The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Friday, May 24, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? Click Here to Register! ×

Two Groups of Researchers Make Gasoline from Sugar

Using processes familiar to the petroleum industry, two separate research groups craft "green gasoline" from sugar and carbohydrates.


September 24, 2008  |  13 Comments

Following independent paths of investigation, two research teams are announcing this month that they have successfully converted sugar -- potentially derived from agricultural waste and non-food plants -- into gasoline, diesel, jet fuel and a range of other valuable chemicals.

National Science Foundation (NSF) Small Business Innovation Research awardee, chemical engineer Randy Cortright and his colleagues at Virent Energy Systems as well as researchers led by NSF-supported chemical engineer James Dumesic of the University of Wisconsin at Madison, are now announcing — based on data from separate trials — that sugars and carbohydrates can be processed like petroleum into the full suite of products that drive the fuel, pharmaceutical and chemical industries.

"NSF and other federal funding agencies are advocating the new paradigm of next generation hydrocarbon biofuels," said John Regalbuto, director of the Catalysis and Biocatalysis Program at NSF and chair of an interagency working group on biomass conversion.

"Even when solar and wind, in addition to clean coal and nuclear, become highly developed, and cars become electric or plug-in hybrid, we will still need high energy-density gasoline, diesel and jet fuel for planes, trains, trucks, and boats. The processes that these teams developed are superb examples of pathways that will enable the sustainable production of these fuels."

Virent discovered its process in early 2006 and announced it in early September at the Growing the Bioeconomy conference. The team has recently filed patent applications for it.

That announcement was followed later this month by the publication of a separate discovery of the same process in the Dumesic laboratory. Dumesic and his colleagues announced their findings in the Sept. 18, 2008 online ScienceExpress, to be followed in print in the Oct. 18, 2008, issue of Science.

University of Wisconsin researcher Jim Dumesic 's student Edward Kunkes is in the lab next to a reactor system used in the conversion of sugars into targeted classes of liquid fuels. © Jim Dumesic, University of Wisconsin

Aqueous Phase Reforming

The key to the breakthrough is a process developed by both Dumesic and Cortright called aqueous phase reforming. In passing a watery slurry of plant-derived sugar and carbohydrates over a series of catalysts — materials that speed up reactions without sacrificing themselves in the process — carbon-rich organic molecules split apart into component elements that recombine to form many of the chemicals that are extracted from non-renewable petroleum.

According to Dumesic, a key feature of the approach is that between the sugar or starch starter materials and the hydrocarbon end products, the chemicals go through an intermediate stage as an organic liquid composed of functional compounds.

"The intermediate compounds retain 95 percent of the energy of the biomass but only about 40 percent of the mass, and can be upgraded into different types of transportation fuels, such as gasoline, jet and diesel fuels," said Dumesic. "Importantly, the formation of this functional intermediate oil does not require the need for an external source of hydrogen," he added, since hydrogen comes from the slurry itself.

As part of a suite of second generation biofuel alternatives, green gasoline approaches like aqueous phase reforming are generating interest across the academic and industrial communities because they yield a product that is compatible with existing infrastructure, closer than many other alternatives in their net-energy yield and most importantly, can be crafted from plants grown in marginal soils, like switchgrass, or from agricultural waste.

While several years of further development will be needed to refine the process and scale it for production, the promise of gasoline and other petrochemicals from renewable plants has led to broad industrial interest.

Addressing Commercialization and American Competitiveness

Virent's process, called BioForming, is allowing the company to address one of the key goals of NSF's SBIR program, commercialization, and a broader NSF target, American competitiveness. A recent alliance with one of the world's largest energy companies aims to bring these alternative fuels to market, and investment from major automotive and agricultural companies from around the world are broadening the company's impact.

Randy Cortright holds a flask filled with Virent's biogasoline product. © Virent Energy Systems Inc.

"The early support of NSF helped lay the groundwork for our technical, and subsequent industrial, successes," said Cortright, chief technology officer at Virent. "Our scientists now have years of expertise with our BioForming process and are rapidly moving the technology to commercial scale. We are quickly working to put our renewable, green gasoline and other hydrocarbon biofuels in fuel tanks all over the world."

Added Rose Wesson, the NSF program officer who oversaw Virent's grant, "The technology developed by Virent is extremely promising, and has been refined over the last six years. The aqueous phase reforming process used by both research teams is an innovative approach that may yield an important, positive impact on the energy demands of the U.S. and worldwide."

Related Links

  • Video interview with Randy Cortright, CTO of Virent Energy Systems
  • Video interview with John Regalbuto, Director of Catalysis and Biocatalysis Program, NSF

13 Comments

Register To Comment
Linda Angulo
Linda Angulo
October 20, 2008
Hi, I´m the new kid,...excuse my ignorance, but this sounds like a great alternative to biodiesel but what about the patent issues. How does the common person start producing? LA
Aziz Ahmed
Aziz Ahmed
October 17, 2008
The concept and success to convert sugar into gasoline are great. But conversion of food sugar like cane sugar into gasoline will hurt the food supply as like as conversion of corn starch into ethanol. Conversion of lignocellulosic material into gasoline is the best answer to avoid competion with food supply. Production of sugar from biomass is a big step. Scientist from Virent energy system can check the economic feasibility of producing sugar from biomass that will be their starting material for catalytic reformation of sugar to gasoline. I believe the production of ethanol from biomass and co-products development is more promising from economic point of view in comparison to sugar-to-gasoline process when the starting material is biomass.
BOB MARINO
BOB MARINO
September 27, 2008
It's always exciting to hear about a breakthrough which could benefit us all. I'm suprised at the variety of responses to anything new.
I'm especially facinated by the negative responses from people before the new technology has had a chance to prove itself.
In any event, this inspiring article brings to mind---Could a suitabe strain of algae serve as a feedstock for this process relieving the agricultural environment of any burden whatsoever?
Algae can be grown almost any where,requires no fertile farmland and is environmentally friendly. If this technology could be used with a high carbohydrate strain of algae the potential benefits would be mind boggling.
Robert Foster
Robert Foster
September 27, 2008
These processes may be a good idea like biodiesel, or a bad idea like hydrogen, we will not know without the answers to the above three questions.
Robert Foster
Robert Foster
September 27, 2008
For those that hope the hydrogen hoax from oil multinational corporations will work out, perhaps you can see some light at http://tiny.cc/CYLpk. The same questions are needed here:

How much will a gallon of gas equivalent cost, realistically? Hydrogen >$60 per gasoline gallon equivalent, sugar-cane-ethanol, <$3 per gasoline gallon equivalent, jatropha biodiesel <$2 per gasoline gallon equivalent.

How big will the carbon footprint be? Hydrogen, large, sugar-cane-ethanol, small, jatropha biodiesel, very small.

How much energy will we gain in this process? Like hydrogen is a net loss, sugar-cane-ethanol is a small gain, jatropha biodiesel is a large gain.

These questions must be asked and answered early on to gain perspective and directions to focus our attention now and in the future.
John Spagnoli
John Spagnoli
September 26, 2008
First of all comment 7 is correct, Brazil has been doing this for years. As for the everglades, you must not have noticed that Gov. Crist has just used taxpayer dollars to buy out the largest sugar producer in the US. I'm no fan of the Gov. of Florida, but this time his action, even if it gave the Sugar outfit a huge amount of money may have saved the glades. Last I refuse to believe that we will need to burn hydrocarbons in the future. Are we all that stupid to not realize that oil in particular is far more valuable as a petrochemical then fuel. The most efficient trains in the world are the mag-levs, and electric cars and trucks can and will be converted to either electric or hydrogen cracked from water by electricity. The last and only thing that can not be done with TODAYS tech. are the airplanes,. surely in the future either with lighter then airships or more efficient ramjets we will solve that problem too. The thing holding all of these things back is and has been political will. We just should not be burning hydrocarbons[oil]. I personally worked in a coal to gas plant over 30 years ago, which procuced methane[cleaner then nat. gas] at a competative price, but it's still not the way to go. Clean energy can be done now, the longest journey starts with one step, and if we don't start now it won't matter. So is it a good thing that we have people smart enough to make gas from crop waste, yes, but at what cost? Don't even get me started on nukes, as anything started in that area wouldn't make power for at least ten years. Solar and wind can put in place now and as each new piece comes on line in months not years, it will relieve the energy crisis we face now. Further building and maintaining these plants will provide many jobs and allow us to have a better world to live in. Without the crushing cost of energy in that future, we can get on with the business of productive lives.
Everol Smith
Everol Smith
September 26, 2008
Brazil is using sugarcane for its ethanol business and no complaint of sugar shortage there for consumption. This is a very good article, interested in the energy input to produce fuel? and what is the anticipated timeline for commercialization?
EUGENE Lucas
EUGENE Lucas
September 26, 2008
I read these kinds of stories here almost every week, but never see anything at the pump. I am concerned about any reforming process - high cost; and I see the same problem here as with other biofuels - water use. We don't have enough water now, and the word "slurry" implies a lot of water. To just meet the corn-based ethanol mandates of the Renewable Fuel Standard of 2007 will require an additional 80 million acre-feet of water per year. I wonder how much this would take?
Dominic Jermano
Dominic Jermano
September 26, 2008
I just can't seem to justify the cost it takes to do all this. Fine and dandy to make gasoline from sugar like ethanol but the cost is high... How many acres of land is needed? You have to cut the stuff, grind it, and that takes energy...It takes water resources, and what if there is a flood or drought that wipes out your switch grass patch?

All that cost and worry, when comparing the same price to making Hydrogen as a fuel to use instead, is a no brainer.

I still believe in geothermal development where cars can ride along roads getting charged. and when off road they use their own batteries...The same with trucks and railways....

No fuel stations, no running on empty, and no liquid fuels.... to transport from here to there.....gasoline still contributes to Global Warming......

This gas idea is truly that; nothing but passing gas...
Tom Goddu
Tom Goddu
September 26, 2008
Say Hello to Cuba,
Goodbye to the Everglades. Can you grow sugar on tundra??
Matthew Earleywine
Matthew Earleywine
September 25, 2008
As cool as this is, we must still be careful that we don't rely too much on food crops for all of our transportation needs. I realize there may be a place in the renewable energy future for gasoline, ethonal, biodiesel and other fuels, to power jets, trians, or large trucks, but the less we can depend on them, the better. I know there are still problems with using fuel cells, and batteries, but if we can overcome those obstacles, at least we wouldn't be competing with the world's food supply. We need to feed ourselves too.

Matt
Chris Deisinger
Chris Deisinger
September 25, 2008
Another advantage of this approach is the easy separability of the hydrocarbon product and the aqueous solution - oil floats on water. No need for high-energy input distillation processes as is the case with fermentation derived ethanol. This is very promising. Ultimately I think feedstocks for such a process will come from a mix of dedicated crops, waste ag and forestry sources and unicellular sources from ponds or bioreactors. The latter intrigues me. Why waste photosynthetic energy to build - over extended growing seasons - plant structures that are then problematic to harvest and break down to get to cellulose and sugars. At the University of Texas, for example, they've genetically modified cyanobacteria to produce easily accessible cellulose and sugars.
murray rose
murray rose
September 25, 2008
Whats the difference between the sugar conversion/upgrade requirements, to create diesel as opposed to gasoline?(If any)Anybody?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Editors' Picks

  • EU Debate Over Climate Change Policy Could Dampen Renewable Energy Growth
  • The Future of Solar in Latin America
  • Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • Are Run-of-River Hydroelectric Systems Ready to Ride US Currents?
  • Moniz Unanimously Confirmed As New DOE Chief

Most Commented

  • 13
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 6
    Renewable Energy Research Initiative Launched in UK
  • 3
    French and German Ministers Call for 2030 Renewable Energy Targets
  • 1
    EU Should Scrap Energy Subsidies to Fight Warming, Poland Says

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • Renewable Energy World Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
  • Green Power Conferences
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Chaloux Environmental Communications, Inc. (CEC)
  • Rotork plc
  • RenewableEnergyWorld.com
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information