Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

US Interior Secretary Says Department Will Play Large Role in Transmission

February 24, 2009   |   5 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"We must change the energy marketplace so we can save our country and our planet. We began with the 2007 energy bill, we continued it in the stimulus package, and now we must complete the work."

-- Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
February 25, 2009
It's a frosty morning, but there's a good megawatt of sunshine beating down on our back garden.

It's windy too.

In my opinion there's too much emphasis on big industrial machinery with high mechanical and thermodynamic efficiency, and not enough on solutions embeddded in the local network that work well with plethoric but 'diute' or 'thinly spread' energy sources.

Embedded systems may have lower capital costs and they do have lower transmission losses. Also, they could render the grid less vulnerable to the crashes that occur sometimes in the USA and Europe.
Comment
2 of 5
February 25, 2009
It's true that local energy generation can reduce transmission losses and decrease widespread grid outages. But it's my impression that things like rooftop solar and backyard wind turbines won't collectively generate enough renewable electricity to replace the dirty coal and natural gas power plants. Of course we need all the renewable kW we can find, but overall we will still need large wind farms and large solar plants, probably solar thermal plants in the deserts.
Comment
3 of 5
February 26, 2009
I live on the Utah boarder with the Navajo transmission (Lake Powell to Vegas) line in plain site. Too bad the words solar and renewable are like a war cry to the coal based electric cooperative which will not consider net metering nor see the local job creation possibilities of a solar facility in our area.The sooner we can establish the transmission system the better.
Comment
4 of 5
February 28, 2009
Christopher-

Costs for even the largest "distributed" solar PV systems are much higher than those for large, centralized systems. Large-scale transmission projects that reach large and efficient plants, which also maximize line utilization with good planning and resource mixes will add significantly less cost.

Additionally, the actual potential is much less for distributed energy projects.

Josh
Comment
5 of 5
March 1, 2009
A comprehensive approach is needed, combining demand reduction, with both distributed and centralized production for the short and near term. Long term, I would love for buildings to become net producers, rather than net consumers of energy. While not here today, I believe that the new technology will enable this before long, and with smart grids, will begin a new paradigm.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Delta Rigging & Tools SMA America, LLC AllEarth Renewables The Switch Second Wind Inc. National Solar Trainers Magnum Energy Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters