The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Monday, May 20, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Sea Power, Part 1

No, not fleets of warships -- this power comes from warm and cold running water. Part 1 of our 3-part series.

Mason Inman
August 03, 2009  |  8 Comments

"The current energy crisis is fueling a worldwide search for power. Energy explorers are discovering that the largest reserve of potential energy covers more than 70 percent of the Earth's surface—the oceans." Replace "energy crisis" with "climate crisis," and these words could be pulled from the websites of any of several companies that are now looking to generate clean electricity from the heat stored in the oceans.

But these words were actually spoken nearly 30 years ago in a video showing the deployment of a vast plastic pipe, first snaking along a Hawaiian beach and then being towed out to sea. This pipe was a crucial part of the first power plant of its kind to tap into the energy in the seas, through a process called ocean thermal energy conversion.

In 1979, when this power plant was built, oil prices were near an all-time high and the United States had been searching for alternative sources of energy for almost a decade. The main goal then was energy independence: U.S. policymakers wanted to ensure the country’s energy supply rather than rely on oil bought from hostile countries.

"We might very well have had a fleet of ocean thermal plants by now," says Robert Cohen, who in the 1970s was the first manager of the U.S. Department of Energy’s research on ocean thermal energy. "We were headed toward that under the Nixon, Ford, and Carter administrations. But the Reagan administration was not friendly to renewables, especially ocean thermal. They pulled the rug on our funding." Since then, plans for harnessing this technology have lain largely dormant. As Cohen puts it, "It’s become an orphan technology."

But now the orphan is finally being adopted. With growing awareness of the vast amounts of clean energy that the planet needs to keep the global economy spinning while avoiding a climate catastrophe, companies and governments are again at work on harnessing ocean thermal energy. But this time these efforts are backed by new technologies—many from a seemingly unlikely sector, the offshore oil industry—that may finally make it practical and affordable. "Ocean thermal could become a big source, possibly the biggest global source of renewable energy," Cohen says.

Estimates of the size of this energy source vary widely, but even a conservative tally figures it could sustainably produce more electricity than the whole world consumes today. The technology has some spin-offs that are already commercially viable, and others that could become so soon, including low-cost air conditioning for buildings, desalination for turning seawater into drinking water, and fish farms fed by the nutrient-rich water from the deep.

But ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC) still has to prove itself. So far it has been tested only in small pilot projects, and no one has built a commercial power plant. Now, with a few plants in various stages of planning, OTEC may finally get a shot at competing with other sources of clean energy (such as solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal) to show whether it can match up, or even beat them.

Simply Difficult

In some ways, harnessing ocean thermal energy requires only the simplest of gadgetry: plastic and metal plumbing for carrying the water and exchanging heat between the warm and cold streams, and turbines for generating electricity. Yet in practice, building a robust power plant — one that can stand up to corrosive salt water, hurricanes, and microbial scum that seems to grow everywhere — requires a lot of ingenuity, patience, and money. Gérard Nihous, an ocean engineer at the Hawaii Natural Energy Institute, says, “The principle is elementary, but the practical application is a headache.”

The energy behind OTEC is sunlight. The oceans’ surface waters absorb it in prodigious amounts and store the energy as heat. In hurricanes, cyclones, and typhoons, this pent-up heat comes pouring back out in spiraling convulsions of wind and rain. To harness the energy for useful ends, OTEC systems need not just heat, but a way to make that heat move in a controlled way. That’s where one of the great challenges of ocean thermal energy conversion comes in: it requires large amounts of cold water as well. OTEC systems tap into a store of cold water that’s available around the world (see map, below).

"Here in Hawaii, it’s miraculous that if I drop a few hundred meters, it is so cold," Nihous says. "It shouldn’t be. It’s only because of this deep circulation," a vast current that winds around the whole globe, known as the great ocean conveyor. By sticking a very long pipe down into the conveyor’s depths, its cold water can be pumped up to the surface. When the cold and warm water are piped separately through a device called a heat engine — basically, a refrigerator that runs in reverse — it generates electricity.

The most likely way of doing this is the so-called closed system, in which the stream of warm surface water flows past a system of tubes containing some kind of refrigerant — a liquid that boils somewhere close to room temperature, such as ammonia. Shallow water in the tropics is warm enough to boil the refrigerant, producing a jet of vapor that pushes through a turbine, spinning it to generate electricity. Then the cold, deep-ocean water runs past the vaporized refrigerant to cool it and turn it back into a liquid, recycling it so it can run through the device again and again.

But to get much juice out of a system like this requires veritable rivers of both warm and cold water. A 100-megawatt OTEC plant (about one-tenth the size of a typical coal-fired power plant) would need several thousand liters of water flowing through it per second. According to Nihous’s estimates, producing electricity at the rate it’s used worldwide today — about 2 terawatts, or 2 trillion watts — would require a flow of cold water more than 10 times greater than that coursing down all of the world’s rivers combined. And in the future, if development continues at the current fast pace and the world moves from dirty fuels to green energy, we’ll need dozens of terawatts of clean electricity.

In part 2 of this article, we'll look at some pilot OTEC installations around the globe.

Mason Inman is a freelance science journalist currently based in Karachi, Pakistan.

This article originally appeared in World Watch Magazine May/June 2009 and is reprinted by permission.

8 Comments

Register To Comment
ron davison
ron davison
October 15, 2011
I bet this would double or triple the kwh/$ COMPARED TO any ocean temperature graident system. best to improve what is existing and get the benifit from what has been invested alllready.
fIX FOR ABOVE
ron davison
ron davison
October 15, 2011
What if you just put the turbines minus all the piping down in the deep ocean currents off of hawaii?
How would the cost/kwh compare?

Again why not just pump up the cold water for lowering the Tc of the working power plants?
What % efficiency increase would this be?
What would be the differential cost/kwh of adding this type of system to the powerplant?
I bet this would double or triple the kwh/$ of any ocean temperature graident system. best to improve what is existing and get the benifit from what has been invested alllready.
In case you did not notice capital darn near extinct around the world with all the deleveraging, so we need to improve and build on present investments as a society.
This will allow for building capital at the fastes rate so we caN DO THE THE CUTTING EDGE STUFF.
This can be used for building a combined plant that can be built out as needed or as capital becomes available If both systems aRE CONSIDERED WHEN DESIGNING THE PIPING AND SYSTEMS THEN IT CAN BE OPTIMZED FOR BOTH TO SOME DEGREE, POSSIBLY WITH LARGE BENIFICAIL OVERLAP IN OPTIMUM DESIGN. iMPROVE THE POWER PLANT FIRST AND BUILD OUT FROM THERE.
ron davison
ron davison
September 21, 2011
Thank you for responding to my questions.

You did not address the tipping point of hydroxides under pressure with cold temperatures, probably because of my condensed writing style used in comments.

If we where to generate 50% and contrasted to 100% of human energy needs what would be the resulting temperature rise at the depths of these hydrates?

How close or how far would we be with the two %'s to the tipping point of hydrate phase change?

What would be the consequences if this were to happen?

Also if we all ready have fossil fuel powerplants with waste heat being thrown away, why not use this as the high side Th for the heat engine. If the average temperature for Th could be raised 20 C or 40 C what would be the efficiency increase? what would the cost in kW/$ reduction be. How much extra piping would be needed and would this be more or less than the cost reduction kW/$ without this added into the equation?

if this is done offshore it moves and lowers the delta temp near the shoreline that effects fish and marine life. Although it will increase the volume of water that is raised in temperature. Not sure what would be better or worse for marine life.
Comments encouraged from all.
Peter O'Connor
Peter O'Connor
August 12, 2009
What a silly comment to make "A 100-megawatt OTEC plant (about one-tenth the size of a typical coal-fired power plant) would need several thousand liters of water flowing through it per second." SOOO ???

Excuse me but "Several thousand liters" is just several tons. What's the big deal?? A small (ankle-deep) stream a child can jump across at 1:12 gradient carries about a ton a second. (1000lts).
Lets not sensationalise figures. An oil pipeline carries several thousand liters of water flowing through it per second. We're talking water here people - in the ocean !!
Robert Cohen
Robert Cohen
August 10, 2009
In response to Ron_Davison, Comment 2, please see the article by Chris Barry entitled "Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion and CO2 Sequestration", along with my comments 10, 11, 14, 19, and 20, at http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2008/07/ocean-thermal-energy-conversion-and-co2-sequestration-52762

In the tropical and subtropical oceans, available Carnot efficiencies range from about 6 to 7%, and achievable net efficiencies are about 2 to 3% and ought to be optimized. However, efficiency is NOT the bottom line, which is energy cost in ¢/kWh.

Although there is no fuel cost, there will be a large capital cost to circulate appreciable amounts of seawater through extensive arrays of heat exchangers. Nevertheless, the Lockheed Martin design team projects that even a first-of-a-kind 100 MWe ocean thermal plant will be commercially viable in many places like Hawaii where oil is presently used to generate electricity.

Info re broad environmental aspects of ocean thermal is in a 1986 NOAA study report, by researchers at NOAA and Argonne National Laboratory, entitled "The Potential Impact of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) on Fisheries at http://spo.nwr.noaa.gov/tr40opt.pdf

Since operation of an ocean thermal plant requires the circulation through the plant of a veritable "river of water", there will necessarily be some resulting effect on the local and downstream temperature distribution with depth. Hence much will depend upon properly and responsibly discharging the effluent seawater. Proper design of the discharge process -- how to discharge the "not-so-warm" and "not-so-cold" effluents -- can be dealt with in various ways. The plant operator will avoid perturbing the pre-existing local temperature distribution, since plant economics dictate maximizing the temperature difference between the warm seawater and the cold seawater at depth.

NOAA is the federal agency charged with licensing ocean thermal plants and plantships.
ron davison
ron davison
August 6, 2009
What are the environmental consequences of this temperature gradient engine?

The figure i remember reading over a decade ago were efficiencies of ~ 4%

What are the efficiency numbers that are used to questimate 0.22$/KWh

hat about underwater methane crystal fields? Will they be effected and plume into the atmosphere/

What are the global warming scenarios if this happens?

At what level of deployment does this and envirnmental effects kick in?

Why not build power plant waste heat generators with the same length of pipes offshore using the same principle or added to it the fact that heat rises and the pipes could be run along the bottom of the sloping sea floor from land to the edge or beyond of the continental shelf/

build solar towers off shore with heliostats on shore reducing heat load and thus cooling cost and create larger heat gradients to double, triple efficiency levels and thus power outputs per installation and thus improve ROI?

anybody have any answers or informed guesses?
Jim Tanner
Jim Tanner
August 5, 2009
This may be covered in later sections.
Hawaii sits on the edge of a good sea current that flows on both sides
of the islands:
http://www.japanprobe.com/?p=3732
Jacques Cousteau was talking about windmills in the sea for places
like that over 30 years ago.

And eventually we will have to start havesting the plastic and seaweed
that grows in the center of these areas.
Guy Mercer
Guy Mercer
August 5, 2009
The sea or at least the salt in the sea may contain a route to a higher energy level within water.
Pressure retarted osmosis for river flow into the sea has a maximum potential of 0.7KWh per M^3 of which about half is obtainable.
A different approach could yield much higher energy densities:

The world needs water as well as energy
Thermal energy (solar or industrial waste ) can be used directly for pumping in a manner that combines energy recovery for reverse osmosis.

The salinity of a concentrate resevoir(s) can be maintained by solar and wind powered desalination and some evaporation

The greater the salinity of these resevoirs the greater the osmotic pressure.
Using an approach for enhanced energy recovery : At 70% efficiency over 4KWh/M^3 could be recovered as water is transfered from sea water into the resevoirs via osmosis.
Arid areas have solar energy and may have some wind & thus could be irrigated and energy crops grown.
It may be worth while for energy utilities to pump salt water freely to consummers to desalinate with renewable energy. The return concentrate being a high density energy source for the ulitily provider.
An infra structure of piped sea water would also enhance the fire fighting capability of such areas. Such a senerio would encourage maximum use of renewable energy for irrigation which in itself would enhance the evironment.
gy.mercer@ntlworld.com

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Most Commented

  • 1
    Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • HydroWorld.com
  • Delta Rigging & Tools
  • Natural Power
  • National Hydropower Association
  • EnergyOcean International
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information