Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

China Offers Tips on Using Energy More Efficiently

By Roger Ballentine, Green Strategies
February 23, 2009   |   7 Comments
An unexpected lesson from "the Saudi Arabia of wasted energy."

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
February 25, 2009
Terrific article. It seems to me that, at this late date, any energy production that doesn't employ some form of CHP/cogeneration/energy recovery borders on the criminally insane. It's criminal for the environment and public health not to harvest all that energy - and prevent all the concomitant pollution; and it's nuts for industries, utilities, and distributed generators to pour all that money into the atmosphere. I've been writing about energy efficiency at my blog on climate change for the Foreign Policy Association. (See for instance http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/09/17/more-groundbreaking-work-on-efficiency/.)

Cement is a fascinating story too. There are ways to get at the massive GHG output from cement production. (See my post here - http://climatechange.foreignpolicyblogs.com/2008/08/19/desalination-and-energy-plus-a-concrete-idea-for-carbon-sequestration/)

The video, not incidentally, at the CER website is very good.
Comment
2 of 7
February 25, 2009
There are many opportunities to improve energy efficiency in China. The major challenge in implementing EE measures in China is the economic, similar to similar implementation elsewhere. The upfront investment is usually hefty, and the ROI is medium to long.

I also want to point out that many developed countries have been exporting pollution to China but moving dirty manufacturing operations there. The pricing pressure imposed by outsourcers, and the poor regulation enforcement, are some of the reasons why China is now the world's biggest GHG emitter. With this in perspective, we all need to help China to use energy more efficiently and to help it to clean up its environment, instead of criticizing on the sideline. There is only one planet and we are all its citizens.
Comment
3 of 7
February 25, 2009
Harvesting the CO2 for plant growth would be another interesting thing for China to do. I think of the huge greenhouses on the way into Vancouver, B.C. Unless you put animals in with the greenhouses, you need a CO2 source. When I visited China in 2001, I saw a vast potential for growing more, although the food waste was probably even bigger than ours in big cities. Although we eat out in droves, the Chinese probably eat out even more frequently than we do. Clover, a nitrogen fixer, was growing in medians, a much smarter choice than the grass we frequently allow there. Getting a proper carbon/nitrogen ratio can be helpful in growing useful plants, including plants for possible fuel production (not corn, Gaia knows). If gardening becomes more popular there, what with the economic challenges, I will be very interested to see what happens. I found the people to be very curious and industrious. I suspect they will use a financial downturn to work on efficiency and to improve outdated processes. I could see allowing workers to own small-scale solar and wind modules to be a good move for a company like Suntech, on the order of Henry Ford wanting his workers to own Fords. Morale seems to be a big deal for high-quality solar-cell production. Maintaining solar production in a high-pollution environment demands more maintenance, but workers could monitor what a good maintenance program requires and how the modules weather the maintenance and the weather.
Comment
4 of 7
February 25, 2009
"Energy Recovery Systems"...Are we talking about "cogeneration?" (One)mention was made in this excellent report of "combined heat and power" --synonym for "CHP" and "CCHP" (Combined Cooling Heat and Power.) Both are "Cogeneration", a definition used for 100 years. Why add another new term? To confuse? (I smell a rat--electric utility maneuvers to confuse/delay any form of more efficient competition.) See the excellent journal "Cogeneration and On-Site Power" and the technical publication "Cogeneration & Distributed Generation Journal" for info about "Cogeneration"--( "Energy Recovery Systems").
Comment
5 of 7
February 25, 2009
@ KYC - Well said. To purely place blame on the Chinese is to not understand the full story and to really miss the point.
Comment
6 of 7
February 25, 2009
At the rate that coal is being consumed in China, I have serious doubts that the mines will be able to maintain a supply for the forty or so years that were predicted some time ago. Questions to consider are:

1. To what further extent will the pollutants produced from burning so much coal affect living in China (and the rest of the world as well)?
2. Is there a limit to the rate at with the coal can be extracted from the mines?
3. Is it fair to be critical of Chinese coal thermal plants when our judicial system in the US has just past a ruling that permits our coal companies to cut off the tops of mountains to get at coal resources?
4. Is ist fair to be critical of pollution practices in China when our own EPA does not even classify coal ash as a toxic material?
5. To what degree are developed nations to point a finger at developing nations with regard to global warming effects? Over the past century, have not developed nations such as the US supplied extremely large amounts of coal burning pollutants to the atmosphere as well? Who is to set the example for whom? Do not under-devloped nations have the same right to enter fully into the industrial and manufacturing age using the same technology to produce power as developed nations?

These questions are presently inadequately answered to my understanding but should be addressed.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
7 of 7
February 27, 2009
Doesn't it remain that the polution per capita is higher in the USA? Is it not also true that this country has the resources to do far much more about it in our own back yard? Our national will must change.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Natural Power ClearEnergy Inc. Solar FlexRack Brightergy SolarNexus Ambient Technologies, Inc. RBI Solar Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters