Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Why Are Utilities Increasingly Announcing New Solar Initiatives?

By Julia Hamm, Executive Director, SEPA
September 2, 2008   |   13 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
September 3, 2008
There are a wide range of measures that Fedral, State and Local governments can take, most of them without dipping into the public purse, to encourage the uptake of solar-electric. See

http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2007/07/solar-energy-government-role.html

The same measures apply equally to solar heating, wind turbines, passive house heating and even electric cars, all of which will move us towards energy independence.
Comment
2 of 13
September 3, 2008
You said it in paragraph 3

"many solar projects are driven by public policies encouraging or requiring renewable energy development"

It is not an interest, but a mandate.
Comment
3 of 13
too bad CA has decided NOT TO COUNT ROOFTOP SOLAR AGAINST RPS when it's generated by regular people, though, eh? instead, it is accounted as a "loss" to the utility, and is completely ignored as RPS energy, which then creates a false "demand" for more utility-scale and utility-owned generation.

the entire system is a scam, designed to disempower, disenfranchise and bankrupt ratepayers, homeowners and taxpayers, while further enriching utilities. why aren't we all fighting for FEED IN TARIFFS at a multiple of retail, like they have in 40 countries already, so that WE can get paid for doing the right thing, we can prevent rate hijacking, we can save millions of acres of open spaces, and we can use the sun and wind that are ubiquitous to DECENTRALIZE the inefficient, wasteful, environmentally destructive 19th century model we are laboring under now.

sure, utilities using industrial rooftops near existing transmission is fairly harmless and I support it, but as part of a COMPREHENSIVE rooftop program, which includes US, not part of a comprehensive "utility owned everything everywhere" program.
Comment
4 of 13
September 3, 2008
dear Stop...

If I thought it was practical to achieve energy independence WITHOUT a grid - I'd support the general thrust of your rant; but there is no path to clean energy which does not include the connection of subscribers to generation, storage, and regulation. You say "so that WE can Get Paid". Um - and that money comes from where exactly?
Comment
5 of 13
September 4, 2008
One aspect which has been overlooked in this article (but it might have been overlooked by the utilities as well, for all I know) is the portfolio aspect of renewable energy as a hedge against fossil fuel price risk. Simply put, the cost per kWh of a renewable generator only significantly depends on two things: the amount (and capital cost) of the initial investment, and the capacity factor achieved during the lifetime. Both quantities can be described quite well, the capacity factor to less than 10% deviation, and the capital cost is known once the project has commenced operation. This means that the next 20 years (for wind) or up to 40 years (for PV), the plant is generating electricity for a set price not far off of current large-scale power prices.
Try to do that with gas. There are financial hedging instruments to hedge against a fuel price risk for up to 10 years ahead, but they easily double the price of the gas. Therefore, looking at it from a risk perspective, it is a good idea to use some non-variable cost options in your generation portfolio to hedge against too strong price deviations in the future.
Bolinger and Wiser did some good work on this, as did others.
Comment
6 of 13
September 4, 2008
The author makes the generalization that Solar energy is PV, and perhaps wind, but the most efficient conversion of the suns energy is as heating replacement directly. No big corp's and lobbyists profiting here tho, so as Rodney says, it gets no respect.
We could save more by using solar firstly as a home and business heating source to replace the high use of other energies. A responsible govt position would be for financial aids in the implementation of solar heating devices for those who have trouble absorbing the installation hit.
But it seems govt's play to the money game and that should change, yah? Do you want your tax dollars to fund the best saving technologies for the common persons or the most profitable for some.
Comment
7 of 13
September 4, 2008
Never forget, the main concern of the UTE's is to be the provider of electric power- For profit!
Here in the United Corporations of America.
How can a more efficient way be focused on if it isn't profitable for some large corporations?
I'd like to know. Seriously.
Comment
8 of 13
September 5, 2008
------"The author makes the generalization that Solar energy is PV, and perhaps wind, but the most efficient conversion of the suns energy is as heating replacement directly. No big corp's and lobbyists profiting here tho, so as Rodney says, it gets no respect."----------

Yes. QUITE right! It is too cheap and easy to set up and use.
Comment
9 of 13
September 5, 2008
The problem with solar as winter heat is that supply and demand are poorly coupled, at best demand is 50% of the year and supply (daylight) is only 50% of that. We have to find energy sources which are upwards of 60 and 70% utilized. Electricity is fungible, there's always a demand, and the supply can be augmented where the sun is unavailable.
Comment
10 of 13
September 6, 2008
That is why you build a large masonry wall behind a south facing window. Open the blinds, and the sun heats the masonry. With enough thermal mass, it can heat the house for days. The only moving parts are curtains, open them up to let the light and heat in, close them to keep the heat in.

If you have solar water heating, you store heat inside the house in the heated water tank. The larger your tanks and collectors, the more heat you can store.

Greenhouses make excellent solar collectors. And you can grow fresh strawberries and tomatos and whatever else you like in them.

Even the Anasazi Indians aligned their Cliff Dwellings to south facing cliffs to take advantage of solar heat.
Comment
11 of 13
September 7, 2008
For thousands of years, mankind did not need all of these "energies" we take for granted today. Mankind will survive without them in the not to distant future, just as mankind survived without them in the past.
The utilization of electricity by the masses had its beginning sometime around the start of the 1900's. From whatever beginnings of mankind you believe in, creation or evolution, upto the 1900's, world human population reached only 2 billion people. Thousands of years.
From the 1900's upto today 2008, the human population has increased by 4.5 billion. 100 years.
Some truths are just plain, self evident. The utilization of electricity by the masses, has caused an increase in world human population of 4.5 billion people in as little as 100 years. When before the utilzation of electricity, it took thousands of years to reach 2 billion.
Religions from all cultures, share similar stories of people being saved, and for what purpose have we been saved from ourselves, countless times through out history? Wake up people! Electricity is not here to save us. It is just another temptation to be saved from.
Pity about Earth.
Comment
12 of 13
September 7, 2008
Thomas,

You couldn't be more wrong.

I've personally crunched the Energy Information Agencies (EIA) numbers on energy consumption by country, year, and population, and the trend, by far, is that the economies which use the most energy per person have the lowest population growth, while those countries with the least energy consumption have the highest rates of population growth.

The numbers suggest that stable populations only emerge with sufficient energy utilization.

Population growth rates have been fairly stable over thousands of years. They are only now starting to slow, and only in countries with sufficient energy.
Comment
13 of 13
September 28, 2008
--------"The numbers suggest that stable populations only emerge with sufficient energy utilization."-------------

????? what is "sufficient" energy utilization? What is "stable" populations?

--------"Population growth rates have been fairly stable over thousands of years. They are only now starting to slow, and only in countries with sufficient energy."---------

According to your statement, population growth rates are adversely affected by energy usage----therefore, we should not use energy.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Julia Hamm

View Julia Hamm's Profile
About: Julia Hamm is the president and CEO of the Solar Electric Power Association (SEPA), a national non-profit that helps utilities make smart solar decisions. Juli... more »

Advertise With Us

RBI Solar Inc. Solaire Generation Second Wind Inc. Solectria Renewables LLC Florida Alliance for Renewable Energy    Solar Electric Power Association North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters