Photo Credit: Pat Corkery
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (13) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
April 2, 2009

Stimulus Dollars Begin to Flow: Here's How, Where and When

by Jeff Postelwait, Online Editor, Power Engineering
Washington, D.C. United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) continues to announce more places where stimulus money is to be spent as more funding from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 is allocated.

"There's a whole sequence of events that has to take place. You have to announce the funding opportunity so people can, based on those requirements, submit their proposals. Then there will be an application review process."

-- David Walls, Director, Navigant Consulting

The DOE Web site has links for funding opportunities offered through the stimulus. Directly, the DOE plans to distribute money via grants, contracts and cooperative agreements through a bidding process. Applications on renewable energy projects, advanced fossil energy projects, Smart Grid projects and others will be considered.

Timelines for funding will be available depending on the specific program and project, according to the DOE. Funding will be provided in an indirect fashion through state and local governments, which will administer several energy block grant programs.

The Obama administration also announced US $3.2 billion in funding for local energy efficiency programs in U.S. cities, counties, states, territories and Native American tribes. The Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block Grant Program has the goal of reducing demand for electricity, increasing efficiency and reducing fossil fuel emissions.

You can download a state-by-state breakdown of the grant funding for state-level energy programs and weatherization assistance for low-income persons.

David Walls, director of Navigant Consulting, said the block grant programs will be one of the first programs to direct money where it is needed.

"Those are probably some of the earliest funding opportunities that will become available. Some of the larger grants, based on the complexity of the projects, will not go out until later," Walls said.

Some of the larger, more complicated programs, such as those that allot money for research and development programs, could take much more time before dollars actually get distributed and spent.

"There's a whole sequence of events that has to take place. You have to announce the funding opportunity so people can, based on those requirements, submit their proposals. Then there will be an application review process," Walls said.

Some of the money for these kinds of programs might not be released until as late as 2010, he said.

Loan Approval

Greg Jenner, partner with Stoel Rives, said the DOE will have to go through a rulemaking process to establish the criteria for the loan guarantee program

"It will take some time. It's cumbersome." Jenner said.

A timeline for the approval and distribution of these loan guarantees is not yet clear, he said.

"The Treasury Department (which administers the program) has never done anything like this program before. They have only recently decided where the program will be housed in treasury and they have just figured that out," he said.

However, the approval of some older applications, such as the $535 guarantee offered to California-based solar power firm Solyndra, Inc., are signs that the process may become more streamlined.

Jenner said his clients are hoping that the circulation of these loan guarantees will be more rapid than they have been under past energy secretaries and past loan programs.

"(Energy Secretary Steven Chu) is making all the right noises when it comes to getting this program working quickly and getting the guarantees approved," he said.

The DOE's loan guarantee program awards guaranteed private sector loans for energy projects using an amendment to the 2005 Energy Policy Act. To qualify, projects must commence construction no later than Sept. 30, 2011.

Through the stimulus act, the DOE can underwrite up to $60 billion in loans with its Innovative Technologies Loan Guarantee program. Loans are offered to qualifying projects in the following sectors: biomass, hydrogen, solar, wind, hydropower, advanced coal energy, carbon capture and sequestration, pollution control and others. Companies can apply for the loan guarantee program online.

Tax Credit Technicalities

Jenner also said that the stimulus act's establishment of the option to choose a grant rather than the Investment Tax Credit may be moving more slowly than it did at first, after running into some legal technicalities.

There is a question of whether the Treasury Department, which administers the program, has to determine compliance with existing laws such as the Environmental Policy Act or the Endangered Species Act, among others, he said.

"There are lawyers who believe very strongly that compliance is not required. It's just some funny language in the statue. Treasury is now working on that," he said.

If compliance with such laws is found to be a requirement, he said, it would negatively impact the program.

"It would mean the death of the grant program if it is concluded that compliance is required and must be shown," he said.

Smart Transmission

A consortium of state and federal regulators, sponsored by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners released a set of criteria for how they think the DOE should consider when distributing the $4.5 billion allocated through the stimulus act for Smart Grid and related transmission programs.

The list suggests that DOE should require smart grid grant applicants to show how the project will provide for interoperability in the absence of approved standards, address cyber security concerns and maintain the grid integrity.

It also says DOE's criteria should state that grant-funded projects should focus on both the transmission and distribution system and include a range of technologies — not just meter installation. Walls said the DOE should be releasing details shortly on funding opportunities involving the Smart Grid and transmission upgrades portion of the stimulus act.

"There's going to be a notice of intent issued by DOE that will identify specific details," Walls said.

Energy Efficiency a Priority

A total of $16.8 billion is going to the DOE's Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy office, a near tenfold increase from the office's 2008 funding level.

The majority of this money will be used for direct grants and rebates for energy efficiency measures and installation of renewable applications, there is also funding for utility-scale biomass projects ($800 million) and the development of geothermal energy technology ($400 million).

The stimulus act also directs $2 billion in EERE funds for the development of advanced battery systems and components in the U.S. to support advanced lithium-ion batteries and hybrid electric systems.

The vast majority of advanced batteries used in the U.S. are manufactured in Asia. New technologies in advanced batteries could have a wide-ranging impact on the generation sector, particularly with regard to renewable energy storage.

Fossil energy

There is $3.4 billion in the stimulus act for fossil energy research and development. This figure includes $1.52 billion for industrial carbon capture and energy efficiency improvement projects, including money for research on the beneficial reuse of carbon dioxide.

Also included are $50 million to identify geological formations that could be used for carbon sequestration and $20 million for geologic carbon sequestration training and research grants.

Several projects are lobbying for this money already. Texas lawmakers asked the DOE March 25 to send up to $1.2 billion in funding to help build a 345 MW coal-fired carbon capture project proposed by Summit Power. The 275 MW FutureGen project, planned for Illinois, is also seeking stimulus money to fund most of its projected $1.8 billion cost.

Blinding Them With Science

The DOE also announced $1.2 billion in new science funding through the stimulus act, spearheaded through the country's network of government-funded laboratories and the DOE Office of Science.

Research dollars that could benefit the power generation sector include:

$150 million for the National Synchrotron Light Source-II at Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York State. This high intensity light source could lead to advances in energy storage technology and solar photovoltaics.

$227 million for Energy Frontier Research Centers. These centers will pursue research in fields ranging from solar energy to nuclear energy systems, biofuels, geological sequestration of carbon dioxide, clean and efficient combustion, solid state lighting, superconductivity, hydrogen research, electrical energy storage, catalysis for energy and materials under extreme conditions.

The $1.2 billion is the first installment of a total of $1.6 billion allocated to the DOE Office of Science by Congress under the stimulus legislation. Another $371 million in science funding has yet to be detailed.

Jeff Postelwait is the online editor at Power Engineering. In that capacity, he manages news content for Power Engineering's website and edits the magazine's weekly electronic newsletter. He is based in Tulsa, Oklahoma.

This article was originally published by Power Engineering and was reprinted with permission.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (13)
 
No image available
April 2, 2009
Yawn... This article really doesn't reveal anything exciting other than "we have to wait a little longer until the DoE reveals more details."
Comment 1 of 13
No image available
April 3, 2009
It is interesting. I agree with Karl. It seems that more needs to be done to streamline grant and loan processes. at the rate the federal and local government move, they will eat up 80 % of that grant money.
There should just be a department that sifts through the requests. a standard set of guidelines to submit them would alleviate fraud. If they spend more protecting against fraud rather than less, it is becomes worse to protect rather than to just give it out.
I don't know how much longer the NEW Green Collar work force has to wait.
Comment 2 of 13
No image available
April 3, 2009
There is too much money wasted on fossil fuel research and carbon sequestration ,1.5 Billion? Give me a break.I thought the goal was to get away from hydrocarbons? Give geothermal 1.5 Billion and we will never need another coal fired plant. And whatever happened to the hydrogen economy? Solar to hydrogen infrastructure is needed, fuel cells made from new polymers,not platinum, instead of batteries, made in the USA, how bout it.? Please people tell congress the research is done. More info on new energy sources is available on the web than I can say here. We need funding for new startup companies in this country, some of which have been abandoned for lack of funding,they could be restarted for minimal investment. Stop wasting my tax money on coal,oil,and nuclear.
Comment 3 of 13
No image available
April 3, 2009
Have you ever checked out how to get a small business loan from the government? I did last October 29th and found out it would take me 27 days on average to get the password approved to download the application. The deadline for 2009 was November 22, 2008 to apply for the small business loan. Needless to say I didn't and couldn't apply. The only ones getting these moneys will be the large outfits that can afford the manpower to wade through the hogwash to get the funding.
Comment 4 of 13
April 3, 2009
Large utility lobiests have been on board with directing as much as they can toward themselves in stimulus funds for quite some time, even in advance of the past presidential election. Whenever we see "concentrated solar" anything, you may read it as utility operated, and as such will have their control and margins to fund.
I would certainly like to see more in the stimulus descriptions as they mature toward actual implementation, about aid for individual and small business funding for using current sunshine in heating water and similar processes.
Solar heating on a small scale displaces the need for the massive electrical grid up-sizing. Even REW has taken on the spin model of assuming that "solar" means electricity for the grid. I suspect it's because that is where the big money is. Yet, it remains true that SOLAR THERMAL on a distributed basis is the way for more people to save more money and prevent the production of more CO2 than any power produced through the utility grids. There just isn't the lucretive PAC money or profit spill over for more grafters and geeks to grab on.
Comment 5 of 13
No image available
Phil is absolutely right. Here in CA, we have an un-funded loan program for residences and businesses to install energy efficiency and renewable energy generation, and 100% of the federal money (which actually means OUR ratepayer money) should go directly to ratepayers who want to reduce their bills, reduce their consumption and feed power INTO the grid when they have excess. 90% of the cities and counties have ignored or stalled on funding the program, even though it is risk-free and will cover 100% of their AB 32 requirements without costing a cent. Why?

Feed in tariffs and loan funding for homes and businesses are the only democratic, environmentally and economically sane way to use our tax (and ratepayer) dollars. NO MORE BIG ENERGY GIVEAWAYS! and no more decimation of our ecosystems for power production! we have more than twice the generation capacity needed to power our entire nation, right on existing rooftops and in-city brownfields, using only the super cheap thin film PV. shouldn't we get going on that and leave carbon-sequestering ecosystems (like the Mojave) intact so they can do their job?
Comment 6 of 13
No image available
Phil is right on target. Our economic system is now heavily biased towards subsidizing big industry and big solutions because they maintain big influence and the possibiltiy of big government control and big corruption. The very essence of sustainable living is producing/storing as and where you consume. Small and distributed alternative energies avoid the transportation infrastructure/resources required and pollution generated (in losses). Subsidies destroy small business because they distort the economic environment. The average small businessman hasn't the time or inclination to pursue grant funding, tax credits, loan guarantees etc. His/her interests, expertise and desire like in the technology and its application, not funny finance. But if you not getting free money from the government, look around because your competitor is and will soon be putting you out of business with it.
Comment 7 of 13
No image available
April 3, 2009
Yep, the some of the effects of gov't programs are always skewed markets and waste. Everyone and everything would be much better off if the gov't would totally get out of the markets - they would function very well if they were FREE like they are supposed to be. Although a simple deterant for pollution would be prudent.

One company is doing well - offering a great deal to TAX-PAYERS - with the available credit - designing a 100% income TAX CREDIT - providing an equity stake in their SOLAR thermal power plant at NO COST -- more than 100% funded by the gov't, or / rather, by one's tax liability. And then you own an asset and the revenue produced -- great deal. More description here: www.tnns.org/energy-credit
Comment 8 of 13
April 3, 2009
Hi All:

Come on, did you really think that it would turn out any differently..??.. Power with a capital "P" is held by the conventionals and arms dealers... Its all wrapped up in the MIC... and history has show that Power NEVER willingly gives it up... it only shifts to a different shell...
With all this money floating around all the "experts" are going to start showing up, buying certifications to make the general public think they know what they are talking about and the poorly designed systems will start to proliferate again, especially in the thermal area where incentives are not based on installed system performance over time, only SRCC certifications which means krap...
So, here we go again.....
Comment 9 of 13
No image available
April 3, 2009
What, are people here diss'n CSP? What is really wrong with a big company (which make your rates lower than a rooftop system anyways)?

I'll tell you!

They will bulldoze the deserts just to convert it into a giant black field. Now, if you seen the video (somewhere here), it is very encouraging since that is EXACTLY what we need to do for all them parking lots!

However, for deserts WE NEED TO COVER IT WITH MIRRORS! Why, because it is the only form of energy (period) that can provide renewable, baseload power on an unlimited scale! Mirrors will not ad any heat especially if they share the land with SEAWATER GREENHOUSES which use the suns heat to convert to freshwater and excess evaporation.

Please redirect the anger to make sure that they are post driven as Sterling Energy System's sun catchers are! (Nobody could be against that, right?) If even we did just that, there would be no future gigantic dust bowl AND the twin problems of PO and GW be solved! The issue of storage might be addressed by the much higher conversion rates that SES has.

However "they" do it, it's better than noth'n at all. I would hope that more money be spent on energy storage (otherwise CSP is the ONLY mass solution). This way, less intrusive means could be used such as offshore wind.

And finally, we need to vent at those who allow RE parts to be made from any other countries with the exception of just a few percent!
Comment 10 of 13
No image available
April 5, 2009
Unfortunately, the lion's share of the stimulus budget is going towards "shovel ready" projects and conventional programs that are not sustainable in the least, but which had been approved in an old paradigm of wasteful thinking. Pressure needs to be applied to our local and state agencies to put "green" stipulations on as many projects as possible that are going to be green lit once the federal money starts rolling in. Otherwise there is just going to be a massive influx of funding going to prop up a school of thought that is out of date, leaving us back in the same place a few years from now.
Comment 11 of 13
No image available
April 11, 2009
Do any of you really think that government funding will help individuals become more politically and economically independent?
This government funding is likely for purposes of industrial nationalization, like any socialist society.
Get real.
Comment 12 of 13
No image available
April 23, 2009
What is the purpose of the money?
Answer: To make the reasons for giving the money obsolete.

Why do we want the Gov't to give us money?
Answer: So we can afford RE.

If the money causes the mftg and installation costs of RE to descend to affordable amounts, haven't we made the reason for giving the money obsolete?

Who are the entities most likely to make RE affordable?
Answer: The people that mftg and install these systems.

Who are the entities that mftg this equipment?
Businesses.

What kind of businesses can supply vast amounts of RE.
Big Businesses.

The point is to create a support system of BIG BUSINESSES for RE that will drive the price down.

FIT is like getting a rebate for cash guzzling cars, when we should encourage producing more cost effective vehicles.

Everyone needs a subsidy for something they can't afford.
Remember: The purpose of the money is to make the reason for giving it obsolete.

The money shouldn't be life support for cash guzzling technologies.
Comment 13 of 13
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Solar Energy International Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) National Hydrogen Association OutBack Power Systems OPEL Solar, Inc. Alteris Renewables
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo