Photo Credit: EPSRC
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (9) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 21, 2009

Air-fueled Battery Could Last Up to 10 Times Longer

by Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Swindon, UK [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

A new type of air-fueled battery could give up to ten times the energy storage of designs currently available.

"The key is to use oxygen in the air as a re-agent, rather than carry the necessary chemicals around inside the battery."

-- Peter Bruce, Chemistry Professor, University of St Andrews

This step-change in capacity could pave the way for a new generation of electric cars, mobile phones and laptops.

The research work, funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC), is being led by researchers at the University of St Andrews with partners at Strathclyde and Newcastle.

The new design has the potential to improve the performance of portable electronic products and give a major boost to the renewable energy industry. The batteries will enable a constant electrical output from sources such as wind or solar, which stop generating when the weather changes or night falls.

Improved capacity is thanks to the addition of a component that uses oxygen drawn from the air during discharge, replacing one chemical constituent used in rechargeable batteries today. Not having to carry the chemicals around in the battery offers more energy for the same size battery. Reducing the size and weight of batteries with the necessary charge capacity has been a long-running battle for developers of electric cars.

The STAIR (St Andrews Air) cell should be cheaper than today's rechargeables too. The new component is made of porous carbon, which is far less expensive than the lithium cobalt oxide it replaces.

This four-year research project, which reaches its halfway mark in July, builds on the discovery at the university that the carbon component's interaction with air can be repeated, creating a cycle of charge and discharge. Subsequent work has more than tripled the capacity to store charge in the STAIR cell.

Principal investigator on the project, Professor Peter Bruce of the Chemistry Department at the University of St Andrews, says: "Our target is to get a five to ten fold increase in storage capacity, which is beyond the horizon of current lithium batteries. Our results so far are very encouraging and have far exceeded our expectations."

"The key is to use oxygen in the air as a re-agent, rather than carry the necessary chemicals around inside the battery," says Bruce.

The oxygen, which will be drawn in through a surface of the battery exposed to air, reacts within the pores of the carbon to discharge the battery. "Not only is this part of the process free, the carbon component is much cheaper than current technology," says Bruce. He estimates that it will be at least five years before the STAIR cell is commercially available.

The project is focused on understanding more about how the chemical reaction of the battery works and investigating how to improve it. The research team is also working towards making a STAIR cell prototype suited, in the first instance, for small applications, such as mobile phones or MP3 players.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (9)
 
No image available
May 22, 2009
"...should be cheaper..." yea, how many times have we heard that one. Translation: cheaper to manufacture=bigger profit margin for the capitalists. Better living through science? Been told that one for years now, too. Science has been hijacked! Just not buying it (literally)!
Comment 1 of 9
No image available
May 22, 2009
So invent sometthing yourself and quit bitching!
Comment 2 of 9
No image available
May 22, 2009
using oxygen during discharge sounds like a fuel cell, does it release oxygen during charging? does it release any gas? the description is not clear.
Comment 3 of 9
No image available
May 22, 2009
Does it turn oxygen and carbon into carbon dioxide, a greenhouse gas? Carbon monoxide?
Comment 4 of 9
No image available
May 22, 2009
Unless I'm missing something here, this technology has been around for 40+ years (maybe more), but seems to be presented here as something new. In the late 1960's I worked on H2/O2 fuel cells at Energy Conversion Ltd. in UK. Another group worked on zinc-air batteries (and other metal batteries, such as iron). Many other companies worldwide have worked on Zn/Air, Al/Air and Fe/Air batteries. The "air electrode" is essentially an oxygen electrode (e.g. silver catalysed carbon), with air blown over it, much the same as the cathode in a fuel cell. The Zn/Air battery could not be recharged electrochemically due to dendrite formation shorting out the electrodes. When discharged, the battery has to have its' zinc anodes replaced and the electrolyte (aqueous KOH) changed after a few cycles, since the zinc is now in solution. It was therefore a HYBRID BATTERY - primary cell (anode)/fuel cell (cathode).

Anode reaction: Zn - 2e = Zn++

Cathode reaction: O2 + 2H2O + 4e = 4 OH-

A large battery was developed for the military, but was costly, had self-discharge problems unless kept dry sealed and was messy to recharge. However, miniature ones have been used in hearing aids and other small electronics for many years.

The "STAIR cell" appears to be a lithium anode version of the same thing, but can be electrochemically recharged. I can see that the energy density could be 2.5 X Zinc/Air ( Li/O2 = 3.5v. versus Zn/O2 = 1.4 v.), but 10 times better (than what?) seems to be stretching it a bit. Must be more to it than the brief description above.

"He estimates that it will be at least five years before the STAIR cell is commercially available."

He could be right. Hate to say it, but I've heard similar remarks more times than I can count.
Comment 5 of 9
No image available
May 25, 2009
Using oxygen from surrounding air raises the question of safety in enclosed spaces. Will it deplete the available oxygen in a room if used as a power cell? Using it in small, portable devices like iPods might not create a problem, unless there were 20 or 30 in a room full of students, all sharing the same air. Would it be a concern used as a power cell in the basement of a residence? Too many questions raised by the brief description in this article.
Comment 6 of 9
No image available
May 26, 2009
Aw come on. Give us a hint how it works. What is being oxydized. How many recharge cycles might it have in its life time. Is it likely to be recyclible.
Comment 7 of 9
No image available
May 26, 2009
http://chemistry.st-and.ac.uk/staff/pgb/group/lio.html

http://www66.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1220+mAh%2Fg+at+2.5V+in+wh%2Fkg

Hope this link helps....
Comment 8 of 9
No image available
May 30, 2009
General Atomics was on the verge of commercialization of zinc air fuel cell technology in the 60's but put on hold by big oil. That division was taken over by Gulf Oil and that was the last we heard of zinc air until the last several years. Check out these misspelled references: http://scienceservice.si.edu/pages/001027.htm
http://scienceservice.si.edu/pages/001026.htm
Good luck finding any of their research. I contacted General Atomics and got no comment on the data from this period. The slurry method for zinc replacement seems the logical step in a seamless transition from gasoline to zinc air fuel cells.
Comment 9 of 9
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Johnson Controls, Inc. SPG Solar, Inc. The Switch EnerWorks Inc. AltaTerra Research Lectrus
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo