Our Magazines Article Archives
 

Roadmap for A Changed Landscape: Consolidation and Integration in the Solar PV Business

By Greg Boutin
January 20, 2009   |   9 Comments

Do you like this magazine?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
December 19, 2008
The observation at the beginning of this article (that consolidation will bring economies of scale) is unproven (both generally and in the specific case of the PV industry). Large companies tend to be slow moving, conservative and not very innovative. I would suggest that the PV industry needs the reverse of this. Grid parity is close (certainly in the case of Italy) and with innovation, is likely to be achieved in the now to 2012 time frame as projected by EPIA.

Still, nothing like conventional wisdom eh!
Comment
2 of 9
December 20, 2008
Perhaps the economies of scale are less important than the capacities of scale. PV-Grid parity is great but moving from 3.5 GWp installed in 2008 to 35 GWp in 2012 will take massive increases in manufacturing capacity. Probably large, centralized factories, near reliable cheap electricity, shipping their finished products around the globe.
Solar PV is the perfect distributed generation product, ironically dependent upon large manufacturers for most of the value chain other than installations.
Comment
3 of 9
December 29, 2008
I especially appreciated Mr. Boutin's comments about the need to de-emphasize (my word) "green" and focus on core customer values such as high-quality service, convenience, price, and a quality product. Soon, and in some locations this has already happened, "green" will be like ice in your water at a restaurant: expected, taken-for-granted and in the background of your main decision-drivers. The difference will be in the same old customer values that have always separated good business from bad business.

One great customer service oriented solar company is Standard Solar operating out of Maryland in the United States www.standardsolar.com
Comment
4 of 9
December 29, 2008
Thank you for your comments. I hope you've enjoyed the article. Erik, your point is highly valid, 'green' is only a differentiation driver for a small minority that is interested in making a statement or feels guilty about its impact on the planet. 'Green', in most instances, is actually just 'Greener', since no product has zero impact on the environment. So for the mainstream, 'green' mostly reads like 'higher priced'.

Mike, you state that the observation "that consolidation will bring economies of scale) is unproven (both generally and in the specific case of the PV industry)". I'm unclear what you base this statement on. The effect of scale on costs in industries producing large quantity of standardized products is a well-documented phenomenon observed in a wide range of sectors, and cost curves from the 70s until the recent silicon shortages clearly show that PV has in fact been a perfect demonstration of that trend. As Dennis alluded to, the amount of capital needed to reach the ever-rising minimum profitably production capacities is huge, and it fuels the creation of large players who have the risk profiles required by lenders.
The risk that large players refrain innovation exists, however in the absence of a real oligopoly it is not warranted. In the article I allude to the "myriad" of ventures seeking the next technology: those are best equipped to innovate, and they will continue to thrive. However I would argue that economies of scale on mostly traditional silicon technologies have been a bigger driver in the price reductions we've witnessed over the past decades, than innovation. Again, that's not to say that innovation does not have a large role to play in keeping the giants on their toes.
Comment
5 of 9
January 22, 2009
We are on 30-50 year boom in solar energy growth and the current activity in consolidation and poly supplies are momentary blips important for day traders, deal makers and newsmakers only. Suppliers will increasingly see the growth of dedicated markets segments (utlility, building integrated, residential, etc.) that will favor differentiation throughout the supply chain and Best of Breed technology strategies. These segments do not lend themselves to economy-of-scale in technology, supply chain, and distribution (thin film on residential? crystalline in the deserts?). There will be continued technological progress and scientific breakthroughs, and there are major geographic factors that favor a broadly distributed industry. The era of oil companies dabbling in renewable energy are quickly passing and I don't see any advantage to a one-stop-shop for any piece of the solar value chain. Brands are tough differentiators when everyone in the industry can calculate the cost per watt per square meter.

I suppose if your in M&A and looking at a severe recession to thin the hurd, then "consolidation and integration" are important short term factors. If you're a technologist, policy maker, investor, supplier, distributor, or power producer, I would bet on other factors.
Comment
6 of 9
January 23, 2009
The general growth of PV and achievement of grid parity are obviously the central themes to the business. However, without significant and efficient energy storage to level the peaks and valleys of alternative energy production (ie. wind and solar) we are still dependent upon natural gas to make everything work. My company is focused on thin film PV cell manufacturing techniques so I'm equally "guilty" in this regard. But honestly, if we are to ever break the strangle hold of fossil fuels, energy storage integrated with the power generation technique is going to be the key. This needs to be included in the grid parity discussion. Further, I would like to see us focus on LCOE more than the old $/watt metric, since cost per kWh is the most relevant metric to the consumer. In general a very good and interesting article. We will see how the slow moving behemoths and the agile small companies stack up against each other as time progresses. Frankly, we all know that the big guys will end up buying the little guys, simply because they can.
Comment
7 of 9
January 24, 2009
"Tom Morrow"?, your assessment that "the current activity in consolidation and poly supplies are momentary blips important for day traders, deal makers and newsmakers only" is interesting. A basic observation of the solar industry over the past decade points to the continuous consolidation in the field... So much for the blip...

What I am predicting is a change in the dynamics of this consolidation, i.e. an acceleration and more forward acquisitions.

Your point that "everyone in the industry can calculate the cost per watt per square meter" contradicts the other argument you make, against the importance of economies of scale.

As for the emergence of differentiated markets, it does speak heavily in favor of the power of a brand, and does not contradict the consolidation trend as in practice, due to the rise of dominant technologies, it is likely to occur primarily in the "last mile" part of the value chain (note what I wrote on strategic uncertainty in the distribution component). In such a competitive market, technology is unlikely to be the core differentiation driver. Companies need to connect with their market on both a logical and an emotional level, and winners will possess a thorough understanding of their prospect base and the ability to create positive movement out of it.

I exposed a lot more elements to a successful strategy than just brand, however, and I would hope you would notice those. My thesis on the importance of market selection seem to somewhat align with some of the points you make.

All in all, I reaffirm the argument that consolidation should play a major role in the business strategy of any player in the industry. My experience tells me that those who don't "start from the endgame", from both a corporate and business strategy angle, soon find themselves acquired on the cheap, or irrelevant.
Comment
8 of 9
January 28, 2009
Some interesting development a week ago, nicely supporting my claim that utilities are engaging in the last mile:
"PG&E currently sources its clean energy from other providers, such as BrightSource and Ausra, but the company's plans will involve building and owning solar installations in the state."
Link: http://www.pv-tech.org/news/_a/pge_to_make_significant_investment_in_solar_power_for_california/
Comment
9 of 9
January 29, 2009
I am responding to Douglas Meyer (1/23/09)...where he says energy
storage is the key. I believe that Hydrogen is the common denominator
for all of the green energy sources and that it will be the clear energy
carrier for a long, long time into the future.

check out, if you wish, .......ier-usa.org
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
ISSUE COVER IMAGE: About Renewable Energy World

With 30,000 subscribers and a global readership in over 170 countries around the world, Renewable Energy World Magazine is targeted at those who make growth happen in renewable industries. Covering policy, technology, finance,... more »

 

Advertise With Us

Planet Solar Inc Applied Energy Technologies (AET) Rotork plc Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. 3TIER ESI Inc. of Tennessee Zep Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters