Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Got RINs?

By John Gelbard, RINXchange
February 12, 2009   |   4 Comments
RINs, an environmental "currency" created by the EPA, may play a large role in increasing the use of renewable energy.

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

4 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 4
February 13, 2009
At the end of this article, I assume you mean 11.1 million gallons and not barrels (about 700,000 gallons per day)
Comment
2 of 4
February 14, 2009
Thanks for keeping us posted how the Fed government can make things more complicated than need be. I anxiosly await electric cars. Then I suppose we will be taxed per mile driven. If you research some of the regulations enacted by the EPA ,the power given to one agency without balance , only subject to lobyist demands, ....its a crime.They should be arrested and shut down.
Comment
3 of 4
February 14, 2009
This article has several errors, the most important of which is that the lousy RFS of 2007 calls or 36 billion GALLONS or ethanol by 2022 - not barrels. The major problem is that 15 billion of those gallons can come from corn, which is a dead loser - the "dead" being some of the 400 million people in the world impacted by the use of food for fuel. That's immoral and uneconomical! I also don't like "short sales" of ANYTHING. speculation is what drove oil up to over $140 per barrel last summer. If you want to buy it - then buy it - don't gamble!
Comment
4 of 4
February 16, 2009
---------"In an effort to decrease consumption of oil in the United States,..."------

I still think that this cumbersome, complicated, rife with possibilites for errors, corruption, and fraud, and costly to implement.

If our goal is to decrease dependence on oil, especially foreign oil, we should simply place a tariff on imported oil. Since 70% of our oil is imported, this will have two effects----first, it will make imported oil more expensive for consumers, second, it will stimulate domestic oil production. Increasing domestic production would be good for the economy----but no help for consumers who will have to pay higher prices for petroleum products. However, higher prices for petroleum will make renewable fuels much more attractive to consumers at the pump----they can avoid indirectly paying taxes by switching to renewable fuels. Generally speaking, consumers like avoiding paying taxes.

It seems much more simple, straightforward and focused toward the intended result to me.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

350 Media BBI International SkyFuel National Hydropower Association Solar Power International 2011 Schneider Electric IntertechPira
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters