article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (2) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
April 1, 2009

State Solar Update: FIT Regulatory Boost in California, Bills on the Docket in Arizona

Arizona and California, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The Solar Alliance and the Vote Solar Initiative announced support for four bills designed to advance solar energy in Arizona. The new legislation would allow Arizona's schools, homes and businesses to take full advantage of the state's strong solar potential.

In California, the CPUC took another step toward a state level feed-in tariff.

“Thanks to the leadership of the Arizona Corporation Commission, Arizona has the fundamental policies in place to support a healthy and robust solar market. These bills are turbo-chargers: they reduce the cost of doing business, attract new customers, and help bring new jobs to the state,” said Adam Browning, executive director of the Vote Solar Initiative.

The four Arizona bills designed to foster in-state economic opportunity in the growing solar energy market include:
  • HB 2335: Would allow municipalities to set up voluntary, opt-in financing programs for solar and energy efficiency investments on home. This type of city-run financing program helps property owners overcome solar’s upfront cost by spreading the system price over an affordable 20-year property tax assessment.
  • HB 2332: Would let schools implement solar and energy efficiency improvements by removing the upfront cost which would be paid back through monthly savings on the school’s utility bills.
  • HB 2329: Would cap permit fees for solar at US $375.
  • SB 1403: Degisned to give incentives to attract solar manufacturing companies to Arizona.

In California, the CPUC took another step toward a state level feed-in tariff. Key elements of a new set of rules created by the CPUC raises project size that will qualify for any tariff from 1.5 MW to 10 MW, and adds another 1000 MW (in addition to the 500 MW for the under 1.5 MW program).

The program would be limited to a 1,000 MW overall cap, allocated across the three utilities according to the share of coincident peak demand. Projects meeting the tariff requirements would be permitted to sign a standard form contract, which would not require CPUC approval.

"After a 8 month process, the Energy Division of the CPUC issued a proposed decision for its inquiry to expand the state’s feed-in tariff program," Browning said. "We will have some comments and recommendations in reply to the proposal, but the program’s general approach treats solar as if it
were a resource that can be the foundation for California’s renewable energy future: it integrates solar into the long term renewable planning process, and looks to provide a framework that provides
security for solar project developers, utility planners, and regulators."

Browning noted however that the decision by the CPUC does not address price, which is likely to be the next step. Rulemaking should take place in the next few months.

Reader Comments (2)
 
No image available
it took them 8 months to come up with this tiny, simple change? i want my money back. i could have decided on sizing and pricing, based on which programs across the world have succeeded incredibly well, and which have tanked. just looking at the German history of FITs from 1991 to today would have shown exactly where the "bull****" rate" became the "effective rate" (hint 2004). guess which one we have here in CA? that NOBODY has signed up for?

clearly they are STALLING and increasing the size of the installation to serve their masters in Big Energy, who already have every incentive they need, and more, to kill our open spaces for private profits. this is super easy to model and they will, much to their chagrin, be forced to acknowledge how much faster and cheaper FITs are than Big Energy Infrastructure, which is exactly what they DON'T want people to know.

it's interesting that the non-elected utility whores in our state get to decide all the critical issues which decide whether rooftop solar lives or dies, isn't it?
Comment 1 of 2
No image available
April 20, 2009
Under Feed-in Tariffs policy, the household outfitted with sustainable energy system may be seen as a sort of sound, reliable pension plan increasing the value of the house considerably, leading to renewed construction boom.
In my mind, it might bring back the much-anticipated economic growth as a cornerstone.
Comment 2 of 2
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
PetersenDean Roofing and Solar Systems groSolar Solar Nation Solar Electric Power Association Global Marine Renewable Energy Conference Suntech Power Holdings
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo