Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Two Groups of Researchers Make Gasoline from Sugar

September 24, 2008   |   13 Comments
Using processes familiar to the petroleum industry, two separate research groups craft "green gasoline" from sugar and carbohydrates.

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Even when solar and wind, in addition to clean coal and nuclear, become highly developed, and cars become electric or plug-in hybrid, we will still need high energy-density gasoline, diesel and jet fuel for planes, trains, trucks, and boats. The processes that these teams developed are superb examples of pathways that will enable the sustainable production of these fuels."

-- John Regalbuto, Director of Catalysis and Biocatalysis Program, NSF
13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
September 25, 2008
Whats the difference between the sugar conversion/upgrade requirements, to create diesel as opposed to gasoline?(If any)Anybody?
Comment
2 of 13
September 25, 2008
Another advantage of this approach is the easy separability of the hydrocarbon product and the aqueous solution - oil floats on water. No need for high-energy input distillation processes as is the case with fermentation derived ethanol. This is very promising. Ultimately I think feedstocks for such a process will come from a mix of dedicated crops, waste ag and forestry sources and unicellular sources from ponds or bioreactors. The latter intrigues me. Why waste photosynthetic energy to build - over extended growing seasons - plant structures that are then problematic to harvest and break down to get to cellulose and sugars. At the University of Texas, for example, they've genetically modified cyanobacteria to produce easily accessible cellulose and sugars.
Comment
3 of 13
September 25, 2008
As cool as this is, we must still be careful that we don't rely too much on food crops for all of our transportation needs. I realize there may be a place in the renewable energy future for gasoline, ethonal, biodiesel and other fuels, to power jets, trians, or large trucks, but the less we can depend on them, the better. I know there are still problems with using fuel cells, and batteries, but if we can overcome those obstacles, at least we wouldn't be competing with the world's food supply. We need to feed ourselves too.

Matt
Comment
4 of 13
September 26, 2008
Say Hello to Cuba,
Goodbye to the Everglades. Can you grow sugar on tundra??
Comment
5 of 13
September 26, 2008
I just can't seem to justify the cost it takes to do all this. Fine and dandy to make gasoline from sugar like ethanol but the cost is high... How many acres of land is needed? You have to cut the stuff, grind it, and that takes energy...It takes water resources, and what if there is a flood or drought that wipes out your switch grass patch?

All that cost and worry, when comparing the same price to making Hydrogen as a fuel to use instead, is a no brainer.

I still believe in geothermal development where cars can ride along roads getting charged. and when off road they use their own batteries...The same with trucks and railways....

No fuel stations, no running on empty, and no liquid fuels.... to transport from here to there.....gasoline still contributes to Global Warming......

This gas idea is truly that; nothing but passing gas...
Comment
6 of 13
September 26, 2008
I read these kinds of stories here almost every week, but never see anything at the pump. I am concerned about any reforming process - high cost; and I see the same problem here as with other biofuels - water use. We don't have enough water now, and the word "slurry" implies a lot of water. To just meet the corn-based ethanol mandates of the Renewable Fuel Standard of 2007 will require an additional 80 million acre-feet of water per year. I wonder how much this would take?
Comment
7 of 13
September 26, 2008
Brazil is using sugarcane for its ethanol business and no complaint of sugar shortage there for consumption. This is a very good article, interested in the energy input to produce fuel? and what is the anticipated timeline for commercialization?
Comment
8 of 13
September 26, 2008
First of all comment 7 is correct, Brazil has been doing this for years. As for the everglades, you must not have noticed that Gov. Crist has just used taxpayer dollars to buy out the largest sugar producer in the US. I'm no fan of the Gov. of Florida, but this time his action, even if it gave the Sugar outfit a huge amount of money may have saved the glades. Last I refuse to believe that we will need to burn hydrocarbons in the future. Are we all that stupid to not realize that oil in particular is far more valuable as a petrochemical then fuel. The most efficient trains in the world are the mag-levs, and electric cars and trucks can and will be converted to either electric or hydrogen cracked from water by electricity. The last and only thing that can not be done with TODAYS tech. are the airplanes,. surely in the future either with lighter then airships or more efficient ramjets we will solve that problem too. The thing holding all of these things back is and has been political will. We just should not be burning hydrocarbons[oil]. I personally worked in a coal to gas plant over 30 years ago, which procuced methane[cleaner then nat. gas] at a competative price, but it's still not the way to go. Clean energy can be done now, the longest journey starts with one step, and if we don't start now it won't matter. So is it a good thing that we have people smart enough to make gas from crop waste, yes, but at what cost? Don't even get me started on nukes, as anything started in that area wouldn't make power for at least ten years. Solar and wind can put in place now and as each new piece comes on line in months not years, it will relieve the energy crisis we face now. Further building and maintaining these plants will provide many jobs and allow us to have a better world to live in. Without the crushing cost of energy in that future, we can get on with the business of productive lives.
Comment
9 of 13
September 27, 2008
For those that hope the hydrogen hoax from oil multinational corporations will work out, perhaps you can see some light at http://tiny.cc/CYLpk. The same questions are needed here:

How much will a gallon of gas equivalent cost, realistically? Hydrogen >$60 per gasoline gallon equivalent, sugar-cane-ethanol, <$3 per gasoline gallon equivalent, jatropha biodiesel <$2 per gasoline gallon equivalent.

How big will the carbon footprint be? Hydrogen, large, sugar-cane-ethanol, small, jatropha biodiesel, very small.

How much energy will we gain in this process? Like hydrogen is a net loss, sugar-cane-ethanol is a small gain, jatropha biodiesel is a large gain.

These questions must be asked and answered early on to gain perspective and directions to focus our attention now and in the future.
Comment
10 of 13
September 27, 2008
These processes may be a good idea like biodiesel, or a bad idea like hydrogen, we will not know without the answers to the above three questions.
Comment
11 of 13
September 27, 2008
It's always exciting to hear about a breakthrough which could benefit us all. I'm suprised at the variety of responses to anything new.
I'm especially facinated by the negative responses from people before the new technology has had a chance to prove itself.
In any event, this inspiring article brings to mind---Could a suitabe strain of algae serve as a feedstock for this process relieving the agricultural environment of any burden whatsoever?
Algae can be grown almost any where,requires no fertile farmland and is environmentally friendly. If this technology could be used with a high carbohydrate strain of algae the potential benefits would be mind boggling.
Comment
12 of 13
October 17, 2008
The concept and success to convert sugar into gasoline are great. But conversion of food sugar like cane sugar into gasoline will hurt the food supply as like as conversion of corn starch into ethanol. Conversion of lignocellulosic material into gasoline is the best answer to avoid competion with food supply. Production of sugar from biomass is a big step. Scientist from Virent energy system can check the economic feasibility of producing sugar from biomass that will be their starting material for catalytic reformation of sugar to gasoline. I believe the production of ethanol from biomass and co-products development is more promising from economic point of view in comparison to sugar-to-gasoline process when the starting material is biomass.
Comment
13 of 13
October 20, 2008
Hi, I´m the new kid,...excuse my ignorance, but this sounds like a great alternative to biodiesel but what about the patent issues. How does the common person start producing? LA
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

American Electric Technologies, Inc. (AETI) Solar Energy International (SEI) Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut) Rittal Corporation Solmetric Corporation PLANSEE SE Westinghouse Solar
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters