Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Amonix Introduces CPV System

March 10, 2009   |   8 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"The Amonix 7700 is the largest and most powerful high concentration photovoltaic power generator in the world and leverages our fifteen years of field experience to reliably produce cost-competitive and emissions-free renewable energy."

-- Vahan Garboushian, CEO, Amonix
8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
March 10, 2009
I'm having trouble reconciling Amonix's claim that their Amonix 7700 "is the first CPV system capable of converting one-fourth of the sun's energy into usable electricity," when this other company claimed that they demonstrated 30% efficiency from CPV in 2006.
http://www.solarsystems.com.au/35pc%20receiver%20news%20item.pdf
Comment
2 of 8
March 11, 2009
Amonix' web site claims also that they are "...the world's first and leading designer and manufacturer of proprietary patented high-performance High Concentration Photovoltaic (HCPV) power generation systems for large commercial and utility scale applications".

As a matter of fact Alpha Solarco, Inc., now SolarTech, Inc., designed and installed the first full size commercial HCPV tracking system for large commercial scale applications in 1989. It was operated for 10 years in Nevada, and SolarTech, Inc. is still marketing it world wide. See www.sst-usa.net for details.
Comment
3 of 8
March 11, 2009
Amonix is likely talking about module efficiency. Subtract some module array mismatch losses, ohmic wire losses, temperature losses and inverter losses and you will be closer to 20%. But that is still an impressive number. The big question will be how much a kWh costs over 20 years (LCOE = levelized cost of electricity).
It is not inconceivable that Amonix, Concentrix, SolFocus, Sol3G, Soalr Systems and friends will break below wholesale electricity cost in the next 4 years. Economy of scale is a chicken and egg problem and can only be overcome with massive subsidies in the beginning. Maybe the stars begin to align for the HCPV community under Obama....
Comment
4 of 8
March 12, 2009
I also thought that Amonix was likely talking about module efficiency, until I read their brochure saying
"Powered by the world's most efficient multi-junction solar cells, the Amonix 7700 delivers an industry leading system efficiency of 25% (AC, post inverter),"
http://www.amonix.com/amonix_products.html

But Amonix's 25% doesn't lead Solar System's 30% by my definition of "leading".
Comment
5 of 8
March 13, 2009
The Solar Systems result is also impressive, but, in the link above, they are referring to the DC output of their "receiver" (the component shown in the photo), not the whole dish system, and not post-inverter AC.

"AC, post-inverter" is probably the best measure of a system's utility, but one problem with it is that it incorporates an inverter efficiency (whichever one they're using), which is really independent of any particular CPV technology being demonstrated.
Comment
6 of 8
March 13, 2009
Mr. Brice is correct on two points. First, yes as I understood my conversations with Amonix, the 25% is a post inverter AC efficiency. Secondly, yes that does take into account the inverter efficiency, but to me that "plug ready" number makes the most sense for comparison's sake as it is the lowest point on the efficiency waterfall. Another thing to note from the comments above: I'm not too surprised that Mr. Blazev is splitting hairs about SolarTech Inc. being "first", as it is his company (which I don't think he mentions in his post). The bottom line to this investor is that Amonix technology represents almost 75% of the world's installed HCPV. The Solar space is new enough and has enough potential for explosive growth, I would think that all the players would be worrying about advancements in technology and processes, not nitpicking each other's marketing claims.
Comment
7 of 8
March 14, 2009
I'd be interested to know what is the cell efficiency and the receiver efficiency, but I don't have any money to buy something like that, and I don't much enjoy talking to sales guys.
Comment
8 of 8
March 20, 2009
You are right, Joe, we should concentrate on the technology, not on history. Yes, Amonix is our competitor, with some impressive achievements, and I did not mean to diminish their importance by splitting hairs about who's done it first. Nor do I have anything against Amonix. On the contrary; they are on the right track and the solar energy field is so huge that we'll need 100 Amonix and that many SolarTech solar equipment manufacturers in the coming years, so let's get back to work...and no more nitpicking.

Best regards,

Anco S. Blazev
President, CTO
SolarTech, Inc.
480-381-7502
www.sst-usa.net
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Renewable Energy World Europe US Solar Institute Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Texas Solar Energy Society Canadian Solar Inc. Florida Alliance for Renewable Energy    ONTILITY Solar Training
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters