Comment
6 of 11
May 14, 2009
"stop killin" only saw what some variables pointed to. I accept his last paragraph tho. It is big corp control of power generation.
Solar thermal is available to everyone at less than "bankster boyz bailout" prices. Heating homes, businesses, and institutions and their hot water is easily accomplished without increasing the electricity infrastructure. Saving more than half of their support outlay is the result. AND it is not purchased power. You make it, pollution free and cost free right at home. It only requires paying for a support of a lifetimes supply of heating energy up front, something that could be done for less than the cost of the financial bailout, which we will pay for again and again.
Comment
7 of 11
May 14, 2009
I read today that an estimated 200 gW of new capacity will be needed by 2020 just to serve the new electronic gadgets we all use. Other growth will require additional resources.
Efficiency, demand management and wise use are the answer. We are the problem.

If only "big energy" would quintuple rates and reduce service reliability then we could not blame them for standing in the way of the individual power producer/consumer. That would open the door to those who can do it faster,better,cheaper,whatever. Then the playing field would be equal.
No image available
Comment
8 of 11
Anonymous
May 15, 2009
I wonder what the thermal stability of the high efficiency PV cells used in CPV is? In particular, one sometimes sees these demonstrated with concentration factors of above 100, so the question arises about whether or not one can extract the waste heat (the remaining 60% after the 40% conversion efficiency) and use that as in solar thermal applications. Ideally one would be able to "double-dip" and get the 40% efficiency of CPV and the ~35% thermal efficiency of steam engines powered by CSP for a ~60% overall efficiency. Presumably there are technical limitations on this currently, but what are they?
Steven
No image available
Comment
9 of 11
Anonymous
May 15, 2009
In comment #2 Jonathan Cole writes: "With climate change altering cloud cover in many areas, CSP is a risky investment."

Cloud cover over the Sahara desert is not likely to be an issue anytime soon, and similar statements could be made about many deserts. One would think that making mirrors for focusing is cheaper than making high-efficiency PV cells so CSP should be cost competitive with PV and will hopefully be subject to better economies of scale. Additionally, the option for thermal storage allows for a degree of load balancing that PV does not possess.
No image available
Comment
10 of 11
Anonymous
May 15, 2009
Several of the posters seem to favor distributed small scale PV, although it is extremely expensive. Even if costs were to plummet this have two additional problems: seasonal variability and high costs to redistribute. If one lives in an urban center such as New York City or London, you cannot possibly get enough energy from rooftop solar, so it has to be imported and getting if from rooftop collection points distributed across the countryside is simply unworkable. Thus, a large proportion of electricity generation will need to be from utility scale production. Seasonal variability of solar insolation in Northern cities such as in England can lead to a factor of 10 difference between July and December electricity generation from PV sources--even assuming the roof isn't covered in snow. Equatorial deserts have a very modest seasonal insolation variation so CSP placed in such locations is a much more stable source of energy.
Comment
11 of 11
July 4, 2009
I entirely agree with comments dated 14 May 09 by Mr Dennis Houghton. We can talk endlessly about renewable energy and investing huge amounts.The problem is on the demand side. There is excessive use of energy at individual levels and this appetite of energy use appears insatiable. Demand management and energy efficiency only can address the problem now, and world should not wait till affordable technologies are developed in the renewable energy sectors. Demand and consumption at individual levels can be better managed thru incentive and penalty programs which encourages energy conservation and usage for individuals and households. Scheme of Carbon Credit is working at Industry level. Similar schemes may be worked out for the household users , and also by stepping up campaigns for reducing energy consumption.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Mike Taylor

View Mike Taylor's Profile
About: Mike Taylor is the Director of Research for the Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA) and leads SEPA’s research publications and materials for over 1000 elect... more »

Advertise With Us

North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners Interstate Renewable Energy Council 3TIER Johnson Controls, Inc. FC Business Intelligence American Wind Energy Association Magnum Energy Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters