Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Biochar: The Key to Carbon-Negative Biofuels

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

28 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 28
April 22, 2009
Thanks for this fine round-up of biochar news.

I truly believe that the ancient wisdom of Terra Preta de Indio -- translated into the modern processes of pyrolysis -- will be the game-changer whereby the wastes and depletions of the Industrial Age will be transformed transcended into an Anthropocene Age of human-and-nature reciprocities and renewals.

I've been looking into the cultural and spiritual basis for this transition, for the narrative that might guide a changing consciousness toward healing the relationship between people and nature.

Here is one of my essays: http://www.re-char.com/2009/04/17/terra-preta-de-indio/

And here is a broad range off materials that I've gathered for my blog: http://lougold.blogspot.com/search?q=biochar

Keep up the good work.

lou
Comment
2 of 28
April 22, 2009
Again a good exposition!
For large populations it is the only longterm sustainable agriculture in the Americas and many other parts of the world.
Research indicates that this soil type must have produced 4-10 times as much food as other tropical soils.
Currently Wageningen University researchers attempt to unravel some of the remaining mysteries surrounding Petra Terra (attempts of recreation)
The presence of fish bones and special bacteria and fungi suggest an aqua cultural and agricultual hybrid soil -with Amazonic aquatic material used as powerfull fertiliser (algae) in addition to the favorable adsorption/desorption and temperature control of the char with its high surface area that slash-and char brings.

Thanks again for spreading some light.

www.algaelink.com
(Venture Capital, Banks: 50% annual roi in the PRC!)
Comment
3 of 28
April 24, 2009
Good coverage and timely for working some biochar into the garden. Surf over to http://www.instructables.com/id/Make_your_own_BioChar_and_Terra_Preta/
to see how to make a burning barrel that won't methanize the atmosphere. Juice up the charcoal with compost slurry. Bourbon and mint go nicely with that...
And take a minute to watch www.thestoryofstuff.com in observance of Earth Day.
Comment
4 of 28
April 24, 2009
Excellent article Thomas, the words 'nail' and 'head' spring to mind

However there is a second attribute of bio-char (carbon) which I think is worth considering, which incidentally ties in with another article in this issue "Storing Renewable Energy on the Smart Grid", and this is that; carbon/charcoal is one of the most effective ways of storing energy, certainly on a volumetric basis (leaving aside nuclear).
Energy storage is a key component in most RE supply chains and most other forms of storage (non chemical) tend to be challenging when trying to store utility scale amounts of energy for long periods, more than a couple of days, because of cost (e.g. batteries) , size (e.g. pumped hydro) or energy retention (e.g. CSP/thermal). By comparison C can store huge amounts of energy virtually indefinitely easily and cheaply.
There is one important proviso however; the use of carbon as an energy source/carrier needs to be part of a 'Closed Carbon Cycle' energy system i.e. one in which RE (renewable energy), most likely solar, is used to re-generate the C from the CO2 produced when it is transformed to another energy form. I say transformed because there is a far better way of releasing C's energy than burning it. Using DCFCs (direct carbon fuel cells) carbon can be converted directly into electricity, in theory at 100% efficiency and 80%+ has been achieved in prototype DCFCs. The other draw back with burning C is that the CO2 released is expensive to capture, however when transformed in a DCFC the waste product is pure CO2, ready for reprocessing.
There are a number of routes for converting the CO2 back to C. Photosynthesis (plants) is the obvious choice but is not particularly efficient, I think chemical reforming using direct solar energy is likely to be the best approach, probably via an intermediate product such as methane, methanol or syn-gas.
Comment
5 of 28
April 24, 2009
As is so often the case, Mr. Blakeslee feels he has to exaggerate to make his point. In this article he says "methane is forty times worse for global warming than CO2". In reviewing a lot of literature over the last several years, I have see numbers from 18 times to 25 times worse, nowhere else have I seen anyone claim forty times! I know these type of statements don't bother you "dyed in the wool" believers but if you are trying to convince those on the fence or even sceptics, you need to be more careful in what you claim.
Comment
6 of 28
April 24, 2009
One more useful by-product, heat. The pyrolysis is exothermic if the biomass is reasonably dry, so the extra heat is usable for cooking, heating greenhouses, etc. Lots of opportunities exist for designing systems of small, medium and large sizes to take advantage of the various by-products depending on the local needs.
Comment
7 of 28
April 24, 2009
Great article, can anyone shed any light on the economics. How much do the pyrolysis units cost and what does the Bio char sell for, and who is buying it???
Comment
8 of 28
April 24, 2009
Another option for creating biochar and useful energy is a downdraft gasifier. Biomass is conveyed into the top of the gasifier in a continutous stream, activated carbon/biochar is augered out from the bottom of the gasifier, and syngas is extracted from the middle of the gasifier which can then be burned directly in a gas turbine to produce clean, carbon-negative electricity. Exhaust heat from the turbine can then be used for cogeneration to dry the biomass or other useful purposes. Locating these baseload or peaking biomass power plants near agicultural sources of biomass will provide an added revenue stream for farmers, and provide them to enhance their soils, and decrease their need for fossil fuel-based fertilizers. Downdraft gasifiers are not expensive or complicated to make. Contact Brent Carman Ph. D. at the Center for Strategic Alliance, if you would like to find out how build one. (270) 236-0440
Comment
9 of 28
April 24, 2009
One more comment. Carbon does not have to be pumped miles underground to remove it from the atmosphere. It should tilled back into the soils as biochar where it can benefit the soils and improve their ability to remove even more CO2 from the atmosphere.
Comment
10 of 28
April 24, 2009
Plants do not absorb carbon from the soil. Plants can only make use of carbon in the form of carbon dioxide from the atmosphere in the process of photosynthesis. The only nutrients absorbed by plant roots are inorganics released by either burning or bacterial decomposition. Biochar is the result of incomplete combustion. Charcoal. Any nutrients found in the soil are the result of the release of nutrients from plant material that did burn.

It is impossible to raise the CO2 level of the atmosphere above base level using biofuels. Biofuels are the result of plants removing CO2 from the atmosphere to carry on metabolism. If there is no CO2, green plants can't take in CO2 and give off oxygen---there is no metabolism, the plants die. The same as you will die without oxygen. No plants, no biofuels. That is why it is impossible to raise atmospheric CO2 using biofuels.

If plants were able to make use of unbound carbon in the soil, there would be no unbound carbon in the soil. Plants would have used it up long ago and it would not be there for us to discover.

There is nothing wrong with returning post combustion ashes to the soil as fertilizer to stimulate new plant growth. Nature has been doing that for billions of years. However, unburned carbon does not fertilize the soil.
Comment
11 of 28
April 24, 2009
Billions of years of natural decomposition, methane, carbon and all, made our topsoil and atmosphere as we flourished in it. In a few hundred years we fixed that. Only energy from current sunshine will stand a chance of any reversal of the collapse of the biosphere. Using biomass for fuel is a very small step against the destruction of that billions years of topsoil thin layer that is being depleted quickly as any fuel source. Nature isn't good for the economy? Yup, thats it, Nature isn't good for the economy.....
Comment
12 of 28
April 24, 2009
Biochar viewed as soil Infrastructure;
The old saw; "Feed the Soil Not the Plants" becomes;
"Feed, Cloth and House the Soil, utilities included!".
Free Carbon Condominiums with carboxyl group fats in the pantry and hydroxyl alcohol in the mini bar.,
Build it and the Wee-Beasties will come.
As one microbiologist said on the Biochar list; "Microbes like to sit down when they eat". By setting this table we expand husbandry to whole new orders of life.

Plant root / fungi symbiosis forms A superhighway for moisture and nutrients, an Internet for plant chemical communication,.
Ultimately producing Glomalins which account for 1/3 of soil carbon, the soil aggregate glue of Soil tilth & texture.

The lion's share of sugars that plants produce feed this fungal Net, to extend the functionality of roots 100 times over, in order for the plant make the sugars that we consume.
The Massive fungi populations (ultimately Glomalin) and wee-beasties, microbes to worms increase ribozome recalcitrant biomass, in addition to sequestered elemental inorganic carbon of the Biochar itself.

biochars have significant reductions in nitrous oxide emissions from the soil; between five- and ten-fold reductions in nitrous oxide emissions ( I think N20 is 296 times the GHG CO2 is)


UNCCD Submission to Climate Change/UNFCCC AWG-LCA 5
"Account carbon contained in soils and the importance of biochar (charcoal) in replenishing soil carbon pools, restoring soil fertility and enhancing the sequestration of CO2."
http://www.unccd.int/publicinfo/AWGLCA5/menu.php

This new Congressional Research Service report (by analyst Kelsi Bracmort) is the best short summary I have seen so far - both technical and policy oriented.
http://assets.opencrs.
Comment
13 of 28
April 24, 2009
Australian Broadcasting TV put together an excellent video that explains biochar (agrichar).
You can see it on YouTube at:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzmpWR6JUZQ
Comment
14 of 28
April 24, 2009
Great article Tom!

I'd like to add that pyrolysis energy ratio is 1:3 to 1:9 (one unit of energy input to 3 to 9 units of energy output). Pyrolysis biofuels could be used in power plants to mitigate their emissions (40% of total world's GHG ).

Also, agriculture contributes with 15% of world's GHG emissions and by apllying biochar to soils, very important reductions can be accomplished.
According to Johannes Lehman, in "Bio-energy in the black":
"Preliminary results indicate that biochar bio-energy not
only leads to a net sequestration of CO2, but that the presence
of biochar in soil may decrease emissions of two even
more potent greenhouse gases, nitrous oxide (NOx) and
methane. In greenhouse experiments, NOx emissions were
reduced by 80% and methane emissions were completely
suppressed with biochar additions of 20 g kg-1 to a forage
grass stand (Rondon et al. 2005)".
Regards,
Arturo Velez
Comment
15 of 28
April 24, 2009
Can we pay the Afghans to plant biochar instead of poppies? Can we pay the Columbians to enrich their soil instead of addicting us to coca?
----------
Can we incorporate charcoal into everything we do, from toothpaste to shoe insoles, char-cremation, cat food & cat litter, animal feed & water, concrete, carbon fiber, Kleenex and toilet paper, detergents, carpets, shingles, red wine and of course bourbon.
Comment
16 of 28
April 25, 2009
------"Can we incorporate charcoal into everything we do, from toothpaste to shoe insoles, char-cremation, cat food & cat litter, animal feed & water, concrete, carbon fiber, Kleenex and toilet paper, detergents, carpets, shingles, red wine and of course bourbon."-------

Well Tom, looking at your list........
---toothpaste is made from gum agar--derived from kelp seaweed
---shoe insoles are made from rubber---from latex tapped from rubber tree sap or other sources, such as milk weed or gum weed. Basically, any plant that produces a milky white sap is high in latex. Ground charcoal is often a component of shoe insoles because it gives them porous qualities that trap and hold sweat, and the charcoal traps and binds organic molecules that are the result of bacterial action in the hot humid environment inside shoes----this reduces odors.
---cat(and dog) food is made from corn and other grains(to make it kibble), the food part is ground and powdered meat and bone meal from all the parts of the animal not used when butchered. DDG made from corn is used to adjust protein and soluble vitamin and mineral content, especially trace elements.
---Cat litter, there are two types. One is rhyolite, a type of volcanic ash. The other is pine shavings, straw or other organic matter that is dried and compressed into pellets with hydraulic rams. This type can be dried after use and either burned or composted.
----animal feed, the final product after ethanol is fermented is DDG(dried distillers grain), this is dried and used as a high protein content ingredient in all types of animal feed. It is also very high in soluble vitamins(B Complex and Ascorbic acid)---DDG is the basic starting point for vitamin, protein and mineral supplements made for humans---or as a supplement itself, anything that lists brewer's yeast as an ingredient.
---red wine, and bourbon---are also produced by brewer's yeast action, bourbon is just hydrous ethanol.
Comment
17 of 28
April 25, 2009
---carpets---the most premium carpets are made from sheep wool, and cotton is commonly used also. Natural fibers(wool and cotton) are still the most durable and desirable and expensive. Most less expensive carpet is made from nylon or rayon(or other artificial fibers or blends) made from cellulose(wood). There are a lot of carpeting and clothing available now that is made from recycled plastics, especially beverage container bottles. Polartec fleece would be an example.
----Kleenex and toilet paper, are made from wood pulp or other plant pulp. As is cardboard or any other paper product. Part of the pulping process produces "black liquor" from which alcohol(ethanol) or plastics(rayon, nylon) can be produced or many other products can be produced.
----Shingles---can be produced from tars from "black liquor" mentioned above. Or, you can bundle reeds together and make thatch roofs which has been done for thousands of years----thatch is still highly valued for its attractive appearance, long term durability and high insulating value, especially in Europe. In the US, cedar shakes(wood) are valued for their light weight, insulation,durability and appearance, and are often used on expensive homes for this reason.
-----detergents are made from plant or animal lipids(fats) treated with lye(sodium hydroxide) This binds an ionic inorganic molecule to the lipids which allows it to chemically combine easily with other molecules and become soluble in water----the way that soap gets things clean.

The point of all this is---we are no where near as dependent on the fossil fuel industry to provide everything we have come to take for granted as part of modern life. The truth is, there is a green substitute for anything that can be done with coal or petroleum. And often, the substitutes are better choices than the artificially produced fossil fuel choices for more reasons than just environmental.

I just think people need to know.
Comment
18 of 28
Lovely that everyone is thinking of the all uses carbon gets put to in our life cycle.

I did some math today: there are 2 billion hectares of 'degraded soil' in the world. Putting in a modest 500mm of soil compressed char would need only 15,000 tons of biomass grown on each hectare converted at a realistic 33% yield. This will take 60% of the energy away from the people who cook and heat their homes with what little biomass grows on it now.

Assuming we can convince the poor, cold and hungry to eat their food partially cooked, we can amend all that soil within 5000 years or so. In the process we will remove 36.7 trillion tons of CO2 from the atmosphere.

Presto! Problem solved.
Comment
19 of 28
April 25, 2009
How about if we give the land to poor, cold and hungry people, and set them up to grow food, and energy crops using permacuture techniques that amend the soil and provide all the materials and food we need.

That way, we have all we need, and there are no more poor, cold, hungry people.

That is what I think our goal should be.
Comment
20 of 28
Permaculture (when done properly) looks a lot like a storied forest, because that is what it is. Usually 4 stories are envisioned with trees levelling off at different heights to get a 3-D garden. It will not be conducive to inserting charcoal as it grows and if chosen well, the plants don't need them anyway. The whole point is to have the plant guilds do that for us.

To date I have not heard a single thing that convinces me char amendment is of value save in particular areas: high rainfall, low nutrition soils, high temperatures, where the energy and nutrients are in the forest that sits on the ground, not in it.

Dr AD Karve in Pune, India has done remarkable work on feeding the bacteria that break down soils to provide fertilizers with components that are otherwise chemcially bound. Dung+sugar+water is used (total 1/2 a ton/ha + water) feeds the right bacteria. The output is remarkable. Simultaneously, he has tried char amendment for 10 years and found no benefit at all.

It appears this char burying business is an armchair technology sitting on some rather suspect math. There isn't nearely enough CO2 in the atmosphere to put a decent amount of char under the world's fields and it would take millenia to do so if there was.

The world is not short of food, it is short of fairness.

Keep an eye out for a new PhD thesis by Willem Nel, Univ of Johannesburg on peak energy which includes peak oil, peak gas, peak uranium, peak coal and peak carbon.

Terra Pretta may work in a few places but microbiology is more lilkely to put food on the table. The CO2 thing will pass of its own accord when we run out of carbon fuels in a few years. Like it or not we are going to renewables but we should invest the energy we have left in sensible ventures. Think of energy as capital and look at the available returns. It is quite 'straitening'!
Comment
21 of 28
April 26, 2009
======="The world is not short of food, it is short of fairness."=========

Truer words have never passed anyone's lips.
Comment
22 of 28
No to unsustainable, expensive and polluting pyrolysis and combustion!

Only biological conversion (by microbes) - of renewable organic material (biomass) to energy rich methane in biogas and to biofertilisers (organic fertilisers) containing most of the plant nutrients, for cultivation beneficial microorganisms and bioenergy in organic compounds - is sustainable ecologically, economically and socially.

Microbiologist J. Ford wrote in his book Microbes Power that technical processes can newer be more efficient that processes carried by microbes.

Pyrolysis is energy intensive thermal degradation (by heat and pressure) of organic material (biomass) in the absence of air to produce char, pyrolysis oil and syngas.
Combustion: Burning, or rapid chemical oxidation of bioenergy in organic structures, is accompanied by release of energy in the form of heat and light. Combustion is a basic cause of air pollution. Second product of combustion is ash - without energy, nitrogen and sulphur. From waste incinerators the amount of toxic ash is up to 25 weight %.

We all are responsible for production of biomass and not only for energy conversion from biomass. Sustainable systems can never be achieved by thermal conversion because that
1) some plant nutrients (nitrogen and sulphur) disappears as environment polluting compounds
2) ash and chair does not contain energy important for soil microorganisms.

Use of bioconversion systems, when the non-converted feedstocks residues are returned to the soil as organic fertilizers, can support production of new biomass without man-made agrochemicals. Many unfertile soils can be very fast turned to agricultural land with the help of organic fertilizers. The positive effects of bioenergy and microbial activity in biofertilisers should be calculated in economical terms.
rsvedelius@hotmail.com
Comment
23 of 28
April 27, 2009
Rick Kolb
Since different greenhouse gasses have different lifetimes there is no one number for comparing them. Methane is 72 times worse than CO2 if you look at over a 20 year period. Over 100 years it is only 25 times worse
look at p5 of this presentation from DOE
http://www.bioeconomyconference.org/07%20Sessions/approved07sessions/Amonette,%20Jim.pdf
Lighten up! I'm not trying to con you.
Comment
24 of 28
April 27, 2009
Ruzenda
You are presenting religious dogma. Nature created fire so pyrolysis is a natural process that happens to be more efficient than fermentation for extracting useful energy from biomass. You present only dogma. Biochar does significantly enrich some soils and so does manure. Let's stick to the facts and accept both.
Comment
25 of 28
April 28, 2009
We've just published a book about biochar and we've had a huge amount of interest and feedback concerning the myths and realities of its potential for mitigating climate change. So much so that we posted a blog entry with a list of what we consider to be the most valuable resources on the debate: http://www.earthscan.co.uk/blog/post/Can-Biochar-Save-Us-All.aspx
Comment
26 of 28
August 9, 2009
On the 1st of August, 2009, Mantria Industries opened it's Mantria EternaGreen Center at Dunlap, Tennessee. The facility is the world's largest BioChar plant - and the only commercial operation of its kind anywhere.

The Center's output of BioChar can potentially sequester 96,000 tons of CO2 per year. The plant will convert 43,000 tons of biomass waste to 32,000 tons of EternaGreen™ BioChar annually. Additionally, the facility will produce enough BioElectricity to power more than 1,200 households.

In the fields next to the center, Mantria Industries will be growing bamboo, switch and elephant grass as feedstock for the plant, earning carbon credit in the process.

EternaGreen ™ BioChar is a BioProduct ™ created by the innovative EternaGreen ™ Carbonization process, which is a groundbreaking new method of converting biomass into energy, fuel and valuable carbon products.

BioChar itself is backed by over 30 years of research and promises to drastically reduce greenhouse gasses, increase crop yields greatly, and provides new life to our ecosystem.
As a soil amendment, EternaGreen TM BioChar can help increase the Cation Exchange Capacity or CEC which allows for nutrients to be readily available to plants. Due to its highly porous structure EternaGreen TM BioChar allows for supreme adsorption of nutrients, minerals, and gasses increasing microbial functions in the soil. EternaGreen TM BioChar acts as a "sponge" for nutrients and minerals releasing them as needed ensuring that farmers get the most out of your soil using far less water and fertilizer.

BioChar is not going to combat global warming alone, but will - now that it is available in commercial quantities - have a very positive impact on CO2 levels, green energy production, waste reduction and increased agricultural output.

To learn more visit: http://www.biocharcorp.com
Comment
27 of 28
December 22, 2010
I hope this it will help you

http://biochar-books.com/

It is a truly biochar Bible.
I believe this is the most beautiful holiday gift for your loved ones.
Comment
28 of 28
tblakeslee
Fire and pyrolysis brings death meanwhile biological transformation during production of biogas and biofertilizers supports life.

Can you show some plants grown in pure biochar?

Biofertilizers are much better soil improvements and also god as material for carbon sequestration.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Thomas Blakeslee

View Thomas Blakeslee's Profile
About: Thomas R Blakeslee’s books have been published in nine different languages. After serving for three years in the U.S. Navy, he earned a degree from CalTech in P... more »

Advertise With Us

Unirac, Inc. Natural Power American Solar Energy Society Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Krannich Solar Inc. Green Power Conferences Free Hot Water
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters