Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Signposts to a Clean-Energy Future

By Ron Pernick, Clean Edge Inc.
July 16, 2008   |   9 Comments
Two new reports shine a light on potential high-growth pathways for the U.S.

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

9 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 9
July 18, 2008
Mr. Schmidt,

I think you are being a bit dramatic.
Alternative fuels are no where close to having any type of monopoly on anything.
How about thinking that maybe we, as a nation could do better.
Like trying something new.
Or we can think like GM management and do nothing.
Comment
2 of 9
July 18, 2008
While solar is indeed an intermittent power source, it is active in direct conformity to the peak electric load. The peak load here in California comes around 2:00 P.M. on a hot summer day, and is about 30% of the load. That's the same time that solar radiation is at its peak. Most of the peak load here is for air conditioning, which gets turned on when it's hot. So solar power is ideal for providing peak power.

And while each turbine is individually intermittent, taken across a wide area total wind power is fairly constant.
Comment
3 of 9
July 18, 2008
The author needs reminding that wind power is not green when it destroys wildlife habitat and kills birds and bats. This could be avoided if careful turbine siting is used by the wind farm operators. However, presently, wind energy is not a regulated energy industry in many places (why not?) so the farm operators are ignoring this inconvenience. I hope this black aspect of the "green" wind industry is recognized and changed before we go completely "hog wild" plastering turbines all over good wildlife habitat.
Comment
4 of 9
July 18, 2008
Wind and solar are intermittent source of power, so base load and peaking power will still be needed. Hydro, geothermal, coal, and nuclear are the best for base load power and natural gas turbines are the best for peak loads. Coal plants can burn wood and other cellulose fuels.
Comment
5 of 9
July 18, 2008
So, when can we expect to see a megawatt wind genny game piece with our Monopoly game boards? Why stop there? There could could be a whole Monopoly game designed after Renewable Energies.
That is what the RE industries are pushing for, right?
A monopoly? Just like any other industry ever created by mankind. The RE industry as a whole is just picking up where others have left off. The RE industries are not concerned with anything else except profits.
So that they and they alone can profit monstrously from something that is free to all from nature?
Hmmm, let me see here... There is 6.5 billion people on Earth. If I could find something laying around on Earth, and sell it to these people at $1.00 each... Or maybe $2, or $3, I could be filthy stinking rich!!!
Isnt that what RE is all about?
Well! Isnt it?
And you say, you want to save the planet Earth. Shame on you.
Comment
6 of 9
July 18, 2008
Question

If solar reaches grid consumer cost parity with fossil in 2015 and then continues downward below cost parity, then anyone considering financing a coal fired power station must account for the fact that by the time they have built it, solar will be cheaper , and so they will be forced to write off their investment as their electricity gets increasingly expensive compare with solar.

Thus the only reason for building a coal ( or nuclear) power station is as a hedge that solar cannot be expanded fast enough, or to account for overnight load, or for directly used non grid consumption.

Not an attractive investment- make sure your pension fund doesn't invest in these.

Is this true?
Comment
7 of 9
July 20, 2008
Houses will have:
1. Their own power station on their roofs,
2. Their own water storage and treatment facilities in their basements,
3. Their own gas supply in the front yard,
4. Their own radar weather facilities,

???

When did we as a nation lose the ability to cooperate? When did specialization of labor stop having advantages? When did scaleability stop meaning higher standard of living for more people?

For the crowd who reads "On Waldon Pond" like a sacred text and preserves the epic of the rugged American individual, it may be time to rethink the myth that individuals are more sucessful than cooperation.

If small systems can compete - that's fine, but somebody show me how rooftop Solar could compete...

Utility scale solar - based on steam - and utility scale wind can produce real quantities of energy.

Ben
Comment
8 of 9
July 20, 2008
It'll all happen the way innovation always does. Mistakes will be made in the decisions as to how and where our energy pipeline infrastructures will take place, where turbines will be places and oriented, etc.

But, as gas hits $6 a gallon and it will eventually, the mistakes will at least allow us to survive as a nation energywise.

In fifteen years all cars will be operating on electrons from companies like A123Sytems or Panasonic. Our batteries will be charged off the grid and/or by PV systems that have been installed on our homes/businesses after mandates structured to create investment incentives; it's obvious.

We don't want to bow down to any country, nor do they to us.

Let's get sustainable and move onto more important human topics.

All the Best,..
Comment
9 of 9
July 21, 2008
Studies show that the number of birds killed by wind turbines is negligible compared to the number that die as a result of other human activities such as traffic, hunting, power lines and high-rise buildings and especially the environmental impacts of using non-clean power sources.

For example, in the UK, where there are several hundred turbines, about one bird is killed per turbine per year; 10 million per year are killed by cars alone.

An article in Nature stated that each wind turbine kills on average 0.03 birds per year, or one kill per thirty turbines.

In the UK, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) concluded in a 2004 report that "The available evidence suggests that appropriately positioned wind farms do not pose a significant hazard for birds."

It notes that climate change poses a much more significant threat to wildlife, and therefore supports wind farms and other forms of renewable energy.

In the United States, turbines kill 70,000 birds per year, compared to 57 million killed by cars and 97.5 million killed by collisions with plate glass.

Bats are more vulnerable. But in the trend to bigger & bigger turbines, which have increasingly longer time per revolution, both bird & bat killings decrease per MW od power generated.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Ron Pernick

View Ron Pernick's Profile
About: Ron Pernick, co-founder and principal of Clean Edge and co-author of The Clean Tech Revolution, is an accomplished market research, publishing, and business dev... more »

Advertise With Us

Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition HelioSage Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. 2GreenEnergy.com HESLIN ROTHENBERG FARLEY & MESITI P.C. Admirals Bank Solar Power International 2012
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters