The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Sunday, May 19, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Renewable Energy: "Yes We Can"

Jay Tannon and Catherine Campbell, DLA Piper LLP
February 09, 2009  |  20 Comments

Changing the direction of the country's energy policy is central to the agenda of the nation's 44th President, and supporting renewable energy development and deployment lies at the heart of President Obama's plan. Most notably, President Obama has called on Congress to pass legislation that would invest US $150 billion in a "clean energy economy" over 10 years potentially creating as many as 5 million green jobs.

Given severe economic conditions, some have expressed concern over the President's ability to deliver on his pledge to promote renewable energy. However, a suite of renewable energy policies will be integral to an aggressive economic stimulus package designed simultaneously to revive the American economy and accelerate the country's transition to cleaner energy. Beyond the stimulus package, President Obama will take further steps to advance a clean energy agenda.

For companies that have experience in renewable energy and those new to the field, the Obama Administration's plan presents promising opportunities for growth.

Form and Substance: What Will the Obama renewable Energy Plan Contain?

President Obama introduced his ambitious renewable energy plan in a speech on January 8th, in which he articulated the details of his economic recovery and reinvestment package. The Obama plan would double the production of renewable energy in the United States within three years and establish a national goal of 25% renewable energy power generation by 2025. While Congress has expressed reservations over the details of the President's proposal, the groundwork has been laid for a dramatic shift in the country's energy portfolio. The President's key energy goals include the following elements:

  • Invest immediately and substantially in renewable energy so as to double renewable energy power generation in the next three years.

  • Increase the country's energy efficiency by modernizing greater than 75% of federal buildings and improving the energy efficiency of two million American homes.

  • Create five million green jobs and invest $150 billion in a "clean energy economy" over 10 years, including the investment in advanced biofuels and plug-in hybrids, development of commercial-scale renewable energy (e.g., solar and wind power) and construction of low-emission coal plants.

  • Build a new electricity "smart grid," thereby saving money, protecting U.S. power sources and delivering clean, renewable forms of energy to all areas of the country.

  • Mandate an increase in the use of renewable energy by implementing a federal Renewable Portfolio Standard that requires 10% of the nation's electricity consumption to come from renewable energy sources by 2012, and 25% by 2025.

  • Reduce by 2020 the use of carbon fuels by 10% and require 60 billion gallons of advanced biofuels to be incorporated into the American fuel supply by 2030.

  • Develop and deploy clean coal technology through carbon capture and sequestration technologies and the development of clean coal technology.

  • Establish national building efficiency goals that include making all new buildings carbon neutral or zero-emissions by 2030 and improving the energy efficiency of both new and existing buildings in the next ten years.

At this writing, it is unclear which elements of President Obama's renewable energy agenda will be included as policy proposals in a an economic stimulus package, and which elements will be marked for later inclusion in separate energy or environment bills.

With respect to the stimulus legislation, President Obama and members of Congress are actively debating package details. The House Committee on Energy and Commerce recently approved the energy provisions of the House economic recovery package, including several energy efficiency and renewable energy components. The full House of Representatives has yet to vote on that legislation, and the Senate is still developing its approach to a stimulus plan.

Several Democratic Congressional leaders, including Senator Kent Conrad (D-ND) and Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR), have expressed concern that the President's plan does not sufficiently promote "clean energy" or renewable energy investments. Although details of the stimulus plan's energy provisions remain under negotiation, the package may ultimately include, among other policies: revolving loan funds for energy efficiency projects, extension of renewable energy tax credits, federally guaranteed loans to biofuels projects, and expanded tax benefits for purchases of plug-in hybrids and energy efficient retrofits in private homes. Given the breadth of Congressional negotiations, the legislation may not be ready for President Obama's signature until mid-to-late February.

President Obama's Energy and Environment Team

The energy and environment team that the President announced in mid-December reflects the incoming Administration's commitment to accelerating the country's transition to more renewable energy: Steven Chu as Secretary of Energy; Lisa Jackson as Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator; Nancy Sutley as Chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ); and Carol Browner as Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change.

In particular, Steven Chu is a strong proponent of "carbon-neutral" energy technology. For Mr. Chu, solving the nation's energy needs involves a two-step process: (1) "maximiz[ing] energy efficiency and decreas[ing] energy use;" and (2) "develop[ing] new sources of carbon-neutral technology." The carbon-neutral technology that Mr. Chu envisions includes photovoltaic cells, cellulosic ethanol from switchgrass and carbon storage and sequestration. Prior to his nomination, Mr. Chu called for tax and fiscal policies that will encourage investment in renewable energy. If confirmed, Mr. Chu will be responsible distributing $38.5 billion in loan guarantees for new nuclear and other power plants that would cut greenhouse gas emissions; researching renewable energy sources such as biofuels, solar power and energy efficiency; and implementing many of the Congressional programs contained in the economic stimulus package and energy legislation.

Finally, President Obama's creation of the new White House "Energy Czar" post signifies that the incoming Administration recognizes the complexity of the country's energy needs and is committed to achieving the goals articulated during the campaign and the transition. President Obama has appointed Carol Browner, the former EPA Administrator under President Clinton, to fill this new position. As the Assistant to the President for Energy and Climate Change, Ms. Browner will coordinate the Administration's energy and climate policy. In part because this is a new position, Ms. Browner faces a significant challenge in the coordination of several very independent federal agencies with different mandates.

Challenges notwithstanding, the announced plan and personnel of the new Administration suggest pushing for dramatic growth in renewable energy will be a cornerstone of the Obama presidency.

Jay Tannon is a partner in law firm DLA Piper's Corporate and Finance practice and concentrates his practice on international and domestic business acquisitions, direct investment projects and other strategic transactions. He counsels U.S., Canadian, Asian and European private equity funds and other businesses, both public and private, on acquisitions, joint ventures, direct investments, capital formation, and other commercial arrangements. Mr. Tannon has developed a focus on renewable energy. He is counsel to two private equity funds active in the sector and recently helped organize the US-India Renewable Energy Summit. He now serves on DLA's energy practice steering committee.

Catherine Campbell is an Associate in law firm DLA Piper's Regulatory and Government Affairs practice and works on a wide range of regulatory compliance obligations under the Clean Air Act and other federal environmental statutes and their state counterparts. Ms. Campbell previously worked in the Office of Policy, Economics and Innovation at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, where she collaborated with outside parties on regulatory and innovative initiatives relating to air emissions, among other areas.

20 Comments

Register To Comment
Al Lewandowski
Al Lewandowski
February 16, 2009
Practical goals, let's just hope that politics allows Steve Chu the opportunity to change the world into a better place.
bob freeston
bob freeston
February 14, 2009
Keep an eye on enhanced geothermal (EGS) for electric power generation. We can drill down 5,000 to 10,000 ft most places in the earth's crust for water above boiling for steam generated electricity, The Germans are commercializing this at 3 to 10 megawatts with district residential heating as a secondary benefit.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
February 14, 2009
------"President Obama's heart is in the right place and his knowledge and judgement appear to be of a very high order. However he is up against vested interests in Congress, in the Arms industry, in Big oil and so forth. The only body of people who can help to overcome these barriers are us, the people. We have eyes everywhere and when we see vested interests obstructing the way to a far more rational, sustainable world, we must 'out' them. In partnership with President Obama and with the glare of publicity, we can put the situation right. I beieve President Obama will give us direction during his fire side chats and through his website. We must listen and help."-----------William Hughes

That is one of the best summations I've ever seen. Will there be errors and misjudgements. Most probably there will be. Will all sides be heard and evaluated on their own merits? I think so. I don't even have any objection to vested interests a getting piece of the pie. So long as they haven't hijacked it from the rest of us.
Bernhard Scheffler
Bernhard Scheffler
February 14, 2009
As a scientist teaching engineers & scientists, I fully support Mark Windsor's comments. If REW wishes to be taken seriously, it should use the simple, logical, concise & unambiguous "Systeme International" (SI) units. Al professional engineering societies (ASME, IEEE . . . ) use (indeed demand) these units. All university & college Science & Engineering faculties & departments too.

Dennis' comments on prefixes in this system is correct, but he is utterly confused about the units for energy (Joules, abbreviated J) and for power (watt, abbreviated W).

To state "one watt = 3.4 BTU (units of energy)" is falsely equating an energy rate or power to an energy. It like saying "one mile per hour (speed) = 60 yards (distance)"
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
February 13, 2009
Dennis----"The coal-fired power plant in Eastern Oregon is an example of how difficult it will be to wean ourselves from coal. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been allocated to clean-up the plant and keep it running. Lawsuits are flying around to close it and yet the plant keeps running. "-----

You touch on what I was trying to communicate. "CLEAN COAL"---it is all a myth to maintain the status quo and continue to reap big $$$$---not only for the utilities----but also for the coal mining lobby which depends heavily on government leases on public lands, eminent domain, and other forms of government coercion and usurpation of individual property rights to be able to continue mining operations. And the same people(utilities-investors-government)----all co-operate together to pour more and more $$$$ into "Clean Coal" research and development. Dollars that come directly out of our pockets to research and develop something that is physically impossible----how do we make "Clean Coal" without mining coal?

Another myth---"It will be difficult to wean ourselves.......high cost......have to replace entire plants and electrical systems.....blah, blah, blah.........it's too complicated, hard, costly, disruptive, to clean up the environment----it will destroy the economy.........BLAH, BLAH, BLAH......."

The only thing we do with coal is burn it to boil water. We can do that with natural gas with a LOT less environmental destruction. All we do is replace coal grate furnaces with gas burners. Nothing else needs to change---buildings, boilers, turbines, generators--all stay the same. You don't even need dump trucks, bulldozers or front loaders to handle natural gas----just a pipeline connection and a valve or two. No smoke, no particulates, no ash and cinders, no stripmines, no water pollution and no abandoned pits to leach toxins for years and years. And we can mix biomethane with the NG at any rate we want.
bob freeston
bob freeston
February 12, 2009
I'd like to get in a few words for heat pumps. Both air to air and geothermal are very commercial technologies. Mitsubishi, Fujitsu and Hallowell all make air to air units that are effective to 0 degrees or well below. These are solar thermal ! Ground source heat pumps are the cheapest way to heat, cool and create most of the hot water for buildings in most markets. This is new application of old technology that is mostly well known to the HVAC industry.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
February 12, 2009
The coal-fired power plant in Eastern Oregon is an example of how difficult it will be to wean ourselves from coal. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been allocated to clean-up the plant and keep it running. Lawsuits are flying around to close it and yet the plant keeps running. It is worse than ironic that the same folks who want to close down this power plant probably opposed the siting of wind turbines on the ridges along the Columbia Gorge on the Washington side because they would spoil the view from the Hood River side. The view that is often obscured by coal plant pollution when there is no wind.
NIMBY-1 the coal plant was sited in eastern Oregon because the prevailing wind would not carry pollutants back to western Oregon
NIMBY-2 a wind turbine farm in the Columbia Gorge was vigorously opposed because it would spoil the view for the same people complaining about smog in the Gorge.

Mr Linn is correct that there is no such thing as clean coal. However the glib advertising campaign is accomplishing its aim, FUD$ millions will be spent on sequestration projects to keep the myth alive and to slow down the changes in fuel use that are essential to the future.
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
February 12, 2009
Chris N---"With renewable energy currently providing less than 2% of the US's energy needs, and roughly 70% of our oil consumption being imported, "energy independence" may not be possible at all for many decades. It will take massive investment and a long, sustained effort to transfer loads from oil to electricity, and to generate that electricity domestically from renewable sources. We should have started doing that in earnest three decades ago. Now we're going to have to play catch-up in a big way. "-------------

Nonsense. It does not take long to install wind or solar. Biofuels can replace petroleum very quickly----all we have to do is make them. It is not technically difficult to grow algae to produce biodiesel---and algae grow very fast. Diesel engines require no modification at all to use biodiesel. Any conventional gasoline engine can use ethanol mixes up to 30% with no modification---flex fuel up to 85% Flex Fuel vehicles are already in production and have been about 20 years----and they cost the same or only minimally more than conventional gasoline. Biofuels require minimal changes to the storage, supply and distribution system already in place. Mostly replacing gaskets and cleaning tanks.
Replace coal with natural gas. The only thing that needs to change is take out the coal grate furnaces and put in NG burners--like on a kitchen stove only bigger. Nothing else needs to change. There is no such thing as "Clean Coal"---no matter HOW you try to clean up smokestacks or sequester CO2----coal STILL comes from stripmines.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
February 12, 2009
Knowing the difference between a watt(energy) and a watt-hour(power) is far more important than capitalization of the acronym, although the SI prefixes have conventions for capitalization which could lead to math errors if not observed in context. The kilowatt-hr is widely known as the billing unit for electric bills and will be recognized by most even if it is written unconventionally. All prefixes larger than kilo(1000) are capitalized, less than 1000 are lower case. For example: 1,000,000 watts is 1MW but 1mW is .001 watt. 500 watts used for 2 hours is 1000 watt-hours or 1kWh or .001MWh
Other useful relationships
one watt = 3.4 BTU (units of energy)
one watt-second W-s= 1 Joule (units of power)
Jeff Wishart
Jeff Wishart
February 11, 2009
Herschel,

I think you miss the point that V2G technology is a component of the smart grid, not something completely separate (not sure where you are getting your "27%" reduction--can you provide a link?). V2G also appears to be a very good solution to the energy storage problem as I don't think that your ice-making idea will be scaleable or capable of providing for areas where air conditioning is not responsible for these peak demands.

This technology could allow the utilities to avoid having to build more peak (mostly natural gas) plants in the future--something they will have to do as energy demands increase, which they most certainly will. Picture the costs per kWh provided for these new massive peak-demand plants versus the ability to use the V2G technology with the smart grids that you yourself have advocated. The cost-benefit of V2G compared to having to build these new plants to idle most of the time are considered to be quite favourable.

Finally, the V2G technology could be used for much more than the 5% of the year where the yearly peak demand occurs. There is in fact a daily peak for which V2G would be quite useful. And the utility would likely pay PHV owners a premium to allow their cars to be used as a buffer, far beyond the 20 c/kWh you mention. It would be worth a lot more to the utilities than that. And this higher financial incentive would mean that more owners would be willing to ensure that their car batteries are available. PHVs may not need this incentive to be attractive to some people, but if it reduced the costs of ownership, I have no doubt that they would become attractive to more people, thus helping to develop the market.
mark windsor
mark windsor
February 11, 2009
kWh not KW-HR
Always a small k
Always a capital W
Never hr instead of h
Never plural
Herschel Specter
Herschel Specter
February 11, 2009
One of the great advantages of the plug-in hybrid in the G2V mode (grid to vehicle) is the ready availability of an infrastructure to support it. No need to build more power plants, grids, wall sockets- they are all there and they could be used all year long. One of the great disadvantages of the V2G idea is that the supporting infrastructure is totally absent. Peak demand periods occur about 5% of the time, or about 440 hours per year. If the plug-in owner paid 5 cents per KW-HR to charge his plug-in and received 20 cents per KW-HR in the V2G mode ,this would only yield about $ 66/year. If peak demand occurs during the hottest 8 hours, it would take 55 days to earn these $66 dollars. I doubt if too many people would do this or if state utility Commissions would want to trust the survival of the grid under stressful times to the good will of thousands of plug-in hybrid owners. Utilities could not justify to these Commissions the high cost of installing and maintaining a massive new infrastructure that would be idle 95% of the time. Further, there are better ways to reduce peak loads like conservation, smart grids, and energy storage, e.g. making ice at night to assist air conditioning when it is hot the next day- and this is known technology. Some claim that a smart grid could reduce peak demand by around 27% , if so, that would further reduce the attractiveness of the V2G mode. Plug-ins don't need this V2G mode to be attractive and I suggest that we all drop it as impractical.
william hughes
william hughes
February 11, 2009
President Obama's heart is in the right place and his knowledge and judgement appear to be of a very high order. However he is up against vested interests in Congress, in the Arms industry, in Big oil and so forth. The only body of people who can help to overcome these barriers are us, the people. We have eyes everywhere and when we see vested interests obstructing the way to a far more rational, sustainable world, we must 'out' them. In partnership with President Obama and with the glare of publicity, we can put the situation right. I beieve President Obama will give us direction during his fire side chats and through his website. We must listen and help.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
February 11, 2009
Mr Benson states: "Advantage of hydrogen is that it is everywhere and we dont need to drill.There are a few technical problems including storage at pressure and safety. gasoline also has safety problems but these are understood. Why not hydrogen.? "

I agree that the future of the third world energy development is stand-alone distributed multi-fuel systems. I see little application potential in the USA, even though, hydrogen is the almost perfect fuel, good energy content, burns clean, can be used in fuel cells. Perfect elegance can be the enemy of practical implementation.
Hydrogen is everywhere but usually is in an energetic chemical bond with other elements, particularly oxygen. Freeing the hydrogen gas molecule, in useful quantities, requires significant energy input whether you are dissociating water through electrolysis or natural gas through steam reforming, both energy intensive processes. Hydrogen storage and safety problems are surmountable but will be costly. Liquid ammonia NH4 at atmosheric pressure is an excellent hydrogen storage medium, with its own set of drawbacks. The electric vehicle and plug-in hybrid markets are driving advances in battery technology which will offset the yet undeveloped value of portable storage of a hydrogen fuel source, the systems will weigh the same and have the same energy density.
The hydrogen molecule is very small and chemically agressive. It will eventually find a way to get out of any physical storage vessel or pipeline. If you store it in a chemical bond then you must supply the energy again to break that bond. Each conversion uses energy, reducing net energy value of the final product when it is again inefficiently burned in an internal combustion engine.
The answer to " Why not Hydrogen?" is probably Hydrogen? Why bother.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
February 11, 2009
Correction on my previous comment.
Only 4 million Smart Meters ( not 40 million ) are funded so there will be hundreds of jobs for several months instead of thousands of jobs for several years. There are about 150 million electric meters in the USA.
tony benson
tony benson
February 11, 2009
There are several factors involved in the green energy debate.

There is enough technology out there to change radically the way we generate and distribute energy.I put forward Hydrogen Generation harnessing concentrated solar/wind as an initial power for individuals ,and eventually the whole world.This is by far the best solution. Solar and wind on their own will never produce enough energy globally and economically.
Nuclear --another the jury is still out.
Advantage of hydrogen is that it is everywhere and we dont need to drill.There are a few technical problems including storage at pressure and safety. gasoline also has safety problems but these are understood. Why not hydrogen.?
California State University has an experimental power plant.Fantastic Check it out .It has all the benefits and few drawbacks in my opinion .
The third world and small communities could have millions of stand alone plants on their doorsteps without the huge distribution costs of sending it thousands of miles.Hydrogen can be used in vehicles and for local generation of electicity even to power small domestic generators. No need for large corporations and oil companies to get involved.OOPS??.
Solar including passive water heating and cooling and local wind generators could be used to backup local power.Solar needs cheaper and more accessible technology to compete .The sun still features but investment infrastructure will struggle to catch up.Fresnel lens and parabolic concentrators are great but still too costly for the individual.Investment is needed now.
Hydrogen still stands out and it doesnt pollute if handled correctly.
world leaders need to assist the huge number of serious Inventors(some amateurs) who have come up with amazing concepts to harness hydrogen for over 100 years.Many have been silenced ,literally.Incentive for them to progress is vital.
Dennis Houghton
Dennis Houghton
February 10, 2009
It appears that funding for up to 40 million "smart meters" is included in the stimulus bill moving through congress. In addition to equipment manufacturing jobs, installation and configuration of new electric meters will require thousands of workers for several years and implementation can start tomorrow. Millions of Advanced Metering Devices have already been installed globally with large projects in Texas and California and smaller, demonstration projects all across the country.

Today, GOOGLE announced their entry into the smart grid market with a software package which will subscribe to the information gathered by the utility, probably close to real time, and allow users to monitor energy use via the internet. Smart metering has been around for several years but the ability to interface and use the data, at low cost, is only being developed now.

This technology will change the US energy use culture of waste by allowing easy use of time of day billing for demand control. Solar PV and energy efficiency advocates should consider this a key tool for these goals. People who only care about cost will be outraged when their electric bills go up, which they surely will for a variety of reasons, only one of which is a more accurate meter..
Chris Nelder
Chris Nelder
February 9, 2009
Beefing up the nation's grid, making it smarter, and powering it with renewable energy are crucially important tasks, for it enables the transition from petroleum-fueled to electric-powered cars. National security and stopping the massive drain on our country's finances are not the only reasons why we must do this, however.

With renewable energy currently providing less than 2% of the US's energy needs, and roughly 70% of our oil consumption being imported, "energy independence" may not be possible at all for many decades. It will take massive investment and a long, sustained effort to transfer loads from oil to electricity, and to generate that electricity domestically from renewable sources. We should have started doing that in earnest three decades ago. Now we're going to have to play catch-up in a big way.

US oil production reached its maximum peak in 1971 and has been in decline ever since despite rising oil prices, having the best technology in the world and transparent, trusted markets. According to many experts in petroleum geology, as well as the CEOs of oil companies and automakers, the peak of world oil production is probably upon us already. Within the next 2-5 years, it is very likely that global oil production will also go into terminal decline. Therefore, as IEA chief economist Fatih Birol has said, "We must leave oil before it leaves us."

This imperative presents us with a serious challenge, as well as incredible opportunities to invest in both old energy--like oil and gas--and new renewable energy technologies. I believe it's the investment opportunity of a lifetime.

For those who are interested in learning more about peak oil and investing in energy, I will be moderating a panel of petroleum and investing experts at the upcoming Oil Investment Summit on March 17 in New York City (http://oilinvestmentsummit.com).

--Chris Nelder
Author, "Profit from the Peak" and "Investing In Renewable Energy"
Sherry Jan
Sherry Jan
February 9, 2009
There could be no better investment in America than to invest in America becoming energy independent! We need to utilize everything in out power to reduce our dependence on foreign oil including using our own natural resources. Create cheap clean energy, new badly needed green jobs, and reduce our dependence on foreign oil. OPEC will continue to cut production until they achieve their desired 80-100. per barrel. If all gasoline cars, trucks, and SUV's instead had plug-in electric drive trains, the amount of electricity needed to replace gasoline is about equal to the estimated wind energy potential of the state of North Dakota.
sangryul han
sangryul han
February 9, 2009
President Barack Obama recently asked Congress "to act without delay" to pass legislation to double alternative energy production in the next three years and build a new electricity "smart grid." This smart grid would be an updated digital version of the electric wires strung across our country in the past century. What makes it "smart" is that the lines would be buried and more efficient and would give homeowners feedback on how efficiently they were using the power inside their homes.

This new smart grid would cost about $400 billion over 10 years but would save between $46 billion and $117 billion over the next 20 years by reducing inefficiencies and power failures, according to the U.S. Department of Energy. It also would help to make us less dependent on imported energy and to reduce climate change. For example, if the smart grid were even 5 percent more efficient, it would keep as many carbon emissions from the atmosphere as eliminating 53 million cars.

A smart grid allows power from residential solar panels, small wind turbines, and plug-in electric vehicles to be fed into the grid. This would encourage the green energy industry by allowing small players, such as individual homes and small businesses, to sell power to their neighbors or back to the grid. It would provide another source of income for larger commercial businesses that have renewable or backup power systems that can provide clean energy for a price during peak demand, such as midday in July when the air conditioning is cranked.

Another brilliant feature of the proposed grid is the potential to use cars to store electricity and then feed it back into the grid during times of peak demand. "Vehicle to grid," or V2G, technology helps balance energy loads by "valley filling" (charging at night, when demand is low) and "peak shaving" (sending power back to the grid when demand is high). This would help utility companies keep voltage and regulation stabler. It would be especially useful when m

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • America's Real Problem with Solar Energy
  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • Massachusetts Resets Its Solar Energy Bar, Four Years Early

Most Commented

  • 55
    Energy Expert Predicts Solar Could Upend Major Utility in California on Price
  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 12
    Massachusetts Solar: Healthy Mix of Business Sense, Environmental Awareness and Public Engagement

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • SolarEstimate.org
  • HelioSage
  • CleanEnergyAuthority.com
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut)
  • AR Power Company, Ltd.
  • SunHedge
  • EcoFasten Solar
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
  • News
  • Conference & Expo
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information