Solar Energy Jobs Initiative
By
Michael Mellish, Consultant
March 12, 2009 | 15 Comments In February, the U.S. Congress passed an ~$800 billion "Stimulus" package that the administration said would create 2 million new jobs, stimulate the economy and reduce the suffering of those who have already lost their jobs in this economic downturn. Critics say that the package has failed in all of these measures. Now what? The goals established for the stimulus package represent the needs & hopes of the American people. If this first effort falls short, then perhaps it is time for simpler, more focused program. The majority of problems in America are solved when working Americans have jobs that allow them to pay their bills, receive employer supported health care and add value to the American economy. The problems in America soar when unemployment rises and Americans can no longer pay their bills, loose their health care and become a drag upon the economy. So let us focus on programs that can create jobs starting in a matter of months, create sustained value for the economy and generally lift the spirits of Americans because they feel they are once more a part of a wholesome America. I propose a Solar Energy Program that would accelerate the path of America's progression toward carbon free renewable energy. This program would target the conversion of America's commercial & industrial flat rooftops into distributed power generating stations. The Solar Energy Program would have Congress set aside US $50 billion in no-interest 15-year loans for the construction of a slew of 250-kW rooftop power stations. The $50 billion would allocate US $1 billion to each of the 50 states who would administer the program (most states already have some sort of solar energy program so this avoids creating a new government agencies). Note that these are loans, not grants or giveaways. The $1 billion should fund at least 1,000 250-kW rooftop installations in each state, creating 250 megawatts (MW) of solar power generating facilities in each state. This is equivalent to one-half of a typical coal-fired power plant so in total, the entire program would create the equivalent of 25 new coal-fired power plants. Consider this a serious down payment on carbon footprint reduction in the United States. The 250 kW size is a function of program efficiency (only 1,000 projects for each state to manage) and making the projects suitable for as many state contractors (solar system designers/installers) as is practical. Greater then 250 kW is too large for most solar companies to cover the initial costs, and smaller means too many applications to get off the ground in time to get the money spent in less then 16 months (so it actually impacts the economy). To maximize the number of U.S. jobs created, some basic rules should apply:
The goal must be to ensure that funds flow smoothly to keep projects moving, that state administration of the program is manageable but that the funds don't get wasted or lost in failed or poorly managed projects. The Solar Program could be passed by Congress and put into operation in as little as 90 days in states with existing Solar Programs. Solar firms could begin generating rooftop proposals while the states get set up to administer the program and there is little doubt that the first installations would be underway within six months. This is a program that WILL create "Green Jobs" and do so without expanding the national debt. It will prove to the world that America has changed its position on our carbon footprint and show our commitment to green and sustainable energy. Michael Mellish is a Process & System Consultant with 30 years of experience in Power Quality & Energy Management, Substation Automation & Electrical Distribution, Off Shore Oil & Gas Platforms, and Manufacturing Execution Systems. Michael is a Graduate of the University Of Lowell with a B.S. in Chemical Engineering in 1978. The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.
15 Reader Comments
|
Recent Opinion & Commentary |
1 of 15
You have an energy plan.
The energy plan is viable, responsible, affordable.
The plan creates US jobs.
The ROI figures used are real time, present day financials.
The pay back is real, affordable, competitive.
The plan produces taxable energy to the benefit of federal and local communities, schools, hospitals, infrastructure, highways
The total cost of the complete "energy independence" plan is less than the annual cost of foreign imported energy
There are problems with the plan.
1. The Saudi government would not agree.
2. The global community would find fault.
3. The foreign governments would cry foul. How does China benefit? If the US borrows Chinese money, the US is obligated to make equal grants back to the Chinese government.
4. There is no kick-back to each individual member of Congress
5. There is no profit for Mr. President in the White House
6. There is no need for the $8 Trillion bail out money to foreign governments that line the pockets of US legislators
7. PAC groups will organize against the plan
8. Colleges and Universities would not need to own and operate power plants
9. Electric vehicles would not be paying gasoline tax
10. Electric lawn mowers would not be using gasoline
11. Who would finance political campaigns?
12. Surely some sea urchent someplace would be endangered in the depth of some undetermined sea
13. Obviously unsightly is the plan to all foreign passerbys and readers
14. The noise would be outrageous if only from citizen excitement
15. Hungry children in some unknown place would not benefit nearly so as possibly the rich working class
16. Western states would not approve NIMBY nor sell coal to the east
17. Southern states could not afford such luxury
18. Northern states are deprived of sunlight
19. Eastern states suffer massive loss in coal revenues.
20. Greenies get cut off Saudi funds