Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: Edison Mission Group
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (19) View image gallery Image Gallery (3) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
February 4, 2009

Wind Installations Continue To Break Records Across the Globe

Brussels, Belgium [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

According to new a new report from the Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC), as of 2008 the U.S. has become the world's largest player in terms of total wind power installations.

"These figures speak for themselves: there is huge and growing global demand for emissions-free wind power, which can be installed quickly, virtually everywhere in the world."

-- Steve Sawyer, Secretary General, Global Wind Energy Council

Worldwide, more than 27 gigawatts (GW) of new wind capacity was commissioned in 2008, a 36% increase on 2007. The three main markets of Europe, North America and Asia dominated.

Global wind capacity grew by almost 29% to reach close to 121 GW at the end of 2008 while the global wind market for turbine installations for the year was worth about €36.5 billion [US $47.5 billion].

As RenewableEnergyWorld.com reported last week, the U.S. wind energy industry shattered all previous records in 2008 by installing 8358 MW of new generating capacity, according to the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).

Increasing total installed wind capacity by 50%, AWEA says the combined development channeled investment of some US $17 billion into the economy.

The share of domestically manufactured wind turbine components has grown from under 30% in 2005 to about 50% in 2008 and manufacturers announced, added or expanded 70 new facilities in the past two years, including more 55 in 2008.

However, warning of an uncertain outlook for 2009 due to the continuing financial crisis, AWEA noted that, towards the end of the year, financing for new projects and orders for turbine components slowed to a trickle and layoffs began to hit the wind turbine manufacturing sector.

Nonetheless, with a total installed capacity of 25 GW installed, the U.S. has now officially overtaken Germany, with 24 GW of wind.

Statistics released this week by the European Wind Energy Association (EWEA) show that 43% of all new electricity generating capacity built in the European Union last year was wind energy, more than all other technologies, including gas, coal and nuclear power.

In 2008, a total of 19,651 MW of new generating capacity was installed across the economic bloc. Of this, 8484 MW was wind, 6932 MW of gas with a 35% share, 2495 MW of oil, a 13% share and 4%; 762 MW of coal.

A total of 64,949 MW of wind capacity was operating in the EU by the end of 2008, 15% higher than in 2007 and a total of some 160,000 workers were employed directly and indirectly in the sector. Investments in the sector came in at about €11 billion in the EU as a whole in 2008.

Germany has a narrow lead, with 1665 MW installed against Spain's 1609 MW. In 2008 Italy added 1010 MW to reach a total of 3736 MW; France 950 MW to reach 3404 MW and the UK, 836 MW to reach 3241 MW. EWEA says that, overall, 2008 saw a much more balanced expansion led by France, the UK and Italy, part of a "second wave" of countries that are providing real momentum to the surge in wind energy. Together with the Netherlands, Portugal, Sweden and Ireland, ten EU Member States — over one-third — now have more than 1000 MW each. Austria and Greece follow close behind with 995 MW and 985 MW respectively. (View the charts below, which show the top 10 countries for installed capacity and for new capacity in 2008.)

Furthermore, a distinct "third wave" became visible for the first time in 2008 as the new Member States had their strongest year ever, EWEA says. Hungary doubled its capacity to 127 MW and Bulgaria tripled its capacity from 57 MW to 158 MW. Poland, one of the fastest growing younger markets, now has 472 MW up from 276 MW. Outside the EU Member States, Turkey tripled its wind energy capacity from 147 MW to 433 MW.

In terms of offshore wind energy, 357 MW of capacity was added in 2008, to reach a total of 1471 MW. Nearly 2.3% of total installed EU capacity is now offshore.

Christian Kjaer, EWEA chief executive, observed: "The figures show that wind energy is the undisputed number one choice in Europe's efforts to move towards clean, indigenous renewable power."

He added: "Wind energy is an example of an intelligent investment that puts EU citizens' money to work in their own economies rather than transferring it to a handful of fuel-exporting nations."

With close to a third of all new capacity in 2008 installed in Asia, China also added about 6.3 GW, reaching a total of over 12 GW installed. China's total capacity doubled for the fourth year in a row and in its response to the financial crisis, the Chinese government has identified the development of wind energy as one of the key economic growth areas.

"These figures speak for themselves: there is huge and growing global demand for emissions-free wind power, which can be installed quickly, virtually everywhere in the world," said Steve Sawyer, secretary general of Global Wind Energy Council (GWEC).

"The 120 GW of global wind capacity in place at the end of 2008 will produce 260 TWh and save 158 million tonnes of CO2 every year," he continued.

GWEC's chairman, Professor Arthouros Zervos said, "Wind power is often the most attractive option for new power generation in both economic terms and in terms of increasing energy security, not to mention the environmental and economic development benefits. The wind industry also creates many new jobs: over 400,000 people are now employed in this industry, and that number will be in the millions in the near future."

Image Gallery (3)
 
Reader Comments (19)
 
No image available
February 4, 2009
It is interesting to note that some of the lowest annual growth rates this year are being reported by some of the nations that made major early pushes into wind power: Germany (+7%), Spain (+11%), and Denmark(+<2% and no significant growth for 3 years in a row now). When we read calls for pell-mell progress in renewable energy development that occasionally occur on this site, we might want to keep this in mind....
Comment 1 of 19
February 4, 2009
You make a good point, Steven,

Wind does have a certain potential in each region. Germany and Denmark seem to have gotten close to their onshore capacity potential. But the good thing for the US and China is that these major energy consumers have the potential to grow more than 20 times their current level. I'm excited to see how they develop...

For details on their race for wind power supremacy, see:

www.setenergy.org
Comment 2 of 19
No image available
February 6, 2009
There is quite a potential for wind projects in Africa. It seems we do not have the right regulatory framework for propel us. This has to be looked at.
Comment 3 of 19
No image available
February 6, 2009
yes, china has one of the greatest wind resources in the world with large potentials... advanced technology and management as well as funding are needed for wind energy development here.
Comment 4 of 19
No image available
February 6, 2009
Denmark have not built an on-shore turbine for a few years now - Germany has slowed right down as they realize that wind doesn't "cut it ". Last I read was that they are in the process of implementing 27GW of coal power -I guess reality has set in.They did talk about shutting down the nuclear stations they had left but realized their CO2 emissions would skyrocket so now maybe new nukes are on the drawing board.
Just like Denmark, Germany now sees that building wind turbines for other countries that are naive and gullible enough to buy them makes better business sense.
Comment 5 of 19
No image available
February 6, 2009
We need to find out why investment in wind energy has slowed/stopped in Germany and Denmark. Is it because they have already exploited the best sites, problems with the grid, a need for base load or firm power, operational or maitenance problems with wind turbines, or what? What are the solutions? Finding these answeers is important for the future of wind energy. What agency is responsibile to do this kind of research and analysis? Can GWEC do the kind of analytical research that is needed to support future wind energy investment?
Comment 6 of 19
No image available
February 7, 2009
I SUPPORT WIND POWER AND I HOPE IT GOES ON FOR EVER
Comment 7 of 19
No image available
February 7, 2009
There is only one way that we will resolve the energy crisis and that is with wind electric generation, wind mechanical power, wind supported shipping, solar thermal, solar pv, passive solar,tidal power, ocean currents, wave power,hydro electric, biomass gas generation, efficient biomass ethenol production,geothermal, deep geothrmal, geothermal raidoactive hot spots, increased efficiency,insulation, that standby that started it all, wood along with some creative human imagination and some good old will power. Should continue our existance for a while longer.
Comment 8 of 19
No image available
February 8, 2009
The charts above seem like just a bunch of meaningless fluff to me.

Top ten total installed capacity? What is that? That only has any meaning if you know what their needs are. Comparing the installed capacity for Denmark to the US or China is meaningless. They do not have the same needs as the US or China. So what if they "only" have a little over 3,000 MW installed----maybe that is all they need.
Comment 9 of 19
No image available
February 8, 2009
I'm an elctrical engineer from the slide ruler time!... all this new technology is so exiting to me that I feel like a engineering student boy again ... all these solar technological matters are to me as new professional commitment and I'm very glad to be young enough (!) to understand your interesting reports in full. Thanks for the opportunity.
Comment 10 of 19
No image available
February 9, 2009
Fred,
Regarding your comment #10:
If you check out the IAEA report for Denmark's electricity generation (http://www.iaea.org/inisnkm/nkm/aws/eedrb/data/DK-elc.html) you will see that they produce ~80% of their electricity from thermal plants (typically coal). At one time Denmark boasted of plans for getting >50% of their electricity from wind power, but progress of late has been very modest, although they are often highlighted in wind energy articles.

Germany generated 6.5% of its electricity from wind last year. Given that they intend to eliminate their nuclear plants, which produce ~28% of their electricity, and also intend to dramatically reduce CO2 emissions, the sluggish increase (7%) in wind capacity this year suggests problems meeting these goals.

A 29% growth rate for wind seems favorable, but if major markets such as Europe saturate at only a ~10% generation this is not a good omen for those wanting to address climate change.
Comment 11 of 19
No image available
February 9, 2009
Vertibrates (such as humans) need what to function? No,.. not flagella or cilia. The answer is a skeleton. Our skeleton allows our muscles, tendons, ligaments and neurological components to exist; sheathed, or protected with support attachments.

How can the world keep building it's "attachments" (turbines) without a strong world-wide "skeleton" to support it? As the "super-backbone skeleton" or Power grid is built, all other energy entities will come enmass to present themselves and elleviate the bottlenecks; much like a surgical procedure to eleviate nerve root compression in one's back.

Create a strong backbone (electrical infrastructure), add muscle to protect it, exercise it correctly, and it will transport the "mass" well (electrons), and stay functional for many many years.

Best to all,...
Comment 12 of 19
No image available
February 9, 2009
Steve-------why should wind be the only energy source? We don't depend on any single source now----why should we in the future?

It only seems to me to be prudent and reliable to have a mix of sources, of which wind would just be one component.

-------"A 29% growth rate for wind seems favorable, but if major markets such as Europe saturate at only a ~10% generation this is not a good omen for those wanting to address climate change."----------

I'm one of those people who would like to address climate change. I'd also like to address stripmining, water pollution, air pollution, and waste pollution. If I have been watching coal trains with 100 cars go by----then wind turbines take over 10% of electrical needs------and the trains that go by only have 90 cars, I'd be happy about that. The next thing you know, I'd be wanting to see Mr. Peabody's coal trains with only 80 or 75 cars.

I've seen windmills that were over 300 years old still in operation doing the work they were originally built for. The fuel to run them still costs today what it cost the day they were built----exactly 0. I think that has to count for something.
Comment 13 of 19
No image available
February 9, 2009
Fred,
Naturally, I agree that a mix of renewable sources is desirable. However, of the near-term renewable solutions, wind generation is one of the few that is economical. Germany still plans to replace it nuclear generation fairly rapidly and if the potential for wind (at least the on-land turbines) will max out at such a low level of production, I don't see how they meet this goal without switching over to coal or importing electricity from elsewhere.

Additionally, if demand in major markets saturates so quickly, it is hard to see how wind's 30% yearly growth rates are sustainable for more than a few years.
Comment 14 of 19
No image available
February 10, 2009
-----------"Additionally, if demand in major markets saturates so quickly, it is hard to see how wind's 30% yearly growth rates are sustainable for more than a few years."-------

It won't. It cann't. If you sold 3 units the first year, and sold 4 units the next year---that's a 30% increase. If you sell 5 units the next year,[4 units equals previous year sales, plus one new unit] you've still maintained your sales numbers[increase in sales = 1 unit, same as previous year], but you've only sold 25% of your previous years increase. The higher the numbers go---the lower the percentage will be. It all depends on your ability to increase production, and the ability of the market to absorb your increased production---a feedback system that will each affect the other. If production cann't rise and the market is strong---price will increase and reduce market---if production rises faster than market demand, price will come down and increase market demand.
This creates high demand/prices early on----as markets mature and demand slows---production is still high so prices begin to fall to increase demand. Just like passing on the early introduction of some fancy widget that is new, highly hyped and expensive----then a year later----going ahead and buying the widget because the price has come down dramatically since its introduction.

---------"I don't see how they meet this goal without switching over to coal or importing electricity from elsewhere."------

First----don't necessarily assume increasing demand---demand can also decrease. Heating water uses about 40% residential power demand. Solar thermal uses no expensive PV cells---is cheap, easy to construct, virtually trouble and maintainance free and has been well used and proven over many years. Using flourescent lighting can reduce energy consumption to 1/3 or 1/4 of incandescent and produce the same amount of light---and flourescent bulbs last longer.
Comment 15 of 19
No image available
February 10, 2009
Fred,
Regarding some of the points made in your comment #15:

1) Solar thermal, while interesting, has only a very small market niche at present and is still quite expensive. Additionally, Germany is not well situated for solar thermal generation so I don't see this as meeting any significant portion of their near term needs.

2) I'd bet the farm on significant increase in demand for world electricity needs--the developing countries are going to need massive new capacity. Whether wind will be able to meet a significant fraction of that is an open question--indeed, whether any renewable technology will be able to provide a significant fraction of this demand is debatable. Furthermore, even in the developed world, if we are going to get away from fossil fuel uses such as methane for home heating, electricity production will need to markedly increase. All the optimists who think electric cars are in our future also believe electricity demand will increase.... Some high efficiency light bulbs (which already have high adoption rates in businesses and industry anyway) are not going to put a dent into the need for more electricity generation capacity. I don't know anyone who thinks Germany can cut demand by anything close to the 30% that is supplied by nuclear plants now.
Comment 16 of 19
No image available
February 11, 2009
Don't believe for one moment their Wind Farm promotion hype.

All they are concerned with is increasing the numbers in their bank accounts. And, keeping alive the centralized powerline control illusion. Instead of empowering the individual to make their own energy from scaled-down wind and solar...on site.

They take no forethought to the repercussions of their mega-watt inventions on the surrounding eco-system. Not to mention the people living by these monstrosities who are subjected to "helicopter sounds" whenever the wind blows.

Bats are dying of barotrauma in record numbers. Farmers are losing entire crops due to downwind "chaos vortices" that are created by wind farms.

If you want to know the truth about this already failing technology, go here and cut through all the "green" wind energy crap:

http://www.wind-watch.org/

Now, what is the solution to the "chaos vortices" pollution? May I share with you a design concept that, once a prototype is built, could make the spinning propeller windpowered generator obsolete?

It has been mathematically-proven by a Russian scientist to be 3X more efficient. And, it is completely benign to living creatures. Plus, this design concept would work just as well underwater in river currents without any harm to swimming creatures.

This windpower energy invention is based upon the tail of the Humpback Whale. Hence, I call it, the "Whale's Tail" windpowered generator!

After reading this webpage, and studying my design drawings (which I have placed into Public Domain) please share with me your valued feedback.

And, if you are so inspired by my design, I will relocate to anywhere that you are living, and use my 20 years of construction experience to build a prototype with you! Thanks!

http://darinselby.1hwy.com/whalestailworkings.html
Comment 17 of 19
No image available
February 11, 2009
Steve---"1) Solar thermal, while interesting, has only a very small market niche at present and is still quite expensive. "----

What does market size have to do with anything-----wind power was a very small market niche 15 years ago. Market size can change overnight.
Ten years ago the market niche for Blackberries and iPods was 0.

Solar thermal heating is neither expensive nor resource or labor intensive.
Take a black garden hose--put it in an insulated box with a piece of glass on top and hook the outflow to your water heater---and the inflow to the cold water line. If the sun doesn't shine---your water heater still heats the water the same as always---when the sun does shine the water heater uses less energy to heat the water---or no energy if the water picks up enough energy from the sun---the water heater thermostat just turns off, no matter WHERE the heat comes from, electricity, gas, or the sun. The greater the size of your collectors and storage tank, the greater the amount of solar energy vs. conventional energy you use.
Passive solar engineering can collect and store solar heat to warm buildings----and built right into the building design. Solar heating and storage can not only heat in the winter---it can also cool in the summer. There is nothing complicated or expensive about passive solar heating and cooling----the Anacazi Indians were constructing their cliff dwellings to use passive solar heating and cooling 1,000 years ago.

We could replace incandecent bulbs with flourescent--use solar thermal to heat and cool buildings and wind power to generate electricity. We could EASILY do the same things we do now with 50% less electricity. Look at any large parking lot at night------acres and acres of empty asphalt pavement illuminated by thousands and thousands of lights----for what? It is pure waste. Put timers on them. Use less, spend less.
Comment 18 of 19
No image available
February 11, 2009
--------"I'd bet the farm on significant increase in demand for world electricity needs--the developing countries are going to need massive new capacity. Whether wind will be able to meet a significant fraction of that is an open question--indeed, whether any renewable technology will be able to provide a significant fraction of this demand is debatable. "---------

Electricity is electricity. Hairdryers and video games don't care where it comes from---if it is electricity, they will run exactly the same.
Renewable energy can provide any fraction of the power we need. Including 100% of the power we need.
We have no need for fossil fuels or nuclear energy---at all.

-------"Furthermore, even in the developed world, if we are going to get away from fossil fuel uses such as methane for home heating, electricity production will need to markedly increase."-------

Why would we want to do that? Biomethane contains exactly the same methane as natural gas. The only difference is the source--NG is pumped out of the ground. We can mix biomethane with NG in any proportion we want with no loss of performance. We can replace coal with natural gas---and mix in more and more biomethane as it becomes available. NO stripmines, NO watershed pollution, NO ash and cinders to dispose of, and we can mix in as much biomethane as we want when and as it becomes available. Any biomethane we mix with NG at above a 6% level means that we are reducing the GHG effects of the cumbustion gasses produced.

It sounds to me like you want people to keep using more and more fossil fuels and nuclear energy.
Comment 19 of 19
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
KACO new energy, Inc. Sustainable Energy Fund Energy Storage Summit Interstate Renewable Energy Council Focus Solar groSolar
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo