Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (4) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
March 25, 2009

Green Bank Act of 2009 Introduced in US House

Washington, D.C., United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

U.S. Congressman Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) this week introduced the Green Bank Act of 2009. If passed, the legislation would create the Green Bank as an independent, tax-exempt, wholly owned corporation of the United States. The Bank's mandate would be to provide a range of financing support to qualified renewable energy and energy efficiency projects within the territorial United States.

" By creating the Green Bank, we will accelerate the development, deployment and production of clean energy and energy efficiency technologies across the country."

-- Rep. Chris Van Hollen

The Green Bank Act of 2009 would provide the Green Bank with an initial capitalization of US $10 billion through the issuance of Green Bonds by the U.S. Department of Treasury, with a maximum authorized limit of $50 billion in Green Bonds outstanding at any one time.

“Energy independence is central to our security, our economy and our environment. By creating the Green Bank, we will accelerate the development, deployment and production of clean energy and energy efficiency technologies across the country,” Rep. Van Hollen said. “Last week, I introduced the National Home Energy Savings Revolving Fund Act, which will enable over one million households across the country to save money and make their homes more energy efficient. Today, with the introduction of the Green Bank Act of 2009, we are taking another step towards America’s clean energy future.”

Original co-sponsors of the Green Bank Act of 2009 include Congressman David Loebsack (D-IA), Congresswoman Gabrielle Giffords (D-AZ), Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) and Congresswoman Madeleine Z. Bordallo (D-GU).  

RenewableEnergyWorld.com first reported on the idea of a federal clean energy bank earlier this month when Solarsa's Scott Jorgensen published an open letter to President Obama highlighting the concept. Click here to read that letter.

Reader Comments (4)
 
No image available
March 26, 2009
Am I really the only economist with a brain IN this country? Issuing bonds right now is a very bad idea because we are in the middle of a terrible deflation that is taking money out of the economy, causing prices (especially illiquid real estate holdings) and salaries to fall, and putting millions of Americans out of work. Duh. Issuing bonds will need to be paid for with money that is far better left in circulation. Just have the federal reserve fork it over or give the function to the federal reserve instead. That way we can have the green economy as a bonus rather than a zero-sum substitution. Who elects these silly-headed congresspeople anyway? Sheesh!
Comment 1 of 4
No image available
March 30, 2009
Surely we all understand that renewable energy is a worthy pursuit. But, this act, like several other recent initiatives, is another attempt to take capital out of the private sector, recycle it and put it onto the backs of the public. I believe the mantra of the present government is "form over substance." I'm told that GE is a prime lobbyist for this statute.
Comment 2 of 4
No image available
March 31, 2009
So you guys think it's great to give a couple of Trillion away to the finance
institutions of the world so they can pay millions in bonuses, travel to spas
and buy up all the competition.

Financing for Renewable Energy Development is a bad idea, Right?

I say horse-puckee, every dollar going into Green can create about
three dollars, lower our energy usage, put people back to work across
our nation, help our planet and fund projects in the hundreds that
currently are having problems finding sources.

Get a clue guys...The banks are not sharing their ill-gotten gains. No credit
equal no projects funded.

In for a penny...In for a pound...Green Earl, Founder
American Energy Conservation Group
Comment 3 of 4
No image available
April 20, 2009
Earl, I agree. If a market develops for green bonds it may end up being something carried by other banks. As to private money having a better use? Who made B. Nicholson the czar of knowing what is good enough to offer the public? Let the market decide. I think a green bond backed by the federal gov't would bring some people back into the market.

Our group is manufacturing a portable fast pyrolysis plant which takes a truckload of biomass a day and makes 3000 gallons of bio oil. We have many purchasers that are not able to get their corporate banking relations to lend money without cash collateral. The SBA is currently the only source for funding our purchasers in this market. If we have educated willing lenders we would have over 100 plants delivered this year.

henry.maclin@mbop.org
Comment 4 of 4
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
MKS Instruments, Inc Lectrus Navigant Consulting Schletter, Inc. Financial Research Associates, LLC European Wind Energy Association
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo