Photo Credit: Jenny Hager Photography
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (9) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
April 22, 2009

NREL Gearbox Study Aims to Grease Wind Power's Future

by Joseph B. Verrengia, NREL
Washington, DC, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Wind turbines appear so simple - tall white sentinels cranking gracefully on the horizon. But up close, a wind turbine is an industrial workhorse. Inside the nacelle hundreds of feet off the ground, hot metal gears grind and strain as shifting winds pull and twist the long flexible blades.

At NREL, senior engineers are expanding a research partnership with operators, utilities and turbine manufacturers to determine why some key wind turbine components tend to wear too soon — sometimes within a few years of installation.

That's a problem because wind turbines are expected to operate for 20 years. Early equipment fatigue, especially in turbine gearboxes, threatens to reduce performance and drive up wind power costs just as the industry is poised to capture a greater share of U.S. generating capacity.

Improving their reliability is key to generating a consistently competitive power source — and a healthy return on investment. Both are needed if wind power is to meet 20 percent of the nation's electricity needs by 2030, a scenario a U.S. Department of Energy report issued last year says is possible.

"The end users and the owner-operators say we're only getting five years, or in some cases, three years out of these gearboxes," said NREL principal engineer Sandy Butterfield, who is leading the cooperative study.

Photo of a man wearing a tan sweater, safety glasses and a hardhat ducking beneath machinery to inspect its wiring.

Newer turbine designs may work, but without the NREL study it will take a number of operating years in the field to prove that the reliability problems have been resolved. (In the image left, NREL senior engineer Shuangwen Sheng inspects the monitoring system for the long-term gearbox reliability study at the National Wind Technology Center. Photo credit: Joseph B. Verrengia)

"This project is designed to search for any residual gaps in the design process and confirm a robust design practice used in current production turbines," Butterfield said. "We can't wait five more years to discover any residual gaps."

Collective Examination

In 2007, Butterfield (pictured in yellow hat, below), senior engineer Walt Musial and consultant Brian McNiff began assembling the Gearbox Reliability Collaborative among turbine manufacturers, utilities and suppliers. The collaborative tests extensively instrumented gearboxes to identify weakness in current design approaches and pointed out ways to improve initial designs and retrofit packages.

The project identifies equipment failures that are common throughout the industry and targets deficiencies in the design process that are contributing to these problems.

Photo of  a man wearing a yellow hard hat, safety glasses and a plaid shirt.

NREL hopes to limit intellectual property concerns by running tests on representative wind turbine configurations and parts, but not replicating any specific manufacturer's wind turbine model.

At the same time, the participants are expected to openly examine turbine problems and question every assumption of the design process.

Focusing on design is especially important, Butterfield said, because the expanding wind industry is trying to rapidly meet market demand for new and larger-capacity turbines. Designers and manufacturers are all following very stringent design quality, in some cases matching aircraft tolerances. Yet the problems persist. This implies the design standards are missing some critical loads or conditions that are unique to wind turbines. Without identifying the fundamental issues behind previous failures, he said, the same flaws could find their ways into new generations of turbines.

Nitty-Gritty of Gearboxes

The tests at the National Wind Technology Center focus on several aspects of gearbox performance.

  • Automated spray lubrication. Wind turbines crank at low RPMs under high torque, especially in the first stage of gearing where heat and pressure are high. New designs have lubrication channeled directly to the bearing races.
  • Oil cleanliness. New turbines have more aggressive filtration systems.
  • Automated gearbox monitoring instruments. These systems are supposed to detect damaging operating conditions before a failure occurs.
  • Micro-pitting. This phenomenon occurs as metal fatigue creates microscopic weak spots in gears that degrade the equipment over time.
  • Load distributions on the gear tooth contacts and the bearing roller elements.
Photo of large wind turbine components bolted to a test machine and connected to monitors and wires.

Initially, the gearboxes under review are being tested on the NWTC dynamometer, where Butterfield and others will simulate a variety of loads and measure the results.

(The image left shows the gearbox of a large commercial wind turbine instrumented for testing at the National Wind Technology Center. Photo credit: Joseph B. Verrengia)

Later, they will put one gearbox into test turbines at the Xcel Energy Ponnequin wind farm and monitor them under real load conditions.

A second testing phase is likely to follow.

Butterfield also intends to build a significant failure database to baseline current failure rates and verify reliability improvements in the future.

"I know we'll discover a tremendous amount in the first year," he said. "We hope we can quickly transfer this experience to the industry."

Learn more about NREL's wind energy research.

Joseph B. Verrengia writes for the U.S. Department of Energy's National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in Golden, Colorado.

This article originally appeared as a National Renewable Energy Laboratory feature article and was reprinted with permission.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (9)
 
No image available
April 22, 2009
Its not hard to imagine why these failures occur. A wind turbine sets up enormous gyroscopic forces. One of the characteristics of a gyroscope is its resistance to having its axis changed. To experience this first hand pick up a bicycle wheel and hold it by its axle. Start it spinning. Now try to change the orientation of the axis. Careful! You might sprain your wrist! A wind generator sets up gyroscopic forces that are many magnitudes greater than a bicycle wheel Every time a wind gust tries to change the axial position, huge resistive forces are sent through the system manifesting as enormous point pressures on the bearing and axle system and probably setting up harmonics and disharmonics that reverberate through the blades, the bearings, the transmission and the nacelle. These kind of forces put momentary pressures on mechanisms that probably exceed the specifications for the component.
Comment 1 of 9
No image available
April 24, 2009
How would you describe the kinds of capabilities that developing countries would need to install and maintain wind turbines and the nature of the training (years, type of programmes) that would be required to produce the necessary capabilities? The capabilities could include, for example, mechanical & maintainence skills, capabilities to plan the set of up of a wind farm, capabilities to develop appropriate maintainence routines, attach turbines to small local grids etc.
Comment 2 of 9
No image available
April 24, 2009
These turbines have been sold to towns as if they never have major problems. Now we see towns like Orleans Massachusetts where the Masachusetts Technology Colaborative purchased two Vestas V-82 wind turbines for 5.2 million dollars. The MTC is stuck with these two turbines from 2005 put up in moth balls in a warehouse in Texas at $3500.00 per month. The turbines are out of warranty but Vestas will offer a plan if you upgrade the turbines prior to purchase.
The next plan was to place these turbines in Fairhaven Ma. but that never happened because local residents filed lawsuits because of setbacks under 1320 feet. These turbines will probably never get used anywhere.
The wind turbine industry has to be honest with the public in Massachusetts or everyone in the state will be faced with compensating residents for ice throw,noise,flicker ,strobe and airplane warning lights intruding on their reidential property tights .
Comment 3 of 9
No image available
April 24, 2009
Frank you bring up an excellent point that the wind turbine industry must be honest with the public. If situations such as the Orleans MA incident continue, wind energy and the wind turbine companies that want to design and install will be portrayed as used car salesmen or compared to the US auto industry (producing an overpriced, poor quality product). The Mars Hill Mountain wind turbine project in Maine is a prime example where the public was misinformed of noise levels and flicker and now have to live with the consequences. The wind energy community should take notice of which past business practices have succeeded, that honesty is the best policy, and if you provide a quality product you stand behind your business will thrive.
Comment 4 of 9
No image available
April 24, 2009
It looks like NREL might be one of the companies that I would like to work for, but first I need to find out where they are. I've been drafting & designing machinery for the oil & gas industry for 30 years and now trying to find work in "green" energy. Unfortunately, I'm not finding companies that BUILD anything. I saw a recent news article that said that 75%-80% of the technology for new energy paradigm is manufactured outside the U.S. and at my age, with my physical handicaps, I'm not prepared to move to Denmark just to get a job. One of the main reasons that the American economy is crashing is because our entire economy has been directed toward making money off of gambling and other people's work instead of actually "making" tangible things here. Texas is now making more KW from wind than any other state, but not manufacturing anything. Why aren't we building wind turbines in Abilene? That where we are installing them.
Comment 5 of 9
No image available
April 24, 2009
A wind study was done by the Massaachusetts Technology Colaborative with a met tower . Prior to the study a report was prepared by the University of Massachusetts for MTC and the Town of Mattapoisett,Massachusetts. It was later found that only the information that was positive for the siting of this turbine was in the report. The introduction of only positive information left no explanation of questions raised by the residents around the turbine site. The study was 23 pages long and had an error on each page and some pages multiple major errors. One such error was: is an IBA (important bird area) which was answered with ? . The residents are well aware that Ram Island in Buzzards Bay is the chief nesting area of Roseate Terns in North America.
At a meeting with MTC the question of these mistakes was brought up .The answer was that MTC only paid the college $1200.00 for the report .
This left residents hiring our own experts to prove the parts of the report that were missing .This was done at our expense to protect our residential property rights from the state rushing to meet renewable energy goals.
The only result in Massachusett will be a class action law suit against the cities and towns for compensation due to placing these turbines within 1320 feet (1/4) mile of residential homes due to shadow flicker , noise, ice throw,airplane strobe lights and overhead 3 phase electric wiring .
This must be done right the first time or it will be battle after battle!
Comment 6 of 9
No image available
April 25, 2009
Mr. Haggerty, I am just curious whether you are a supporter of Cape Wind?
Comment 7 of 9
No image available
April 30, 2009
I thought this article was about the forces and engineering design of large wind machines. Somehow, people have taken offense about the wind machines being installed in Massachusetts. There should be an editor to prohibit those who want to go off topic.
Comment 8 of 9
No image available
May 3, 2009
Perhaps just my ignorance, but would a continuously variable transmission (CVT) help in alleviating some of these forces causing excessive wear and tear?
Comment 9 of 9
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. Marketforce Shanghai New Energy Industry Association SPG Solar, Inc. Solar Nation Energy Storage Summit
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo