Article Rating
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 4 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Learn More About Online Advertising with RenewableEnergyWorld.com

PV's "Moore's Law" Required To Drive Increased Material Efficiency

by Debra Vogler, Senior Technical Editor, Solid State Technology
Published: October 6, 2008

The road to grid parity for PV power generation will be difficult, needing five or more years to compete with utility power, unsubsidized, on a large scale, noted Mark Thirsk, managing partner at Linx Consulting, at a recent SEMI PV forecast luncheon (Sept. 18) in Santa Clara, CA.



Figure 1: PV module demand driven by government subsidy. Individual countries of note: Germany's EEG feed-in tariffs survived a review in 2008; Spain is restructuring its subsidy law for 2009; Greece's newly drafted feed-in tariffs will take time to implement; and the next US administration likely will support some sort of alternative energy legislation, leading to growth in 2010. (Source: Linx Consulting)

Most input materials for PV production are in relative oversupply and will not constrain production, Thirsk pointed out — and for this reason manufacturers are conservative about capacity investment. In particular, his PV module production forecast (see Fig. 1, above) shows an overstep in demand in 2008. One reason for suppliers' reluctance to build capacity for entering the silicon supply chain is that it is an inefficient process. "Only about 15% of all the silicon going into the supply chain goes into the wafers, so it's a pretty wasteful and capital intensive process, so there is a lot of reluctance to build capacity," said Thirsk. Despite the efficiency challenges, Thirsk's forecast indicates that an oversupply may occur in 2009 (see Fig. 2, below).



Global survey of announced polysilicon capacity vs. demand (assumptions made about actual production capacity). Silicon efficiency derived using the Linx Si cell roadmap. Demand-based forecast implies an oversupply may occur in 2009. (Source: Linx Consulting)


Because >40% of PV grade silicon is lost at the wafering step, Thirsk believes this represents a significant opportunity for the right technology. Additionally, diamond wire is a potential replacement for slurry technology, but this technology is still immature. In the crystalline silicon (c-Si) value chain, Thirsk sees opportunities for optimizing mono-crystalline wafers with metal wrap technology and backside contacts; process optimization and material improvements would improve cell efficiency, and glass, wafer, backsheet, and grid improvements can enable more efficient light capture.

Looking ahead, Thirsk told the audience that while thin-film technologies will enjoy strong growth "and may be more attractive to value-add materials and equipment suppliers, thin-film cell production will remain a minority share for the medium term." (see Fig. 3, below) He closed his presentation encouraging the creation of a Moore's Law type of roadmap for the PV industry — one that delivers credible performance predictions based on technology and operational improvements.



Figure 3: Most likely PV market scenario. (Source: Linx Consulting)


SEMI's POV on PV

Bettina Weiss, senior director, PV North America, at SEMI, told SST, that the organization is in the process of signing a memorandum of understanding with SolarTech to give a voice to the equipment and materials segment, while also helping its members better understand other areas of the value chain, all the way up to utilities and installers. "Together with Underwriters Laboratories, for example, we will make sure we have a standards handshake at the module level," she said. "SEMI's scope ends with cell/module manufacturing and UL's scope starts at the final module level with compliance testing, etc., so that's a really good match."

Weiss also said that SEMI's membership has expressed strong strategic business interest in entering the PV market. "Our PV strategy is designed to address the entire PV manufacturing value chain that includes cell and module makers as potential SEMI member companies," explained Weiss. "That's new in a way — we want to attract the customers to join the organization to be closer to their suppliers, and more easily contribute to collective challenges facing the industry, e.g., in the areas of standards and public policy." 

Debra Vogler is a senior technical editor at Solid State Technology.

This article was originally published in Solid State Technology's WaferNews and was reprinted with permission.

Previous Article
Next Article
Add Your Comment 4 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 4
October 8, 2008
REC Group recently announced a reduction in polysilicon production and a shift back to silane gas used in computer displays. REC is possibly the largest global producer of Poly Si. There may actually be an oversupply of modules in 2009. Prices logically should drop but the newly passed ITC will support higher prices for another year or so. PV efficiencies, performance or cost, will not improve in a "Moore's Law" curve. That applies to microelectronics like IC's and transistors; PV is macroelectronic and while manufacturing and performance efficiencies are steadily improving, poly Si and Mono Si technologies will not show dramatic improvements. Other technologies may well improve performance and lower cost but their reliability and durability remain to be proven by time. Silicon PV is a mature global industry which has shown itself capable of ramping up production to meet demand. It is also able to ramp down production to match reduced demand and support prices.
No image available
Comment
2 of 4
October 8, 2008
If PV becomes truly competitive with grid power the demand for it will exceed any possible production increases achieved by the industry. Locally generated power will become not only "green" but will cost less "green," and everybody will want it.
No image available
Comment
3 of 4
October 8, 2008
It seems that if demand exceeds supply the price will go up, not down, making it more unlikely that PV will become grid-competitive. Subsidies help sustain high prices by hiding them from the end user. This is neither a good nor a bad thing. Modules are usually cheaper in the USA than in Germany. Lower subsidies, lower demand.

Where I live we have hydropower and nuclear at $.04/ KwHr. We have a great wind resource and a good solar resource with efforts to develop both but neither will become price competitive with our existing baseline generating capacity. The intermittent nature of wind and solar resources actually increase the operating costs of the baseline resources, especially hydropower. Our river system is managed for flood control, irrigation, salmon recovery, barge transportation and hydropower. These objectives are sometimes in conflict.

Solar PV is already cost competitive in a variety of applications, primarily remote, off-grid applications or as village power in third world countries such as Kenya or Bangaldesh. Every KwHr produced there is worth more than $1 in increased productivity, which is a days wages in these countries. The carbon offset of PV power in the third world is probably higher than the USA. Displacing kerosene, diesel and charcoal for cooking and lighting is better than displacing hydropower and nuclear in developed countries. The average US household uses 1-2 KwHr per day to keep the parasitic loads of our computers and entertainment equipment on so we can have instant access. Connecting solar PV to the US grid is equivalent to pouring Perrier into a leaky bucket, why bother. More than a billion people have no access to electricity or potable water. Just providing each of those human beings with 100 watts of PV capacity would take more than 30 years at 2007 manufacturing output and install system nameplate (@3GW).
Solar PV will not save the planet but it might save humankind, one small, distributed system at a time.
No image available
Comment
4 of 4
October 8, 2008
It would be good to note the current efficiency and pricing for the PV modules.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
 
SolarTech Consortium TurboCare Rolls Battery Engineering Southwest Windpower Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC) SolarCraft ATAS International, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters